How Yemen Changed the Balance of Power in the Region

The U.S. and U.K. attacks on Yemen are a continuation of the maximum pressure policy aimed at containing the Axis of Resistance. In this context, Iran remains a key player in the alliance, but this does not imply absolute dependence of resistance groups on Tehran. These groups, including Yemen, operate independently, and their actions stem from internal and regional dynamics.

Nournews: In recent weeks, the United States, with British support, has launched a new wave of airstrikes against Yemen. Despite Washington’s claims of targeting military facilities, reports indicate that residential areas have also suffered severe damage. These attacks, facilitated by British aerial refueling of American fighter jets, highlight London's close collaboration in military operations against Yemen. The continuous flights of British Air Force refueling aircraft from Akrotiri Base in Cyprus to the Red Sea further expose the U.K.’s role in sustaining these strikes.

Meanwhile, former U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that Washington’s attacks have reduced Iran’s support for Yemen. However, he also acknowledged that Yemen still possesses equipment to continue its attacks. Trump has threatened that any military action by Yemeni forces will be considered as directed by Iran—statements that, rather than demonstrating American power, reveal the White House's efforts to justify its ongoing military operations against Yemen.

The Discrepancy Between Field Realities and Trump's Claims

Washington continues its strikes to project strength and increase pressure on Yemen. However, an analysis of battlefield developments shows that not only have these attacks failed to prevent Yemeni military actions, but they have also reinforced Yemen’s asymmetric warfare capabilities, posing a major challenge to the U.S. and its allies.

The Failure of the U.S. Naval Strategy

Despite continuous airstrikes, the Pentagon has been forced to increase its military presence in the region. Reports indicate that the U.S. Department of Defense has deployed the aircraft carrier USS Carl S. Vinson to the Red Sea in support of USS Harry S. Truman. This decision signals the failure of the U.S.’s initial strategy to contain Yemen. According to a Yemeni military spokesperson, the country’s missile and drone units have successfully inflicted significant damage on American warships, forcing the Pentagon to alter its military posture.

The growing number of U.S. warships in the Red Sea, contrary to Washington’s claims of reducing threats, indicates rising military costs and American frustration over the prolonged conflict. This situation mirrors the experiences of Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which, despite U.S. and U.K. support and extensive aerial and technological superiority, ultimately withdrew from Yemen without achieving their objectives.

Yemen’s Asymmetric Warfare: A Game-Changer

Over the years, Yemen has demonstrated that it is more than just a guerrilla force—it has developed a new model of asymmetric warfare. By integrating drone, missile, and naval operations, Yemen has reshaped regional security dynamics. Not only has it withstood large-scale attacks, but it has also successfully carried out precision strikes targeting warships, defense systems, and enemy logistical centers.

While the U.S. and its allies seek to weaken Yemen, the reality is that the country has emerged as a key player in the regional balance of power. Yemen’s attacks on strategic targets have proven its capability to execute complex operations at multiple levels. Contrary to Trump’s claims, Yemen’s strikes on Israeli military installations and its active role in regional developments indicate that its defense infrastructure and military capabilities have not only survived but have significantly expanded.