Showing posts with label Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 16, 2018

For US Money Is More Important Than Murder of Saudi Journalist


For US Money Is More Important Than Murder of Saudi Journalist
TEHRAN (FNA)- A top priority for the US administration, as with many recent administrations, is the selling of massive amounts of US arms to Saudi Arabia. That says why President Donald Trump will never get to the bottom of the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.
He first claimed he is determined to tackle this matter at the “highest levels.” Now Trump is walking back the issue, insisting that it isn’t worth it for the US to imperil $110 billion in arms sales to Saudi Arabia over a single journalist. Trump says it wouldn’t be acceptable to lose the $110 billion deal, adding that the journalist’s disappearance took place in Turkey, and he’s not a United States citizen.

Trump, as with many recent presidents, has prioritized the relationship between Saudi Arabia and the United States over that of the journalist’s death. He has even specifically warned against upsetting Saudi leaders as it could hurt the US monetarily. “I don’t like stopping massive amounts of money that’s being poured into our country,” Trump said, according to a tweet this week. He added, “they are spending $110b on military equipment and on things that create jobs for this country.”

This is not something of a surprise:

- The arms deal is simply too important to US arms companies, and any serious attempt to punish the Saudis for the killing of Khashoggi is going to boil down to a fight over the arms deal. After all, this is the same autocratic regime that has been murdering thousands of Yemeni people since 2015 and the US government has done nothing to stop the conflict, much less stop its arms supply or refuelling Saudi aircraft mid-air.

- Saudi Arabia is no different than the other authoritarian, violent, and despotic regimes that have dominated the region since the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire. Saudi Arabia is a harsh place, where politically-motivated assassinations and unsavoury governing practices are as commonplace as the oil flowing underneath its sands. To view Saudi Arabia as above the region’s other Arab states is not matched by the facts.

- The relationship between the US and Saudi Arabia is not rooted in common beliefs, shared values and ethics. It is rooted in identical foreign policy interests to dominate the region and protect Israel. Such ties are the reason why Yemen and Syria are in turmoil. They are also the reason why ISIL and Al-Qaeda, the US-Saudi foot soldiers, are still present throughout the region.

- Saudi Arabia is not the answer to the region’s many problems, as Trump would like to suggest. It is in fact the root cause of all regional problems. The despotic regime has taken maximum advantage of America’s appetite for controlling crude market and a desire for a long-term regional partner in crime in order to press its own Takfiri-Wahhabi agenda in the region. This agenda is centred on the regime’s rivalry with Iran and its absolutist quest for hegemony. The United States, having interest in the sectarian fault-lines of the Middle East, has frequently chosen to wade into Arab conflicts on Saudi Arabia’s side.

- Saudi Arabia’s indiscriminate bombing campaign in Yemen, its embargo of Qatar and its export of Wahhabi ideology are not exactly helpful in assuring US security. Many of those who carried out terror attacks in the US were from Saudi Arabia. Riyadh’s war on Yemen, and Washington’s logistical assistance to the Saudi Air Force in particular, has been especially devastating to the people of that destitute country and America’s reputation among the Yemeni population — all the while providing more operating space for the very transnational terrorist groups the US and Saudi Arabia claim to combat in the Peninsula.

- Khashoggi's story now displays pretty well that the Saudi regime is not concerned about women’s rights, press freedom, due process, political pluralism, and individual freedom, but focused on perpetuating its control and subjugating its smaller Persian Gulf neighbours into vassal states. Saudi Arabia has never been a helpful partner in ensuring regional security and peace. Saudi and Persian Gulf Arab money have been absolutely essential in creating and arming ISIL and Al-Qaeda.

In the prevailing environment, it is silly to assume that Trump will ever upend the terms of the decades-long alliance between the United States and Saudi Arabia. US politicians, media figures and foreign policy elites - even those who have fawned over the authoritarian Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman – will never criticize the continuation of US-Saudi alliance. Quite the opposite, the US will continue to give the Saudis a blank check, politically and militarily, for nearly as long as it can last.

In between, in Washington who cares if the Saudis kidnapped, tortured and assassinated Khashoggi inside their consulate in Istanbul? After all, Saudi Ambassador Khalid Bin Salman has told the US that the consulate cannot provide video footage of the consulate because they only have livestreaming, not recorded video! Again, who cares if this is the only consulate in the world that doesn’t tape - and didn’t tape its own nefarious activity.

Therefore, don’t expect the White House to rush to judgment. Because all of this and more have already passed the smell test in Washington. This particular murder case will never call the relationship between Saudi Arabia and the United States into fundamental question because Trump says jobs would be at risk if arms sales to the country were halted.

Friday, October 12, 2018

Saudi media tries to cover up circumstances of Khashoggi’s death

By Ramin Hossein Abadian
TEHRAN - A week has passed since Jamal Khashoggi, the high-profile critic of the Saudi leadership, was last seen entering the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. The Saudis continue to deny any knowledge of his whereabouts.
The speculation over the House of Saud’s role in the murder of Khashoggi runs high with numerous speculations and reports. Since the Saudi authorities are not capable of addressing the ambiguities surrounding the death of Jamal Khashoggi, the Saudis’ state-own media have worked round the clock to distract the public’s attention.
Al Arabiya News Channel in an exclusive interview with Salah Khashoggi, Jamal Khashoggi’s eldest son, made attempts to show Khashoggi’s disappearance differently to the public.
Khashoggi’s son claimed: “There are attempts by foreign parties to politicize the disappearance of my father. This is totally unacceptable. The issue at hand is that there is a Saudi citizen who has gone missing. We are cooperating with the Saudi authorities to uncover the circumstances. The issue is a personal matter and is far from a political matter. My last contact with my father was during his stay in Washington. I had no idea about his recent trip to Turkey and his presence there.”
The interview questions were posed in a way to fulfill the House of Saud’s objective. Al Arabiya tried to impose its position on Khashoggi’s son’s words in order to make the allegations more credible. While the direct role of Saudi Arabia in the killing of Khashoggi is quite evident, childish remarks blaming Khashogg’s personality issues cannot go anywhere.
Meanwhile, other Saudi media, including the Al-Hadith network, have made efforts to cover Riyadh's crackdown on Khashoggi. 
The Saudi network, without referring to Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi prince, and his desire to hold the throne and to take out opponents, tries to cover up any link between bin Salman and Khashoggi's murder. But media has failed to cover up the murder of Khashoggi in the embassy.
Even the Washington Post, a major American newspaper, says that two Turkish police officers have confirmed the murder of Khashoggi that it was preplanned, and a 15-member hit squad, allegedly Saudi policemen, came from Saudi Arabia to Turkey.
In an interview with Bloomberg News last week, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman claimed that Khashoggi had left the Saudi Consulate in Turkey shortly after his entry on Tuesday.
“Mojtahed” an active member on Twitter, twitted: “Turkish sources say Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi was tortured then murdered, and his body was mutilated after the murder. Pictures of all these events are available. A video of the torture and murder of Khashoggi has been sent to Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. If the news is confirmed, it means that bin Salman had never left Turkey to Saudi Arabia.” Mojtahed’s tweet has led to a new wave of protest against the Saudi family.
The United Nations has also gotten involved with the case for Khashoggi's death. The UN special rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, David Kaye, has called for an investigation into the disappearance and alleged murder of the prominent Saudi journalist in Turkey.
“Disappearance and alleged murder of Jamal Khashoggi requires an immediate and independent international investigation,” Kaye tweeted on Sunday.

Saudi Arabia likely murdered “Jamal Khashoggi”: Askari

By Javad Heirannia
TEHRAN – Professor Hossein Askari, an expert on Saudi Arabia who also teaches international business at the George Washington University, believes that Saudi Arabia likely murdered “Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi”.
 “If this is what happened, then it had to be ordered and sanctioned by MBS. No one in Saudi Arabia beside him would dare to authorize such an assassination,” Hossein Askari, who served as special advisor to Saudi finance minister, tells the Tehran Times
Following is the text of the interview:
Q: Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi, Saudi journalist that fled Saudi Arabia on 18 September 2017 killed in Turkey. Turkish sources say they believe that Khashoggi was killed inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on 2 October, by a 15-member "murder" team from Saudi Arabia. What do you think?
A: Sure, it is possible. But I have no idea if this is what happened. Why do you need 15 people to kill one man in a consulate? 
Q: Before this event we have saw the behavior of Mohammad Bin Salman with his critics and this lead some convinced that MBS is behind the killing of Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi. What is your opinion?
A: If this is what happened, then it had to be ordered and sanctioned by MBS. No one in Saudi Arabia beside him would dare to authorize such an assassination.
Q: What will be the reaction of U.S. and Turkey to this event?
A: Again, if this is what happened the U.S. will do nothing. The Trump Administration is all in with MBS. Turkey may make a little noise behind the scenes to get some financial support from Saudi Arabia but it will do nothing either.
Professor Hossein Askari

Was Dissident Journalist Jamal Khashoggi Murdered in Saudi Istanbul Consulate?

Crescent International


The dissident Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi has not been seen since he entered the kingdom’s consulate in Istanbul on October 2. This has raised fears that he was murdered at the consulate.

Two Turkish sources have reported that the 59-year-old Khashoggi was murdered. While no direct proof has been offered, such a serious allegation would not be made unless there was some basis to it.
Khashoggi had been living in exile for two years now. He has criticized the kingdom of being ruled by one man. He wrote a regular column for the Washington Post.
The Post ran a blank column on Friday October 5 to reflect its concern over his fate and lack of information from the Saudi authorities.
The Washington Post said it would be a "monstrous and unfathomable act" if he had been killed.
Khashoggi’s visit to the kingdom’s consulate in Istanbul was to get some documents signed.
These related to confirming that he had divorced his ex-wife, so that he could marry his Turkish fiancée, Hatice Cengiz. The latter accompanied him to the consulate but stayed outside.
Khashoggi never came out of the consulate even though Ms. Cengiz said she waited outside for 11 hours.
She further said Khashoggi was asked to surrender his mobile phone at the consulate, which is standard practice in some diplomatic missions.
Aware that there was a risk of foul play, Khashoggi told his fiancée to call an adviser to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan if he did not return.
A Turkish official told the BBC that initial investigations indicated he was murdered in the consulate.
Speaking to CNN Turk, the Turkish TV station, an official of Turkey’s ruling AK Party said that there was concrete evidence of foul play.
Officials said Khashoggi was killed on the premises and his body was then removed.
Investigators said a 15-person Saudi team arrived at the consulate on October 2, returning to Riyadh the same day.
What was the purpose or mission of the Saudi team arriving in Istanbul and leaving the same day?
The head of the Turkish-Arab Media Association, Turan Kislakci, told the New York Times that Turkish police officers providing security for the consulate had checked their security cameras and did not see the journalist leave on foot.
Kislakci added that diplomatic cars had been seen moving in and out of the consulate. What was the reason for such activity when normally there is little movement in and out of the consulate?
Not surprisingly, Saudi Arabia has denied the accusations, saying it is “working to search for him.”
What else would they say: they murdered the dissident journalist whom they saw as causing embarrassment to the regime?
On October 3, Bloomberg News quoted Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as saying that Turkish authorities were welcome to search the building because “we have nothing to hide.”
The prince said the Saudis were “very keen to know what happened to him”, saying his understanding was that Khashoggi left “after a few minutes or one hour”.
If so, why didn’t the CCTV footage show him leaving the consulate building?
The speculation is that the 15-member Saudi team was involved in removing the body from the consulate.
The Turkish authorities must investigate what aircraft the 15-member Saudi team use and what was loaded onto it. There would be CCTV footage available of this.
When asked if Khashoggi faced charges in Saudi Arabia, the crown prince said his country would need to know where he was first.
The Saudi rulers are becoming brazen in their conduct. They have not only arrested thousands of people and thrown them in jail on flimsy charges, they also do not hesitate in kidnapping critics residing abroad.
Several members of the royal family that have disagreed with the regime’s policy have also been kidnapped and returned to the kingdom where they have simply disappeared.