Vain Bid of the Seditious Saudi Clan to Survive

By: Kayhan Int’l 

Would the spurious British created entity called Saudi Arabia whose existence is based on terrorism, survive the next few decades?

This is the question troubling the mind of the regime that so brutally murdered one of its own recently (Jamal Khashoggi) and which wrongly thinks that with the support of the godfather of all terrorism, the US, and the terrorist Zionist entity, it can somehow prolong its precarious existence, despite the growing awareness and opposition of the masses groaning under the sandals of the Najdi clan since 1932.

Of course Wahhabi terrorism predates the formal founding of Saudi Arabia, since the desert brigand of Jewish origin, Abdul-Aziz, had seven years earlier in 1925 savagely descended on the Land of Revelation, Hijaz, to desecrate and destroy the Islamic sanctities in the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, and unleashed torrents of Muslim blood in Taef and Jeddah as well.

The people of the oil-rich eastern region have also not forgotten how their homeland was seized during First World War by this same very terrorist, thriving on British help against the interests of the tottering Ottoman Empire.

Likewise the people of Najran, Asir and Jizan still resent the detachment of these northern Yemeni provinces in 1934 by Abdul-Aziz – again with British help – and their forced merger with Saudi Arabia. 

Even in Najd public sentiments run against the upstart Saudis who are viewed as criminals who in 1921 with London’s assistance dislodged the 85-year rule of the Aal-Rashid dynasty, whose members are still held in awe by the Wahhabi regime of Riyadh.

The people of Iraqi, whether Shi’a or Sunni, whether Arab or Kurd, detest from the depth of their hearts the state terrorism of the Saudis, who had backed Saddam of the repressive Ba’th minority regime of Baghdad to the hilt with billions of dollars to carry on frequent bouts of massacre, the desecration of Islamic sites, the unwarranted 8-year war against Iran, and the recent takfiri terrorist bid to takeover the country, which was saved thanks to the timely response by the Islamic Republic to the request for help of the government and people of Iraq.

In Afghanistan, in Bahrain, in Yemen, and other places, the common people feel greatly indebted to Iran’s sincere support for their rights which the seditious Saudis and their stooges are trying to desperately suppress – through Daesh, through the criminal Aal-e Khalifa minority regime, and through the puppet Mansour Hadi.

If the Palestinians feel betrayed by the dalliance of the Saudis, Bahrainis and other reactionary Arab regimes with the Zionists, against the cause of the struggle for liberation of Islam’s first qibla, Bayt al-Moqaddas, the Egyptian people are still seething in anger on the torpedoing of their democracy bid by Riyadh which worked with the military to overthrow the only elected government in their history.

Interestingly the people of Turkey, and especially of Istanbul, where Khashoggi was so macabrely murdered earlier this month, recall how a blasphemous criminal progenitor of the Saudi clan, Abdullah Aal-e Saud, was beheaded in the public square of the Ottoman capital in the 1820s for his desecration of the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, following his capture by the Egyptian ruler, Mohammad Ali Pasha, who after driving out the heretical Wahhabis from Hijaz had pursued them right to their stronghold Diriyah (near modern Riyadh).

No wonder in view of these undeniable facts, the seditious Saudis, whose time is almost over despite their gifting of the looted oil wealth of the deprive people of the eastern region to the Americans and the British, are desperately labelling all sorts of weird and wild accusations against the Islamic Republic of Iran and the popular liberation movements in the region, in the vain hope of surviving somehow, even if it means licking the boots of the Zionists. 

How Long Will Spurious Saudi Arabia Survive?

By: S. Nawabzadeh

      At a time when it is starving to death millions of Muslims of Yemen by its three-and-a-half years of blockade of that country’s land and marine borders, as well as airspace, in addition to having killed over 20,000 Yemeni men, women and children so far, the repressive Wahhabi minority regime of Riyadh is celebrating with a two-day holiday what it calls its 86th ‘national day’.

      It is mind-boggling how a spurious entity can call itself a nation when the fact of the matter is that Saudi Arabia, which Britain created for the desert brigand of Najd, Abdul-Aziz Aal-e Saud, is not a geographical area, neither is it a historical piece of territory, nor is it a culturally cohesive land with people sharing the same set of beliefs, traditions, or a common heritage – let alone political objectives.  

      Over the past two days, millions – if not billions – of dollars of the looted oil wealth of the deprived people of the Eastern Region, who since the First World War are groaning under the boots of the Najdi occupiers – the 50-year lease long lapsed – have been squandered on fake festivities by the godfather of takfiri terrorism who shamelessly styles himself as "Custodian of the Two Holy Shrines”.

     Whom does the ruler and the regime think they are deceiving when most of the world knows that in 1925 with British help Abdul-Aziz had seized the Land of Revelation, Hijaz, by massacring thousands of Muslims, including pilgrims, taking refuge at the Holy Ka’ba in Mecca and the Holy Shrine of Prophet Muhammad (SAWA) in Medina!

      He then went on to desecrate and destroy the Sacred Cemeteries of Jannat al-Mo’alla in Mecca and Jannat al-Baqi in Medina – where the monotheist forbears and the blessed offspring of the Prophet repose in peace. 

     Abdul-Aziz continued to unleash rivers of Muslim blood as his hordes swept across the then mostly Shi’a Muslim resort of Ta’ef and the Red Sea port of Jeddah. In 1934, again with British help, he occupied the northern Yemeni provinces of Najran, Asir, and Jizan.

     History also bears testimony that London bestowed the fiefdom opon Abdul-Aziz and named it Saudi Arabia in 1932, only after he gave a written pledge for implementation of the infamous Balfour Declaration for setting up of a Jewish entity in Palestine – created 16 years later in 1948 for the illegal Zionist migrants of Eastern Europe. 

      In 1953 Abdul-Aziz died, and since then his sons (so far 7) have ruled as the unelected and unrepresentative rulers of a country that lacks acute legitimacy as a nation. 

     As a result Saudi Arabia has always been jittery and apprehensive of the imminent collapse of the unnatural and rootless entity.

     The 1950s and 1960s were scary for the Saudi clan during the heyday of Jamal Abdun-Nasser’s nationalism and the regular fall of Arab monarchies. The 1970s brought unaccounted wealth and with it luxuries and lavish spending on pleasures because of the astronomical oil price rise, which ironically benefitted the West, especially Washington, as tens of billions of petro-dollars flowed back into US banks.

      In 2011 the wave of Islamic Awakening and the collapse of the pro-western regimes in Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen, again threatened the survival of Saudi Arabia and the crafty regime in Riyadh, while pretending to support President Mohammad Morsi, stabbed him in the back by overthrowing the Ikhwan al-Muslimeen government through General Abdul-Fattah as-Sisi’s military coup.

      No empire or dynasty has ever survived, let alone spurious entities. This means the end is nigh on the horizon for both the Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia and their Zionist cousins in Israel, no matter what crimes against humanity they continue to commit – including involvement in the recent terrorist attack in Ahvaz.   

Saudis now want to follow ‘moderate’ Islam: really?

Crescent International

Suppose a Dalmatian (a dog breed, in case there is some confusion!) says it wants to get rid of its spots. Suppose further, that a scorpion says it would no longer sting. How much credibility should one give to these claims?

Something similar has happened in “Saudi” Arabia where the Crown Prince, Muhammad bin Salman announced yesterday that “We are returning to what we were before—a country of ‘moderate’ Islam that is open to all religions and to the world.”

Bin Salman (BS for short) was speaking at the Future Investment Initiative, an economic forum in Riyadh attended among others by Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Christine Lagarde. There were also business leaders from around the world.

BS announced plans to create a totally new city at a price of $500 billion. What would be different in this city, to be named Neom that other cities in the opaque kingdom do not offer?

The ambitious young prince wants to lead the way in the use of drones, driverless cars and robotics.

Interestingly, the kingdom only recently announced that women would be allowed to drive cars, but from next year. Why not allow them to drive immediately was not made clear.

Is the idea of driverless cars a way to placate the country’s conservative elements that are not happy with allowing women to drive? They allege that women driving cars would lead to immorality!

We need to return to BS’s claim of representing “moderate” Islam and his pledge to work to defeat extremist ideas. He said this would ensure that young Saudis live in harmony with the rest of the world.

“We will eradicate the remnants of extremism very soon. We represent the moderate teachings and principles of Islam,” BS said.

“Saudi” Arabia is a terror factory. Wahhabism is at the root of most of the sectarian problems in the world. Takfirism is its poisoned fruit that has caused havoc in much of the Muslim world.

So which “moderate” Islam is BS referring to? The very raison d’etre of “Saudi” Arabia is Wahhabism. The toxic alliance between the Bani Saud and Ibn Abdul Wahhab in 1744 is what ultimately led to the emergence of the “Saudi” kingdom in 1932.

“We were not like this in the past,” said BS. A reasonably informed person would say that is absolute BS. Wahhibism and extremism are two sides of the same coin; in fact they are one and the same thing. So what exactly is BS talking about and why now?

The Saudi economy has suffered massive blows as a consequence of the foolish policies pursued by BS and his demented father, King Salman. They have suffered defeats in Syria, Iraq and Yemen. Low oil prices have caused havoc in the kingdom.

The Bani Saud need cash and lots of it, hence the Riyadh conference as well as the new makeover of a “moderate” outlook. Ms Lagarde’s presence was reflective of Saudi desperation. At the end of August, the regime went to the IMF with a begging bowl for $10 billion.

That is peanuts in terms of Saudi needs but these are desperate times. And the kingdom has to show it is opening up and it would no longer export extremism.

The real test would be whether the kingdom would now disband such outfits as the Rabita, the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY), and Dar al-Ifta that are used as fronts to spread Wahhabi extremism by dishing out largesse in the Muslim world.

There must be proof that the Saudis have stopped financing extremist madrassas in countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Indonesia—the last two corrupted by large doses of cash in recent years—before BS’ pronouncements can be taken seriously.