The US and Israeli aggression against Iran, which began on February 28, has undermined confidence in the American administration, especially given that Donald Trump has repeatedly promised to renounce new wars of aggression.
Mohammed Amer
In the American press and in media outlets in the Global South, most commentary suggests that the American Gulf War was a clear failure, “making the region more dangerous and diplomacy more detached from reality.”
In the United States itself, it has caused significant divisions, resulting in political forces within American society. Washington’s actions were condemned not only by the Democratic Party, which opposes the president, but also by some Trump supporters in the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement.
The US military campaign against Iran is often attributed to Israeli pressure, the general logic of containing Tehran, and Donald Trump’s desire to gain control of oil sources in the Middle East.
The House Armed Services Committee proposed including a section entitled “US-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027
Israel is attempting to undermine the US-Iran agreement
When the US president announced his intention to conclude a deal with Iran and cease military action, Israeli authorities voiced their opposition, strongly encouraging the US to continue the war to overthrow the current Iranian regime. Immediately, supporters of the US Jewish lobby became active, seeking to derail the emerging peace agreement between Washington and Tehran. Their power cannot be underestimated, although, according to the Jerusalem Post on May 29, 2026, 60% of American adults have an unfavorable view of Israel. Many observers believe that Trump’s highly contradictory statements regarding a ceasefire with Iran are largely due to pressure from the pro-Israel lobby, which has repeatedly warned the president against making concessions to Iran in any deal to end the war. It is no coincidence that on May 25 of this year, Trump called on several countries, predominantly Muslim, to join the Abraham Accords—a set of agreements aimed at normalizing relations with Israel. On his “Truth Social” network, Trump stated that Saudi Arabia and Qatar should sign such an agreement first. He also called on Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, and Jordan to join, despite the fact that Turkey has recognized Israel since 1949, and Egypt and Jordan have peace treaties with Israel signed in 1979 and 1994, respectively. He even mentioned the possibility of Iran joining the Abraham Accords.
Deepening US-Israel Military Cooperation: A New Initiative and Its Implications
The pro-Israel lobby remains influential in the US Congress. Therefore, the House Armed Services Committee proposed including a section entitled “US-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative” in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027.
This legislation aims to significantly strengthen ties between the two countries’ militaries by expanding their collaboration in research, production, and weapons development. If adopted, this provision could mark a turning point in one of the world’s closest military alliances. For Israel, the partnership, which has so far relied heavily on US military assistance, could transform into deeper integration of defense industries. This would essentially grant Israel unprecedented access to US technology and significant influence over US defense priorities.
It is noteworthy that the White House, despite criticism, continues its attempts to “appease” Israel. This is evident, in particular, in the fact that Israel has been allowed to bomb southern Lebanon for several weeks now, ignoring the ceasefire agreement.
The Iranian Campaign as an Instrument of US Domestic Policy
Some political scientists believe that the Iranian campaign has become a tool for the White House to weaken the traditional separation of powers and secure its exclusive right to domestic decision-making. In this context, Donald Trump’s rhetoric, which has repeatedly portrayed Iran as a state that has humiliated the United States for 47 years, takes on particular significance. Historical analogies serve as a compelling rationale for decision-making.
The United States also needs Iran to reaffirm its imperial status. The symbolic backdrop created by examples such as Greenland, the Panama Canal, Canada, Gaza, and the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America is complemented by the president’s opportunity to demonstrate not just an image but actual results through a war with Iran. This logic could lead to Trump demanding that, after a victory (more imaginary than real), America accept a new norm: the president governs independently, determines the price of victory, can revise the War Powers Act, and presents the economic costs to the public as the price of military operations.
Prospects for an Agreement with Iran
Some observers believe that Washington will likely agree to a ceasefire agreement with Iran, as it lacks the capacity or resources to continue active military operations. The president will try to present this as a personal victory. However, it is possible that the US could resume military operations after some time, especially if an agreement with Iran on joint control of the Strait of Hormuz and, consequently, the sharing of shipping revenues fails.
Mohammed Amer, Syrian publicist, expert on current issues of global and regional politics
No comments:
Post a Comment