Monday, April 29, 2024

“Israel” Fears ICC Arrest Warrants against Bibi, other Officials over Gaza Genocide

By Al Ahed Staff, Agencies

“Israel” Fears ICC Arrest Warrants against Bibi, other Officials over Gaza Genocide

Reports revealed that the International Criminal Court [ICC] is probing “Israel’s” actions in the West Bank and Gaza, independent of other cases at the International Court of Justice, such as South Africa’s accusing “Israel” of Gaza genocide.

According to “Israeli” media, their government has received indications from legal officials that the ICC is considering issuing arrest warrants for senior officials, including prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The ICC is currently investigating “Israel’s” actions in the occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

In addition to Netanyahu, the ICC investigation could lead to arrest warrants being issued for War Minister Yoav Gallant and Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi.

Last week Netanyahu slammed the ICC investigations as outrageous, saying they would set a dangerous precedent.

Walla news site, analyst Ben Caspit said Netanyahu was “under unusual stress” over the prospect of an arrest warrant against him and other “Israelis” by the United Nations tribunal in The Hague, which would constitute a major deterioration in “Israel’s” international status.

Netanyahu was leading a “nonstop push over the telephone” to prevent an arrest warrant, focused especially on the administration of US President Joe Biden, Caspit reported.

US State Department Resignations: Opposition to “Israeli” Policy in Gaza

By Al-Ahed News

US State Department Resignations: Opposition to “Israeli” Policy in Gaza

An infographic showcasing US officials who resigned over the government's stance on the “Israeli” war in the besieged Gaza Strip.

US State Department Resignations: Opposition to “Israeli” Policy in Gaza

American Students’ Calls for University Divestment: Advocating for Palestinian Rights

By Al-Ahed News

American Students’ Calls for University Divestment: Advocating for Palestinian Rights

An infographic summarizing the investments that US students want their universities to withdraw.

American Students’ Calls for University Divestment: Advocating for Palestinian Rights

Educational Fallout: Effects of the “Israeli” War on Gaza’s Education

By Al-Ahed NewsEducational Fallout: Effects of the “Israeli” War on Gaza’s Education

An infographic focusing on the repercussions of the “Israeli” war on the education in the besieged Gaza Strip.

Educational Fallout: Effects of the “Israeli” War on Gaza’s Education

IRG Unveils New Suicide Drone: A Gem of Land Warfare

By Al Ahed Staff, Agencies

IRG Unveils New Suicide Drone: A Gem of Land Warfare

The Islamic Revolution Guards [IRG] has manufactured a new suicide drone that is expected to considerably boost the combat capabilities of its ground troops.

The new suicide drone, whose name has not been yet publicized, is categorized as a loitering munition.

The Iranian unmanned aerial vehicle resembles the Russian-made ZALA Lancet drone.

The weapon is widely used for counter-ambush operations.

Equipped with electro-optical systems and a built-in warhead, a loitering munition is widely used in ground warfare. Such drones loiter around a specific area until a target is located.

Considering their small size, loitering munitions can be carried by the ground troops and be employed in various operations.

The IRG Ground Force and the Iranian Defense Ministry have already developed Meraj-521 and Sina loitering munitions.

The IRG has made a big investment in the development of loitering munitions in recent years. A range of advanced suicide drones, such as Shahed-131 and Shahed-136, have been employed in various war games across Iran.

Assuming that the new loitering munition manufactured by the IRG is inspired by the Russian-made Lancet, the drone must have a flight endurance of 30 to 60 minutes and carry a payload of 3 to 6 kilograms within a range of 40 kilometers.

Netanyahu and Difficult Suicide Options

By Mohammad Al-Hosseini

Netanyahu and Difficult Suicide Options

The decisive Iranian response to the “Israeli” aggression on April 14 will forever be etched in history as a strategic turning point in the conflict against the “Israelis”.  The date of the Iranian missile and drone attack joins October 7, which initiated the ongoing Al-Aqsa Flood Operation.

It's safe to say that whatever comes after these two dates will not be the same as the day before for many reasons and due to many consequences.

The first is that the “Israeli” entity, its government, and its premiere, Benjamin Netanyahu, are now faced with two critical options: the best of which is a catastrophe that will befall “Israel”, its ‘invincible’ society, institutions, and army.

The first option is launching an all-out war in the region, and the second is carrying out limited strikes equivalent to half a war on the northern fronts and the Gaza Strip.

Stopping the war is suicide

Tel Aviv’s refusal to adopt a peaceful option or stop the war, is motivated by the fact that any decline in the agenda of military and security operations or the continuation of the status quo will inevitably lead to an existential crisis that will primarily topple Netanyahu and his political and military pillars.

It will also create an internal tremor that may lead to the restructuring of the Zionist entity’s defining pillars.

This time, however, it will be according to realistic principles that consider the new data produced by the events of Palestine’s Al-Aqsa Flood and Iran’s True Promise.

We should not neglect the fundamental impact that the victories of the Islamic Resistance had over the enemy in all stages of the confrontation between July 1993 and the liberation in May 2000, all the way to July’s Truthful Promise in 2006.

An all-out war is suicide

In his current confusion, Netanyahu finds nothing but to lean towards one of the two options. He is playing Russian roulette in an effort to enlarge the circle of fire by igniting the region in a multi-faceted war. Perhaps in doing so he will reconstruct the elements of the crisis in a way that protects him and preserves his political presence as long as possible.

This is likely, especially since he is suffering from growing internal and external pressures, while placing hope on the American strategic embrace that is striving to protect “Israel,” the project in which Netanyahu holds the highest position.

However, adopting this option from an “Israeli” perspective means an official declaration of suicide and taking the entity towards a dark fate. “Israel is not built for multiple missions,” according Major General [Res.] in the “Israeli” army and former chief of the Ground Forces Command, Guy Tzur.

Tzur called for reflection on “the greatness of ‘Israel’ and its enormous power.” In his opinion, the “absolute victory” that Netanyahu spoke about is “just nonsense.”

An all-front war

Thinking rationality based on data and developments suggests that “Israel”, will not fight a single battle if Netanyahu adopts the option of an all-out suicide. Instead, “Israel” will take fire from all sides.

If he heads in this direction on the inevitability of luring the United States into a war, then the current experience in the course of the current confrontation indicates otherwise. The Americans were unable to prevent the Yemeni and Iraqi missiles from striking targets inside occupied Palestine and the Western alliance as a whole was unable to influence the decision of the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon in continuing to support the Palestinian resistance in Gaza by opening the northern front, which represents the greatest challenge to the enemy.

This alliance does dare support “Israel” in repelling the Iranian punishment except by forming an air protection dome from the missiles and drones that were distributed over the Golan and northern Palestine to its center and south in Beersheba and Eilat and hit their specific targets.

On the contrary, US President Joe Biden took the initiative to pressure Netanyahu to absorb the blow and be satisfied with a weak, childish response aimed at Isfahan and to convince himself that he has won! This was highlighted by the American press.

The hidden is more immense

The countries and parties of the axis announced, very clearly, that they support the Palestinian resistance and will continue to do so until they force “Israel” to stop the aggression against the Gaza Strip and achieve the goals of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.

It also said that it is fully prepared to raise the level of the challenge in the event that Netanyahu and his war government recklessly decide on an all-out war.

The Zionist decision-making circles realize that the weapons and ammunition that the resistance axis has used, so far, are like an outer shell that hides the greatest capabilities that strike the temporary entity at its core and inflict on its enormous losses that it cannot bear.

However, Netanyahu finds himself stuck in his options. He sees his failures deepening without achieving any result other than demonstrating the strength of the axis of resistance in exchange for the American axis of evil’s withdrawal from involvement in the war.

Therefore, he may resort to the second option by launching field operations or small wars limited to their goals, places, and time, thus escaping from facing his internal political crisis and imposing new rules of engagement. However, this scenario, according to the Zionist planners, has proven to be a failure in the war on the besieged Gaza Strip, as the battles have not yet yielded any real achievements after more than six months.

The hammers of critical options

Res. General Yitzhak Brik, in the occupation army, confirms, “‘Israel’ must declare a cessation of the war in Gaza because it has already lost it.”

Dozens of suicide cases have been recorded among soldiers returning from battles. As for the north, Hezbollah has turned the area into a strip of settlements devoid of life for the first time since 1948, in parallel with daily targeting of vital military sites, while 40% of those displaced from the settlements independently consider the possibility of not returning, and half of the young people who were evacuated are suffering from loneliness and depression.

Can Netanyahu hold out on five open fronts, while he can barely hold out on one and a half fronts?! Which army will be able to protect settlements and posts from the barrage of missiles and drones that will be planted throughout occupied Palestine?! Who will deter the Islamic Resistance from crossing with its units and fighters into Galilee and beyond?!

As for the interior, despite his deaf ears, Netanyahu will not be able to look away from the demonstrations demanding an end to the war and the return of soldiers captured by Hamas.

Netanyahu is stuck between the hammers of critical options, and he does not want to admit defeat because it means that he shot himself in the head and not his feet. This recognition is not better than the war options because it would be tantamount to suicide, the repercussions of which would not stop at the personal level of the head of the most failed government in the history of the temporary entity. Rather, the repercussions would haunt “Israel”, which is now politically divided and lost its strategic direction with the fall of the Greater “Israel” project and the collapse of the theory of the promised land and a safe country. Thus, it has already begun the first stages of structural collapse.

The possibility of a change in Iran’s nuclear doctrine

 By Xavier Villar 

TEHRAN- Hours before the Israeli "response" sending a couple of drones that were intercepted in Isfahan, the commander in charge of protecting the country's nuclear facilities, Ahmad Haqtalab, sent a message to the Zionist Entity stating that if it intended to attack any of the country's nuclear installations, this action could force a change in Iran's nuclear strategic doctrine.

In this regard, it should be noted that for the Islamic Republic, the nuclear issue is constrained by the fatwa -an Islamic decree- issued in 2003 by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the current Leader of the country. This fatwa clearly prohibits the production and use of nuclear and biological weapons. Several representatives of the Islamic Republic have made it clear that if the country has not developed nuclear weapons, it is not due to a lack of technical and scientific competence, but rather because of the explicit prohibition of the fatwa. Its importance is such that in 2021, the then Minister of Intelligence, Mahmoud Alavi, faced harsh criticism from renowned Islamic jurists for suggesting that the country should possess nuclear weapons to defend itself if cornered. From a legal-political perspective, therefore, the nuclear issue is limited to a civilian nuclear program. This does not mean that there is not a growing public opinion that believes the country should possess nuclear weapons as a measure of protection against Western threats. But as long as the fatwa is in effect, the debate is framed within its parameters.

Haqtalab's statements, while staying within the official doctrine expressed by the Leader's fatwa, are important for two reasons. Firstly, because they come from the mouth of a high-ranking military official, and secondly, because they demonstrate a level of public discourse that many people considered absent in the Islamic Republic.

As mentioned earlier, in the days following Operation "True Promise," various types of responses were considered by the Zionist Entity, including the possibility of attacking one of the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities. In that scenario, the country could have accelerated uranium enrichment and thus come close to the possibility of actual and effective nuclearization.

It is worth remembering that although Iran has reduced its levels of uranium enrichment (as confirmed by the International Atomic Energy Agency), the country still has significant reserves of radioactive material (estimates suggest that the Islamic Republic possesses close to 5,500 kilograms of uranium).

All of the above, along with the new phase characterized by active deterrence in which Iran finds itself, could mean that the United States, Israel, and to a lesser extent the European Union, pay even more attention to the Islamic Republic's nuclear program with the aim of preventing possible nuclearization.

Several Iranian analysts believe that the current nuclear strategy may be modified depending on how the authorities responsible for the nuclear dossier react to three issues:

- Firstly, the attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus can be seen as a clear manifestation that the Zionist Entity has decided to cross all red lines, and there is no guarantee that it will not do so again. It is precisely this view that would explain the change in the Islamic Republic's political-military strategy in its policy toward Israel: from the traditional doctrine of strategic patience to the new doctrine represented by active deterrence.


- Secondly, Iran's response to the attack in Damascus, the well-known Operation "True Promise," may increase the perception, for the United States and Israel, that Iran has become an even greater "threat," and therefore, greater pressure will be deemed necessary to be applied to the Islamic Republic.

- Lastly, although the Israeli response was a failure in military terms, the attempted attack in the province of Isfahan, where one of the country's most important nuclear plants is located, could lead Iranian political and military leaders to consider increasing their deterrence capabilities to prevent future attacks against their nuclear facilities.

It cannot be forgotten that the current phase of the conflict, characterized by a much more assertive attitude from Iran in responding to Zionist provocations, may be a lasting phase. In this regard, the Islamic Republic will have to increase its deterrence capabilities to avoid becoming the target of Israeli attacks. One of the possibilities Iran has on the table in case it needs to enhance its deterrence capacity is to resume uranium enrichment, which would ensure the continuation of avoiding an open conflict in the region while sending a clear message to Israel and the United States about Iran's unwillingness to submit. Some suggest that Haqtalab's words should be interpreted in this context.

The possibility of a change in Iran's nuclear doctrine would entail a nuclear reorganization in the region that must also be taken into account. In this sense, both Saudi Arabia and Turkey could develop their nuclear capabilities, and the Zionist Entity could publicly acknowledge what is an open secret: the existence of its nuclear program.

Taking into account all of the above, the Iranian nuclear program, which for the moment remains within the civilian limits imposed by Ayatollah Khamenei's fatwa issued in 2003, must be analyzed within a context that considers both the internal and external particularities of the current geopolitical situation. Any change in it should be analyzed based on the discursive principles upon which the Islamic Republic is founded, especially those that guarantee Iran's independence and autonomy.

This was evident in the recent negotiations with the West to try to revive the nuclear agreement that was unilaterally dissolved by the United States. During those negotiations, the Islamic Republic, through its negotiating team, sought a fair agreement that would guarantee independence from the West in setting its own terms.

China surpasses US as most influential global power in Africa: survey

The United States is no longer viewed as the most influential global power in Africa, having been surpassed by China in a new survey from Gallup.

The survey found that median approval ratings of the U.S. slipped from 59 percent in 2022 to 56 percent in 2023, while China rose from 52 percent to 58 percent in that same period, The Hill reported on Wednesday.

The survey asked people in 36 African countries about four global superpowers: the U.S., China, Russia and Germany. The U.S. was the only power that didn’t see its approval increase across Africa at least slightly in the latest poll.

The highest approval rating of the U.S. in Africa was held in 2009, when 85 percent of Africans approved of the country’s leadership. It dipped to its lowest point, 51 percent, in 2017.

China’s highest approval rating was at 72 percent in 2011 but has hovered around 50 percent in recent years until its six-percentage point jump last year. The largest increase in approval came from Ghana, Cote d’Ivoire and Senegal, the survey found.

Gallup noted that China’s improved rating may come from its increased investment on the continent. It’s now Africa’s biggest trading partner.

The U.S. saw some of its biggest approval increases from Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire as well, but saw major decreases in Gambia, Uganda and Kenya.

The survey also found that Germany’s leadership image sits at 54 percent and Russia’s is at 42 percent after dipping to 34 percent in 2022 following its invasion of Ukraine.

The 2023 approval ratings survey was conducted among people 15 years or older in more than 130 countries around the world. The margin of error ranges from 1.2 to 5.6 percentage points, Gallup said.

Raisi: Violent Suppression of Anti- ‘Israel’ Student Protests Shows West’s True Colors

By Al Ahed Staff, Agencies

Raisi: Violent Suppression of Anti- ‘Israel’ Student Protests Shows West’s True Colors

Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi has vehemently slammed the heavy-handed crackdown against pro-Palestine student protests in Western universities, especially in the United States, saying it has laid bare the true nature of Western civilization.

Raisi made the remarks while addressing a meeting of his cabinet on Sunday.

The Iranian president described violent suppression of anti-Zionist student protests, and the beating and arrest of professors and students in Western universities, especially in the US, as “another scandal for self-proclaimed advocates of freedom of expression.”

“Today, thanks to the blessed blood of the oppressed martyrs of Gaza, the true nature of Western civilization has been revealed to the people of the world more than any time before,” the Iranian president said.

Students and staff of Tehran University have held a rally in support of growing protests on US university campuses where students have erected encampments to demand action to end “Israel’s” aggression on Gaza.

Raisi added, “It has become evident that those who claim to be advocating freedom of expression do not think about anything other than maintaining their own domination.”

Elsewhere in his remarks, Iran's president said the current uprising of Western students, professors and elites in support of the oppressed people of Gaza is a major development with vast ramifications.

“Undoubtedly, this uprising and awakening against [West’s] oppression and crime and domination will not be extinguished through violent practices, [as well as] beating and arresting professors and students who support the oppressed people of Gaza,” Raisi said.

Iranian university students have staged mass rallies to express their solidarity with pro-Palestine academic demonstrations across the United States and Europe demanding an end to “Israel’s” months-long genocidal war against Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip.

US students are calling for universities to distance themselves from companies that are supporting the occupying entity’s war on the besieged Palestinian territory.

According to American media reports, hundreds of students have been arrested and face expulsion in universities across the United States as they continue demonstrations to demand an end to “Israel’s” genocide in Gaza.

Germany is Israel's second-largest arms supplier

Last year, Germany became Israel's second-largest arms supplier after the United States, Spiegel International reported. According to the Stockholm-based peace research institute SIPRI, around 53 percent of the weapons imported by Israel came from the U.S., around 47 percent from Germany, and 0.6 percent from Italy.

Five days after the October 7 attack on Israel by Hamas, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz read out his government's statement in the federal parliament, the Bundestag, saying, "There is only one place for Germany at this time, and that is by Israel's side."

Since the number of civilians killed, including many women and children, has extended into the tens of thousands, the German government has become increasingly isolated with its position.

‘U.S. pro-Palestine protesters will never be silenced by violent crackdown’

TEHRAN- Iran’s permanent mission to the United Nations office in Geneva has strongly denounced the current suppression of pro-Palestine protests on U.S. college campuses, emphasizing that using force against nonviolent demonstrators will not stop them.

As the 200th day of Israel’s U.S.-backed genocide against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip approaches, protests against the regime’s attack on the besieged area are growing more intense, and prominent American institutions have been the site of altercations between students and police.

Over 20 U.S. campuses are participating in anti-war demonstrations in response to the conflict, which has claimed the lives of over 34,000 people since October of last year, many of them women and children. 

The students want colleges to distance themselves from any firms supporting the war on Gaza being waged by the Israeli regime. 

Numerous demonstrators have been taken into custody by police on college campuses. 

In a post on X on Saturday, the mission said that “we strongly condemn the brutal and violent crackdown on widespread peaceful pro-Palestinian protests at universities in the United States. The U.S. Police brutality and excessive use of force during peaceful assemblies, and targeting students advocating for an end to genocidal war in Gaza is a matter of serious concern.”

It went on to add, “Demonstrators are precisely calling for ending the U.S. complicity in ongoing genocide in Gaza in their name. Firing and beating peaceful protesters does not silence them, who are the frontline human rights defenders; it only reaffirms the urgency of the struggle for justice for Palestine.”

“Police attacks against university students and professors, the scale of arrests and the conditions of detentions are deeply disturbing and we call for the release of all detained.”

The United States is fully manifesting a double standard approach regarding the students who are sympathizing with the grieving Palestinians who have been subjected to death, bombardment, displacement, starvation, etc. for nearly seven months.

On Thursday, police with shields and batons shoved into protesters at Indiana University Bloomington after students established an encampment. Police officers also tore down tents at the University of Connecticut. At Ohio State University and Emerson College in Boston, police also attacked protesters. 

Police officers further clashed with students at the campus of Emory University in Atlanta. A large number of people were detained during attacks on these universities.  

Demonstrators at Emory accused police officers of using pepper spray and tear gas to break up the encampment they had set up a few hours earlier.

The Atlanta Police Department acknowledged that its officers had “used chemical irritants during the incident.” The Georgia State Patrol also confirmed its troopers used pepper balls for crowd control. 

Separately, The New York Times has reviewed video footage that shows a trooper using a stun device on a protester who was on the ground.

The protestors are accused of “anti-Semitism” while a considerable number of the protestors are Jews. The Western decision-makers, who are subservient to Israel, are using charges of anti-Semitism against anybody who opposes Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian lands let alone those who are chanting slogans, carrying placards, and launching encampment protests at campuses condemning Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Contrary to claims of anti-Semitism, students are calling for a ceasefire, asking their universities and colleges to stop doing business with Israel or any companies that support Israel in its ongoing war in the coastal enclave, cease funding the regime’s war machine, and avoid complicity in this genocide.

Since the Tel Aviv regime began its offensive on the besieged Palestinian enclave on October 7, the United States has given Israel unrestricted military, intelligence, and financial backing. 

Israel receives $3.8 billion in military aid from Washington each year, and U.S. President Joe Biden has been a steadfast supporter of the illegal entity even during the Gaza conflict. 

Biden enacted a hefty financing agreement on Wednesday that would provide the occupying regime an additional $17 billion. 

Additionally, Washington has vetoed multiple resolutions from the UN Security Council that demanded an end to the heinous military invasion. 

Eighty percent of Gaza’s schools have been damaged or destroyed since the conflict started in early October, according to a panel of United Nations experts last week. There have been around 5,500 deaths, along with 261 instructors and 95 academics.

Iran seeks mutually beneficial relations with global partners: vice president

TEHRAN- Iranian Vice-President Mohammad Mokhber has affirmed Tehran's commitment to bolstering multilateral ties with African nations, particularly Burkina Faso.

The meeting between Mokhber and Burkina Faso's Prime Minister, Apollinaire J. Kyélem de Tambèla, unfolded on the sidelines of the 2nd Iran-Africa Trade Summit. 
 
Mokhber commended the reopening of Burkina Faso's embassy in Tehran in 2023 and the establishment of ambassadorial posts between the two nations, citing them as "positive steps towards fostering stronger bilateral relations."

He emphasized the importance of expediting the implementation of cooperation agreements inked during the inaugural joint commission meeting, asserting that it signals a new era in Tehran-Ouagadougou relations.

Highlighting Iran's technological prowess as a cornerstone of its strength, Mokhber reiterated the country's readiness to share its advancements with others, contrasting Iran's approach with that of the West and the United States, which prioritize self-interest over mutual gain.

The Iranian Vice-President underscored the imperative of deepening economic ties between Iran and Burkina Faso, stressing the need for enhanced collaboration between the private sectors of both nations. 

He touched on the necessity of creating a conducive environment for private sector cooperation, citing visa waivers and streamlined banking processes as pivotal facilitators.

In turn, Burkina Faso's Prime Minister expressed gratitude for the successful Iran-Africa International Summit, affirming his country's keen interest in leveraging Iran's expertise across various sectors including industry, healthcare, and technology.

Acknowledging Iran's strides in diverse fields, he reaffirmed Burkina Faso's unwavering determination to broaden bilateral relations with the Islamic Republic.

Iran’s capital Tehran is hosting economy ministers from more than 40 African countries at the second Iran-Africa International Summit which is being held from April 26-29.

The opening ceremony of the event was attended by senior Iranian officials including President Ebrahim Raisi and Minister of Industry, Mining and Trade Abbas Aliabadi.

Speaking at the opening ceremony, President Raisi voiced Iran's readiness to further boost it economic relations with African countries.

"This meeting is a symbol of the will of African countries and Iran to expand economic relations," he said.

Akka Op: A Severe Blow to the “Israeli” Army

By Latifa Al-Housseini

Akka Op: A Severe Blow to the “Israeli” Army

For the first time since December 2023, sirens sounded in Akka [Acre] in northern Palestine. It was a combined attack by the Islamic Resistance on the headquarters of the Golani Brigade and Unit 621 [otherwise known as "Sayeret Egoz"] in the "Shraga" barracks in Akka. The qualitative operation is of an unusual nature, as acknowledged by “Israel’s” media. Why?

The strike, as the Resistance leadership explained in its statement, comes in response to the assassination of one of its fighters. For that reason, the decision was made to inflict pain on the enemy by resorting to surprise tactics that they are not accustomed to during their war that has been going on for more than six months.

In terms of implementation, the resistance resorted to a dual method of attack, using two types of drones, diversionary and assault, to ensure that targets are accurately hit and destroyed.

In terms of the target and its characteristics, the enemy’s media acknowledges the harshness of the strike due to the heavy losses. The resistance drones reached deep into the outskirts of Haifa and the coast of Palestine for the first time since the start of the military confrontation in October and bombed two “Israeli” military bases in Safed and Akka. This is an expansion of the scope of the support war 200 days after it began.

The scale of panic among the settlers that accompanied the operation when the sirens were sounded and the drones passed through the airspace of Akka also show the impact of the complex attack, especially with 200,000 settlers hiding in shelters during the operation. Meanwhile, the Iron Dome missiles malfunctioned and fell into the sea instead of intercepting the targets, which means that the operation was completed successfully and without complications.

In conclusion, the resistance’s drones flew over "Nahariya", Akka, Safed, and Haifa, completed the objective, delivering their knockout blow.

Clarifying misunderstandings about Prophet Yusuf

Imran Khan

Yusuf became isolated or an alien because of his brothers.

He ended in a foreign country, living among “foreigners”.

Yusuf was sold as a slave boy who did work in the palace of a populist Egyptian ruler.

And the man from Egypt who bought him [Yusuf] said to his wife, “Make his stay [with us] honorable; he may well be of use to us, or we may adopt him as a son.” (The Ascendant Qur’anSurat Yusuf, verse 21).

The first observation is that Yusuf is displaced from his people and homeland.

That is why, in the Qur’an there is no phrase where Yusuf says “Yaa Qawmi (O my people) …”

So those Muslims who want to rely on the narrative of Yusuf to serve in a political administration must first tell us if they are part of the social make-up or not.

If they are, then they cannot apply the circumstance of Yusuf.

In Surat Yusuf when Allah speaks about Yusuf and the rulers of Egypt, the word Pharaoh does not appear.

There are two words Aziz and Malik and not the dictatorial rulership and dictatorial description that comes with the word Pharaoh.

Azizu Misr is the very influential, popular, adored, dear, or beloved decision-maker and ruler of Egypt who Yusuf was staying with or who “adopted” Yusuf.

Azizu Misr means he’s the dear and popular one of Egypt.

“[What followed was] the women of the city saying [to one another], ‘The wife of the populist ruler …’” (The Ascendant Qur’anSurah Yusuf, verse 30)

“And [one day] the king said …” (The Ascendant Qur’anSurat Yusuf, verse 43).

This king knew Yusuf overcame his sexual temptations in the potential affair that could have taken place with the wife of the populist ruler.

He also knew that Yusuf could interpret visions which he had done for his prison mates and the ruler.

Then, in his personal interaction he sensed the quality and fine character of Yusuf.

Yusuf was a very mature, dependable individual who overcame his lusts.

This says something about the king himself.

He wasn’t one of those cheap personalities.

Even though there’s no indication that he was a Muslim, he had a sense of fairness and evaluation.

The second observation is that Yusuf was serving in a political administration of a populist ruler or king that sought truth and justice, not an administration characterized by oppression and injustice.

Then, we come to Yusuf’s appointment to high office.

And the king said, “Bring him [Yusuf] to me, so that I may assign him to my own person.”

And when he had spoken with him, [the king] said, “Behold, [from] this day you shall be of high standing with us, invested with all trust!” (The Ascendant Qur’anSurat Yusuf, verse 54)

Yusuf would not have become the person in-charge of Egypt’s agriculture and resources if there was a Pharaoh in Egypt.

It was a friendly society as far as Bani Israel were concerned when Yusuf and his brothers were there.

Banu Israel were favored by the Aziz and Malik.

Yusuf was appointed to high office and had a new title, the title of Azizu Misr i.e. the very influential, popular, adored, dear, or beloved decision-maker and ruler of Egypt.

They said, “O you populist [ruler]! [We beg your] attention … (The Ascendant Qur’anSurat Yusuf, verse 78)

[And the sons of Ya‘qub went back to Egypt and to Yusuf]; and when they presented themselves before him, they said, “O most popular and beloved one! Hardship has visited us and our folk, and so we have brought but scanty merchandise; but give us a full measure [of grain], and be charitable to us: behold, Allah rewards those who give in charity!” (The Ascendant Qur’anSurat Yusuf, verse 88).

The third observation is that Yusuf is given a very high position in a political administration, something equivalent to a prime minister or economic and agricultural minister from where he could do justice without having to beg, solicit, lobby, campaign or curry favor for the position.

Now, when we look at those Muslims who participate in the political system claiming to be following Prophet Yusuf’s example, how many of these conditions do they fulfil?

Do they deal justice?

Or do they become self-enriching status quo preservational agents whose primary obsession is to be a career diplomat and careerist politician?

EgyptProphet YusufAzizu MisrJust rulerThe Ascendant Qur'an