From ICE raids and tariff wars to the kidnapping of foreign leaders and threats of territorial seizure, Donald Trump's cascading shocks reveal not strategy but a dangerous pattern of authoritarian domination — one rooted in fear, grandiosity, and the collapse of restraint.From ICE raids and tariff wars to the kidnapping of foreign leaders and threats of territorial seizure, Donald Trump's cascading shocks reveal not strategy but a dangerous pattern of authoritarian domination — one rooted in fear, grandiosity, and the collapse of restraint.
It is governed by spectacle. And it has a rich tradition.
Psychiatrists who study authoritarian leaders caution against the temptation to reduce such leadership to a single diagnosis. The problem is not necessarily that Trump is “crazy,” but that he demonstrates a set of characteristics that flourish in a system that is hollowed out by inequality, media addiction, and institutional collapse. Psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton wrote of despots: “These are pathological individuals without being psychotic. That is, they are fully in charge of their actions, but are driven by a compelling compulsion to dominate, to be seen to dominate.”
The shock politics of Trump reflect what sociologist Max Weber identified in charismatic authority at its worst: power resting not on law or tradition, but on performance. Every shock becomes an endorsement of power. Every outrage fuels the legend of omnipotence. Order is the enemy, since order disperses attention.
“Grandiosity with fragility” is often cited by international psychiatrists analyzing strongmen as a characteristic of their personalities. The claim that he ‘knows more than the generals,’ that his IQ is ‘off the charts,’ that he alone can solve all problems, is not confidence. It is compensation. Political psychologist Jerrold Post, who analyzed authoritarian personality types, finds that politicians who habitually assert their superiority exhibit an underlying intolerance of weakness.
And so the ICE raids. Immigration enforcement has nothing to do with the law; it has everything to do with theatre: uniforms, lights, and sirens, cameras—fear in action, live on TV. This, too, is a message of domination over the weak, an ancient ritual of power designed to reassure the strong.
The tariff war is no different. Tariffs will harm American consumers and destroy international relationships. Economists warned Trump about this. He didn’t listen. Tariffs are an observable demonstration of power. Tariffs are something that can be seen and felt. Tariffs reduce complicated international politics to a brawl. Trump thinks he can win. Hannah Arendt was a political theorist who studied authoritarianism. She found that authoritarians always choose conflict rather than politics because it’s simple: enemies and submission.
Then came Venezuela. Kidnapping a foreign leader was not law enforcement; it was ritual humiliation, a case of mafia justice by another name. Organised power structure scholars refer to this phenomenon, where punishment in public serves as a means of deterrence, a show of warning. It was not a message directed at Caracas; it was a message directed at the world.
Greenland, patently absurd, is a perfect fit. The threat of seizing allied territory by force is suggestive. It shows that, in Trump’s mind, sovereignty is a conditional concept. The borders are merely a guideline. The treaties mean nothing. This is what sociologist Zygmunt Bauman referred to as “liquid power”: not bound by rules or norms, accountable to no one and nothing but itself.
Iran rounds out this scenario. This is where the shock doctrine meets its match in reality. Threats must escalate because threats are a means to an end. When you rule through fear, fear itself becomes a resource that must be replenished. The words “locked and loaded” are words that only a man who confuses intimidation with policy could utter. Wars that are fought for psychological reasons are rarely ended on your own terms.
Is it megalomania? While psychiatrists are advised against using the term “megalomania,” they know it by the leaders’ consistent belief in their own infallibility, disdain for knowledge, and desire for admiration beyond concern for the consequences. Trump qualifies on all counts. The presence of superiority or inferiority complexes is secondary in all this. Alfred Adler once observed how the two conditions can coexist. “Grandiosity is the cloak of the insecure.”
The problem is structural. Trump is not the cause of the moment, but rather the one who is exploiting it. There has been a long period of neoliberal austerity that has undermined institutions. Some media ecosystems reward outrage, and the militarisation of foreign policy has become a bipartisan tradition. Trump is the symptom, but the symptom can be fatal.
A declining empire will look inward, confusing brutality with strength and spectacle with legitimacy. The shocks are going to continue because they have to. They escalate the stakes with every passing event, shrinking the list of choices until force is the only recourse.
What we are seeing is not a sequence of disparate acts but an ideology: dominance instead of deliberation, fear instead of law, spectacle instead of truth. It is the psychology of authoritarianism operationalised. And it always ends, in fact, not in victory but in ruin—because reality does not bow down indefinitely.
The question is no longer what drives Trump. The question is how much damage this will do before it collapses under the weight of its own delusions.
No comments:
Post a Comment