Thursday, April 16, 2026

Empire of Piracy blockades Iran and China

Pepe Escobar, Strategic Culture Foundation

Iranians are itching to fight – in case the ceasefire collapses.

All hail the almighty return of Pirates of the Caribbean, now upgraded to Pirates of the Persian Gulf.

The spectacular collapse of the Islamabad diktats – Barbaria came to dictate, never to negotiate – has been followed by a coercion psy ops on steroids: Jesus! (literally, as he posted it on Truth Social) threatening every single ship now paying the Strait of Hormuz toll booth.

As every grain of sand from the Gobi to the Sahara already knows, this is all about China.

So the question needs to be posed again. CENTCOM has now merged into INDOPACOM, a new pyrate hydra. Will INDOPACOM have the balls to harass a Chinese supertanker which sailed through the Strait of Hormuz after paying the toolbooth in yuan?

In his trademark delusional supremacy mode, US Treasury Secretary Bessent said that China will no longer be able to get oil from Iran.

This Baboon of Barbaria gimmick in fact translates as economic warfare against not only China but an array of mostly Asian nations, disturbing global energy flows, trade, and major shipping transporting all manner of goods from the West down to the East and from East to West. An oil blockade targeting not only China but also a great deal of the multipolar world.

Before the start of the American blockade, ships from only five nations could transit through the Strait of Hormuz: China, Russia, India, Iraq and Pakistan. Once again: will INDOPACOM dare to seize or sink ships from four nuclear powers?

South Korea went a step ahead and sent a special envoy for direct negotiations with Tehran to guarantee safe passage through Hormuz and buy more cheaper oil and gas. As it stands, at least 26 South Korean tankers remain stranded.

Now compare Bessent with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, in Beijing, after talking to Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and being received in person by President Xi:

“Russia can, without a doubt, compensate for the shortfall in resources that has arisen.”

Roughly 13% of China’s oil imports come from Iran – approximately 1.38 million barrels a day. In parallel, Power of Siberia-1 – operating at full capacity – delivers 38 billion cubic meters of gas a year of gas, and the ESPO oil pipeline is hitting record highs.

Power of Siberia-2 may only become operational next year. Russia already supplies as much as 20% of China’s oil. “Compensate”, in Lavrov’s terms, means pushing spare capacity to the limit. But that’s doable.

Iran for its part can count on an alternative pipeline and the Jask oil terminal, with capacity for 1 million barrels a day, which completely bypasses the Strait of Hormuz.

So far, 8 Chinese tankers transited via Hormuz since the blockade was announced. Moreover, China has as many as 1.3 billion barrels in inventories, enough to cushion some losses from Iran for months. And China will continue – in theory – to receive oil from tankers departing from other non-Iranian Persian Gulf ports (they will still need to pay the toll booth).

The big question is how long Iran – and China, for that matter – will tolerate the shadow fleet being interdicted by INDOPACOM without a ballistic response.

Waiting for the Al Aqsa Triangle Blockade

A blockade of all Iran’s ports – and not of the Strait of Hormuz per se – may soon meet its match: the incoming Al Aqsa Triangle Blockade (Bab-al-Mandeb, Yanbu port in Saudi Arabia, Suez, in connection with Hormuz), as qualified by Yemen’s Ansarallah. The Houthis are just waiting for the uber-strategic moment to join the chat. That will inevitably lead to oil reaching over $200 a barrel – and counting.

Translation: an irretrievable, system-wide supply shock.

The cowardly Baboon of Barbaria administration certainly did not think this through – as it’s obsessed with starving China of oil and US dollars while destroying, in theory, key nodes of the New Silk Roads/BRI.

What everyone else is paying attention to is how the INDOPACOM-enforced blockade will devastate scores of nations outside of China.

Which brings us to a pedestrian but quite feasible calculation – in tune with mutts such as Bessent: let’s starve everyone of oil and US dollars so they will be desperate to sell their US Treasury bonds back to the US way below face value, as long as they can get oil and/or US dollars in return.

This is Grifter Central: the Americans take their debt out of circulation – at a huge discount – and simply erase those humongous interest payments on the debt which they are unable to pay.

There’s no guarantee the Baboon of Barbaria administration will get what it wants. Tehran does not depend on maritime routes. After decades of sanctions, they developed an array of alternative land corridors, barter trade channels, and swapping mechanisms, for instance via Turkmenistan.

China, once again, is not a prisoner anymore of the Malacca Dilemma – between Malaysia and Sumatra in Indonesia – because they have meticulously diversified their sources, starting with the Sino-Russian pipelines.

Moroever, the China-Myanmar pipeline totally bypasses Malacca.

The long China-Central Asia gas pipeline spanning Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan – paid by China and bypassing American thalassocracy – has been in effect since the early 2010s.

Then there’s Gwadar deep-sea port in the Arabian Sea, the key node of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) and a stalwart of BRI. Gwadar is only 80 km east of the port of Chabahar in Sistan-Balochistan in Iran: hence far away from the Persian Gulf. That translates into an overland route from the Arabian Sea to Xinjiang.

China will not starve if deprived of Iranian oil. China leads in nearly every single energy and power production sector. They have the industrial capacity – talk about productive capitalism – the raw materials, the supply chains, and enough skilled labor to produce the technology and infrastructure necessary for every relevant energy system: solar panels, turbines, batteries, transmission lines, everything in solar, wind, hydro and next-gen nuclear power. That’s exactly what I saw traveling across Xinjiang back to back last year while shooting a documentary.

Obviously myopic Baboon of Barbaria minions cannot possibly understand how China’s strategy of total domination in EVs, solar batteries and exporting electricity is protecting the Middle Kingdom from artificial oil/gas shocks such as the blockade.

As it stands, The Invincible Armada remains in the outer fringes of the Gulf of Oman, out of range of many – but not all – Iranian missiles and drones, but certainly targeteable by long-range ballistics and hypersonics. The Americans will continue to use their ISR to track ships; then small boats and helicopters will engage in the “interdiction” procedure.

So far, nothing happened. Well, actually a big thing happened: a sanctioned, non-Iranian supertanker capable of carrying 2 million barrels of oil, sailed to Iran via the Strait of Hormuz with the AIS switched on for every tracker to see. INDOPACOM didn’t dare to touch it.

The Iranians, meanwhile, are just waiting. Asymmetrically. But make no mistake: they are itching to fight – in case the ceasefire collapses.

In this case, we’ll be plunged right into the Mother of All Cliffhangers. Iran just needs to sink one American destroyer; and/or “disable” one of those multibillion-dollar sitting ducks with a missile/drone volley, guided by Chinese intel.

The whole planet will then see it for what it is: the definitive, graphic strategic defeat of the Empire of Chaos, Lies, Plunder, Piracy and “If I Don’t Like You I’ll Kill You”.

Bring it on.

Iran condemns YouTube’s removal of AI-driven Lego-style channel over anti-US narratives

TEHRAN- A YouTube channel producing artificial intelligence-generated animations in a Lego-inspired format focusing on recent US-Israeli aggression on Iran has been taken down, drawing criticism over what some describe as selective enforcement of content policies.

The channel, operated by Explosive Media, had gained attention since 2025 for publishing politically themed videos created by a young Iranian artist. The group announced that its account on YouTube was suspended on the grounds of “violent content,” a characterization it has openly challenged.

In a post shared on X, the group questioned the decision, arguing that its stylized Lego-like animations could not reasonably be classified as violent. Despite the suspension, its presence remains intact across other platforms, including Instagram, TikTok, and Telegram.

The development comes as AI-generated media continues to expand globally, reshaping how political messages are produced and disseminated. Notably, even official institutions such as the White House have increasingly incorporated AI-generated visuals into their communications.

Esmaeil Baghaei, spokesperson for the Foreign Ministry, criticized the move, describing it as an attempt to silence alternative perspectives on the recent US-Israeli war imposed on Iran. He argued that such actions reflect a broader effort to control narratives in the digital sphere.

“In a land that proudly hosts Pixar, DreamWorks Animation, and The Walt Disney Company, an independent animated YouTube channel — which had organically grown by depicting US aggression & warmongering, and garnered millions of viewers — was abruptly shut down!! Why?! Simply to suppress the truth about their 'illegal war' on Iran and shield the American administration’s false narrative from any competing voice.” Baghaei wrote on X. 

The channel’s content frequently employed satire and elements of American popular culture to critique Washington’s policies. In several widely circulated clips, figures such as Donald Trump were portrayed in exaggerated, cartoonish forms, often conveying themes of political failure and retreat.

Observers note that while a wide range of AI-generated content continues to flourish online, material that challenges dominant Western narratives appears to face greater scrutiny. The removal of the channel has therefore reignited debate over freedom of expression and the boundaries of acceptable content on major technology platforms owned by corporations such as Alphabet.

As AI tools become more accessible and influential, the contest over digital storytelling—and which voices are allowed to be heard—appears set to intensify.

The Lego-style animated videos produced by Explosive Media seek to present a narrative aligned with the experiences of Iranians, using accessible and visually engaging storytelling to reach a global audience. Through satire and simplified imagery, these productions aim to shed light on the realities of the recent war imposed on Iran, while criticizing what they portray as US aggression and unilateralism. By drawing on familiar elements of popular culture and reinterpreting them through a political lens, the creators attempt to raise awareness among international viewers and challenge dominant narratives surrounding American policies.

Farhadi’s “Parallel Tales” to premiere at 79th Cannes Film Festival

TEHRAN – The Cannes Film Festival has announced the auteur-driven competition lineup fort its 79th edition including the new film by the celebrated Iranian filmmaker Asghar Farhadi.

Titled “Parallel Tales,” Farhadi’s 10th feature film will vie for the coveted Palme d'Or with the latest films by well-known figures including Polish filmmaker PaweÅ‚ Pawlikowski, Japanese writer-director Ryusuke Hamaguchi, American filmmaker Ira Sachs, Spanish director Pedro Almodovar, and Romanian filmmaker Cristian Mungiu among others, Honaronline reported.

“Parallel Tales” marks Farhadi’s second French-language film after “The Past” with Berenice Bejo, who won the Best Actress award for her performance at Cannes in 2013.

The new film by the two-time Oscar-winning filmmaker was shot in Paris during fall 2025. Its stellar cast includes Isabelle Huppert, Vincent Cassel, Virginie Efira, Pierre Niney, Adam Bessa, and Catherine Deneuve.

Written by Farhadi, the story deals with a young man who falls madly in love with an older woman, leading him into a dangerous obsession.

A French-Italian-Belgian coproduction, the film is produced by long-time collaborator Alexandre Mallet-Guy alongside Farhadi and David Levine. The prestige project will be launched by Charades and UTA Independent Film Group at the upcoming Cannes Film Market. Charades will handle international sales, while UTA Independent Film Group will rep U.S. rights. Memento will handle distribution in France.

It is the fifth collaboration between Farhadi and Memento Production after “The Past,” Oscar-winner “The Salesman,” “Everybody Knows,” and “A Hero”.

The 79th annual Cannes Film Festival will take place from May 12 to 23. South Korean filmmaker Park Chan-wook will serve as jury president for the main competition section.

One of Iran's most prominent cinematic voices, Farhadi, 53, is known for his thought-provoking films that explore social issues. He earned a bachelor's degree in dramatic arts from the University of Tehran in 1988 and later a master's degree in theater direction.

Farhadi won the Best Foreign Film Oscar in 2012 for “A Separation” (which was also nominated for Best Screenplay) and once again in 2017 for “The Salesman”.

He has been selected four times in competition in Cannes with “The Past,” “The Salesman,” “Everybody Knows,” and “A Hero”.

“The Salesman” won Best Screenplay and Best Actor awards at Cannes in 2016 and “A Hero” scooped the Grand Prize at the 2021 festival.

“Everybody Knows,” Farhadi’s Spanish-language debut starring Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem, opened and competed at Cannes in 2018.

Farhadi was also selected twice in Berlin. He was awarded the Silver Bear for Best Director in 2009 for “About Elly” and the 2011 Golden Bear for “A Separation”.

Last week, when Iran was fighting an imposed war by the US and Israel, Asghar Farhadi, in a message, called on artists and filmmakers around the world not to remain silent in the face of the destruction of Iran's civilian infrastructure and be a voice for stopping the aggression against Iran.

His message was a reaction to the US President Donald Trump who had threatened to decimate Iran's power plants, bridges and other vital infrastructure.

Farhadi emphasized that the destruction of these centers is a direct blow to the life and human dignity of Iranian citizens.

“I appeal to artists and filmmakers everywhere in the world, in these sensitive days and hours, to use every possible means to be a voice for stopping the devastating aggression that has increasingly led to the destruction of civilian infrastructure,” he said in the message.

“These infrastructures belong to the people of Iran and are related to their basic daily needs. The destruction of infrastructure is not just the destruction of buildings; it is a blow to human life and dignity,” he added.

“Attacking a country's infrastructure is a war crime. Regardless of any belief or perspective, let us unite our voices to stop this inhumane, illegal, and devastating process,” he noted.

The US and Israel attacked Iran on February 28 and for 40 days martyred about 3,000 people including the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, several officials, and military commanders as well as numerous civilians, including women and children.

The aggressors claimed at the beginning that the attacks were aimed at preventing Iran’s nuclear program but they later revealed their real objectives. For Israel, the maximalist goal was the regime change in Iran and the US sought to seize the oil and gas resources of the country.

Therefore, besides some military targets, the US and Israel launched organized attacks against civilian infrastructure, including residential homes, hospitals, refineries, power plants, schools, universities, art and cultural spaces, bookstores, museums, and ancient sites in several cities, causing total or partial damages and injuring innocent people, in an attempt to force the country to surrender to their illegitimate demands.

The attacks prompted a swift response from the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC), with missile and drone launches targeting Israel and several U.S. bases in the region, which were gradually intensified.

Iran, the US and Israel agreed to a two-week ceasefire on April 8. The Supreme National Security Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran announced in a statement that Iran had achieved a great victory and forced the US and Israel to accept its 10-point plan.

Seyyed Abbas Araghchi, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, wrote on X: “Considering the request by the US for negotiations and acceptance of the general framework of Iran’s 10-pont proposal as a basis for negotiations, I hereby declare on behalf of Iran's Supreme National Security Council: If attacks against Iran are halted, our Powerful Armed Forces will cease their defensive operations. For a period of two weeks, safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz will be possible via coordination with Iran's Armed Forces and with due consideration of technical limitations”.

Iranian psychology body calls for an assessment of Trump’s mental health

TEHRAN – The National Psychology and Counseling Organization of Iran, in an open letter to psychologists in the United States, has called for an assessment of the mental health of US political leaders, particularly Donald Trump, in the interest of world peace.

The letter, which includes the scientific and humanitarian concerns of the Iranian psychological community and counselors, criticizes the destructive and antisocial behaviors of American leaders and their direct impact on creating psychological disorders, violating world peace, and creating trauma among nations, IRNA reported.

Referring to the recent US military aggression against Iran, the assassination of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, and the killing of elementary school children, the letter emphasizes the clear conflict of these actions with global mental health standards.

The American scientific community has also been asked what the mechanism is for assessing the mental health of their political leaders in response to impulsive and psychopathic decisions that are leading the world into the abyss of fire.

As Trump threatens to wipe out Iran and attacks the pope, even some former allies and advisers are questioning whether he has grown increasingly unbalanced, describing him as “lunatic” and “clearly insane.”

Democrats who have long challenged Trump’s psychological fitness have issued a fresh chorus of calls to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove the president from power for disability, The New York Times reported.

The same can be heard now among retired generals, diplomats and foreign officials. And most strikingly, it can be heard now on the political right among onetime allies of the president.

Former Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia Republican who recently broke with Trump, advocated using the 25th Amendment, telling CNN that threatening to destroy Iran’s civilization was “not tough rhetoric, it’s insanity.” 

Some of the questions about Trump’s soundness come from people who once worked with him and have since become critics. Even before the civilization post, Ty Cobb, a White House lawyer in Trump’s first term, told the journalist Jim Acosta that the president is “a man who is clearly insane” and that his recent string of belligerent, middle-of-the-night social media posts “highlights the level of his insanity.” 
Stephanie Grisham, a former White House press secretary for Trump, wrote online last week that “he’s clearly not well.”

Naval blockade: A desperate, erratic and hasty decision

TEHRAN - Just hours after the talks between Iran and the U.S. in Islamabad ended on Sunday morning with a breakthrough, President Donald Trump declared a naval blockade of Iran.

Trump did not wait even until the end of the two-week ceasefire mediated by Pakistan. 

The U.S. naval blockade that targets ships to and from Iran’s ports, went into force on Monday.  Simply, it is a violation of Iran’s sovereignty. 

Trump enforced the blockade despite the fact that the world has warned that this will worsen the situation and have more effects on the global economy, especially as Iran has warned that “free navigation for all or for nobody”.

Trump made this decision even though he told reporters late on Sunday (U.S. time) that the ceasefire is “holding well”.

This means the U.S. has somehow resumed the war before the ceasefire expires. 

This also took place while neither Iran’s nor the United States’ chief negotiators have not completely closed the door to diplomacy and there is still room for diplomacy and extending the ceasefire plan.  

Talking to reporters before the war on Iran, Trump dismissed the widely perceived view that he is personally impatient. But he is. He must not be that much naïve not to understand that a finding a durable solution to the nuclear dispute between Tehran and Washington, that was triggered again with his withdrawal from the Obama era nuclear deal in his first administration, can be achieved in a short time or in one session. 

The 2015 nuclear deal was the result of two years of intensive talks and 11 years of intermittent negotiations, starting 2003.

Trump and his close aides must know that the issue has become much more complicated following the U.S.-Israeli aggression against Iran at the end of February that Iran in retaliation closed the Strait of Hormuz in the first days of the war, although it loosened the closure later, and now it is open under the fragile ceasefire agreement. 

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who had tacitly approved of the war on Iran, is quite right that that he had low expectations for the Islamabad talks. 

“I wasn’t surprised by the decision to break off the talks in Islamabad. From the outset, I didn’t get the impression that (the talks) were particularly well-prepared,” Merz said in remarks in Berlin on Monday morning.  Merz also said that a diplomatic solution will not be a quick process. 

It is quite understandable that in any negotiations Iran will not easily give up its control of the vital Strait of Hormuz without receiving guarantees that it will not be attacked again and a final solution is not found for the decades-long conflict between Tehran and Washington.

Iranians must not live under a constant fear of war by the U.S. and Israel. The June 2025 Israeli-U.S. war on Iran, that lasted 12 days, ended with just a ceasefire and not a deal. Again, they started the current war during the Iran-U.S. talks in Geneva. There must be an end to such a situation. 

Senator Tim Kaine has cited reasons why Iran should not trust the Trump administration and insist on its credible concerns. 

“Vance says Iran won’t agree to what they agreed to 10 years ago,” Kaine said. “I’m sure Iran wonders: if we agree to it, will the United States tear it up again, bomb our civilian infrastructure, kill schoolchildren, and engage in an assassination campaign against our leadership? This is not going to be an easy negotiation, because the last negotiation that led to control of Iran’s nuclear program, the U.S. made the decision to tear it up and walk away.” 

He added, “If you make diplomacy impossible, you tend to make war inevitable.”

Also, if Iran agrees to a dilution of its 400 kilograms uranium enriched to 60 percent it must receive guaranteed concessions instead, top among them a non-aggression pact and a total abolition of sanctions.  

The New York Times has said that during the Islamabad talks the U.S. side proposed a suspension of nuclear enrichment by Iran for 20 years but the Iranian side agreed to 5 five years. If this report is true, the 5-year suspension is an important concession because Iran has been subjected to crippling sanctions, or in Trump’s words “maximum pressure” campaigns. It has also lost many of its nuclear experts in covert and open Israeli assassinations before and during the June 2025 war.

Iran has also lost several hundreds of billions of dollars in oil sanctions. Considering the indirect effects of sanctions, the losses, as some economic experts have put it, reach more than 3 trillion dollars.

The Iranian government has announced it has suffered 270 billion dollars in damages directly and indirectly from the current war.

However, if Trump expected Iran’s surrender at the Islamabad talks and agreed to the U.S. terms, it shows that Trump is alien to diplomacy. 

 Trump is erratic in making decisions and reckless in making statements. His naval blockade before the end of truce is a concrete example of erratic behavior. And his pre-ceasefire threat that “a whole civilization will die” if Iran does not open the Strait of Hormuz is evidence of thoughtlessness.

It is for these reasons that many people find him unfit for the job. Former CIA chief John Brennan, appearing on MS Now on Saturday, said Trump’s recent statements and actions related to the Iran war raise serious questions about his fitness to remain commander in chief, arguing that the Constitution’s 25th Amendment was designed for situations like this.

Trump’s war and rhetoric on Iran have drawn reactions from Washington’s allies. Just on Monday, British Prime Minister Meir Starmer said Trump's threat that Iran’s civilization would die was "wrong". He also reaffirmed his previous position on the war on Iran, saying Britain would "continue to stay out of the war".

Trump told reporters on Monday that if a deal is not reached by the end of the ceasefire, “it won’t be pleasant for them.”  His remarks show as if he has not yet violated the ceasefire. 
While he himself acknowledged that 34 ships transited the Strait of Hormuz on Monday, what message does the naval blockade send?”

Trump, unsuited for president, is surrounded by sycophants rather competent aides. He uses harsh language against those who oppose his views and uses humiliating and insulting language against his rivals and enemies. 

Trump exemplifies a person who makes erratic and desperate attempts, especially at a time that he should act circumspectly.

Attracting 320,000 intl. students by 2028 on agenda

TEHRAN – According to the Seventh National Development Plan (2023-2028), the country is projected to increase the number of international students to 320,000 from currently around 60,000.

To this end, the higher education system needs to adopt some institutional and developmental approaches in organizations associated with foreign students, Mehr news agency reported.

In this regard, the parliament research center has evaluated Iran's situation in attracting international students and measures that need to be taken into account. 

According to the report, the number of foreign students in the country has grown from 13,767 in Iranian year 1394 (2015 – 2016) to 68,563 in 1403 (2024 -2025). The number of educational institutions that are allowed to accept foreign students has noticeably increased from 45 to 206 over the past decade.

The report also shows that 13 acts, such as providing short-time sabbaticals, granting visas, establishing a center for foreign student graduates, and holding remedial courses, have been developed and officially accepted by the parliament as part of educational charter for foreign students; however, they have not been implemented in time. 

Also major organizations and institutions of the country have no participation in planning cultural programs for foreign students.

A lack of strategic comprehensive marketing skills, and bureaucratic and time-consuming correspondence were among other recognized problems.

The parliament research center has put forward some proposals to help attract more international students. The most important one highlights adopting an approach that focuses on generating income, soft cultural power, and expanding science. 

The other suggestion emphasizes the importance of boosting south-south international relations, that is developing political and economic interactions with highly populated countries like Pakistan, India, Egypt and some countries in Central Asia.

Ongoing evaluation of other countries’ policies in attracting students, developing software and hardware infrastructures, stable and secure network, as well as increasing the number of scholarships are among other suggested solutions.

Before the US-Israeli war against Iran, nearly 60,000 foreign students from 101 countries, mainly from Afghanistan, India, Iraq, and Pakistan, were studying in Iran.

The Ministry of Science has announced that educational programs for foreign university students present in the country will continue despite the unfavorable conditions caused by the imposed war.

All universities have been asked to ensure that all international students benefit from the educational facilities and capacities of the universities by adopting innovative measures, including preparing offline educational packages, developing intensive summer training courses, and anticipating the possibility of completing practical courses in the coming years, in addition to continuing online education, IRNA reported.

These measures and plans should be implemented in a way that ensures that international students do not suffer academic, training, or even financial losses due to the conditions resulting from the imposed war.

Science Minister Hossein Simaei-Sarraf has said over 30 Iranian universities had been directly attacked by the United States and Israel since the war began in late February.

Five university professors and more than 60 students had been killed in the strikes, added Simaei-Sarraf, describing attacks on Iranian infrastructure as “crimes against humanity.”

“The main reason the enemy targeted this sensitive infrastructure was that they did not want us to gain access to this technology,” he said, adding that many Iranians abroad have contacted the university, offering to help fund its restoration.

Since the beginning of the attacks, a series of extensive assaults on Iranian scientific and academic centers including the Iran University of Science and Technology, ShahidBeheshti University, the Iranian Space Research Institute, Abbaspour University, and the Pasteur Institute of Tehran, have drawn global attention.

These attacks go beyond conventional military operations and carry broad strategic, cultural, and scientific implications. Analyzing these strikes highlights both the fear of foreign powers toward Iran’s scientific progress and the necessity of emphasizing the resilience of local science and knowledge in the face of violence and bombing.

Targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure on such a scale can, according to credible legal sources, constitute clear violations of international humanitarian law. Under the Geneva Conventions and customary international humanitarian law, civilian locations, including schools and universities, are generally protected from attacks.

The Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings (WUR) 2026 has placed 101 Iranian universities among the top universities in the world in 11 subject areas, compared to 81 universities in 10 subject areas in 2025.

These ten subject rankings include arts and humanities; business and economics; clinical and health; computer science; education; engineering; life sciences; physical sciences; psychology;  social sciences, and Law.

The Times Higher Education World University Rankings by Subject 2026 evaluated 1,165 universities from 84 countries and territories, using 18 performance indicators categorised under five core pillars, including Teaching (evaluates teaching reputation, student-to-staff ratio, doctorate-to-bachelor’s ratio, doctorate-to-staff ratio and institutional income), Research Environment (focuses on research reputation, income, and productivity), Research Quality (includes citation impact, research strength, research excellence, and influence, Industry (measures income from industry partnerships and patents),and International Outlook (accounts for international students, staff and co-authorship).

Global economy at risk: The price of a US-Israeli war on Iran

TEHRAN- As tensions escalate between the US-Israeli alliance and Iran, economists are warning of a seismic shock to the global economy.

A full-scale military confrontation would not remain confined to the Persian Gulf. Instead, it would trigger a cascade of supply shocks—starting with a sharp spike in oil and gas prices—that could plunge the world into a prolonged period of stagflation.

The core threat is “imported inflation.” Unlike demand-driven price rises, this phenomenon occurs when external factors—soaring energy costs, disrupted shipping routes, and skyrocketing insurance premiums—push up prices regardless of domestic monetary policy. 

With the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for nearly 20% of global oil supply, potentially becoming a conflict zone, analysts forecast crude oil prices could exceed $150–$200 per barrel. Natural gas prices would follow suit, crippling industrial production in Europe and Asia.

The Strait of Hormuz, a 21-mile-wide waterway between Oman and Iran, is the world's most critical oil chokepoint. Nearly 20% of global petroleum passes through it daily—about 17 million barrels. Iran has repeatedly threatened to block the strait in response to military strikes.

Under this scenario, central banks face an impossible dilemma.

Raising interest rates—their standard anti-inflation weapon—would do nothing to lower energy prices or fix broken supply chains. Instead, higher borrowing costs would choke off investment, increase unemployment, and accelerate a slide into recession.

The result is a textbook case of stagflation: rising prices alongside stagnant growth, a combination that defeated policymakers in the 1970s.

The damage would not stop at goods inflation. Financial markets would see a flight to safety, hammering equities and corporate bonds. 

Banks holding energy-sector debt could face cascading defaults. Global trade volumes would shrink as shipping costs multiply, further isolating economies already fractured by geopolitical rivalries. 

Developing nations, heavily reliant on imported energy and food, would face the most severe hardships, potentially triggering debt crises and social unrest.

In short, a US-Israeli war with Iran is not merely a regional military conflict—it is an express ticket to global economic turmoil. 

Policymakers in Washington and Tel Aviv must weigh any military calculus against this grim economic reality: higher inflation, lower growth, broken financial systems, and a world left poorer and more unstable. 

The lesson from history is clear—in an interconnected global economy, war always comes with a bill, and everyone ends up paying.