Thursday, November 12, 2026

Iran’s traditional water wisdom could help address modern challenges: heritage official

 By Afshin Majlesi

TEHRAN – Traditional Iranian knowledge of water management, from historic water-sharing systems to rainwater harvesting and community-maintained reservoirs, could offer valuable lessons for addressing contemporary water challenges, Atousa Momeni, head of the Tehran-based regional research center for safeguarding intangible cultural heritage in West and Central Asia, has said.

Speaking in an interview with the Tehran Times ahead of the commemoration of the International Day of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Momeni emphasized that safeguarding living heritage requires more than registering cultural practices on national or international lists. It depends on the active participation of local communities, the transmission of traditional knowledge to younger generations and the preservation of the social and environmental conditions that allow such practices to survive.

The Tehran center has chosen “Living Heritage and Water” as the theme of this year's commemoration, scheduled for Monday, November 9, 2026, and will present its “Living Heritage and Water Award” to three selected initiatives from Semnan, Hormozgan and Fars provinces.

The occasion is intended to highlight how traditional knowledge and community-based practices can complement contemporary approaches to water management, particularly in regions facing drought, climate change and growing pressure on water resources.

“Water is one of the clearest expressions of the relationship between historical knowledge, living culture and the future of our land,” Momeni said.

She noted that Iran's heritage of water management extends well beyond its celebrated qanats, reservoirs and historic hydraulic structures. Over centuries, communities developed extensive knowledge of identifying, collecting, storing, distributing and responsibly using water in arid and semi-arid environments.

The annual commemoration, she said, should not be viewed as an isolated ceremonial event. Identifying, documenting and introducing successful experiences in safeguarding traditional water-related knowledge is among the programs approved by the center's governing council.

The initiative also seeks to encourage research, exchange of expertise and regional cooperation among countries in West and Central Asia, where water scarcity, climate change and humanitarian challenges are increasingly shared concerns.

“An award is not the end of the process for us; it is the beginning of a broader effort to introduce valuable knowledge, strengthen community participation and create opportunities for transferring successful experiences,” she said.

Explaining a selection of three selected initiatives, Momeni said each illustrates a different dimension of the relationship between intangible heritage and contemporary life.

In Semnan, the selected experience concerns a traditional system of water management and distribution. Its significance lies not only in physical infrastructure but also in the customary rules governing water rights, shared responsibilities and cooperation among users.

“The heritage of water in Semnan is not merely a story of water engineering; it is also a story of social organization and the wisdom of living in a water-scarce environment,” she said.

On Qeshm Island in Hormozgan province, the traditional practice known as “Kheyrab” demonstrates how rainwater harvesting in historic reservoirs can be connected with community participation and modern technological capacities. Momeni said the experience could offer useful insights for coastal and island communities, where freshwater supplies are particularly vulnerable.

The third initiative, in Karmostaj, a village in Fars province's Larestan region, focuses on the restoration of traditional reservoirs and water-storage facilities through the involvement of local residents and charitable contributors.

Together, the three projects demonstrate how indigenous knowledge, collective responsibility and cultural attachment can help sustain traditional practices while addressing present-day needs.

Momeni stressed that local communities must remain at the center of safeguarding efforts, in line with the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, which recognizes their central role in identifying and maintaining their heritage.

She said the Tehran ceremony would provide an opportunity for representatives of the selected initiatives to explain their work, ensuring that the discussion is not limited to officials and academic specialists.

“Water heritage should not be narrated solely by experts and administrators,” she said, pointing to traditional water managers, farmers, craftspeople, reservoir builders and those who maintain customary water-sharing systems as the actual holders of this knowledge.

“Living heritage cannot be safeguarded for people alone; it must be safeguarded with people and through their participation.”

Turning to a broader challenge in heritage protection, Momeni said the number of registered elements should not be treated as the principal measure of success.

She underlined that traditional knowledge may disappear even after being included on a national or international heritage list if its practitioners lose opportunities to pass it on, face economic difficulties or see the social and environmental settings supporting it gradually disappear.

She said the more meaningful questions were whether knowledge holders could continue transmitting their expertise, whether younger generations had the motivation and opportunity to learn, and whether local communities were involved in decisions affecting their heritage.

Restoring a historic reservoir, for example, would not be enough if the traditional skills required to build and maintain it were no longer passed down. Similarly, documenting a customary water-sharing system would preserve only a historical record if the experience of those who operate it were overlooked.

“Registration is the beginning of recognition; safeguarding is a commitment to the continued life of heritage,” she said.

Momeni described the central message of this year's commemoration in a simple phrase: “The future of water depends on the memory of water.”

She cautioned, however, against assuming that solutions to today's complex water problems could be found simply by returning to the past. Rather, historical experience should be considered alongside contemporary science and technology.

For younger generations, she added, learning traditional water-management practices is about more than acquiring old technical skills. It also means understanding fairness, shared responsibility, moderation and respect for the rights of others and future generations.

“These are the values we hope to communicate to society through this year's commemoration,” she said.

The legacy of strategic patience

 By Batool Subeiti

LONDON -- Strategic institution building characterized Iran’s strategic patience phase, whereas now is the moment of testing. The current transformations cannot be separated from the prolonged period that Iran experienced under the leadership of Sayyed Ali Khamenei. It was characterized by a policy of strategic patience and an avoidance of escalation into an all-out confrontation.

Since Sayed Ali Khamenei assumed leadership, emphasis was placed on building institutions, expanding them, strengthening their reach and consolidating their ability to endure. Despite the breaches and vulnerabilities to which they were exposed, this period witnessed the emergence of deeply rooted institutional, military, security and political structure. These have now become a fundamental part of Iran's ability to engage in confrontation.

This does not mean that these institutions were immune to infiltration. Rather, the central point is that the accumulation of institutions and capabilities over many years enabled Iran to reach a stage where it could sustain confrontation, despite attacks and losses.

However, the policy of strategic patience did not leave behind institutional legacies alone. It also contributed to the emergence of a political current that believes in maintaining this policy and avoiding direct confrontation. This is based on the conviction that patience and negotiations may be less costly than war.

Consequently, the developments witnessed in the current Iran-US. confrontation place this political current before a difficult test. This is as realities on the ground undermine the belief that avoiding confrontation is the most effective option under all circumstances.

Under the circumstances faced during the leadership of Sayed Ali Khamenei, strategic patience was the fundamental approach for continuing the mission. However, when war becomes inevitable, confrontation and diplomacy must become the central approaches, rather than continuing to tolerate violations and acts of aggression.

The more this approach loses its influence over decision-making, the greater Iran's and the Axis of Resistance’s ability to move from a policy of absorbing pressure, to one of imposing corresponding costs on their adversary.

Herein lies the paradox: the period during which institutions were established under the banner of strategic patience, may prove to be the very period in which these institutions are used to change the rules of confrontation. The institutions have developed the capacity to withstand pressure and operate under increasingly complex conditions.

Iran has not merely confronted the attacks; it has also adapted to the conditions of war and drawn lessons from the realities imposed by the confrontation. The significance of this lies in several interconnected areas. This includes the following: understanding the enemy's methods, such as how the United States and the Israeli occupation entity select their targets, determine the timing of their strikes and identify what they consider to be the centers of gravity. These are areas they believe the destruction will weaken or paralyze the resistance's ability to respond.

Protecting domestic capabilities: reassessing the means of protecting facilities and military, security and political centers, while addressing the infiltrations and vulnerabilities that may emerge during the confrontation.

Assessing the enemy's capacity for attrition: monitoring the volume of ammunition, resources and operational capabilities consumed by the enemy, as well as its ability to sustain mobilization, deploy forces and bear the associated costs.

Managing domestic resource consumption: balancing available resources against the demands of sustaining the war, and establishing priorities in a way that prevents Iran's capabilities from being depleted prematurely.

Strengthening domestic manufacturing: developing domestic manufacturing, production and replenishment capabilities, thereby giving Iran greater capacity to sustain the confrontation.

Distributing decision-making centers: strengthening the ability to make decisions and maintain operations even if certain leadership centers come under attack.

Military decentralization: distributing capabilities and responsibilities across multiple centers, ensuring that the targeting of a single location does not paralyze the entire system.

Rebuilding forces through accumulated knowledge: drawing on the information accumulated about the enemy's methods, strengths and weaknesses to rebuild and develop forces based on a realistic understanding of the nature of the confrontation.

Assessing potential targets: studying the types of targets that the enemy may seek to strike and preparing for the possibility of attacks by distributing risks. This is rather than assuming that military and political infrastructure will remain beyond the reach of targeting.

The significance of these factors lies in the opportunity they provide Iran to move beyond simply absorbing attacks and towards developing its methods of confrontation, based on practical experience. War does not merely expose weaknesses, it also reveals the extent to which each side is capable of learning, adapting and reorganizing its capabilities.

Living costs, housing, and employment uncertainty have united protesters across Europe

Countries across Europe have been swept by a wave of protests by young people angry at the spiraling cost of living who have little trust in traditional institutions, France 24 reported.

While local grievances have fueled the fire, the movements that brought hundreds of thousands to the streets of France, Belgium, Spain, Italy and Germany at the weekend are all linked by shared continent-wide issues such as sky-high housing costs, poor pay and the climate crisis.

School and university students have found themselves at the front line of these protests.

The spark was lit in mid-September, when French high school students took to the streets to demand better and more facilities, and an end to an opaque university admissions system.

"It's a European movement but France served as the catalyst," said Sylvain Boulouque, a historian of social movements.

After weeks of rallies, the French protests drew at least 550,000 people on October 17, with the largely peaceful demonstrations swiftly eclipsed by episodes of looting, arson and clashes with the police.

Four days later in Greece, more than 10,000 people rallied across several cities, with some bearing placards with slogans written in both Greek and French.

"The problems are shared between various European countries," insisted one protester, Filippos Armen, a physics student at Thessaloniki's Aristotle University.

Across the continent, many people have found themselves face-to-face with "a model that has run out of steam", said Belgian sociologist Geoffrey Pleyers.

"What they're being offered is, at best, a job, and for many, a precarious one," said the specialist in social movements at the Catholic University of Louvain.

At the same time, their studies no longer guarantee the standard of living their parents enjoyed, as a result of high housing costs and the risks linked to the climate crisis.

In many of the protests, as in Spain, Portugal and Greece, housing is "a central element" because it is directly tied to purchasing power and "an ever-more unequal distribution of wealth", the researcher added.

On the other hand, political scientist Mariam Martinez-Bascunan argued that "discontent is fueled more by uncertainty than by poverty".

Speaking to Spain's RTVE television, the professor at the Autonomous University of Madrid pointed to the "contagion effect" of images of protests in France and of tent encampments of housing rights activists in Portugal.

For Boulouque, "young people are acutely conscious of the weight of the debt and environmental problems" left by previous generations and have "the feeling of being sacrificed" as a result.

Boulouque, who also teaches in a high school, pointed to an unexpected side effect of the ban on mobile phones in French classrooms: "Students began to socialize again and lifted their heads to see just how far their working conditions have worsened".

In Germany, the possible reintroduction of military service at a time of tensions with Russia has also led many young people to join the protests.

The youth protests have struck a nerve with the wider public, at a time when Europe is gearing up for a wave of key elections in Spain, France, Italy and Greece over the coming year.

The French students were joined by the Yellow Vest movement, which organized a previous round of protests against the cost of living in 2018-19, while in Italy, drivers and farmers opposed to the high price of petrol joined the young demonstrators at Friday's rallies.

Another shared grievance is the widespread feeling of not being listened to, which is leading to an increasing "distance" and "dissociation" between ordinary people and the state, said Pleyers.

On top of that is the sense that society has become unequal and unfair.

"Young people whose parents live comfortably have a more comfortable life and, conversely, those who come from more precarious backgrounds have a much harder life today," Pleyers added.

Saudi Arabia in Ansarallah’s sights as Trump sees air campaign futility

TEHRAN - Yemen’s Ansarallah forces are on the march, and America’s ally Saudi Arabia is in their crosshairs. 

From their stronghold in Yemen, forces from the Ansarallah movement are raining missiles and drones on Saudi airports, oil facilities, and military installations while blocking Saudi shipping through the crucial Bab el-Mandeb Strait. 

The kingdom’s leader, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), is urging President Donald Trump to help, including joint air operations over Yemen. But knows that another air campaign against them is futile. 

On October 10, a strike killed 13 people and injured more than 300 at Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport. Saudi authorities gulped hard and canceled their flagship investment conference, and the country is bracing for more attacks. Ansarallah’s attacks are shaking confidence in Saudi Arabia’s security and denting MBS’s ambitious economic plans.

For now, the United States and other Saudi partners are supporting the kingdom while avoiding direct action in Yemen. They are right to be cautious. Renewed U.S. airstrikes would almost certainly break the bilateral truce with Ansarallah that has been in place since 2025. Doing so would invite attacks on American personnel and assets in the region. 

With the Iran war deeply unpopular, the Trump administration has strong incentives to avoid broadening the war or being drawn into a costly, open-ended fight in Yemen, The National Interest said in a commentary published on November 2.

Nor is it clear that the US airstrikes that MBS wants would turn the tide. Air campaigns against Ansarallah have limits. Saudi Arabia, the United States, and Israel have all tried, with limited success—including Operation Rough Rider, a major, 52-day US bombing campaign in 2025 that failed to stop Ansarallah from harassing Red Sea shipping. 

Airstrikes won’t fundamentally threaten Ansarallah’s control of a chunk of Yemen or change their behavior. In fact, past bombing campaigns backfired when they killed Yemeni civilians and served as a rallying cry against foreign intervention.

Washington can create the conditions for an eventual political settlement that will need to include Ansarallah. 

The immediate trigger for the renewed fighting between Saudi Arabia and the Ansarallah movement was a Saudi airstrike on Sana’a International Airport in July 2026. Ansarallah responded by declaring a naval blockade against Saudi shipping and attacked Saudi energy facilities and vessels.

The Ansarallah movement has demanded the lifting of restrictions on Yemen's airports and seaports, saying that they have deepened the humanitarian and economic crisis in areas under its control.

The deteriorating economic situation in northern Yemen and the lack of progress on economic relief increased Ansarallah's willingness to confront Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia’s MBS launched war against Ansarallah in March 2015, vowing to crush them in few weeks. However, the war lasted for about eight years. The war only humiliated Saudi Arabia that was backed militarily and logistically by its allies, including the UAE and the United States. 

Not taking lessons from that scandalous and protracted war, Saudi Arabia reopened the doors of hell.  

Dafineh museum group proposes intl. council of Islamic world museums

TEHRAN – The Dafineh museum group has proposed establishing an “international council of museums of the Islamic world” to strengthen cooperation among museums in Muslim countries, with the initiative expected to be examined by Iran’s Islamic Culture and Relations Organization (ICRO).

Hamidreza Soleimani, CEO of the Dafineh museum group of the Mostazafan Foundation, put forward the proposal during a meeting on Tuesday at which a memorandum of understanding was signed between the group and ICRO.

Soleimani said the proposed council could provide a platform for greater cooperation and coordination among museums in Islamic countries, particularly in developing common standards and protocols for museum activities.

He noted that while the International Council of Museums (ICOM) works to establish professional standards for museums worldwide, no comparable structure currently exists specifically for the Islamic world's cultural and civilizational sphere.

Establishing such a council, he said, could serve as a starting point for developing shared approaches to museum management and strengthening cultural ties among participating countries.

Soleimani also highlighted ICRO's network of more than 60 cultural centers and offices abroad, describing it as a valuable capacity for expanding international cooperation and promoting Iran's cultural heritage.

“Museums are places where the manifestations and symbols of a civilization and culture come together,” he said, emphasizing their important role in introducing a country's historical and cultural identity to international audiences.

He added that Iran's tangible and intangible heritage had not received sufficient international recognition, calling for greater efforts to present a more accurate picture of the country's historical and cultural achievements abroad.

According to Soleimani, an executive working group is expected to be formed at ICRO to examine the proposed council and begin the process of pursuing the initiative.

Hossein Divsalar, ICRO's deputy for scientific and cultural cooperation, said the organization's network of more than 60 cultural offices abroad could play a significant role in promoting Iran's cultural capacities internationally.

He described cultural counselors as representatives of Iran's cultural interests abroad, tasked with working alongside other national institutions to introduce the country's cultural assets to international audiences.

Divsalar said cooperation among government ministries and cultural institutions could strengthen Iran's public and cultural diplomacy.

He also noted that ICRO had organized 10 specialized meetings on museum-based diplomacy. The secretariat for museum-based cultural dialogues has also been established at [the UNESCO-registered] Golestan Palace in Tehran, he added.

Divsalar expressed his organization's readiness to support joint cultural and museum programs, including incoming initiatives such as Russian Cultural Week in Iran and overseas events such as Iranian Cultural Week in Turkmenistan.

He added that ICRO was also prepared to cooperate with the Dafineh museum group on joint museum activities with other countries.

The meeting concluded with the signing of a memorandum of understanding between the two institutions.

Hotel-based medical care facilities to boost health tourism in Fars province

TEHRAN – Fars province is exploring plans to establish hotel-based medical care facilities and expand accommodation services for patients and elderly people as part of efforts to strengthen its position as a health tourism destination.

The proposals were discussed at a joint meeting between the provincial tourism chief Behzad Moridi and Ali-Akbar Ramjerdi, head of the Fars Health Endowment Association, which also highlighted opportunities for greater cooperation between the healthcare, charity and tourism sectors.

Moridi said Fars, particularly its capital Shiraz, has considerable potential to attract medical tourists, citing its experienced medical specialists, well-equipped healthcare facilities and advanced hospitals.

Promoting the province's medical capabilities nationally and internationally could attract more foreign patients while stimulating economic growth, investment and sustainable job creation, he said.

Moridi also stressed the need for closer coordination among healthcare institutions, charitable organizations, tourism operators and government agencies to make better use of the province's existing capacities.

Ramjerdi outlined the association's 24-year record of supporting healthcare development, saying the current value of projects and contributions made by health benefactors exceeded 200 trillion rials.

Their contributions have helped create more than 500,000 square meters of healthcare, medical and educational facilities, provide advanced medical equipment, expand emergency medical services and improve healthcare infrastructure across the province, he said.

The association currently operates 18 accommodation facilities for patients and their companions, having provided more than 400,000 bed-nights to date, Ramjerdi added. It also runs support funds for patients and students, alongside several specialized committees.

Among the proposals discussed was the development of hotel-based medical care facilities combining accommodation, treatment and care services.

Ramjerdi said the country's ageing population made it increasingly important to plan for specialized residential and medical facilities for older people, offering accommodation, healthcare and support services under one roof.

Iran is particularly known for offering high-quality services in fields such as stem cell therapy and organ transplants, which have drawn growing interest from patients abroad.

Iran brings Washington to its knees

 By Syeda Farheen Naqi Mossavi 

TEHRAN – “We will bring the enemy to its knees,” martyr Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on the cold night of January 3, 2026.

These words carried a powerful message of resistance, determination, and perseverance. Just months later, their political significance has become increasingly evident. 

Donald Trump and his Republican Party have suffered a major electoral setback, with the war against Iran emerging as a decisive factor. 

Washington expected military pressure to weaken Tehran, but its aggression instead produced consequences that have come back to haunt the White House. 

The November 3 midterm elections dealt a severe blow to the Republican Party, while Democrats gained control of both chambers of Congress. For Trump, who came to power promising economic recovery, national strength, and an “America First” foreign policy, the result represents a major political retreat. 

It has exposed the contradiction between his electoral promises and a foreign policy increasingly driven by confrontation and Israel’s strategic interests. One of the most significant acknowledgements of the political cost of this war came from within the Trump administration itself. 

Vice President JD Vance acknowledged the political consequences of the conflict with Iran, challenging those who believed that sacrificing the Republican Party’s Senate majority for the next six years was justified by the military campaign. His remarks also pointed to growing public frustration over inflation, the abandonment of America First priorities, and Washington’s relationship with Israel. 

Trump himself acknowledged that the conflict with Iran had contributed to the Republican Party’s electoral defeat, particularly because American voters were unwilling to bear the burden of rising gasoline prices. 

His defence of military action exposed the central contradiction of his presidency: a president elected on promises to avoid unnecessary foreign wars had dragged his country into yet another costly confrontation. 

The old propaganda chorus could not save the Republican Party. Laura Loomer, Jared Kushner, Mark Levin, Catturd, Gunther Eagleman, Libs of TikTok, End Wokeness, and the wider pro-Trump media ecosystem spent years manufacturing outrage and shaping political narratives. Yet they could not manufacture enough public enthusiasm for a war Americans did not want. 

The Epstein files, internal political feuds, and the hollow nationalism of the America First slogan further damaged the Republican Party’s credibility. Nevertheless, the confrontation with Iran became one of its heaviest electoral burdens. The war exposed the widening gap between Washington’s foreign policy ambitions and the everyday priorities of ordinary Americans. 

The economic consequences of war cannot be concealed through presidential speeches or media campaigns. Rising fuel prices, financial uncertainty, and growing domestic frustration have made the cost of Washington’s foreign policy increasingly visible to American voters. They were promised that their interests would come first. Instead, they found themselves paying the price of yet another confrontation in West Asia. 

Iran did not need to defeat the United States on the battlefield to expose the weaknesses of its strategy. It needed patience, perseverance, and strategic calculation. By refusing to follow the aggressive timetable set by Washington and Tel Aviv, Tehran allowed its foes to confront the political consequences of their own mistakes. 

Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu increasingly appear as leaders willing to endanger regional and international stability in pursuit of their political objectives. The electoral backlash has, to some extent, demonstrated the growing price of this approach. 

Another important consequence of these elections is the growing willingness among American politicians to challenge unconditional support for Israel. Michigan Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed delivered an extraordinary message in his victory speech. Addressing AIPAC, which he said had spent $42 million against him, he declared: “To AIPAC, who spent $42 million against us: Thank you for giving me the opportunity to beat you twice.” 

He also openly accused Israel of genocide and apartheid, drawing loud applause from the audience. His remarks reflect a changing political environment in which criticism of Israeli policies is no longer confined to the margins but is increasingly entering the American political mainstream. 

For decades, AIPAC’s financial influence has been a prominent feature of Washington politics. El Sayed’s victory sends a clear message: political money cannot guarantee electoral success. Growing opposition to unconditional support for Israel indicates that American voters are increasingly questioning why their taxes should be used to sustain Israeli military policies. 

El-Sayed also challenged Trump's claims of having successfully concluded the war with Iran. He compared the conflict to an unfinished construction project that initially appeared limited but eventually turned into a prolonged and unnecessary burden. His criticism exposed the fundamental weakness of Trump's strategy: starting a war is easy, but explaining how to end it is far more difficult. 

The Republican defeat, therefore, was not simply another midterm electoral setback. It represented a confrontation between domestic priorities and an interventionist foreign policy. 

The Trump administration attempted to demonstrate American power through confrontation, but the consequences weakened its own party and exposed divisions within the American political establishment. 

Democratic control of Congress also means that Trump may now face tougher oversight, investigations, and possible impeachment efforts. Although impeachment does not automatically remove a president from office, the administration's weakened political position has created new difficulties and vulnerabilities. 

For Iran, the broader lesson is that national sovereignty is not determined by threats against a country or the military power assembled around it. Strategic patience and refusal to surrender under pressure can impose political costs on an adversary that extend far beyond the battlefield. 

Despite sustained pressure, Tehran refused to capitulate, challenging Washington's assumption that military superiority would inevitably translate into political submission. 

Trump's reckless decision to wage war against Iran has proved extraordinarily costly. It is a humiliation that history may remember long after the immediate political consequences have passed. 

The cold night of January 3 carried a message: the enemy would be brought to its knees. The American elections have given that message a new political meaning. Trump remains president, but his party has lost control of Congress. 

His vice president has openly questioned the cost of the war, while unconditional support for Israel faces growing criticism. The slogan “Make America Great Again” has become a political noose around Trump's neck. 

America has not become great again; instead, Trump has once again been humiliated. If Americans want to preserve their country's dignity, they must hold this Epstein-files-linked, bankrupt, war-criminal administration accountable and send those responsible behind prison bars. 

The martyred Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah had warned that Trump and his administration would eventually realize that they had lost this region and would also pay the political price in elections. Today, his warning carries renewed significance. If this process continues—and Insha'Allah, it will—the liberation of Al-Quds (Jerusalem) may be closer than ever. 

When the United States eventually withdraws from this region, the Zionist regime may find itself deprived of the military and political backing on which it has depended for so long. Its leaders may ultimately be forced to pack their bags and leave this land, without the need for another war. 

The end of American hegemony in West Asia would fundamentally transform the regional balance of power. Iran has demonstrated that the consequences of resistance extend far beyond the battlefield. 

What Washington attempted to impose on Tehran has returned to haunt America in the form of a domestic political crisis. If this cannot be called regime change in Washington's political calculations, it is certainly a profound strategic retreat.

Washington went to war to bring Iran to its knees, but it proved the opposite. What a spectacular miscalculation! Madman Trump’s costly gamble: Tehran stood firm, Washington paid the price! 

Bravo! Iran.