Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Baku Denies Hosting Israeli Forces During Iran War: Why is Tehran Concerned?

Alwaght- Recently, CNN in an exclusive report citing informed sources said that during the 40-day war, Israel secretly stationed its military and intelligence forces in Azerbaijan, a neighbor of Iran. The move is part of a massive network of secret military bases and outposts across the region to back the operations against Iran.

The report further said that the Israeli forces were deployed in several points of Azerbaijan close to the Iranian border. According to two sources, some of these positions in their closest distance were only 100 kilometers from the city of Tabriz, a city that was majorly targeted by the airstrikes.

Citing its sources, CNN reported that elite and intelligence units were deployed in neighboring regions of Iran and acted to collect information and launch drone attacks. This deployment, the sources added, enabled Tel Aviv to watch military activities in northern Iran.

Baku denies the reports amid close ties with Tel Aviv

Azerbaijan has rejected the CNN report. The spokesperson for the Azerbaijani Embassy in Washington told CNN in a statement: “We categorically deny the baseless claims that Azerbaijani territory was used for operations against third countries.”

Separately, on Friday, Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry dismissed as “completely baseless” international media reports saying that Israeli military and intelligence forces had used its territory for operations during the ongoing conflict with Iran.

Azerbaijan shares roughly 700 kilometers of border with Iran and has repeatedly stated it will not allow its soil to be used against its neighbors.

That said, Israel and Azerbaijan have built close military and economic ties in recent years.

Azerbaijan supplies a significant portion of Israel’s oil needs, while Israel is one of Baku’s main suppliers of advanced weaponry.

In 2016, Azerbaijan also became the first foreign country to purchase Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system. Analysts say this relationship has brought Baku political advantages alongside security and economic gains.

Tehran's concerns

Over the past two decades, the close ties between Azerbaijan and Israel have remained a persistent point of friction in Tehran-Baku relations. Iran has repeatedly warned that deepening security, military, and intelligence cooperation between the two is a threat to regional stability.

Tehran’s main concerns break down into three key areas:

1. Israeli intelligence and security presence near Iran’s borders: Iranian officials have long opposed any Israeli intelligence presence or activity in neighboring countries. Tehran fears that Azerbaijan’s security cooperation with Israel could help build intelligence infrastructure aimed at Iran.

2. Extensive military cooperation: Azerbaijan is a major client of Israel’s defense industry, having purchased drones, surveillance systems, and advanced weaponry in recent years. Iran believes this growing military partnership could upend the region’s security balance.

3. Possible use of Azerbaijani territory against Iran: Over the years, some media outlets and analysts have speculated that Israel could use Azerbaijan’s territory and resources as a launchpad for intelligence operations against Iran. While Baku has denied these claims, the possibility remains a live concern for Tehran.

Iran's official warnings

At various times, Iranian officials have warned that Israeli presence in South Caucasus is a destabilizing factor. Especially after Karabakh wars and growth of Baku-Tel Aviv partnership, Tehran asserted it will not allow shift of geopolitical and security balance on its northern borders.

Experts believe that close ties between Israeli regime and Azerbaijan make up one of the key sticking points between Baku and Tehran. Each time the two sides have upped their military and security ties, the Islamic Republic has issued stronger-toned warnings. That is why Israeli presence in South Caucasus remains one of the critical and determining cases in Iranian-Azerbaijani relations.

2026 FIFA World Cup: Asian and African teams 'offsided' in US even before kickoff

By Press TV Website Staff

As the 2026 World Cup, co-hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico, prepares for kickoff in less than a week, a series of immigration and visa-related incidents involving Asian and African teams, match officials, and fans has raised serious questions about the US's capacity to serve as a neutral and welcoming host.

Over the past 48 hours alone, a disturbing pattern of visa delays, denials, and intrusive security procedures has emerged, disproportionately affecting teams from Muslim-majority  Asian and African countries, and other teams outside the Western alliance system.

These incidents reflect systemic issues and policies that discriminate on the basis of nationality, race, and political affiliation, in violation of the spirit of the FIFA World Cup.

Swiss player faces visa delay

In the most recent case, Breel Embolo, a forward for the Swiss national team, had his visa placed under administrative review upon arrival in the United States.

The review process prevented him from joining his teammates for several days, disrupting his preparation for the tournament that will begin in less than a week.

While Embolo was eventually admitted, the delay imposed on a high-profile European footballer with no criminal or security background suggests inconsistent and unpredictable application of US entry procedures that go against the spirit of the gentleman’s game.

Iranian players and staff face discriminatory treatment

The Iranian national team faced even more severe difficulties. The delegation spent multiple days completing visa procedures at the US Consulate in Türkiye.

The team finally received the visa, but fifteen members of the Iranian delegation, including coaching and support staff and team manager Mohammad Nabi, were denied visas outright, forcing the team to operate with a reduced contingent.

More scandalously, Iranian players were granted entry only on match days, effectively preventing them from establishing a normal pre-tournament training schedule.

On Tuesday, with only three days left before the inauguration of the FIFA World Cup 2026, US authorities obstructed the presence of Iranian football fans at stadiums where Team Melli will play three matches in the group stage.

Iran’s football federation strongly condemned the abrupt decision by US authorities to cancel its ticket quota. According to the regulations and common procedures set by FIFA, 8 percent of the ticket capacity for each match is allocated to the federations.

Iraqi team subjected to extended scrutiny

Aymen Hussein, a player for the Iraqi national team and the highest goal-scorer for the team, was detained and interrogated for nearly seven hours upon entry for questioning.

No formal charges or public justification for the extended detention were provided.

An official photographer for the Iraqi national team was also detained and interrogated for nearly 10 hours at the airport and eventually refused entry and forced to go back.

Top African referee denied entry

Omar Abdulkadir Artan, who was named CAF's Best African Referee of 2025, was denied entry to the United States despite traveling with a diplomatic passport.

Following his refusal at the Miami Airport, FIFA officially announced that Artan would not be permitted to officiate at the tournament, without providing any plausible explanation.

The rejection of a referee of his caliber, selected by FIFA as one of the world's best, has raised many questions about whether US entry policies are overriding the international sporting body's authority and judgment.

South African and Senegalese delegations face delays and invasive searches

The South African national team arrived in the United States significantly later than planned because a part of its delegation was not granted visas in time.

The unnecessary delays disrupted the team's preparation and travel logistics.

Members of the Senegalese national team staff were required to remove their shoes and clothes and submit to lengthy security searches upon entry.

Staff members and observers characterized these measures as excessive and discriminatory, particularly given that similar procedures were not visibly applied to European or North American delegations, sparking concerns of racial profiling.

Uzbekistan team searched with bomb-sniffing dogs

The Uzbekistan national team was subjected to extensive security screening that included bomb-sniffing dogs upon arrival in the United States, as videos showed.

Footage of the search circulated widely on social media, drawing scathing criticism for the treatment of a national delegation from a Central Asian country with no history of hostility toward the United States.

The use of explosive-detection canines on professional athletes and officials, absent any credible threat, has been cited as evidence of a security posture that presumes guilt based on national origin and goes against the spirit of the World Cup.

Scottish supporters denied entry under ESTA program

Several Scottish supporters who were eligible to enter the United States without a visa under the ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) program had their travel authorizations revoked just days before departure.

These revocations occurred after the supporters had already purchased match tickets and booked accommodation, resulting in significant financial losses.

No public explanation for the revocations has been provided so far.

Widespread visa rejections for ticket-holding fans

Across multiple countries, fans who had purchased World Cup tickets and arranged travel were notified that their US visa applications had been rejected.

Most Moroccan fans who had already purchased expensive tickets for their national team’s matches in the US had their visa applications denied, costing them huge amounts of money.

In many cases, these rejections came after non-refundable expenses had been incurred.

The absence of a transparent or expedited appeal process for sporting events has left thousands of supporters unable to attend a tournament for which they had already paid.

Systemic issues in US hosting capacity

The pattern of incidents over the past 48 hours points to several structural problems with the United States as a main World Cup host, angering football fans across the world.

First, US visa and border policies do not distinguish adequately between ordinary travelers and accredited participants in major international sporting events.

Despite FIFA's credentialing systems and the diplomatic status of football delegates, US authorities have repeatedly overridden these protocols.

Second, there is a demonstrable disparity in how teams from different regions are treated. European delegations have not reported delays, denials, or intrusive searches. Teams from Muslim-majority nations (Iran, Iraq), African nations (Senegal, South Africa), and Central Asia (Uzbekistan) have borne the brunt of the most severe, discriminatory measures.

Third, the denial of entry to someone like Artan, a FIFA-selected referee traveling on a diplomatic passport, suggests that US border authorities are willing to contradict FIFA's own rules and judgments, undermining the tournament's integrity.

Finally, the financial harm inflicted on fans whose visas were rejected after purchasing tickets and accommodation indicates a lack of coordination between US immigration authorities and FIFA's ticketing and logistics systems.

Qalibaf: Iran has options other than diplomacy to deal with US and Israel

Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf says Iran prefers to use diplomacy to put an end to the US-Israeli aggression against the country, although he warns that other options are on the table to deal with the aggressors.

In a Tuesday post on his X account, Qalibaf hinted that Iran would be ready to use the language of force to deal with the US and the Israeli regime if they choose to breach their commitments under a ceasefire announced in early April.

“We prefer the language of diplomacy, but we speak other languages far more fluently. Break your commitments, and we'll switch to what we speak best,” he said.

The post came less than two days after Iran carried out extensive missile attacks on targets inside the Israeli-occupied territories in response to the Israeli regime’s violation of the terms of the ceasefire by attacking Iran’s allied resistance forces in Lebanon.

Iranian attacks stopped after Israel halted its attacks on the Lebanese capital, Beirut, under apparent pressure from the US and amid fears that Iran could escalate its reprisal operations.

Qalibaf said in his post that the US and Israel would be to blame for a potential flare-up in the confrontation with Iran solely because they have decided to breach the ceasefire.

“You ride the horse you saddled!” he said in the post.

The parliament speaker has led Iran’s diplomatic efforts aimed at putting a permanent end to the US-Israeli aggression and was in charge of a high-profile Iranian delegation that met with US representatives in Islamabad days after the ceasefire was announced by Pakistan on April 8.

Iranian armed forces to leave no attack unanswered, FM warns after fresh US aggression

Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has warned the United States that its most recent spate of attacks on southern Iranian areas "will not go unanswered."

The top Iranian diplomat made the remarks in a post on X early on Wednesday after the US struck multiple locations across the Hormozgan Province.

"Despite its defeats on the battlefield, the U.S. opted to test our determination," he wrote, warning that the Iranian armed forces "will leave no attack or threat unanswered."

"Leave our region if you want to be safe," he stated, adding that "the history of the Persian Gulf has many chapters on dire fates of intruding outsiders."

Earlier, the Islamic Republic's national broadcaster reported that several locations in the southern Iranian province had been hit by US projectiles.

It named the Qeshm Island and the Jask and Sirik Counties as the targets.

Right before the attacks, in a statement posted to social media, US Central Command had said it had begun strikes against Iran following the crash of a US Army Apache helicopter off the coast of Oman.

A day earlier, US President Donald Trump had acknowledged that one such helicopter had gone down near the Strait of Hormuz, confirming a report by The New York Times. Trump had vowed that the United States "must" respond, accusing Iran of downing it.

Iranian officials and military forces have denied any role in the incident, warning that any act of aggression against the country will certainly warrant reprisal.

Prior to the American strikes too, Araghchi had cautioned, "Our Powerful Armed Forces are on constant alert for any violation of Iran's airspace, land or waters. Foreign forces in proximity to our territory are at constant risk on account of their own human errors, plain accidents, or potentially being caught in crossfire."

"To reduce risk, the best solution is for foreign forces to exit, as soon as possible, an environment which will never be hospitable to a hostile presence," he had stated.

Tuesday, June 09, 2026

Operation Nasr: How’s Iran Shattered Trump-Netanyahu Calculations?

Alwaght- The two-day clash between Iran and the Israeli regime after a two-month truce was, more than a temporary confrontation, an effort by the two sides to change the dynamics of the fragile ceasefire that has put the region in a state of no war, no peace. Both of them tried, through new attacks, seize the initiative and foist their conditions on the opposite side.

Over the past few weeks, Israeli regime officials, who had been trying to separate the Lebanon case from the Tehran-Washington dialogue, assumed that Iran would not directly retaliate for an attack on Beirut’s southern suburb of Dahiyeh. Their calculation was that Tehran would want to avoid undermining the ceasefire and complicating diplomatic efforts, especially while Pakistan’s envoy was shuttling between political factions in Tehran.

Based on that very calculation, the Israeli army launched strikes on parts of Beirut's southern suburbs on Sunday, aiming to establish a new rule of the game: attacking Beirut would become a routine, repeatable response to strikes on northern occupied territories.

Over recent months, Hezbollah has zeroed in on a key vulnerability of Tel Aviv’s security cabinet: its inability to secure a safety guarantee for northern settlements and bring back displaced residents. The ongoing lack of security in the north of occupied territories, and the ghost towns left behind, has put more pressure on Netanyahu’s cabinet than even rocket barrages on Haifa and Tel Aviv.

Despite advances south of the Litani River and attempts to create a buffer zone along Lebanon’s border, the Israeli military has still failed to change the security situation in the north. Hezbollah’s attacks continue, and displaced settlers have yet to return home. This failure and growing desperation led Netanyahu to see only one option left: expand the threat shadow over Dahieh to force Hezbollah to halt its attacks.

Conditions worsening for Netanyahu

But developments did not go as Tel Aviv officials had predicted.

In support of Lebanon, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched two carefully calibrated missile strikes on occupied territories, one Sunday night and another Monday morning, effectively shattering Tel Aviv efforts to establish a new equation on the ground.

These strikes, carried out with reported 30 missiles and a number of drones, hit several key military sites and energy facilities in the occupied territories, including the Nevatim and Tel Nof airbases, as well as petrochemical plants in Haifa, causing significant damage.

The heavy strikes not only prevented the equation Netanyahu sought to cement in southern Lebanon from taking shape, but also made the situation for Tel Aviv more complicated than ever. Iran focused its attacks on the northern areas, precisely the Achilles’ heel of Tel Aviv’s security cabinet. As a result, insecurity in the northern occupied territories has now worsened, and fears over the future of those areas have grown.

In the aftermath, Ben Gurion Airport shut down again after two months. Schools and educational centers were closed indefinitely, Israeli hospitals went into full emergency and high-alert mode, and millions of people were evacuated to shelters for hours. According to Al Jazeera, the situation was so severe that large parts of the occupied territories were effectively paralyzed.

These strikes made clear that Iran is fully determined to enforce a ceasefire equation across all fronts, and that Lebanon must be included under the security umbrella of any ceasefire.

Upsetting Trump's calculations

Iran's missile response not only shattered Tel Aviv’s calculations, but also dealt a working blow to Trump's plannings.

Over the past two months, the strategy of the US government rested on maintaining controlled tension with Iran, meaning that Washington will keep economic and political pressures on Tehran while avoiding a large-scale military clash, to steer clear of higher oil prices, turbulent financial and energy markets, and also discontentment of the Arab countries. Meanwhile, Trump wants to run the FIFA World Cup games smoothly with least challenges.

But IRGC’s missile strike has now thrown Washington’s strategy of controlled escalation into serious disarray, and makes it clear that Tehran has read Trump’s mind, and is moving to impose its own terms for a ceasefire on the enemy.

Under these circumstances, if the Israeli regime resumes its attacks on Beirut, Iran will have the justification it needs to step up its strikes even more forcefully. And if the US backs any Israeli military action, the region could see tensions return to pre-ceasefire levels, especially in the Strait of Hormuz and with attacks on US bases in Arab countries. So, it is fair to say Iran’s missile operation has completely upended Trump’s calculations. The first sign was oil prices spiking.

In a post on social media, Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, made it blunt: “We shattered the ceasefire equation that existed on paper but was repeatedly violated on the ground.”

All in all, the Islamic Republic has used this missile strike to cement a new equation in favor of the Axis of Resistance. For the first time in this short confrontation, Iran was the one to go on the offensive, showing that if enemies try to break ceasefire agreements in the region, Tehran is ready to stage a higher level of conflict. The strike also sent a clear message, saying that Tehran will not leave its allies stranded on the battlefield, and that “unity of fronts” strategy, which says an attack on one branch of Axis of Resistance draws responses from other branches, is very much alive.

‘Walk with Israel’ in support of genocidal terrorist entity that rapes prisoners!

Crescent International

Proof of zionist war crimes against the Palestinians. How low can the zionists get?
The annual ‘Walk with Israel’ march in Toronto brazenly supports the genocidal zionist entity.

Its rulers, both civilian and military, are wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) on war crimes charges.

Yet what was witnessed was thousands of zionists joined by Canadian politicians of all stripes at the June 7 walk.

It occurred a day after the zionists murdered a 7-month-old baby, Sam Fahed Abu Haykal in Hebron by shooting him the head.

There was not a word of condemnation for this dastardly crime, nor indeed for the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians murdered in the last 30 months.

Nor the scores of Palestinians raped in Israeli dungeons (see B’Tselem report here and UN report here).

The zionist rapists are presented as heroes on television.

It was also a day after the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attack on a Muslim family in London, ON.

Four members of the Afzaal family out for an evening walk, were deliberately run over and crushed to death by a speeding van on June 6, 2021.

This had followed the terrorist attack on peaceful Muslim worshippers at the Quebec City Mosque on January 29, 2017.

Six Muslims were murdered and another 20 injured, yet apart from platitudes no serious steps have been taken by the political class to protect Muslims.

Politicians hypocritically claim that they oppose racism and genocide but they shamelessly walk in support of the genocidal entity.

Such activities promote Islamophobia. The zionists are in the forefront of fomenting anti-Muslim hate.

Far from arresting the organizers of the June 7 hate march that supports genocide and rape, the police accused Canadians who oppose such activities of “promoting hate”.

Deputy Police Chief Frank Barredo told a press conference in Toronto on June 5 that the police presence along the walk route will be “robust”.

He also vowed to maintain greater separation between walkers and counter-protesters than has been enforced in previous years.

This is being done because last year, some march participants felt “uncomfortable” when they heard anti-Israeli chants from counter-protesters.

“Last year we were well aware of some frustration from participants. It was called a gauntlet of hate if you will.

“To the dismay of many it was too proximate to the walkers,” he said of a counter-protest that was staged near Bathurst Street and Sheppard Avenue during the walk.

“We had police officers there and there was a separation but the very fact that people, families walking by may have heard something that was offensive was really distasteful and something that we are hoping to reduce if not eliminate completely this year.”

Officers from several jurisdictions including the Ontario Provincial Police and Durham, York and Peel police will be supporting what Barredo called “crowd control efforts” and policing at the event.

To ensure peaceful counter-protesters get the message, the police will be fully-armed.

Toronto was turned into a war zone to ensure that genocide-supporting zionists are not made to feel ‘uncomfortable’!

Violence and hurling obscenities are the hall-mark of Israeli supporters, as anyone who has attended pro-Palestinian rallies in downtown Toronto would confirm.

Vile invective and intimidating tactics against peaceful protesters are common zionist traits.

Pro-Palestinian rallies are attended by men, women and children as well as Christians, anti-zionist Jews and people of other faiths.

It is becoming clear that voicing concern about the ongoing genocide in Gaza, starvation of two million Palestinians and the well-documented rape of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli dungeons is unacceptable.

Barredo told the June 5 conference, “You are going to have officers deployed on horses, bicycles and such but also officers with helmets, officers with long guns, officers with protective equipment.

“There are going to be a wide variety of police resources using a wide variety of police equipment,” he said.

This is being done to facilitate a march by people supporting mass murderers and rapists.

Such intimidating tactics violate the Charter Rights of Canadians who want to promote peace and human dignity.

Undercover agents were deployed “along the entirety of the route” looking out for what was described as hate speech and hate signage.

“Hate crime experts” were present on the ground.

For “hate crime” read, slogans condemning Israeli war crimes and declaring zionism as racism.

Like the US, Canada is also becoming zionist occupied territory.

There is a simple solution to all this.

The zionist war criminals should stop killing innocent Palestinians including children, and end their barbaric practice of torturing and raping prisoners.

Is that too much to ask?

Canadian zionistsIslamophobiaToronto (Canada)zionist war crimesWalk with Israelsupporters of zionist terroristszionist genocide in GazaICC

The rise of the Unified China: A new world order emerging from the ashes of hegemony

 By Ahmed Moustafa

CAIRO – In the grand chessboard of international geopolitics, the board has been flipped. The era of unipolar hegemony, long dominated by the United States and its allies, is not just waning; it is being actively dismantled by the emergence of a "Unified China." This is no longer a prediction of the distant future but a reality of the present. We are witnessing the consolidation of a nation that has weathered the storm of containment, emerged victorious in the technological war, and restructured the global financial architecture to serve the Global South.

The recent, highly anticipated official visit of Donald Trump to Beijing was meant to be a show of force, a desperate attempt to renegotiate terms of engagement. Instead, it served as the funeral pyre for American coercive diplomacy. The mission failed not because of a lack of American bravado, but because China has fundamentally changed the rules of the game. While the American delegation arrived with a list of demands regarding Taiwan and trade balances, they were met with a polite but firm reality check: China is no longer dependent on the Western markets for its ascension, nor is it susceptible to Western intimidation.

The failure of this summit underscores a seismic shift in Chinese priorities. Beijing is no longer looking West for validation; it is looking South, East, and to the developing world. By prioritizing the Global South and establishing parallel financial and monetary systems—anchored in the digital yuan and independent of the SWIFT system—China has effectively inoculated itself against the sanctions-based warfare that Washington has wielded like a blunt instrument for decades. The BRICS expansion and the new financial corridors mean that the U.S. dollar’s stranglehold on the global economy is loosening by the day.

Nowhere is this shift more palpable than in the realm of technology and microchips. For years, the United States, Britain, and Israel attempted to strangle China’s rise by enforcing a blockade on high-end semiconductors, believing that technological supremacy was their "ace in the hole." They tried to bolster Taiwan as a fortress of silicon, a vital organ that the West could threaten to remove to bring Beijing to its knees. Yet, these tricks have failed spectacularly.

The narrative that the U.S. and Taiwan hold supreme dominion over IT and digitization is now a relic of the past. Huawei, the company the U.S. tried to bury, has not only survived; it has thrived. With the release of its latest processors, Huawei has effectively demonstrated that it is exceeding Nvidia—long considered the gold standard—in both price and quality. This technological leap renders the Western sanctions obsolete. China has achieved self-sufficiency in critical sectors, meaning that the "chip card" which Washington and London played to blackmail Beijing has turned into dust. The realization that China can produce superior, cost-effective hardware domestically has shattered the confidence of Western tech giants and panicked policymakers who underestimated the speed of Chinese innovation.

However, the technological and economic fronts are only part of the story. The military balance of power has undergone a radical transformation, precipitated by recent catastrophic miscalculations by the West. The confrontation between Iran and the United States served as a grim litmus test for American military prowess. The result was a shock to the system: the United States lost approximately 50% of its Airforce assets in the engagement. This staggering loss has exposed the vulnerability of American air dominance and the limitations of its defense systems.

While the U.S. military grapples with this depletion and the logistical nightmare of replacement, China has achieved monumental progress. The People's Liberation Army is not just modernizing; it is revolutionizing warfare. Reports from defense circles indicate that China has deployed electromagnetic submarines and possesses "greater distortion systems"—electronic warfare capabilities that disrupt and blind enemy radar and communications in ways the Pentagon has never encountered and does not fully understand. These systems create a "bubble of invisibility and confusion" around Chinese assets, rendering traditional U.S. tracking methods ineffective. This asymmetry is precisely why the U.S. and Britain are terrified; they realize they have lost the qualitative edge they once held.

It is in this context of Western desperation that we see the resurrection of the Xinjiang card. Unable to compete economically, outmatched technologically, and militarily vulnerable, the U.S. and Britain have returned to their old playbook: information warfare. Once again, they are trying to play on the matter of the Uyghur population in Xinjiang province, alleging that the Chinese regime and the Communist Party of China (CPC) are oppressing Muslims. This narrative is not a genuine human rights concern; it is a calculated distraction designed to mobilize the Muslim world and the Global South against Beijing at a time when China is deepening its ties with both.

The hypocrisy is staggering. The West cries crocodile tears for Muslims in Xinjiang while remaining silent on the plight of Palestinians in Gaza or the victims of Western airstrikes in the Middle East. The timing of these renewed allegations—coming immediately after the U.S. military setbacks and the failure of Trump’s visit—betrays their intent. It is an attempt to sow discord and delegitimize a rising superpower that they can no longer control.

This pattern of fabrication is not new. We must recall the chaotic days of 2020, when Donald Trump alleged that China was the main cause of the COVID-19 pandemic. In a moment of economic panic, facing a massive deficit, he attempted to propagate a narrative of global compensation from China, seeking to extract trillions of U.S.$ to fix the gaping holes in the American economy. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the global scientific community eventually denied these fabricated stories, citing a total lack of evidence. Yet, the damage was done, and the seeds of Sinophobia were planted. Today, the Xinjiang allegations are simply COVID-19 2.0—a baseless narrative designed to contain China through reputational damage.

Furthermore, at the Middle East level, the features of geopolitical alignment have become clearer than ever before. It has been said that Chinese President Xi Jinping recently stated a truth that many in the Global South feel, but few leaders have dared to declare: that Israel represents one of the causes of many global crises, and that its armament should be reconsidered. However, this bold position—despite the uncertainty surrounding it—reflects China’s alignment with the rising anti-colonial sentiment in the developing world. It is no secret that Israel has participated in sending weapons to Taiwan, making it an indirect tool for Western powers seeking to destabilize regional stability. By supporting separatist forces in Taiwan, while simultaneously engaging in Middle East conflicts, Israel has positioned itself as a disruptive factor to global stability.

Whereas President Xi Jinping’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) acts as the indispensable diplomatic framework underpinning the ambition of a "Unified China," fundamentally reshaping the definition of stability in a volatile world. Moving away from the zero-sum games of Cold War-era alliances, the GSI champions the principle that security is indivisible, thereby directly challenging the Western military encirclement—manifested through AUKUS and the Quad—aimed at fragmenting Chinese sovereignty.

This initiative posits that a unified, territorially intact China is not merely a national prerequisite but a cornerstone of global peace. By offering an alternative to hegemonic coercion, the GSI rallies the Global South behind a vision of cooperation that respects sovereignty, effectively neutralizing U.S. attempts to weaponize human rights or regional tensions to prevent reunification. Consequently, the GSI is more than a policy; it is the strategic catalyst that transforms China’s drive for unity from a bilateral struggle with Taiwan into a broader mandate for a multipolar world order, ensuring that the path to a "Unified China" is paved with international legitimacy and collective security rather than conflict.

China’s position is clear: peace cannot be achieved while actors like Israel continue to fuel conflicts and disrespect the sovereignty of nations. The Chinese leadership understands that a unified China—sovereign, technologically supreme, and militarily secure—is incompatible with a world order that allows such interference. The pivot to the Global South is not just about economics; it is about constructing a moral framework for international relations that rejects the double standards of the West.

The "Unified China" is a reality that the West must accept. The tricks have failed. The sanctions have backfired. The military threats have been neutralized by superior Chinese electronic and submarine capabilities. The recent visit by Trump ended in failure because the leverage the U.S. thought it had—from Taiwan’s chips to the might of the Air Force—has evaporated.

We are moving into a multipolar era where the dictates of Washington, London, and Tel Aviv carry less weight with each passing day. China has built its fortress on innovation, economic resilience, and alliances with the Global South. As the West continues to grasp at straws—reviving debunked pandemic claims and recycling human rights propaganda—the rest of the world is moving forward. The United States may still possess the remnants of its power, but the initiative has firmly passed to Beijing. The dragon has not only awakened; it has taken to the skies, leaving the outdated containment strategies of the 20th century far below.

Ahmed Moustafa is the director and founder of Asia Center for Studies and Translation and a non-resident research fellow at VIIMES 
(Vienna International Institute for Middle East Studies), Austria