War Mongers as "Leaders of the World"

Iqbal Jassat

Why are war criminals in their capacity as heads of state who despite being consistently in breach of global conventions governing human rights, treated as royalty?

What sets them apart from common criminals by having red carpets rolled out and celebrated with pomp and ceremony?

Do they belong to a special class of untouchables? A distinct class who enjoy status, privileges and worst of all, immunity?

To list them is not difficult, for not only are they prominent as they parade on global arenas like proud peacocks, they are feted as celebrities too by no less than members of the mainstream media.

Sounds difficult to comprehend and quite inexplicable that supposedly informed media personalities would find it hard to haul such criminals over the coals.

Tough and robust interviews to interrogate, shame and humiliate thugs who masquerade as leaders seem not to matter anymore. Instead embarrassingly, journalists find it cool to jostle with each other to obtain - wait for it, not a scoop but a selfie!

From Delhi to Tel Aviv; from Riyadh to Dubai; from Rangoon to Beijing; from Cairo to Washington, the misfits who claim to be leaders of their respective nation states are no more than usurpers causing untold harm to millions under their brutal reign.

Whether its Narendra Modi or Benjamin Netanyahu, the list of crimes committed by them including gross human rights violations ought to have them face prosecution at the Hague. Instead they are revered as respected leaders without any accountability.

Kashmir and Palestine - despite the weight of international law being on their side, share a bitter experience of having their rights ignored by the United Nations.

Their occupiers, India and Israel, are brutally repressive and utterly unmindful to the point of being dismissive about repercussions from international bodies such as the United Nations.

India is among Israel’s biggest importer of arms and Modi’s security forces have been receiving training for “anti-terror” operations that Netanyahu’s regime conducts against Palestinians.

Widespread suppression of freedoms and fundamental human rights are conducted within a post-9/11 framework, defined as defeating the “scourge of Islamic terrorism”.

It is this manufactured terror frame that is sold to the world to justify the aggressive nationalisms of Zionism and Hindutva.

India and Israel thus inaugurate the colonial occupations of Kashmir and Palestine.

It is important to recall that Modi’s culpability during the 2002 Gujarat massacres that resulted in mass murder of Muslims, earned him the title of the “Butcher of Gujarat”.

Given the atrocities being committed by his occupying forces in Kashmir, we can add the title, the “Butcher of Kashmir” as well.

As the “Butcher of Palestine”, Netanyahu continues plundering land and destroying lives via ethnic cleansing.

His overt apartheid policies are cheered on by over-zealous supporters, who have allied themselves with white supremacists in Europe and America.

It is a shame that the world is adorned with ethno-nationalist presidents and prime ministers whose ideologies are defined by racism and religious extremism.

Some gain power by ostensibly “democratic” means, while others via hereditary privileges which enthrone them as “kings”, “princes” and “emirs”.

The Arabian Peninsula is littered with unelected despots and tyrants who masquerade as leaders. The impunity associated with their iron-fisted rule makes a mockery of religious values they supposedly subscribe to.

While Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and other Gulf fiefdoms claim to be Muslim governments, their representation of Islam is far removed from its pristine teachings.

Neither civil right activists nor political opponents are tolerated in these oligarchies.

The brutal murder of Jamal Khashoggi and the circumstances that led to his death, illustrate the rogue conduct of Mohamed bin Salman.

Yet despite the evidence that implicates him directly, MbS is feted as a “moderate” and embraced on the global stage.

The devastation caused in Yemen by the Saudi-led war is yet another example of literally getting away with murder.

MbS and his Emirati mentor MbZ have since 2015 wreaked havoc leading to the UN declaring Yemen to be the world’s largest humanitarian catastrophe.

Human rights monitors report that the Saudi coalition has conducted scores of indiscriminate and disproportionate airstrikes killing thousands of civilians.

That this illegal war has failed to achieve any of the coalition’s goals apart from reducing Yemen to ashes seems of no concern to the warmongers, as they continue exacerbating crisis after crisis by blowing up civilian targets.

Saudi Arabia’s status as a client-state of America and having inched closer to publicly embracing the Zionist project which dispossessed Palestine, leads MbS to believe that repercussions if any, will be limited and managed by Trump.

War crimes indeed! Yet despite going on unabated for four years, the criminals responsible for it are sought after as “celebrities” instead of facing prosecution and lifelong jail terms.

Turning our gaze to Myanmar, it is necessary to repeat the question Mehdi Hasan posed: why hasn’t Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi been indicted for war crimes and genocide at the International Criminal Court?

Two years have passed since the Burmese military launched a renewed campaign of terror and violence against the Rohingya Muslim minority in Myanmar’s Rakhine region.

Documented evidence point to dastardly crimes committed as Hasan reminded us: “Rohingya men hacked to death; children burned alive; women and girls raped and sexually-assaulted in their hundreds and thousands. Scores of villages were pillaged and razed to the ground as more than 700,000 Rohingya were driven from their homes.”

In listing some of the corrupt “leaders” engaged in genocidal crimes against their own people, others and those occupied by them, does not suggest that the list is complete.

Egypt’s military dictator who may now have donned a three-piece suit cannot escape the fact that his ascension to power was via a violent bloody coup.

General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi was America’s chosen candidate to betray Egypt’s revolution by deposing its only democratically elected leader Mohamed Morsi and placing the entire country under siege.

Not surprisingly, the rogue elements who financed and supported the overthrow of Morsi, banned the Muslim Brotherhood and imprisoned its leaders along with thousands of civil rights activists, journalists and opponents, are none other than Bin Salman, Bin Zayed and Netanyahu.

Sisi’s authoritarian rule has crushed democracy and taken the country back to a state of emergency which Egyptians revolted against and succeeded by removing the tyranny of Hosni Mubarak.

Paradoxically, instead of facing the ICC prosecutors, Sisi has been rewarded with the chairmanship of the African Union - much to the shame of the continent.

Why, one may ask has the world allowed murderers to hold high office with impunity?

Is it due to the current construct of global politics being skewed in favor of the rich and powerful? Is it as the result of the ease whereby corruption at all levels of society allows manipulation of political power?

Or is it a combination of both and more that says to Modi, Netanyahu and fellow warmongers: go on, your fascist policies are untouchable?

Israel’s hidden role in the brewing India-Pakistan conflict exposed

Israel’s export of Zionism and neocolonialism — and the accompanying oppression that in practice actually helps to create many of the very terrorist groups they fight against — is just as dangerous as its export of arms.

These were the remarks of Chile-based American journalist Whitney Webb in her article for MintPress, titled: “Israel’s hidden role in the brewing India-Pakistan conflict exposed”.

Well-known British journalist Robert Fisk recently wrote a very telling and troubling article in newspaper ‘The Independent’ regarding the outsized role of the Zionist regime in the burgeoning tensions between India and Pakistan, two nuclear powers. The story — despite its importance, given the looming threat of nuclear war between the two countries — was largely overlooked by the western media.

The tit-for-tat attacks exchanged between India and Pakistan recently have seen long-standing tensions between the two countries escalate to dangerous proportions, though Pakistan helped to deescalate the situation somewhat by returning and “saving” an Indian pilot whose plane had been shot down in retaliation for India’s bombing of targets in a disputed area administered by Pakistan.

That bombing was retaliation for a car bomb attack launched by Jaish-e Mohamed militants, a group that both India and Pakistan recognize as a terrorist organization, against Indian forces. Some analysts have speculated that India’s decision to bomb this area was made by Indian President Narendra Modi, a Hindu ethno-nationalist, in order to rally his base ahead of upcoming Indian elections in May.

Yet, whatever the reason, the bombing has revealed the close ties that have formed between Modi’s India and Benjamin Netanyahu’s Zionist regime, particularly between their militaries. As Fisk notes, following the bombing, Indian media heavily promoted the fact that Israeli-made bombs — specifically, Rafael Spice-2000 “smart bombs” — had been used in the attack. Fisk writes:

Like many Israeli boasts of hitting similar targets, the Indian adventure into Pakistan might owe more to the imagination than military success. The ‘300-400 terrorists’ supposedly eliminated by the Israeli-manufactured and Israeli-supplied GPS-guided bombs may turn out to be little more than rocks and trees.”

Arguably the most important aspect of Fisk’s report is his detailing of the very close ties that have been forged between the Israeli and Indian militaries in recent years. For instance, according to Fisk, India was Israel’s arms industry’s largest client in 2017, spending nearly $700 million on Israeli air-defense systems, radars, ammunition and missiles. Many of those weapons had been promoted as “combat tested” after being used against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, the world’s largest open-air prison. That same year, India represented 49 percent of Israel’s arms export market.

In addition to arms purchases, many Indian soldiers have traveled to the Negev desert to be trained by Israeli “special commando” units, and at least 16 elite Indian “Garud” commandos were recently based at two separate Israeli air bases.

Just as troubling as this military cooperation is that ethno-nationalism and anti-Islam rhetoric are increasingly becoming the basis for the relationship between the Modi government and the Zionist regime.

For instance, a recent article in the Israeli daily ‘Haaretz’, written by Indian journalist Shairee Malhotra and cited by Fisk, noted that “the India-Israel relationship is also commonly being framed in terms of a natural convergence of ideas between their ruling BJP and Likud parties.”

Other reports have noted that this has translated into more “aggressive” policies from Modi targeting Kashmir and Muslims elsewhere in India and that continued Israeli goading of Modi’s anti-Islam tendencies could make life much more difficult for the estimated 200 million Muslims living in India.

While some analysts and reports have warned about this danger, Fisk notes that it will be difficult to prevent the Zionist, fascist nationalism of Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party from influencing India’s ruling party, writing:

It is difficult to see how Zionist nationalism will not leach into Hindu nationalism when Israel is supplying so many weapons to India – the latest of which India, which has enjoyed diplomatic relations with Israel since 1992, has already used against militants inside Pakistan.”

Fisk goes on to note that “signing up to the ‘war on terror’ – especially may seem natural for India and Israel which were built on colonial partition.” Indeed, India’s actions in the disputed Kashmir region share many similarities to Israel’s neocolonial occupation of Palestine.

For instance, the Muslim majority of Kashmir are treated as second-class citizens on their own land and their push for self-determination has been brutally suppressed by Indian forces. As of 2016, 500,000 Indian military personnel in the region were present in the region, roughly equating to one soldier for every 25 civilians. As Al Jazeera noted at the time, there have been more than 70,000 killings, about 10,000 enforced disappearances and 7,000 mass graves found since 1947 in Indian-administered Kashmir.

There are many other parallels between Kashmir and Palestine, including the fact that the British government shares a large share of the responsibility for both. Indeed, the British-planned partition creating the current states of India and Pakistan in 1947 is the root of the current conflict in Kashmir much as the Britain-mandated creation of the Zionist regime in 1948 is the root of the current conflict in Palestine. As far as Kashmiris and Palestinians are concerned, the government of India and the Zionist regime picked up where their colonial master of years past left off.

If a deadly conflict ultimately breaks out between India and Pakistan, it will hardly be the first time Israel has armed controversial governments. Israel sold arms to the Rwandan government during the Rwandan genocide and, more recently, to the government of Myanmar during its “ethnic cleansing” of the Rohingya Muslims.

Yet, as Fisk notes, Israel’s export of Zionist nationalism and neocolonialism — and the accompanying oppression that in practice actually helps to create many of the very terrorist groups they fight against — is just as dangerous as its export of arms.