Showing posts with label “Yemen war”. Show all posts
Showing posts with label “Yemen war”. Show all posts

Sunday, December 15, 2019

It’s time for the international community to stop ‘recognising’ Hadi’s ‘government’

Omar Ahmed
Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi, President of Yemen [z_sattam/Twitter]
In spite of having no substantial physical political presence in Yemen, and no formal armed forces on the ground, the media is insistent on running with the same, tired expression of “the internationally recognised legitimate government” of the fugitive president, Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi, who has apparently been running the country from the Saudi capital, Riyadh, since he fled Yemen in 2015.
It has now been over a month since the signing of the Riyadh Agreement, which was hailed as ushering in peace in the south, not only among the warring factions of Hadi’s forces, which largely consists of Islamist, Islah militia and Sudanese mercenaries against the Security Belt forces, who are aligned with southern separatists, the Southern Transitional Council (STC), but it was also hoped to simmer down the tension between the patrons of these two parties, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) respectively, both partners in the anti-Houthi coalition in the north, but backing opposing sides in the south.

No longer ‘Iranian proxies’

It was also a month ago that I argued that this agreement will fall flat in its objectives, namely due to the fact that Hadi doesn’t have any concrete authority in Yemen, and the real political legitimacy lies with the National Salvation Government (NSG), which has been ruling the capital Sanaa since 2014. Its power-base was formed from of an alliance between the Ansar Allah movement, the Yemeni military and remnants of the General People’s Congress political party – however the same news outlets who are trying to convince us of the “internationally recognised” government, are the same ones peddling the misleading narrative, that the NSG are merely “Houthi rebels” or “Iranian proxies”, following Tehran’s orders.
Houthis patrol around after the clashes between Houthis and Former Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s supporters took place in Sanaa, Yemen on 5 December 2017 [Mohammed Hamoud/Anadolu Agency]
Essentially, this agreement stalled the inevitability that the Saudis, and the wider international community, will have to accept the reality that the NSG (“Houthis”) are the legitimate government in Yemen. I am using the past-tense here because the agreement is void and no longer exists – it was signed on 5 November and included a 30-day deadline in forming a new cabinet of 24 members, equally split from the north and south. I concluded with the revelation that the Saudis had acknowledged that they had opened channels of communication with the Houthis.
In fact, a few days following the signing of the accord, the UAE minister of state for Foreign Affairs, Anwar Gargash, conceded that the Houthis will have a role in post-war Yemen. In more recent developments, Saudi foreign minister, Adel Al-Jubeir, has suggestively indicated that the Houthis are in fact, a legitimate entity, stating “all Yemenis, including the Houthis have a role in the future of Yemen.”
It would now appear that the Trump administration has also done an ‘about-face’ on its policy on Yemen, having once framed the conflict as being an Iranian proxy war, they are now trying to downplay Iran’s involvement. Brian Hook, the US special representative for Iran, went from declaring in September that Iran was “controlling and deploying” the Houthis as a “terror front”, to now stating that “Iran clearly does not speak for the Houthis.” I mentioned back in September how this Iranian connection has been exaggerated and misrepresented by the media. One needs only to refer to a 2015 article which stated that Iran, for example, had in fact warned the Zaydi movement against taking over Sanaa. Indeed, the Houthis, as with Lebanon’s Hezbollah, are actually acting independently, albeit with assistance from Tehran. 

Who speaks for the south?

The Riyadh Agreement was always problematic from the outset, because although on paper it was plausible, the reality on the ground, in particular in the interim capital city of Aden, was another thing entirely. There are constant reports of violent clashes between Hadi’s mercenaries and the southern separatist forces. Additionally, there has been a steady increase in assassinations across the city, with the STC hinting liability with Hadi’s associates. Hampering conciliatory efforts, the STC are also refusing to vacate the presidential palace in the city. There are also reports that the former president of the Democratic People’s Republic of Yemen, Ali Nasser Mohammed, has warned the STC against plans to seize his home in Aden province, captured by the separatists last July.
It is important to recognise that the STC does not speak for all southerners, nor for the Southern Movement. There is the Southern National Salvation Council (SSC) based in Mahrah, who not only oppose both Saudi and Emirati interference in Yemen, but had opposed the Riyadh Agreement from its inception, noting that “the agreement gives legitimacy to regional militias affiliated abroad,” with reference to the STC.
The director of Human Rights for Yemen, Kim Sharif, explained to MEMO that the SSC is composed of the “original secessionists” and that the STC are widely regarded as a “traitor entity” by most southerners, as they are a party formed by the UAE who are using and exploiting the memory of the South Yemen state.

Illegitimacy of Hadi vs legitimacy of the NSG

Sharif agrees that the Hadi government lacks legitimacy, because following the election where he stood as the sole candidate, he was appointed as president for a transitional period of two years as part of the Gulf Initiative back in February 2012, reluctantly accepted by many, to avoid further bloodshed. Under the initiative, elections were to be held within the transitional period.
However, this failed to materialise and according to Sharif, under Hadi assassinations and terrorist attacks began to increase “funded by the Saudis,” and with a reliance on the Islah Party militia, who have close ties with General Mohsen Al-Ahmar, the vice president whose links to Al-Qaeda are well-documented. Hadi formerly resigned from the presidency in 2015, but has held onto the position ever since, giving him “zero legitimacy”. “There’s no such thing as an ‘internationally recognised government’ under international law. This is sheer abuse of the terms of the Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations and is a totally unacceptable trespass on the sovereignty of the state of Yemen,” Sharif continued.
Meanwhile, with regards to the legitimacy of the National Salvation Government based in Sanaa, Sharif described the 2014 takeover within the context of the failure by Hadi to carry out elections as per his mandate. Additionally, under International Customary Law, whomever takes control of the capital of any country is considered the “de facto” government. In order for this to be ratified, the government has to become “de jure”. Sharif argues that such a government must first follow an “internal legislation process”, which the Sanaa government has done by preserving national institutions, creating the Supreme Council, which includes all political parties including southern secessionists and operates within the existing constitution.
Furthermore, it is the Yemeni armed forces who are subservient to the NSG, in addition to the “Popular Committee” (Houthi fighters), who are the ones defending the nation against foreign aggression enacted by the Saudi-led coalition. These points and the fact that the NSG entered into the “Tribal Honour Agreement 2015” with all tribes, given that tribal rule still plays a vital role in Yemeni politics, ensures that the NSG based in Sanaa are the legitimate government in Yemen.
Although a southerner, Sharif herself is supportive of the NSG and AnsarAllah, as they have a common goal in liberating Yemen from the foreign aggression and occupation. The ultimate aim being “uniting all factions in the south with a view of freeing Yemen from all foreign occupation.”  She is confident that this movement will succeed “in partnership with our brothers and sisters in the north.”

International recognition

The National Salvation Government is not only arguably the legitimate government of Yemen. The Yemeni armed forces and its alliance with AnsarAllah has proven that they are indeed the most powerful entity in the country, with an ever-developing arsenal, they have recently announced an improved air defence system, capable of “neutralising” coalition aircraft up to a projected 90 per cent in the year ahead, which is significant as according to Yemeni military expert, Brigadier General Aziz Rashid, the coalition depends on aircraft for 85 per cent of its operations. They have shot down several drones in the past two weeks, in addition to an Apache helicopter belonging to the Saudis. Just today, at the time of writing, the Yemeni armed forces downed a Saudi spy plane over the Jizan region.
As the Riyadh Agreement gradually fades into obscurity, and the Saudis and its allies begin to sue for peace and pay for the damage that they caused, in the realisation that it is the Houthi government which is the legitimate power and authority in the country, it is high time that the international community start recognising this too, at the expense of the puppet government based in Riyadh headed by Hadi, who effectively has been held in captivity there and does not speak for the Yemeni people nor has control of the armed forces. Peace, stability and an end to the man-made humanitarian crisis is achievable with the help of this international community, who have been delusional for far too long.

Monday, December 02, 2019

Saudis Trying to Run From Yemen Trap: Report

SANAA (Kayhan Intl.) -- Yemenis loyal to former president Abd Rabbuh Mansour Hadi feel deeply sidelined by Saudi Arabia's direct talks with Houthis, a London-based news portal says.
According to Middle East Eye (MEE), Riyadh does not discuss its existing engagement of the Houthis with the "weak” pro-Hadi regime.
"Saudi Arabia is trying to find an exit from the trap it fell into," Muhammad Ali, a journalist and commentator from the southwestern city of Ta'izz, told MEE.
Riyadh has admitted having an "open channel” with the Yemeni movement to negotiate an end to the conflict.
Last month, the Associated Press reported that Saudi Arabia and the Houthis have been holding "indirect, behind-the scenes talks” mediated by Oman.
The talks reportedly began in September after a Houthi attack on the world’s largest crude oil facility in Saudi Arabia temporarily impacted nearly six percent of daily global production.
The Houthis reportedly offered to stop launching attacks on Saudi targets if the kingdom ended its airstrikes in Yemen. They later unilaterally released hundreds of prisoners, while the Saudis freed 128 Yemenis on Thursday.
The Hadi regime is apparently incensed, thinking that the communication between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis is aimed at ending attacks on the kingdom.
According to an unnamed Houthi source in Sana'a cited by the Middle East Eye, the current talks are not part of the UN-brokered Stockholm agreement.
The Stockholm agreement was between the Houthis and Hadi, "but now the negotiations are between the Houthis and Saudi Arabia,” the source said.
On Tuesday, a statement carried on Saudi state media said the kingdom would ease restrictions on Yemeni airspace to allow flights out of the Yemeni capital Sana'a, which is administered by a coalition including the Houthis.
According to MEE, the agreement between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis and lifting blockade on Yemen was reached in Oman, but Hadi's delegates were not involved in the negotiations.
Saudi Arabia made the concession after three of its border brigades were captured by Yemenis in August and the Houthis bombed oil facilities in September, the report said.
Hadi's deputy prime minister Abdulaziz Gubari warned Saudi Arabia last month not to sign any bilateral agreement with the Houthis.
Abdulghani Rageh, a pro-Hadi military leader in Ta'izz, said the talks between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis have sidelined the former Yemeni president.
"The Houthis are the winners of the talks,” he said, claiming that battles have calmed down on the Saudi borders but not on local fronts.
Ali told MEE that Saudi Arabia prioritizes its safety and economy over all other issues.
Hadi and his regime, he said, are "only helpless followers of Saudi Arabia" and Riyadh prefers to discuss any solution with the Houthis instead of its "weak” proxies.
Saudi Arabia launched its military aggression against Yemen in 2015 in an attempt to reinstate Hadi and eliminate the Houthis.
With those objectives appearing more elusive than ever, the only way for Hadi seems to also engage the Houthis.
However, Hadi and his high-ranking associates live outside Yemen and "none of them care about Yemenis,” Ali said.
"I hope to see Yemenis inside Yemen holding talks with the Houthis and reaching reconciliation internally. Solutions will come from within Yemen, not from another country," he added.

Monday, October 14, 2019

Mideast States Believe Region Safer Place without US: Iran

By
 IFP Editorial Staff

Members of the US' 5th Special Forces Group (A) conduct 50. Cal Weapons training during counter ISIS operations at Al-Tanf Garrison in southern Syria, November 22, 2017. / Photo by US Defence Department
The Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) says many Western Asian countries believe the Middle East without the United States is a safer place.
Ali Shamkhani wrote in a piece that the US administration’s bitter but instructive confession has led many West Asian nations, even the group that has hosted US troops in the region for years, to acknowledge that “the Middle East is a safer place without America.”
The senior security official said three clear statements by US officials over the past two months reveal facts that the US administration previously lacked the courage to accept and express.
“After Yemen’s Ansarullah drone attack on Aramco facilities in Saudi Arabia, and in response to pressure from the Saudi kingdom to deal with the perpetrators, the US statesmen explicitly emphasised their opposition to meet Saudi Arabia’s demand, announcing that Saudi Arabia was attacked, not the United States,” stated the SNSC secretary.
Shamkhani also maintained that in the wake of the ongoing political and military defeats in the region, the $8-billion US military presence [plan] in the region was unveiled, and it was announced that the US presence in the Middle East has borne no fruits and was a pointless act.
“Recently, after Turkey’s attack on northern Syria the US turned its back to its Kurdish allies, and the American officials confessed to waging a bloody war in Iraq by falsely claiming that there existed WMD in the Arab country. They admitted that entering the Middle East was the worst decision ever made in the US history.”
Shamkhani went on to add that the US administration seems to have come to the conclusion, through objective experience, that the equation of power and the political geometry of the world has changed, especially at its heart, the Middle East. Besides, the United States can no longer claim an absolute supremacy over the affairs of the international system, in spite of all its massive propaganda.
“Washington has come to realise that there are only two ways forward, either to bear the expense of having a hollow face of a global superpower or to embrace the present reality of the world with a realistic approach to free itself from the burden of the enormous costs of this show,” said Shamkhani.
“In other words, the US administration has realised that today it does not have the means to be a superpower for any reason, and it is impossible to go back to the topmost era. As its inability to execute strategic projects such as “Middle East Disintegration”, “Deal of the Century “, “Regime Change in Iran”, “Turning Saudi Arabia into the Region’s Gendarme”, “Yemen war”, “The Afghan Peace”, “The Syrian Crisis” etc., has been proven to everyone.”