Sunday, January 31, 2021

Pope Francis to meet Iraq's top Shi'ite cleric on March visit

Pope Francis is set for an historic meeting with Iraq's top Shi'ite Muslim cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, during a trip to Iraq planned for March, the patriarch of Iraq's Chaldean Catholic Church said on Thursday, Reuters reported.

The visit, which eluded Francis's predecessors, takes place amid deteriorating security in some parts of Iraq and after the first big suicide bombing in Baghdad for three years.

The programme for the March 5-8 trip, announced at a news conference by Patriarch Louis Raphael Sako, who is a Catholic cardinal and head of Iraq's biggest Christian denomination, will include Masses in Baghdad and the northern city of Erbil.

The pope will visit the former Islamic State stronghold of Mosul which has a significant Christian minority, and the ruins of ancient Ur in southern Iraq, revered as the birthplace of Abraham, father of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

Francis said in an interview broadcast on Jan. 10 that his Iraq trip might be cancelled because of the coronavirus pandemic, but it now appears that preparations are going ahead, including vaccinations for potential participants.

In meeting the 90-year-old Sistani, Francis will hold talks with one of the most important figures in Shi'ite Islam, both within Iraq and beyond.

Sistani commands a vast following among Iraq's Shi'ite majority and huge influence over politics and public opinion. His edicts sent Iraqis to the polls for the first free elections after dictator Saddam Hussein was toppled, rallied the country to fight Islamic State in 2017 and ousted an Iraqi government during mass demonstrations in 2019.

Francis has visited predominately Muslim countries including Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, Bangladesh, Azerbaijan, the United Arab Emirates and the Palestinian territories, using those trips to call for inter-religious dialogue.

Iraq is trying to recover from the destruction caused by the campaign to defeat Islamic State, and beset by economic hardship after a fall in oil prices during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Iraq has been home to Christian communities for centuries. Hundreds of thousands of Christians fled sectarian violence after the fall of Saddam or were driven out when Islamic State captured much of the north in 2014.

But hundreds of thousands remained, divided among a number of denominations, with the largest being Chaldean Catholics, who practice an ancient Syriac rite and are loyal to the pope. Since Islamic State was driven from the north in 2017, Christians have largely recovered the freedom of worship.

Why is West not after constructive ties with Iranian Rev.?

By: Mehdi Azizi

Why is West not after constructive ties with Iranian Rev.?

TEHRAN, (MNA) – For almost 42 years, Westerners have been claiming that the Iranian revolution is coming to its end every year, however, it is the liberal democracy that reached its end, especially after the US post-election events.

Today, the Islamic Revolution of Iran marks the 42nd anniversary of its victory, while a few years ago John Bolton, Trump's national security adviser, had claimed that the Iranian revolution would not see its 40th anniversary.

Like many Western politicians, John Bolton's words could have been used as propaganda at the time, but the point is why the West speaks so angrily about the Islamic Revolution in Iran.

Basically, what is the secret of the Iranian revolution that the Westerners have been kept imposing economic sanctions and cultural aggression and organizing plots, conspiracies and disintegration scenarios against the Islamic Revolution?

Have other revolutions been like this?, the answer is No!

The reason is clear. The Iranian revolution was not supposed to stay within the borders due to its characteristics.

Brinton’s The Anatomy of Revolution also provides the same definition signaling that the Iranian revolution was a cross-border ideological development and would not be confined within Iran's borders.

Therefore, the West made all its efforts and resorted to many tools to prevent the discourse of the Islamic Republic.

For almost 42 years, Westerners have been claiming that the Iranian revolution is coming to its end every year.

The Western media also came to the aid of the American and British politicians, and each year they tried to examine the weaknesses of the Islamic Revolution, besides destroying the conditions for stabilization of the Revolution by creating a negative atmosphere aimed to disappoint people. Of course, these measures can be better understood when putting them beside four decades of America's economic war and siege against Iran. 

Westerners resorted to all tools to confront the Iranian Revolution but in vain and this has made them angry especially considering the fact that the defects of Western Liberal Democracy have become more clear after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, particularly in the last decade. 

Western societies, even American citizens, realized the absurdity and inability of this model to govern society, and in particular, the post-election events in the United States and Trump's insane behavior and approach was also the last nail in the rotten coffin of liberal democracy.

Health sector growth after Islamic Revolution

 By Faranak Bakhtiari

TEHRAN – After the Islamic Revolution (1979), many advances have been made in the health sector, namely, increased medical facilities, increased life expectancy and reduced infant and maternal mortality, growth of medical universities, and upgraded medical equipment.

According to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the life expectancy index at birth increased from 49.5 to 51.5; In other words, life expectancy among Iranians before the Islamic Revolution has been among the lowest in the world. While ten years after the revolution, despite the eight-year Iran-Iraq war, the life expectancy rate has increased to 61.5 years, showing a 10-year increase.

The World Bank report shows that the life expectancy rate experienced a growth of 22 years since the beginning of the revolution, raising to 76.7 years.

Infectious diseases toll declines

With the development of the health system, the causes of mortality have decreased and deaths due to infectious diseases, pregnancy and childbirth have decreased, according to the Islamic Revolution Document Center.

According to statistics, the crude death rate in Iran has decreased from 13 people per 1000 live births in (1970- 1976) to 5 people in 2007.

According to studies, there has been a decrease in child mortality in the country over the last four decades, as 200 infants and 250 children under five died per 1000 live births before the revolution, which dropped to 7 deaths in 2017.

According to the World Bank, more than 140,000 infants died annually since 1979, a figure that has dropped to less than 20,000 in recent years.

Hospitals and medical centers expanded

Before the Islamic Revolution, there were about 558 medical institutions with 57,927 beds in the country, which was insufficient in comparison to the country's population.

Meanwhile, after the fourth decades of the Islamic Revolution, primary health care (PHC) has reached a coverage of 93 percent for the urban population and over 97 percent for the rural residents. At the same time, the establishment of the health care network system as a global model has taken place with more than 31,400 Health Houses and 7,400 healthcare centers.

Moreover, the distribution of hospitals in different provinces and regions demonstrates the observance of health justice in all parts of the country.

While in 1978, only 37 percent of the country’s cities had hospitals, this figure has now reached more than 94 percent.

In 2017, the number of hospitals in the country and hospital beds was 910 and 148,000, respectively. While in 1978, these figures were 556 and 56,000.

Growing number of doctors, specialists

Before the Revolution, there were only a limited number of physicians for the entire population of 36 million in Iran, so all the cities of the country and the country's villages were suffering from the lack of doctors and specialists in 1,500 rural health centers.

The number of physicians in the country, including general practitioners and specialists in various fields, amounted to about 14,000, while a significant number of whom were foreign physicians. So, there were still about 9.3 physicians per 10,000 people.

According to the World Bank, the physician-to-population ratio improved six-fold in the post-revolutionary period.

In 1978, some 33 million Iranians were in need of foreign physicians, but now, with a population more than doubled, the number of physicians is growing, meeting the whole country’s needs.

Also the specialized physicians were 7000 in 1979 who reached up to 72,792 in 2017, and it is noteworthy to say that people from many countries travel to Iran to receive treatment from Iranian physicians.

Medical universities growth

Before the Islamic Revolution, four medical faculties were established in universities, but now there are about 59 medical universities across the country.

The number of medical students increased from 600 to 3,000 a year, after the Revolution.

Over the last four decades, the outstanding growth of the number of medical universities in all provinces of the country, especially the deprived areas, the increase in the number of graduates of medical sciences, especially women, and the laws related to the presence of medical graduates in deprived areas are among the most important achievements in medical education.

Self-sufficiency in medical supplies

Before 1979, there were about 50 manufacturing companies in the field of medical equipment across Iran, all of which imported raw materials from abroad and assembled them inside Iran. These companies were only able to supply 3 percent of the domestic needs.

According to the statistics in 2017, medical equipment companies reached 500, which supplied over 80 percent of hospitals' needs across the country, producing more than 8,000 types of medical equipment and supplying them to domestic and foreign markets.

Being the leading medicine producer in the region, production of 97 percent of medicine and export of pharmaceuticals including biotechnology drugs, self-sufficiency in the production of vaccines, eradication of polio and other epidemics, vaccination coverage from 30 to 100 percent are among other achievements of the country.

Also, Iran is now ranked 12th in the world and first in West Asia in terms of biotechnology, by producing 27 biotech medicines.

Starbucks, Google and the Lot: The Capitalist Delusion

BY: Andrew Rupp Starbucks, Google and the Lot: The Capitalist Delusion

What was, and still is, occurring was a shift from patriotism to giving into the omnipresence of major corporations. “Love of country” became “love of brand”. We didn’t notice, and we weren’t encouraged to care. Seeing a Starbucks café open in a Barnes and Nobles bookstore was more exciting than learning of our government forcibly overthrowing Central and Latin American politicians, conflicts with the Iranian government for (what else?) oil, or the history and subsequent outcomes of the 1992 L.A. Riots.

NOURNEWS – What was, and still is, occurring was a shift from patriotism to giving into the omnipresence of major corporations. “Love of country” became “love of brand”. We didn’t notice, and we weren’t encouraged to care. Seeing a Starbucks café open in a Barnes and Nobles bookstore was more exciting than learning of our government forcibly overthrowing Central and Latin American politicians, conflicts with the Iranian government for (what else?) oil, or the history and subsequent outcomes of the 1992 L.A. Riots.

Midwestern Beginnings

The time is 1986 with supply-side economics firmly running the show. I am born into a loving family in the naturally beautiful state of Michigan. As most children who live in affluence, I am oblivious to the hardships of those in other nations, or even within my own state, living in lack or poverty. It was not until independently seeking answers, beginning in my angsty teenage years, did I begin to understand the inner workings of the corporate-government-mutation and its undertakings; especially with regards to domestic and international impacts.

We small-city people in the Midwest are encouraged to enjoy consumer choice given to us throughout the proliferation of shopping malls, Disney Stores, and Nike-Towns while being kept firmly in the dark of behind-the-scenes activity. So much as we were concerned, the ability to live comfortable lives were all that was needed; well, as far as most are concerned this is cause for celebrating. What was, for a while, unbeknownst to many was not only our government’s far-reaching obtrusion, but also the Reagonomically-assisted issues of increased corporate influence and corruption.

Throughout the first half of my life, the darker side of American politics, to many in the Midwest, was not broadcasted. A good number of condemnatory affairs had dodged public awareness for some time due to the diligent work of corporate lawyers and media officials. These events, both small and large in scale, were downplayed or simply hidden. These include (but are certainly not limited to) massive profits gained from the privatization of prisons, the Hacker Crackdown of the early 1990’s, the trampling of the 1999 Seattle World Trade Organization protests, and the autarchical, self-serving passage of the Patriot Act of 2001; allowing the government access to metadata for anyone deemed a “threat”.

Concentrated Momentum

As the separation between corporations and government transformed into a revolving door, the rise in corporate exploitation and corruption arose, again, with the facts being downplayed or swept away. Examples include ExxonMobil’s scandal (choose whichever one you’d like), Big Tobacco CEO’s committing perjury in the 1994 Waxman Hearings, the proliferation of Export Processing Zones (a.k.a. sweatshops…the modern equivalent to colonialist slavery), the Bush Jr. administration’s efforts to distance itself from the turmoil of Enron’s accounting scandal, and later the free reign instituted for big data companies to profit from surveillance capitalism.

What was, and still is, occurring was a shift from patriotism to giving into the omnipresence of major corporations. “Love of country” became “love of brand”. We didn’t notice, and we weren’t encouraged to care. Seeing a Starbucks café open in a Barnes and Nobles bookstore was more exciting than learning of our government forcibly overthrowing Central and Latin American politicians, conflicts with the Iranian government for (what else?) oil, or the history and subsequent outcomes of the 1992 L.A. Riots.

It is ironic that with the everywhereness of brands and logos that they are owned by such a small number of corporations. This, of course, is not due to chance. A clear picture has emerged of the monopolistic nature of the American economy. Take the news media, for example. Any tiny amount of research will show that a handful of corporations own the near-entirety of American (and beyond) news media.

From the Corporate to the Corporeal

Further, by usurping and driving out “potential competition” (no matter how small the business may be) it is possible to place further degrees of separation in regards to accountability and responsibility. These take-overs (nicely termed as mergers, buy-outs and/or acquisitions) can indeed facilitate the deflection of blame for corrupt business practices. For example: higher-ups at Nestlé, a Swiss-based multinational conglomerate corporation which has “acquired” many companies (not just those in the sweets department), continue to enjoy huge profits despite repeated charges of union-busting, employing children and the nonchalant undertaking of deforestation operations in the developing countries it exploits.

During the second half of my life, I noticed the increase of service jobs alongside a decrease in labor and higher-skilled jobs. Gone were the comforts of job security, union memberships, and livable wages. Instead, we have been endowed with low-skilled, tedious, and minimum-wage jobs that encourage one’s mind to be “turned off”. To illustrate, I will share one disheartening story:

Throughout my time working for the gigantic sporting goods retailer, Cabela’s (later taken over by their sworn enemies at Bass Pro Shops), I experienced the characteristic woes of part-time labor at a corporation that does not care about its work-staff: fluctuating schedules, full-time hours without full-time pay and/or benefits, and an irritating boss (whose high levels of stress brought him to a heart attack months after my leaving). However, this story is not about me.

After leaving Cabela’s, I worked part-time for another massive corporation with an analogously callous business model: GameStop. When at the register, an old co-worker from a different department came in and was selling back games. What I will never forget, though, was his look of defeat.

As we caught up, I learned he was 40-something, had children, and that Cabela’s had made even more lay-offs (firings) to some 20+ full-timers across the store; him being one of them. This hasty move seemed to echo the firing of hundreds at that same store just 2 years before. “Ho-hum” to their years of devoted service.

What made this episode more infuriating was that they offered him and some others the chance to come back and work there… as part-time. As he told me these things, I saw firsthand the humiliation and crushed spirit handed down from the remote offices of business executives.

Exploitation and Oppression – Business as Usual

Time and time again come the destruction of people’s spirit due to the abhorrent axiom of: “Nothing personal… it’s just business”. All the while the corporate leaders have become the oil barons of old, donning the very same contempt for those who contribute much more to the core of their brands. Analogous to earlier presumptions, many have revered these big shots despite their continued crimes against humanity both domestic and abroad. Recent examples include:

Steve Jobs – Apple – Responsible for massive job-outsourcing to countries suffuse with inhumane labor practices.
Mark Zuckerberg – Facebook – Owner and CEO of the planet’s largest cult and source of countless abuses and scandals, recently allowing other corporations (Netflix, Microsoft, Spotify, Amazon, Sony) to not only access user data, but even to read private messages.
Jeff Bezos (Lex Luthor) – Amazon – Leader of greed-incarnate, a corporation that has enjoyed mega-profits despite ignoring worker’s rights and driving out countless small-businesses.

Of course there has been some public outcry, but companies like Google and Amazon move much too quickly for lawsuits and feeble anti-trust laws to slow them down.

“Well that’s just… sorry, what were you saying?”

So… what of public awareness? Where have screaming masses been? What happened to public conversation and debate? Or even to taking a moment to reflect on what has been happening all around us? One major factor has been the overwhelming barrage of images, vignettes, Pavlovian-contrived jingles, third-class mail, and hollow words subjecting humans to a non-existent level of thought.

Put simply: ads.

Marketing and advertising has become a fellowship all its own, as it represents an estimated 20% of America’s GDP. In other words, 1/5 of the nation’s output is committed to persuade individuals to buy, buy, and buy. Billions are spent for increased visibility for goods, many of which remain the same year after year (i.e., McDonald’s, Coca-Cola, Starbucks, and Pepsi). This prodigious sum of money, nullified of benefiting anyone except corporate higher-ups, represents an ideology more popular and influential than any other philosophy or even organized religion. To me, the symbolism of this time and effort from so many smart and talented individuals is indicative of collective insanity.

Day-to-day, I receive a continual barrage, whether they be e-mails or the eerie, algorithmically-targeted ads appearing on seemingly nonaligned websites. And yet this only includes the digital ballyhoo. The exhaustion of being alerted to consume things I don’t want, let alone need, has no end in sight. Even in the unlikely meltdown-scenario of throwing out all my electronics and sticking only to books for information, the omnipresent billboard and constantly-lit-up signs would continue to draw my precious attention. And with the abomination that is Black Friday nearing…I can only expect an intensification of society’s sensory molestation.

For me, being born where and when I was allowed for many opportunities, more-or-less unrealized until I reached young adulthood. There was never any real hardship, and my childhood was spent in leisure, not knowing the sacrifice of the many for my amusement. Sure, it is unrealistic to expect children to contemplate the source of their Nike shoes or who assembled their smart-phones, but ongoing corporate obscuration of facts have had far-reaching effects. Mental, financial, and emotional well-being cannot harmonize with the unlimited corporate craving for everlasting profitability.

Being one who has the corporate wool pulled over my eyes is a driver to my writing this, as well as the resentment of the impunity these too-big-to-fail companies enjoy. These bullies-in-suits continue to starve the masses, hiding behind the vain promises of trickle-down economics. Inequalities of income and wealth have reached an unprecedented high, with multi-national corporations showing huge profits while many attempt to stretch their stimulus checks as much as possible.

What the media spotlights, however, is content which polarizes citizens even though many are fighting the same battles. A prime example are Trump’s egotistical tweet rants receiving more attention than corporate exploitation of America’s infrastructure. Insubstantial drivel runs the show on many major media networks, again, owned by a small number of large corporations. As George Carlin stated: well-educated, well-informed citizens are not what these companies want. With our sensory inputs being endlessly crammed with alienating news stories and mindless advertisements, these companies have benefited from not only our buying products built-in-the-third-world, but also have capitalized from the crescendo of American unconsciousness.

Political Economy Journal

Congress will likely put up barrier in the way of Biden to rejoin nuclear deal

TEHRAN - The new Biden administration may find it difficult to revive the nuclear deal endorsed by the UN Security Council in 2015 due to the likely opposition by Congress, according to Politico, an American magazine.

In foreign policy area, President Joe Biden has promised to rejoin the nuclear agreement that former president Donald Trump described it as “horrible” and “the worst deal ever.” 

Due to Trump’s imposition of severe financial and economic sanctions on Iran, Biden and his aides are facing serious challenges as they are seeking a path back to the 2015 nuclear agreement. 

“For now, the U.S. government employees involved in sanctions policy have been thinking through what steps to take to return to the deal, a U.S. official said. They plan to submit their ideas to Biden political appointees, including Rob Malley, a foreign affairs practitioner whom Biden has appointed as a special envoy for Iran,” Politico reported on Saturday. 

The nuclear deal left in place numerous other U.S. sanctions on Iran, such as those related to the so called, and definitely wrong, Iran’s support for terrorism, its defensive missile program. Many of the U.S. sanctions are especially powerful because they apply to non-American companies who want to do business with Iran.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has indicated he is willing to keep some sanctions. “The nuclear agreement was one thing, but continuing and even strengthening our ability to push back and to deal effectively with Iran’s egregious behavior, including in the terrorism realm, was something that we needed and should do,” he said on January 19,2021.
 
“Those lawmakers are skeptical of the deal will likely object to many if not all of Biden’s attempts to ease sanctions. They also will monitor how the administration goes about enforcing sanctions that it decides to keep”, a Republican Senate aide said to the Politico. 
 
The unidentified aide emphasized “one area of concern is how the Biden administration defines what goods fall under ‘humanitarian’ exemptions to sanctions.” 

“If they lift sanctions, I could see new sanctions being moved through Congress,” the aide predicted. “We’ll be closely watching any sort of agreements or understandings they’ll reach with the Iranians.”

TAGS

Zarif meets with Taliban delegation in Tehran

TEHRAN – Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif met on Sunday with a Taliban delegation led by deputy head of the group’s political bureau Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar.

In the meeting, Zarif welcomed the idea of formation of an all-inclusive government with the participation of all ethnic and political groups in Afghanistan, the Iranian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

“Political decisions could not be made in a vacuum, and the formation of an all-inclusive government must take place in a participatory process and by taking into account the fundamental structures, institutions and laws, such as the Constitution,” the statement quoted Zarif as saying in the meeting.

The chief Iranian diplomat expressed Iran’s readiness to facilitate dialogue among the Taliban, the Afghan government and other Afghan groups, noting, “The noble people of Afghanistan have been wronged. The war and occupation of Afghanistan have dealt heavy blows to the Afghan people.”

He expressed hope that the Taliban would focus efforts on an immediate end to the pains and problems of Afghan people so that the establishment of peace in Afghanistan would strip the outsiders of a pretext for occupation.

‘Inclusive Islamic government’

According to a Tasnim report, Zarif also voiced support for an all-inclusive Islamic government in Afghanistan.

“We support the formation of an all-inclusive Islamic government with the participation of all ethnicities and sects and consider it necessary for Afghanistan,” Zarif was quoted by Tasnim as telling the Taliban delegation. He underlined the need for the Taliban to avoid targeting the people of Afghanistan.

Zarif also told the Taliban delegation that the United States is not a good mediator.

The Taliban delegation, for its part, gave a report of the Afghan peace process and the intra-Afghan negotiations.

“Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar also noted that the relations between Afghanistan and Iran are based upon friendship and good neighborliness, expressing hope for the expansion of relations between the two countries with the establishment of peace and calm in Afghanistan,” the statement noted.

US Protests to China in Own Backyard as Biden Pivots to Asia

US Protests to China in Own Backyard as Biden Pivots to AsiaBy Ahednews, Agencies

The US military protested to Chinese military activities in the South China Sea as leading policy outlet Politico said the new Biden government is reorienting foreign policy priorities to China and Asia from the Middle East.

The US Indo-Pacific Command [INDOPACOM] said in a statement on Friday that Chinese military flights in the South China Sea over the past week fit a pattern of destabilizing and aggressive behavior by Beijing.

"The Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group closely monitored all People’s Liberation Army Navy [PLAN] and Air Force [PLAAF] activity, and at no time did they pose a threat to US Navy ships, aircraft, or Sailors," INDOPACOM spokesperson Navy Capt. Mike Kafka said.

Such actions, he claimed, reflected China’s attempt to use its military as a “tool to intimidate or coerce” those operating in international waters and airspace.

The INDOPACOM spokesperson also said the United States would continue to fly, sail and operate in the South China Sea.

“The US has a persistent military presence and routinely operates throughout the Indo-Pacific, including the waters and airspace surrounding the South China Sea and East China Sea, just as we have approached the region for the past 240 years,” he said.

China, which has long geared its military towards defending itself against the United States, recently conducted exercises that would simulate an operation against an aircraft carrier, according to the sources.

"They purposely conducted the drills when the US carrier was passing through the Bashi Channel," one source said, referring to the waterway between southern Taiwan and the northern Philippines.

"China is trying to tackle the issue of the South China Sea; it wants to stop the US military from entering the South China Sea. China wants to diminish the United States' weight in the western Pacific."

The South China Sea is a gateway to major sea routes, through which about 3.4 trillion dollars’ worth of trade passes each year. China claims sovereignty over much of the strategic waterway and has since 2014 built artificial islands on reefs and installed military bases on them.

The United States routinely sends warships and warplanes to the South China Sea to assert what it calls its right to freedom of navigation, ratcheting up tensions among the regional countries.

China has constantly warned the US against its military activities in the sea, saying that potential close military encounters between the air and naval forces of the two countries in the region could trigger accidents.

Oriental ’Orientalists’ and the US Unchanged Policies

Oriental ’Orientalists’ and the US Unchanged PoliciesBy Elham Hashemi

Media outlets have been trying to anticipate and predict the new Biden Administration’s performance in terms of US domestic and international politics, with much focus on the nuclear deal with Iran known as the JCPOA. 

Articles and Op-eds praised the quick reversal of his predecessor’s decisions such as the reversal of the ‘Muslim Ban’, which may seem like a sign of goodwill. He seems to be giving his administration a façade of diversity which is impressive to the public opinion at least.  

But people of different color and race in the new administration is not necessarily a good thing. If those placed in power do not represent the popular opinions of the communities they come from then it is to no avail. The appointing of Kamala Harris, as the first woman of color to hold the position of Vice President, does nothing unless she is willing to create real change for women of color. 

Also pointing an American-Palestinian, Maher Bitar to a position co-ordinating the stream of information coming in from the US intelligence apparatus does not necessarily mean Biden will retreat from supporting the Israeli apartheid regime. 

According to a report published by the Politico last Friday, Bitar, who served as general counsel to Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee and played an important role in former president Donald Trump’s first impeachment, will assume the post of senior director for intelligence on Mr. Biden’s National Security Council.

The designation of the high-profile Arab-American lawyer to a prominent White House position co-ordinating the stream of information that pours in from the vast US intelligence apparatus and Kamala Harris sounds like Biden has decided to use the “oriental orientalists” to help him push his US policies forward. 

The Joe Biden website reads “Joe knows how we treat Muslim-Americans and prioritize issues affecting them reflects who we are as nation. As President, he will: protect Muslim-American constitutional and civil rights; honor the diversity of Muslim-American communities; ensure adequate healthcare; create a safe learning environment; rebuild our economy with a more resilient, more inclusive middle class; and make communities safer.” But these remain to be words of publicity and an exploitation to the American diversity unless serious steps are made and new policies are made in terms of dealing with the “East”. 

Why should the reversal of the “Muslim Ban” matter when the US is helping destroy many of the Muslim countries on that list? The halting of the border wall is maybe perceived as move of good will too, but wouldn’t it be great and more real if the United States was to also halt its policies which help create many of the refugees trying to find a better life in the United States?

The US Biden administration is different from the Trump administration, probably only in stopping the US staunch support for Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen. It may arrive to a deal with Iran too on its nuclear program, but simultaneously without addressing the nuclear war heads Israel possesses or the violence and breach of law against other states. 

"Orientalism," as Edward Said wrote, is "a Western style for dominating, restructuring, and having authority over the Orient."

The result of this attitude and these policies? A culture in which the Middle East is seen as a playground and a subject for exploration, rather than a region of equal worth and value as the West. This was what the Palestinian-American intellectual and professor Edward Said observed in much detail in his famed book Orientalism, over fifty years ago.

GIDHR to Biden: Put an End to the War on Yemen

GIDHR to Biden: Put an End to the War on Yemen

By Staff, GIDHR.org

On the Global Day of Action for Yemen, the Gulf Institute for Democracy and Human Rights addressed US President Joe Biden urging him to put an end to the war on Yemen.

Dear President Joe Biden,

We, in the Gulf Institute for Democracy and Human Rights [GIDHR], are writing to you to offer our congratulations on your election.

We are, also, writing to bring to your attention the unprecedented crisis in Yemen due to the war launched by Saudi and Emirati led coalition.

Targeting civilians

The Saudi and Emirati led coalition directly target Yemeni residential neighborhoods, schools, markets, leaving civilian casualties, without being held responsible for their crimes. It is estimated that, until November 2020, more than 100,000 Yemenis [including thousands of children and women] were directly targeted and killed.

These attacks are blatant violations to the international law which guarantees protecting the lives of civilians and children during armed conflicts. They also amount to be described as war crimes, whose perpetrators and those who ordered the attacks should be prosecuted.

Imminent Catastrophe

The high levels of food insecurity and acute malnutrition which knock on the Yemenis’ doors are alarming, especially with the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. Many people lost their jobs what to lead to an increase in the population rate who lost the ability to secure their needs, and an increase in the rate of those who need humanitarian aid.

The designation of Houthis as a foreign terrorist organisation by the former US secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, raised the concerns of worsening the famine and the humanitarian conditions in the country.

In this context, Mark Lowcock, the director general of the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, called for the decision to be reversed. He warned the UN that “the likely humanitarian impact of the US decision would be a large-scale famine on a scale that we have not seen for nearly 40 years.”

David Beasley, the UN food chief, described the situation as “literally a death sentence to hundreds of thousands, if not millions of innocent people, in Yemen”.

The systematic destruction of farms, fisheries, sewage, sanitation plants and much more had brought more suffering to the Yemeni people. UN reports estimate that two-thirds of Yemenis are already hungry and half of them do not know what their next meal is. Quarter the population suffer from malnutrition, ranging from moderate to severe, including more than two million children.

Blockade and siege

For nearly six years, Yemenis have been facing a blockade on all their ports, preventing humanitarian aid, food, medications, fuel, and any other goods from entering the country.

The blockade has been contributing to the humanitarian disaster which the Yemeni people are facing.

The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimated that 131,000 Yemenis have died from indirect causes such as lack of food, health services and infrastructure. All these causes are results of the Saudi and Emirati led war on Yemen, their direct targeting of civilians and the blockade they are enforcing, starving millions and killing tens thousands of Yemenis.

Recommendations:

We are aware of your statements to end US support for Saudi Arabia’s military intervention in Yemen. Hence, we urge you to:

  • End the US support of Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen as soon as possible.
  • Stop the arms sales to Saudi Arabia and United Arabic Emirates.
  • Pressure the international community and the coalition, especially Saudi Arabia and United Arabic Emirates, to end the blockade enforced on Yemeni ports.
  • Hold the perpetrators and the instigators of the war crimes committed against the Yemeni people accountable and refer them before fair trials.
  • Compensate the victims of this war.
  • Reconstruct Yemen.

Yours sincerely,

Gulf Institute for Democracy and Human Rights [GIDHR]

US plans political occupation instead of military occupation in Iraq

Hossein Ruivaran

Speaking to Quds News Agency, an Iranian Middle East political expert, Hossein Ruivaran talked about the new government in the US and its effects on the regional affairs as well as the Zionist regime.


Qodsna (Tehran) - Ruivaran referred to the recent reports about the approval of the Zionist regime with the deployment of the Iron Dome, Israeli air defense system, in some Arab states around the Persian Gulf, saying that the Iron Dome has not been security insurance for Zionists and has only tracked 20 percent of missiles and rockets.


“Despite the UAE military deal with the United States, the situation in the region is still as before, and the Islamic Republic of Iran can respond to any external threat,” he added.


The Iranian scholar also stressed that the approach of the Biden’s government is different than Trump’s.


“The scale-down of US troops in Iraq does not mean that the US plans to leave the country. US officials want to expand their influence on top political authority in Iraq instead of having a military presence,” Ruivaran noted.


“Currently, the US has formed a new party in Iraq with the help of Iraqi Prime Minister, Mustafa Al-Kadhimi and that’s a reason why the upcoming election in Iraq has been delayed by Al-Kadhimi.”

Hidden goals of deployment of Israeli Iron Dome in Persian Gulf Arab states

 Qodsna Editorial Board

The United States is expected to soon begin deploying Iron Dome missile interceptor batteries, in its bases in the Persian Gulf States, according to security officials, according to Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

 

The Iron Dome systems were handed over to the Americans – and Israeli defense sources say the United States has received the approval of senior Israeli officials to begin deploying the missile defense systems on American military bases in a number of countries, including in the Middle East, Europe, and Far East.

 

One of the reasons that Arab states, which have normalized their relations with the Zionist regime, use to justify their treason towards the Muslim world and the Palestinian cause is their concerns about the scale down of US military presence in the region and their loneliness against Iran.

 

Those Arab regimes think that integration with the Zionist regime can increase their military power and they can use the power of the Israeli lobby in Western countries. On the other hand, Iran has repeatedly declared its goodwill in improving relations with regional countries. While Arab regimes know this fact, they consider the support of world powers as insurance for the survival of their rules.

 

Zionist rulers plan to seize the moment and expand their influence in Arab states, which would decrease their security spending in the region. The Zionist regime also seeks to increase its military presence around Iran by having deeper ties with Arab states.

 

While Arab regimes are interested in using Israeli military equipment, the Iron Dome has not yet been security insurance for Zionists against Palestinian missiles and drones. Many military experts argue that the Israeli air defense system cannot deal with Hezbollah’s missiles and drones, therefore, political experts believe that the deployment of the Iron Dome in Arab regimes in the Middle East is more politically and economic-oriented.