Damascus can sell a future of investment and regional revival from conference stages. The harder task is turning political power into institutions that can generate wealth, protect incomes, and restore a battered social contract.
The Cradle
Self-appointed Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa (a former Al-Qaeda chief known as Abu Mohammad al-Julani) made all three claims at the Arab Media Summit in Dubai days ago. Ambition becomes dangerous, however, when it displaces economic reality, and publicity is used to obscure an increasingly harsh living reality.
Economies are measured by their capacity to produce wealth, provide work, protect incomes, and sustain essential services, rather than by the promises announced from summit platforms.
Across Syria, that divide is widening. Official rhetoric points toward recovery while households confront rising prices, eroding purchasing power, and services that remain weak or unaffordable. The gap raises questions about public policy, political credibility, and the ability of the authorities in Damascus to move from managing one emergency after another toward building effective state institutions.
Poverty has the last word
The scale of the crisis is laid bare in data from the Syrian Center for Policy Research. In May 2026, a reference household needed 3.437 million old Syrian pounds a month – around $254 – simply to remain above the extreme poverty line.
The lower poverty threshold stood at 5.407 million pounds ($400), while the upper threshold reached 7.464 million ($552). The burden also differed considerably by governorate, ranging from 4.742 million pounds ($351) in Damascus to 2.176 million ($162) in Suwayda.
The same data shows that in April, the salary of a university-educated government employee covered only 33.3 percent of the reference household's extreme poverty line. A salary does not necessarily represent a family's entire income.
Even so, the comparison exposes how far wages have fallen behind the cost of survival. For households without savings or reliable secondary income, every increase in the price of food or energy cuts directly into social stability.
These figures also expose the weakness of economic arguments built around national aggregates. A future rise in gross domestic product would mean little to families whose wages remain detached from the cost of basic goods.
Growth becomes socially meaningful only when it creates work, strengthens household income, and restores access to services. Until then, the distance between the promised recovery and lived conditions will continue to expand.
Fuel shock spreads through the market
On 13 September, the Energy Ministry raised the diesel price from 125 to 175 new Syrian pounds per liter – an increase of 40 percent. The price of 95-octane gasoline rose to 195 pounds and 90-octane to 185. Officials blamed soaring international procurement costs and a major overhaul at the Baniyas Refinery, which has forced greater reliance on imports.
Higher fuel prices raise the cost of transport, agriculture, irrigation, manufacturing, generators, heating, and distribution, feeding quickly into food prices, fares, and service charges. Farmers and factory owners unable to absorb the increase or pass it on to consumers with little purchasing power may be forced to cut production.
Before the latest increase, Energy Minister Mohammad al-Bashir said the country was producing around 100,000 barrels per day (bpd) against requirements of up to 350,000. At a parliamentary hearing on 20 September, he put normal output closer to 140,000 barrels, saying it had dropped to 98,000 during road blockades, while average demand stood near 300,000 and could reach 325,000 to 350,000 in winter. The explanation accounts for some of the shifting figures, but also shows how difficult it is to assess policy when basic energy data emerge piecemeal.
That leaves Damascus facing a costly import dependence while lacking the fiscal means to shield households and productive sectors. Calling the rise temporary offers little comfort to a family with no reserves, a farmer unable to finance the next season, or a small workshop already surviving on a narrow margin.
Nor does the pressure stop when global prices ease. Transport operators and traders rarely reverse increases at the same speed with which they imposed them, while producers forced to reduce output may need months to recover. A supposedly temporary fuel shock can therefore become embedded in food prices, rents, and informal service charges long after the original justification has weakened.
Paying more for darkness
Electricity shows what happens when price reform runs ahead of service quality and purchasing power. The Syrian Center for Policy Research recorded annual increases of 48.9 percent for electricity, gas, and fuel in May 2026, while the broader housing, water, electricity, gas, and fuel category rose by 58.5 percent.
The official bill captures only part of the burden. Power cuts force households and businesses to buy generator fuel, pay for repairs, and absorb lost working hours. In industry and agriculture, unstable supply damages equipment, raises unit costs, and weakens competitiveness. Syrian manufacturers have already warned that higher electricity tariffs are landing on a sector already constrained by expensive fuel, scarce inputs, and weak domestic demand.
The case for higher tariffs rests on figures the government has yet to make public, including the true cost of generation, losses across the grid, the scale of subsidies, and the hours of electricity actually delivered. Raising bills while supply remains poor merely shifts the sector’s failures onto households already struggling to survive.
Syrians often pay once for state electricity and again for generators, batteries, or solar systems. Businesses fold the same costs into their prices, leaving households and small producers to carry an electricity bill that extends across the entire economy.
Investment by announcement
Reconstruction will require foreign capital, technology, and expertise, but investment cannot be measured by press releases or the headline value of agreements. What counts is the capital actually deployed, the jobs created, the domestic value retained, and the share of the returns that reaches the Syrian state.
Since western sanctions were eased, Damascus has unveiled a succession of prospective deals while pressing ahead with sweeping market reforms. Many remain memoranda of understanding rather than binding contracts.
Until their terms are disclosed, there is no way to know whether they will rebuild Syria’s productive base or enrich politically connected intermediaries through privatization and long-term resource concessions.
Ports, real estate, and extractive projects may bring revenue without reviving domestic production. The greater test is whether foreign capital creates skilled employment, supports Syrian suppliers, and helps rebuild infrastructure. Otherwise, the country may exchange its present isolation for a new form of dependence.
A market built for insiders
Damascus is presenting the market as the answer to Syria’s economic collapse. Yet markets do not operate outside the state. They depend on courts that enforce contracts, regulators able to restrain monopolies, and public institutions that prevent essential services from becoming privileges reserved for those who can afford them.
None of those safeguards can be built overnight. Removing subsidies and freeing prices before genuine competition exists gives dominant traders and politically connected firms greater power over the market.
Meanwhile, wages remain suppressed, and public services continue to deteriorate, leaving ordinary Syrians exposed to prices they cannot afford.
Economic liberalization may alter the state’s role, though it cannot absolve the authorities of responsibility for healthcare, education, infrastructure, and protection for vulnerable households. Withdrawal under these conditions would leave the market to those who already control contracts, capital, and political access.
Firefighting the backlash
A Syrian economist who spoke to The Cradle on condition of anonymity says the crisis extends beyond economic indicators to the relationship between the authorities and society. International and regional support may have given Damascus a temporary surplus of power, but control and foreign sponsorship cannot sustain legitimacy while living conditions continue to deteriorate.
The fuel protests revealed how much anger had already accumulated. On 13 September alone, the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) recorded 36 demonstrations linked to the price increase. Protesters blocked roads and halted oil tankers across several regions, forcing the government to offer cheaper diesel for heating, agriculture, industry, and selected service sectors.
The economist calls this a “firefighting” response, with concessions offered only after anger spills onto the streets. Subsidized diesel may ease the immediate pressure, though it does little to address wages that no longer cover basic needs or the continued collapse of electricity and public services.
When reality catches up
The promises made in Dubai bear little resemblance to the economy Syrians encounter each day. The government is asking a population already pushed into poverty to finance its reforms through higher prices, even as it withholds the figures needed to judge those policies and fails to improve the services people are paying more to receive.
Damascus has treated the crisis largely as a revenue problem, extracting more from households whose incomes have already collapsed. Foreign backing may shield the authorities from immediate political pressure, but it cannot prevent declining living standards from feeding public anger across the country.
Any credible recovery must begin with an admission of how far the economy has fallen. Forecasts are being presented as accomplishments, while agreements whose terms remain hidden are advertised as investments. For Syrians struggling to cover food and energy costs, such promises have little connection to daily life.
The $200 billion economy exists for now in speeches delivered at international summits. The economy Syrians know is one of depleted wages, struggling factories, and steadily rising living costs. No amount of publicity can close that gap.
No comments:
Post a Comment