Wednesday, April 22, 2026

The victory of Iran’s discourse

 TEHRAN PAPERS

Farhikhtegan, in an analysis, examined the consistency of Iran’s discourse during the Ramadan War and throughout the ceasefire period. According to the paper, Iran’s discourse has been shaped by stability, coherence, realism, and alignment between words and actions.

Tehran’s messages — even when delivered in a warning tone — have a calming effect on the markets because they are credible and executable (such as the actual reopening of the Strait of Hormuz).The dominant global narrative no longer belongs to whoever shouts the loudest, but to the actor who speaks more deliberately, coherently, and realistically, and above all, fulfills its commitments. In this asymmetric media arena, the Islamic Republic of Iran has managed to shift from being a consumer of others’ narratives to becoming a producer of global perception. Today, the global oil market responds more positively and calmly to Iran’s voice — a voice that signals stability and proves it through action — than to Trump’s repetitive and unstable threats. This shift in perception may be Iran’s most important strategic achievement in this unequal conflict: the triumph of a discourse of stability over a discourse of excitement and volatility.

Siasat-e-Rooz: Iran’s management of the Strait of Hormuz is certain and essential

Siasat-e-Rooz dedicated its editorial to the importance of Iran’s management of the Strait of Hormuz. The editorial states that, alongside the defensive readiness of the armed forces, the strait can provide permanent deterrence for the country. Normalizing the situation in the Strait of Hormuz — which is accompanied by a drop in oil prices — could give Trump the illusion that he can extract more concessions in the Islamabad negotiations, and by rapidly lowering energy prices, reduce the cost of starting a new war for aggressors. Under these conditions, the paper suggests that smart management of the strait — combined with firm warnings to any violating vessels and with the clear message that the situation will not return to the pre‑war era — is a factor that raises the enemy’s costs and strengthens Iran’s bargaining power. As a key deterrent principle, it must be internalized globally that Iran’s management of the Strait of Hormuz is definite and essential, and that accepting Iran’s conditions and rights is an irreversible necessity.

Iran: A strategic victory for Iran

The Iran newspaper, in an interpretation, examined Iran’s powerful approach toward the enemy’s plot. According to the paper, the Israelis had convinced the Americans that if the US supported and directly entered the war, they could overthrow the Iranian system within a few days by assassinating Iran’s leader and other senior officials. Their strategy was that by assassinating the leadership, the system would collapse or people would take to the streets, and it would be over, but that did not happen. In response to the continuous attacks and threats from the aggressive enemy, Iran launched extensive strikes on all US military bases in the region. Iran crossed its own red lines, targeted industrial and vital areas, and warned that if its bridges and power plants were attacked, it would shut down the entire region. This threat forced the enemy to pause. In the end, Israel and the United States achieved nothing, while Iran — relying on three pillars: the armed forces, the unprecedented presence of people in the streets, and active diplomacy — succeeded in achieving a strategic victory.

Shargh: The Strait of Hormuz, a powerful lever

For five decades, the United States, by guaranteeing the security of the Arab states of the Persian Gulf, had created the assurance that the region’s oil would be sold in dollars and that the resulting dollars would flow back into US financial markets. But the current war has revealed how fragile these guarantees are. Today, China purchases a significant portion of its needed oil from Iran and Russia, and many of these transactions are settled in Yuan. The dollar’s share of global foreign‑exchange reserves has fallen to its lowest level of this century. This structural shift in the architecture of global finance goes far beyond a temporary tactic. As Deutsche Bank emphasized in an analysis, the Iran war may be recorded in history as a ‘key catalyst in the erosion of the petrodollar and the beginning of the petroyuan era.’ In this new architecture, Iran — with the leverage of controlling the Strait of Hormuz — plays a central role. What is happening is not a tactical shift but a structural transformation in the global financial system, and no future agreement can reverse this trajectory. Iran now holds a lever that extends far beyond the Strait of Hormuz — reaching deep into the foundations of the global financial order.

File closed: Why Iran's nuclear program must never return to the negotiating table

By Amin Mohammadi

For decades, the Islamic Republic of Iran engaged in nuclear diplomacy with the United States in good faith because it had nothing to hide about its peaceful nuclear program.

Time and again, the successive governments in Tehran entered negotiations with the United States – on the nuclear file – only to be met with bad faith, broken promises, and escalating pressure, in the form of military belligerence and draconian sanctions.

The lesson, written in the blood of martyrs, is now undeniable: trusting the US has never helped Iran. In return for Iranian goodwill, Washington has launched unprovoked wars, imposed crippling sanctions, and used every agreement as a pretext for renewed aggression.

The nuclear issue is the clearest example. And the words of the martyred Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, stand as a prophetic record of why talks with the US serve no purpose for the Islamic Republic and its people.

The JCPOA's broken promise

On November 23, 2016, nearly a year after the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, took effect, Ayatollah Khamenei addressed a gathering of Basij members in Tehran with a clear warning that still echoes loudly.

His message to both Iranian officials and the broader public was clear: the nuclear agreement must not be allowed to become a recurring tool of pressure wielded by the enemy against the Iranian nation.

"We must not allow it to be used as a means of pressure," he said, knowing fully well the consequences of trusting the enemy that does not understand the language of diplomacy.

He reminded the audience that officials had originally justified the agreement as a necessary step to lift unjust and illegal sanctions imposed on the Iranian nation. Yet even after eight or nine months, key promises remained unfulfilled.

"What they promised to do back then, which was supposed to be done on the very first day, has still not been fully implemented and remains incomplete," he said, noting that even those directly involved in the negotiations had openly acknowledged this shortfall.

In a striking biblical and Quranic reference, he said: "If someone, imitating the weak spirits of the Children of Israel, says, 'Indeed, we are overtaken' – meaning they will catch up to us and destroy us – then we, in emulation of Prophet Moses, declare: 'No! Indeed, my Lord is with me; He will guide me.'"

That speech was both a critique of the JCPOA's failed implementation and a rebuke to those who believed external pressure, including sanctions, could break Iran's resolve.

Just three months later, on February 15, 2017, Ayatollah Khamenei addressed the people of East Azerbaijan Province with a sharp critique of how the US and its allies wield the threat of war as a political weapon against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

"Both during the previous US administration and the current one, one of the enemy's tricks has been to constantly threaten war – saying that 'the military option is on the table' and so on," the Leader said.

He then revealed a telling anecdote. A European official had reportedly told Iranian negotiators that war against Iran was inevitable – that had it not been for the JCPOA, military war would have certainly broken out.

Final verdict: Imposition, not negotiation

On September 22, 2025, in one of his final public addresses, the martyred Leader of the Islamic Revolution delivered a clear assessment of America's true intentions.

"America's demand is not negotiation; it is imposition and bullying," Ayatollah Khamenei declared. "No honorable nation and no wise statesman will accept this."

The statement, precise and calculated, cut to the heart of decades of tensions between the Islamic Republic and the US, rooted in the 1979 Islamic Revolution and its aftermath.

For the Leader, the American approach had never been about genuine diplomacy or mutual understanding. It was about coercion dressed in diplomatic language – maximalist demands presented as offers, ultimatums disguised as invitations to talk.

By framing US policy as fundamentally incompatible with honor and wisdom, Ayatollah Khamenei drew a clear line: any nation that submits to such bullying sacrifices not only its interests but its dignity. No one worthy of the name would lead his country down that path.

After what we witnessed in the 40 days, from the Leader’s assassination on February 28 to April 8, when the American side agreed to Iran's ten-point proposal, it has once again become clear to all and sundry – you can trust Americans at your own risk and prestige.

After the 40-day war of aggression that has so far claimed the lives of over 3,300 Iranians – the war that came in the middle of indirect nuclear talks – the nuclear file is effectively closed. Iran proved its goodwill time and again, but the opposite side failed to reciprocate.

Iran's nuclear capability today is the fruit of decades of tireless effort, sacrifice, and the lives of the country's devoted scientists, martyred by the same war machine. It is the foundation for national progress and prosperity through the peaceful benefits of nuclear technology.

The martyred Leader, speaking on September 22 of last year, said the only path for the country's advancement is to grow strong. That strength is rooted in the scientific progress that Iran has made since 1979, despite devastating sanctions.

To demand that Iran abandon its nuclear program or reduce enrichment to zero is not the language of a party that just lost a major war and had to beg for a ceasefire.

As the martyred Leader said on May 20 last year, the enemy's claim that "We will not allow Iran to enrich uranium" is "absolute nonsense."

"We do not wait for anyone's permission. The Islamic Republic has its own policies and approaches, and it will follow them," he affirmed in unmistakably firm language.

The Islamic Republic will never haggle over this national asset. Every round of nuclear negotiations in the past has resulted only in the erosion of Iran's legitimate rights, followed by unprovoked and unjustifiable wars, more sanctions, and more bullying.

Iran has drawn its lessons. The nuclear file will no longer be on any negotiating table.

A word on rights and realities

Those unnerved by Iran's nuclear enrichment program must understand that the Islamic Republic claims its rights under Article IV of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to pursue a peaceful nuclear program for energy purposes – unlike rogue regimes such as Israel, which refuses to join the treaty and possesses undeclared nuclear arsenals.

It is also imperative to understand that the decision to scale up uranium enrichment from 3.67 percent (as stipulated in the 2015 nuclear deal) came a year after the same megalomaniac president, in a unilateral and illegal move, pulled his country out of the landmark agreement in May 2018, followed by the reinstatement of the heaviest sanctions.

The multiple rounds of talks between Tehran and Washington, mediated by different parties, failed to produce a breakthrough because of the US policy of procrastination. The nuclear issue was only a pretext to punish the country that refuses to be subservient to US hegemony. And that will never happen.

Trusting the US has never served Iran. It has only proved counter-productive. The martyred Leader's words – spanning nearly a decade – form a powerful and irrefutable indictment of American diplomacy, which is not diplomacy, but bullying in a suit.

Iran has heard the threats, braved the sanctions, and buried its martyrs. It will not return to the negotiating table on the nuclear issue – not because it fears talks, but because it has finally understood that the US has never once come to the table in good faith.

The nuclear file is effectively closed. Iran's path forward is one of strength, self-reliance, and unwavering adherence to its rights. No amount of pressure will change that.

Amin Mohammadi is a Tehran-based political analyst and writer.

Makan: Lost at School

TEHRAN - Among the children massacred by a US missile attack on Shajareh Tayyebeh elementary school in Minab, southern Iran, was a 7-year-old boy named Makan Nasiri.

The US Tomahawk missiles left nothing of his small, fragile body. His parents are left to wait for a son who will never return, with only a wrinkled blue sweater and a pair of cream-colored sneakers to hold; a devastating testament to the reality of a war of aggression – a reality known only to those who must bear its cost.
 
The deadly US strike on Shajareh Tayyebeh elementary school on the first day of the imposed war, February 28, is known as the most heinous massacre of innocent children in the world, killing at least 168 school children, mainly girls aged between 7 and 12. Large parts of the school building were destroyed while classes were underway. 

Subsequent to the tragic event, most children’s bodies, with some being torn into pieces, were recovered and buried, all except for that of Makan.

 Just a single sneakers, an empty grave

Makan: Lost at School

A symbolic grave has been created for Makan as nothing from his body has left.

His crushed blood-stained blue sweater, and a single cream-colored sneakers are the things found over the past forty-six days; no other single thing was remained of him. All his belongings are placed within a small glass box in a mosque in his neighborhood.

Among the hundreds of graves of the Minab elementary school's victims, there lies an empty grave, created in honor of Makan, who was declared missing as his body was not found after a 46-day search under the school’s rubble. 
  
It was 11:16 in the morning. Asieh Rahinejad, Makan’s mom, was doing household chores, when the phone rang. Makan’s teacher, Ms. Mandana Salari, was on the phone. She asked Asieh to pick Makan up from school immediately, as the enemies attacked the school.

Asieh, totally unaware of the earlier attack in Tehran on the same day, called the school bus driver. The man who happened to be near the school promised to go there at once.

She was still holding the phone when she heard a terrible explosion. The school was bombed severely. Asieh, along with her husband, who was home on that day, rushed to school.

School reduced to rubble

Makan’s parents got off the car and ran towards the school. The bombs had already levelled the school buildings. There was total chaos. There were people everywhere. Makan’s mom was wondering what to do, and where to go to look for his son.

“As we arrived at school, many were under the rubble, but no single child stayed alive. We stayed there from 11.30 a.m. till 2.30 a.m. The lifeless bodies were pulled out of rubble. Few were suffocated to death. Most were dismembered. In the first 38 days, we went to forensic medicine department every day to identify the martyred students, but we couldn’t find Makan. 

Makan: Lost at School

A single sneakers and a blood-stained sweater are the only thingsfound from Makan

We took DNA test to help find the body of our son. There were only his books and notebooks. No piece of his body, no bag, and not even his shoes were found. On the 38th day, my brother found a single sneaker that belonged to my dear son.”

On February 28, the day that the school was targeted, Hamzeh Rahinejad, Makan’s uncle, went to school. The air was filled with smoke, dust, and the smell of burning bodies.

“Since the very beginning of the incident till 5 a.m., along with many others who were helping to locate the lost loved children, I was searching to find something from Makan.

 The worst atrocities of war

As we removed pieces of rocks, we could only find small pieces of torn hands, legs, and heads of the innocent kids. It was like a nightmare, the worst atrocities of the war. I cannot put it in words. It was even more saddening than the martyrdom of Imam Hussein (AS) and his loyal companions in the battle of Karbala. I think it was much worse. 

From the second day into school bombardment, we formed a 20-member team of uncles and their children to look for Makan. We even searched the jungle in the vicinity of the school. I carried a gauze bandage and a plastic bag with me, and take any piece of flesh or finger found under the rubble. 

Makan, like his other family members, had a birthmark on his body, something like a mole that would get more colored in winter. Now, I was searching for such a thing, but he seemed to be vanished.

Till the 38th day of our search, we were hopeful that we could find him alive. That day, I went back to the scene. About a 100 meter away from the destroyed buildings, there among the trees of a garden, I found some bags and shoes, put them all inside a box and took it to my sister’s house. 

The house was full of people. I asked Asieh if any of those things belonged to Makan. The sight of a cream sneaker made her faint. It was like a doomsday scenario, the major calamity of the brutally targeted elementary school.” 

In reaction to Makan’s tragic martyrdom, government spokesperson, Fatemeh Mohajerani, wrote on her X account that “His name was Makan. He was 7. All that remains is a blood-stained sweater and a single shoe. The strike on a school in Minab is not a mistake—it is a clear violation of human rights and children’s rights. No justification can restore a child’s life. Silence is complicit.”

Take revenge for our children  

Now, Makan has a symbolic grave in Minab’s martyred graveyard, a memorial in Mahdieh mosque in his family’s neighborhood, and a memorial in Khomeinishahr, his father’s birth place, where, according to Makan’s uncle, a street is going to be named after him.

Asieh goes to the mosque, where Makan’s mementos are put into a glass box. She also visits his empty grave from time to time and cries over his missing beloved son. 

Addressing the first memorial ceremony of Minab’s martyred students in Isfahan province, Asieh said: “I was terrified by the idea of having to place Makan in the grave, I couldn’t stand that. I prayed to God for help, and it may explain why we couldn’t find him.”

Speaking on behalf of parents of the 168 martyred students, she just said one sentence, “We want them to take revenge for our children’s massacre.”

Global condemnation

The scale of the tragedy has shocked the international community and sparked widespread condemnation. National and international organizations as well as domestic and foreign officials have forcefully condemned the strike.

“The Minab school incident has no comparison with any other incident,” said the head of the Iranian Red Crescent Society. “Even in Gaza,” Pirhossein Kolivand added, there had not been such a high number of students killed simultaneously. He also called the attack “a unique and bitter incident.”

The United Nations cultural and education agency, UNESCO, condemned the strike, saying in a statement on social media on Sunday: “The killing of pupils in a place dedicated to learning constitutes a grave violation of the protection afforded to schools under international humanitarian law.”

 International law is clear on protecting civilians

International law is clear on the protection of civilians and educational institutions during armed conflict. Intentionally attacking a school, hospital, or other civilian infrastructure is a war crime, and indiscriminate strikes also violate the law. 

Even if schools are used for military purposes, the law requires armed parties to take all feasible precautions to avoid or minimize harm to civilians, as emphasized by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). These rules are codified in the Geneva Conventions and customary international humanitarian law, which explicitly prohibit targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure.

Nobel Peace Prize winner Malala Yousafzai, who has campaigned for the right of young girls to go to school, condemned the Minab attack on social media: “They were girls who went to school to learn, with hopes and dreams for their future. Today, their lives were brutally cut short. 

I am heartbroken and appalled by the US and Israeli strikes on Iran, including reports that a girls’ school in southern Iran was hit, resulting in the injury and death of many girls. The killing of civilians, especially children, is unconscionable, and I condemn it unequivocally. 

Makan: Lost at School

Makan is seen in his classroom in an undated photo.

My heart is with the children, families, and communities affected by escalation across the region. I stand firmly against violence and the targeting of schools and civilians. I call for the escalation of violence across the region to end. Justice and accountability must follow. All states and parties must uphold their obligations under international law to protect civilians and safeguard schools.”

The killing of students in Minab resonates against a backdrop of repeated attacks on schools in conflict zones globally. Israel, in particular, has carried out strikes on schools in Gaza during the Gaza war, which started in October 2023. 

Reports from international human rights organizations documented multiple incidents in which schools sheltering civilians were hit, leaving children and families exposed to severe harm. These attacks have consistently drawn condemnation from the United Nations, NGOs, and legal experts, as attacks on schools constitute violations of international law and fundamental human rights.

Humanitarian commentators and analysts outside Iran have highlighted the school strike as emblematic of the severe civilian toll in the conflict, reiterating the urgent need for accountability, adherence to humanitarian norms, and the protection of children in conflict zones. 

They emphasize that such attacks not only violate international law but also erode the moral and legal frameworks that safeguard civilian life worldwide.

Legal experts note that the attack on Shajareh Tayyebah elementary school violates numerous provisions of international humanitarian law. The Fourth Geneva Convention protects civilians in times of war, and the Additional Protocols explicitly safeguard schools as civilian objects. 

The United Nations Security Council, through multiple resolutions, has reaffirmed that attacks on schools and children are unacceptable under any circumstances, urging member states to enforce protections rigorously.

NYC mayor: $500 million spent daily on crimes against people of Iran, Lebanon

TEHRAN- The mayor of New York has criticized the US administration for spending $500 million a day on killing the people of Iran and Lebanon.

In an interview with US National Public Radio (NPR), Zahran Mamdani condemned federal government policies, saying: "We're talking about a federal administration that has spent close to $30 billion killing thousands of people at a time when working-class people across this country cannot afford the bare minimum."

"And to be told that a city-run grocery store is implausible, but spending more than $500 million a day to kill people in Iran and Lebanon is not only plausible but necessary — it speaks to a broken kind of politics," he added.

Mamdani also noted that military aggression against Iran has had a significant impact on the US economy. "At the core of any war is a dehumanization that takes place. And that dehumanization is not limited to any battlefield," he said.

“Direct talks with Israel: An insult to Lebanon”

 By Wesam Bahrani

TEHRAN – Hezbollah has warned it will respond to any violation of the ceasefire by the Zionist regime of Israel.

Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naeem Qassem has emphasized that the battlefield proved to be the decisive factor, and the successful strategy that utilized battlefield results as a source of strength to force the Zionist regime to comply with Lebanon’s rights, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.

Sheikh Qassem said the temporary ceasefire in Lebanon would not have happened without the resistance fighters on the southern borders. Their legendary performance astounded the world, and they stood firm against the Zionist-American enemy, despite the huge disparity in military balance.

He emphasized that in Lebanon, there are those who sacrifice their all for liberation, dignity, and independence, and this includes people from all sects, regions, and areas.

He noted that Hezbollah had withstood attempts by Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) to advance, even when it deployed 100,000 soldiers. The IOF had failed to reach the Litani River, even after 45 days of combat.

The IOF army acknowledged that another soldier had been killed in southern Lebanon due to an explosion, while nine others were injured, including some in critical condition.

The explosion occurred during a mission by the 7106 Brigade in the village of Kafr Kila, when a D-9 engineering vehicle belonging to the unit detonated a bomb planted by Hezbollah. 

The day before, the IOF confirmed another soldier had been killed “during combat in southern Lebanon”. He served with Rafael, a major Israeli defense technology company, and the Paratroopers Reserve Battalion 89. Several others soldier sustained injuries. 

Hebrew media has referred to the latest casualties in southern Lebanon as a “bloody weekend,” with growing criticism of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government for its failure to manage the war and achieve its objectives, while Lebanese people return to their villages and cities.

Sheikh Qassem also denounced a statement from the U.S. State Department regarding the ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and the Zionist regime, calling it an “insult to Lebanon”. 

He pointed out that the U.S. had dictated the terms of the agreement and falsely presented it as having been approved by the Lebanese government, which had never convened to discuss it.

He condemned the direct negotiations with the Zionist regime and the U.S. issuing statements on behalf of Lebanon, calling it a humiliating and dangerous path. 

“Enough,” he said. “The Lebanese people are proud, and they will remain so in solidarity with the army, the people, the resistance, and the political leadership that seeks Lebanon’s independence and liberation.”

The Secretary-General emphasized that the ceasefire must mean a complete cessation of all hostilities, stressing that Hezbollah does not trust the enemy. The resistance fighters in the field are ready to respond to any violations, he underlined. 

In his statement, Sheikh Qassem reiterated Hezbollah’s openness to cooperate with Lebanon’s government in a new phase, based on achieving Lebanon’s sovereignty, unity, and preventing sedition. He added that Hezbollah aims to protect Lebanon from foreign interference and the Israeli regime’s political objectives.

Meanwhile, Hezbollah has denied any involvement in the incident involving the UN peacekeeping force (UNIFIL) in the Ghndouriyeh-Bint Jbeil area in southern Lebanon. 

The Lebanese resistance movement urged caution in making premature judgments regarding the incident and stressed the need to wait for the Lebanese army’s investigation into the matter.

Hezbollah confirmed its ongoing cooperation with both the local population and UNIFIL forces, emphasizing the importance of full coordination between the Lebanese army and peacekeeping forces, especially in such delicate circumstances.

Hezbollah expressed astonishment at the rapid accusations against it, particularly when these same parties remain silent when the IOF attacks UNIFIL forces. 

Earlier, Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri condemned the attack on a French UNIFIL patrol in southern Lebanon, following reports from French President Emmanuel Macron about the killing of a French soldier in the attack.

Elsewhere, a security official of the Iraqi Hezbollah Brigades, Abu Mujahid al-Assaf, praised Hezbollah’s resilience in Lebanon, emphasizing it is a successful model and called for enhanced coordination among resistance forces. 

Al-Assaf stated that Hezbollah’s steadfastness in Lebanon helped establish a new model of asymmetric warfare, forcing the American and Zionist regimes into an agreement. He described this as a clear victory, despite the external pressures and internal complications that Lebanon is facing.

He emphasized that the concept of “unity of fronts” has had a significant impact on their adversaries. The Iraqi resistance official called for the development of new coordination mechanisms between regional resistance forces and other parties to elevate cooperation and open additional avenues to confront the United States and Israeli regime.

Since the illegal American and Zionist regime’s war on Iran on February 28, the axis of resistance, stretching from the Islamic Republic to Iran, Lebanon, and Yemen, has executed operations. 
In some cases, joint operations against the aggressors were waged. 

Qalibaf answers ten key questions on Iran–US talks in Islamabad

TEHRAN – In a televised interview, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, who headed Iran’s negotiating delegation in Islamabad, addressed ten key questions regarding the talks with the United States and other topics.

Here’s a concise summary of the interview in a question-and-answer format.

1- Why do you believe Iran is victorious in this war?

Trump did not achieve his goals. He faced a worse disaster in Isfahan than in Tabas [the ill-fated Operation Eagle Claw in 1980]. We are undoubtedly victorious.

The recent conflict is the third imposed war, which started with America’s cunning in the middle of negotiations. In the 12-day war [in June 2025], there was a 14-hour delay in our reaction. But in the third imposed war, despite the martyrdom of the commander-in-chief [of the armed forces, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Kamenei], the IRGC commander-in-chief, and the chief of general staff of the armed forces, our reaction was carried out in the shortest possible time and with precision.

The F-35 incident was not an accident. It was the result of a laborious and operational effort. With the missile that exploded near the aircraft, the enemy understood our capabilities.

Iran has become more formidable in its offensive capabilities and [military] design than in the past. The adversaries could not believe it until they saw it proven in the field. For nearly 50 nights, [the Iranian] people have remained on the streets. Iran hit about 180 [enemy] drones — a capability it did not have in the previous war.

2- Do you say that Iran is stronger than the US militarily?

The Americans possess more wealth, equipment, and military facilities, and the Zionist regime also holds great power. We did not destroy them. [Nevertheless,] we are the winners in this war. We fought an asymmetric war and repelled the enemy with our own design and preparation. The enemy had money and facilities, but did not act correctly.

3- Why has Trump called for a ceasefire?

The US government claims “America First,” but in practice, it demonstrates that “Israel First” matters more. We hold the advantage in the field, and that is why Trump is calling for a ceasefire. The enemy’s goal was to force Iran to surrender in a war lasting only two or three days, but we fought for 40 days, and the enemy was forced to accept a ceasefire. They could not make us surrender.

The idea that we destroyed the enemy’s military is not true. Even though we did not destroy them, we are still the winners; that is a different matter.

Whether in the field, in the streets, or in diplomacy, it is we who command the position of strength. The enemy cannot impose its will on us.

Negotiation is simply another form of struggle. There will be no compromise in diplomacy. If the enemy makes a mistake at any moment, we are ready. We have no trust in the enemy. The armed forces are fully prepared.

On approximately the 36th or 37th day of the conflict, a 15-point proposal was conveyed to Iran through Pakistani intermediaries, specifically the Prime Minister and the Chief of Army Staff. [This is after] Trump had threatened to hit [our] infrastructure.

After review, Iran formulated ten points that outlined the nation’s demands. We informed Pakistan that we did not accept the original fifteen points, but that our ten points were acceptable. We stated that if the US had input on these ten points, they were negotiable. The Americans later proposed nine points, but Iran insisted on its original ten. Eventually, the US requested a temporary ceasefire to begin the negotiations.

4- What role did you expect Trump to play in announcing the ceasefire?

We informed Pakistan: if the US wants a ceasefire, Trump must announce the request on his [Truth Social] account. This ensures everyone knows the request originated with them. This is the diplomacy of authority.

Hezbollah launched its recent operations to support Iran; the Resistance Front came to our aid. Therefore, the ceasefire had to include them. A primary condition from Iran was a region-wide ceasefire, including both Iran and the Resistance Front.

5- Who currently controls the Strait of Hormuz?

The Iranian Armed Forces control the Strait of Hormuz. Our intent is for those who did not align with the enemy to pass through without difficulty. We have no desire to increase insecurity; not now, and never

After the talks in Islamabad started, the US attempted to send a minesweeper after discovering a mine [in the Strait of Hormuz], but we did not back down. We warned that it would be a violation of the ceasefire and that we would strike. We moved to the brink of conflict, and they retreated.

6- What exactly did you tell the American delegation about their minesweeper?

In Islamabad, I warned the American delegation: “If your minesweeper advances even a small distance, we will shoot.” They requested 15 minutes to issue a command to turn back. They gave the order, and it returned.

7- What is your response to the US blockade of Iran?

The Americans have been trying to impose a blockade for days. This supposed siege means that while others pass freely, Iran is blocked! It is a decision rooted in clumsiness and ignorance.

8- What will happen if the US does not lift the blockade?

If the U.S. refuses to lift its blockade, the Strait of Hormuz will be restricted. If we are prevented from passing, then we will ensure no one [connected to the adversaries] passes.

I have no trust in the enemy. Building trust is their first task. Trump posted [on Truth Social] that the negotiators were alive to negotiate, but if no decision is made within 24 hours, it is unknown if they will stay alive. This is your behavior. We will stand until the end.

9- When did negotiations with the US actually begin?

We did not hold any negotiations until 48 hours before the ceasefire. Trump is a master of lying and psychological warfare. Yesterday [on April 17], he posted eight tweets, seven of which were false.

The negotiations began when Trump posted a request for a ceasefire. We summarized our position in 10 points, and the Leader of the Islamic Revolution [Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei] accepted the underlying basis and the specific conditions [to start the negotiations].

We were in Pakistan for thirty hours, arriving at midnight on Saturday. There were no prior negotiations with the U.S. before this; there were only exchanges of messages [through mediators.]

We view negotiation as a method of struggle, a way to complete the work of the field and assert the rights of our people on the streets. Rest assured, we are pursuing these issues one step at a time.

10- How would you describe your personal readiness for what lies ahead?

Whether it is a matter of negotiation papers or war plans, my resolve remains the same. I am prepared to sacrifice my life and my honor. We move as one under the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, following his guidance exactly: neither overstepping nor falling behind.

All the enemy’s efforts are aimed at destroying the unity and solidarity of the people. Nearly 30 million [Iranian] people have already registered for the JANFADA [those who are ready to sacrifice their lives] campaign.

When the threat was made to bomb our infrastructure, families—including parents with their children—arrived to form human chains to protect those sites.

Our strength lies with the people, and we owe them our deepest gratitude. To ensure that no harm comes to our nation today, it is essential that we all stand behind the Leader.