Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts

Saturday, October 05, 2019

Journalism in an Era of Delusional Politics

Wayne MADSEN

There are several correlations currently being made between the current move by the US Congress to impeach Donald Trump for high crimes and misdemeanors and a similar action that resulted in the resignation of President Richard Nixon as a result of the Watergate scandal. However, there is a major difference between then and now: The Internet and the dissonant cacophony of polemics from non-journalists whose sole goal is to muddy the informational waters with far-out conspiracy theories and libelous prose.
During the Watergate scandal, newspaper, radio, magazine, and newspaper journalists all relied on the same tried and true standards to report from Congress, the White House, and federal courts on the scandal and its aftermath. The reportage included who, what, when, where, why, and how. Opinions were relegated to the editorial pages and television and radio news segments that were clearly identified as commentary, not hard news. The media has not always done a very good job of policing itself. The “yellow journalism” of William Randolph Hearst that led the US into a needless war with Spain in 1898. Media mogul Rupert Murdoch has assumed the Hearst role with regard to covering Trump.
There were scandalous newspapers, newsletters, and flyers published during the Watergate era. These included the “National Review,” “Human Events,” and “American Opinion,” which delved into whacky “left-wing” and “Communist” conspiracies about those who were responsible for investigating Nixon, but these publications and their diatribes were well known as being untethered to reality. Although “Human Events” was read widely by conservative Republican circles in and around Washington, DC, it had little circulation outside the capital. It was these publications that primarily circulated conspiracy theories about Watergate. Moreover, the flyers distributed by the far-right John Birch Society, co-founded by Fred Koch – the father of Trump billionaire political financiers Charles and David Koch – made outlandish claims about Nixon’s opponents. Along with declaring that Nixon was being targeted by a “Jewish Communist” conspiracy, the favorite bogeyman for right-wingers, the John Birch Society made wild claims about laetrile curing cancer, fluoridation of the public water supply, and “international bankers,” the latter a thinly veiled codeword for Jews.
Today, the new purveyors of right-wing conspiracies include a bevy of websites, including 4Chan and Gab. Some far-right conspiracy platforms, including “The Gateway Pundit,” Salem Radio, “The Federalist,” and “Human Events,” have possessed White House press credentials. Credentialing those who engage in libelous activity was a purposeful decision by Trump. It was intended to give them the same or greater degree of credibility than recognized media outlets, many with several decades of acting as the recognized scribes and chroniclers of American and world history.
In July of this year, Trump held a White House summit meeting of the leading “alternative news” websites, including those who promote such outrageous theories as there being “staged” mass shootings with no actual victims, Adolf Hitler being a “Communist” and not a Nazi, Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court Ruth Bader Ginsburg being dead, that former First Lady Michelle Obama is a man, and that South Africa’s government is behind the mass murder of white farmers. Some of these sites go even further, suggesting that the Apollo moon landings were all fakes and that the Earth is actually flat. One common thread among these various websites is that the Holocaust never occurred. Astoundingly, these theories, including the one about Hitler being a Communist, have adherents like Brazil’s far-right President Jair Bolsonaro, “The Federalist” write Paul Jossey, and Republican US Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama.
Social media platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook have tried to limit such vitriolic and hateful content. Some recent mass shooters have been inspired by racial and religious polemics they have read on such websites. Some associated with far-right websites defended by Trump marched in the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, an event where neo-Nazis and white supremacists committed acts of violence on counter-protesters, resulting in one counter-protester’s death and injuries of several others.
Trump has attacked Twitter and Facebook for violating the US Constitutional First Amendment rights of free speech and the free press. Trump told his alternative media summit, “To me free speech is not when you see something good and then you purposefully write bad. To me that’s very dangerous speech and you become angry at it. But that’s not free speech.” Trump’s lack of understanding of the Constitution, to which he took an oath to uphold, has been on full display. The Second Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” The framers of the Constitution included no provisions governing the private sector’s right to limit content of a libelous and untrue nature. Editors and publishers in 1789 were just as cognizant of the need to separate themselves from the conspiracy-laden flyers and gossip of their day as legitimate media is today.
The effect of confabulation of news events has served to discredit legitimate investigative journalism that delves into mostly Republican-led criminal conspiracies. These include the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy; Nixon’s dalliance with South and North Vietnam to ensure the defeat of Hubert Humphrey, his 1968 Democratic opponent; Watergate; the 1980 “October Surprise” that sealed President Jimmy Carter’s chances for a second term; the Iran-Contra affair; and 9/11, which boosted George W. Bush’s chances for a second term. The same strategy is now at work for the 2020 presidential election by Trump and the Republicans.
Trump is fond of attacking “The New York Times” and “The Washington Post.” While these newspapers have made their fair share of errors, there has been a mechanism to public corrections in errata segments. This does not occur with regard to the far-right media. They are in the very business of disseminating false information. Trump, whose knowledge of history is shallow to the degree of a millimeter, does not likely know that the co-founder of “The New York Times,” Henry J. Raymond, is considered the “godfather of the Republican Party.” Frank Hatton, the editor and second co-owner of “The Washington Post,” was a leading Republican figure during the late 1800s. The Post’s more recent 20th century owner was Eugene Meyer, also a Republican.
Several far-right websites are fond of hurling around accusations that certain targeted individuals are pedophiles. This is seen in the on-line rants of nebulous groups like “QAnon,” whose members are among Trump’s most ardent supporters. While there is absolutely no basis for their attacks, there is ample factual material that suggests Mr. Trump has had provable connections to pedophiles, including the late financial investor Jeffrey Epstein, who Trump, for several years, considered his “good friend.” It was the father of Trump’s Attorney General, William Barr, who played a part in hiring Epstein, who possessed no college degree, as a teacher of youngsters at Manhattan’s exclusive Dalton School.
More recently, Richard Ciccarella, a US Army staff sergeant with the White House Communications Agency and attached to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, was convicted of uploading improper images of children to the Internet. Ciccarella’s sentencing memo contained astounding information about his responsibilities. In operating the White House switchboard in Washington, Ciccarella was “responsible for making and placing calls for the President, Vice President and senior White House Staff,” in addition to being “responsible for setup and maintained all of the communications for the President at Mar-a-Lago.” Epstein had once been a frequent Mar-a-Lago guest and he recruited at least one of his underage female “sex slaves” from the health spa at Mar-a-Lago.
George Nader, a Trump transition team adviser on the Middle East and a previously convicted pedophile, was charged on January 17, 2018 with “transporting visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct” after arriving at Dulles International Airport in Virginia on his way to Mar-a-Lago, where Trump was present.
Actual journalists rely on court filings, trial and deposition transcripts, interviews, and discovery documents to report factual news. It is a far cry from the far right-alternate media, which, although highly prized by Mr. Trump and his associates, obtains its delusional information from thin air.

Saturday, September 21, 2019

Tulsi Gabbard Slams Trump Over Saudi Policy

Tom LUONGO

Rep. and Presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) brought the hammer and the house down on Twitter for calling out President Trump on subordinating the US military to a foreign power’s prerogative.
She was completely right to take this tack with Trump here. And Trump was completely right, for once, to ignore a challenge to his authority and persona. Because had he done so, he would have boosted Gabbard as a real challenger to him in 2020. Trump knows that in politics you neve r attack down unless there is no down side.
Gabbard’s uncompromising honesty and principles on these important foreign policy positions give her the moral high ground.
Trump can’t respond to that without betraying his entire Presidential aura.
She is correct that US citizens who sign up for the military take an oath to protect and defend the constitution and the people of the United States. They did not take an oath to protect foreign dictators incapable of basic defense of their most precious and valuable real estate.
This is especially true when said dictators are the aggressors in a war of conquest against their neighbors. After more than four years of fighting, using weapons produced by the United States, with assistance by US military advisers, the Saudi Arabians have completely botched their war in Yemen, committing dozens, if not hundreds, of despicable attacks on civilian targets without anything to show for it but animosity and, now, wholly insecure infrastructure.
That this infrastructure is vital to the global economy should be irrelevant to Trump’s calculus as to where to send US troops and war materiel. That was something Saudi Arabia’s Clown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman should have considered before starting this war back in 2015.
The Houthi rebels in Northern Yemen claimed responsibility for the attack on the Abqaiq gas processing facility as a direct consequence of Saudi aggression. Of course, they are backed by Iran and Iranian technology.
It’s nearly a week after the event and we still don’t know for sure what happened. We have vague assurances from anonymous sources with the US and Saudi governments but no concrete details other than what was hit and how.
That Trump ultimately decided against going to war with Iran over this incident doesn’t negate Gabbard’s attack on him. It was cogent given the moment and is principled in how US troops should be used.
In all of this discussion about a potential war with Iran no one in the Trump administration or anywhere else have made a credible argument as to what actual threat Iran poses to the people of the United States.
Vague proclamations by Iranian politicians of “death to America” are, ultimately far less threatening or interesting than the parade of US Senators and Congresscritters saying that Iran is a “rogue regime” and it should be wiped off the face of the earth.
Are our sensibilities so fragile that we can’t handle a little criticism from people we have waged war by proxy with for over 70 years?
How is this any different than the average tweet by Lindsay Graham (R-AIPAC)?
We have senior officials, like the Secretary of State and the erstwhile National Security Adviser calling Iran ‘evil’ and we have officially lumped their army in with the same lot of terrorists as Al-Qaeda and ISIS. We have sanctioned their government and individuals within it.
Never forget that you reap what you sow in this life. And any animosity Iran and Iranians bear towards the US and Americans is richly deserved. The reverse, however, is difficult to make a case for.
Because, little factoid, Iran hasn’t attacked anyone in a span of time that is longer than the US has been a country.
Iran threatens Israel in the same way that Israel threatens it. Saudi Arabia threatens Iran as an oil competitor and religious one.
And the idea that the President of the United States should entertain even a mere thought of going to war with Iran over an attack on Saudi oil production should be anathema to anyone with two brain cells to rub together and make a spark.
Because at the end of the day this is not our fight. This is a fight between enemies made rich by oil in some cases (Saudi, Iran), political clout in high places in the US and U.K. in others (Israel) and friends in other high places and cultural integrity (Iran).
This is a cultural and religious conflict we barely understand and cannot change the dynamics of by blundering in with weapons of mass destruction. It is precisely because we take sides in this conflict that this conflict never ends.
And it is a conflict that dovetails with prevailing ‘wisdom’ in the West about how to maintain control over the planet that dates back more than 150 years. And that is why we do what we do. But it is time for that worldview to end.
It’s time bury Mackinder’s ideas alongside his corpse.
To Trump’s credit he seems to have realized that this incident was another like the events which led up to the US Global Hawk drone getting shot down in June. It was designed to get him to over-commit to a policy which would engulf the world in a war that only a very few powerful and highly placed want.
Even the tweet that Gabbard called him out on was carefully worded to cool things down and hint that he wasn’t prepared to respond militarily to this incident. As Gabbard climbs in the polls and is treated worse than Bernie Sanders in 2016 and Ron Paul by the Republicans in 2008 and 2012, she will hold Trump to account on foreign policy with an ever-growing clout and moral clarity which bodes well for the future of US involvement overseas.
And, like Nigel Farage in the U.K. offering the Tories a non-aggression pact to get a real Brexit over the finish line, Gabbard should put country before career and applaud Trump when he doesn’t act like Saudi Arabia’s “Bitch.” That will win her even more votes and more respect among the silent majority who are not in the throes of Trump Derangement Syndrome on both the Left and the Right.
Along with this, the likely end of Netanyahu’s political career should mark a sea change in US policy. While AIPAC’s pull is still very strong in the US, Israel’s commitment to an aggressive foreign policy with an uncommitted President should falter under a new government without its Agitator-in-Chief.
And without that animus propelling events along eventually cooler heads will prevail, and the present dynamic will change.
Trump made an enormous mistake pulling out of the JCPOA. That genie cannot be put back in the bottle. The question now is does he have the sense and the humility to realize his board position has materially weakened to the point where the probability of a rout is rising?
2020 for him has to be about making good on his promises to end the Empire building and improving relations with Russia. With Putin openly trolling him and the Saudis recently over weapon sales the odds of the latter happening are low.
But he can still make good on the former. Trump has lost so much of his goodwill with the people he’s ‘negotiating with’ that there is little to no wiggle room left. He has no leverage and he’s got no goodwill.
I saw this coming the day he bombed the Al-Shairat airbase in April 2017. I said then that it was one of the biggest geopolitical mistakes ever. It set the stage for all the others because it showed us just how out of his depth Trump was on foreign affairs. It set him back with both Putin and Chinese Premier Xi and it also showed how easily he could be manipulated by his staff and their rotten information.
It’s a deep hole he’s dug for himself. But there are still people who want to help him climb out of it. Gabbard’s ‘bitch slap’ is an example of the kind of tough love he needs to right his Presidency’s ship.

His base needs to do that a little more often and then maybe, just maybe, we’d get somewhere.