By Professor Abdullahi Danladi
At moments of global tension, truth is often the first casualty. As threats intensify and the rhetoric of war resurfaces, particularly from the United States and the Zionist regime against the Islamic Republic of Iran, the world is once again confronted with a familiar pattern: distortion masquerading as analysis, propaganda posing as concern, and wishful thinking elevated to certainty. In such moments, neutrality becomes complicity, and silence becomes endorsement of falsehood.
Recent demonstrations within Iran have been seized upon by hostile media and political actors as supposed evidence of a collapsing state. Carefully cropped footage, selective narratives, and deliberate exaggeration are now being used to construct a fantasy in which the Islamic Republic stands isolated from its people and abandoned by history.
Yet unfiltered evidence, long-term observation, and political reality point decisively in the opposite direction: the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to enjoy deep-rooted identification and support from the overwhelming majority of its people, particularly when confronted by foreign threats and external coercion.
Those already celebrating the “fall” of Iran are not engaging in serious political analysis. They are indulging in ideological delusion. For over four decades, the same predictions have been recycled with mechanical certainty, after sanctions, after assassinations, after sabotage, after economic warfare, yet the Islamic Republic remains standing. Because it is anchored in sovereignty, sacrifice, and resistance to domination.
States collapse when they lose legitimacy internally; Iran has instead consolidated it under pressure.
In this charged atmosphere, the recent address by the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Sayyid Ali Khamene’ (may Allah continue to protect him), carried particular weight. It was a speech of composure, historical awareness, and strategic confidence. His message was clear: arrogance is not strength, and power without moral grounding is brittle. The era of unchallenged American coercion is eroding, not because of slogans, but because of accumulated resistance, internal decay, and global realignment.
The United States today is no longer the uncontested hegemon it once imagined itself to be. It is politically polarized, economically strained, militarily overstretched, and increasingly resisted across West Asia, Africa, Latin America, and beyond. Its unconditional alliance with the Zionist regime has yielded not stability but perpetual crisis, not security but expanding fronts of resistance. Each act of aggression has produced deeper regional cooperation among those who refuse submission.
Iran stands at the center of this resistance not out of adventurism, but out of principle. It chose independence over dependency, dignity over normalization, and self-determination over imposed obedience. This choice has made it a target of sanctions, sabotage, demonization, and threats, but it has also made it a symbol. History is unambiguous: nations that surrender their sovereignty for temporary relief lose both their dignity and their future.
For the Muslim Ummah, this moment is not merely geopolitical; it is profoundly moral. Islam requires moral discernment, the ability to distinguish between aggressor and victim, between siege and defense, between truth and manufactured falsehood. To pretend neutrality when a Muslim nation is openly threatened, economically strangled, and militarily encircled is not wisdom; it is abdication of responsibility.
The Qur’anic command to stand firmly for justice does not come with conditions of comfort or convenience.
The Islamic Republic of Iran, despite being, has consistently positioned itself against imperial domination, in defense of Palestine, and in rejection of Zionist and neo-colonial control over Muslim lands. These positions are not marginal, they strike at the heart of the Ummah’s historical struggle.
Those who cheer sanctions, bombardment, or regime collapse, whether out of ignorance, sectarian prejudice, or alignment with imperial narratives, are not advocating reform. They are endorsing subjugation. No society has ever been liberated by foreign missiles, and no Ummah has ever risen by applauding its own siege.
This is therefore a defining test for scholars, activists, intellectuals, and ordinary believers alike: to see clearly in an age of deception and to stand unflinchingly with truth when it is under attack. Supporting Iran today is not about personalities, sects, or politics of convenience; it is about defending the principle that Muslim nations have the right to chart their own destinies without external coercion.
History favors those who endure with conviction, not those who gamble on arrogance. Empires rise loudly and collapse suddenly. Nations rooted in faith, patience, and resistance outlast storms.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has faced storms before, and remains standing.
Those who understand history know why.
Those who understand Islam know where they must stand.
No comments:
Post a Comment