Salim Mohamed Badat
Instead of confronting occupation and aggression, they manufacture sectarian outrage. That alone speaks volumes about priorities.
Their claims are recycled lies:
“Shia equate the Imams with prophets or divinity.”
False. Shia belief holds the Imams as human servants of Allah, not prophets and not divine.
“There are no Sunni mosques in Tehran.”
Misleading. There is no Sunni grand Jami mosque, but Sunni smaller mosques and prayer spaces exist throughout Tehran and Iran. The absence of a central mosque is a security decision, given documented extremist infiltration and foreign intelligence activity, including Mossad into Sunni groups.
“Iran or Khamenei killed Sunnis in Syria.”
False framing. Forces aligned with Ali Khamenei fought Takfiri militias,like ISIS and Al Qaeda, which slaughtered Sunnis, Shias and minorities alike.
“Shia curse the Sahaba.”
A fringe minority does, just as fringe Takfiris commit mass violence. Neither represents the whole.
“Shia are non-Muslim.”
Pure Takfiri ideology. The Sunni Shia divide is historical and political (Imamate vs. Caliphate), not over Allah, the Qur’an, or the Prophet (saw)
The pattern is unmistakable: when Israel is challenged, these voices don’t confront Zionism, they attack fellow Muslims. That alignment isn’t accidental. It reveals the mindset of munafiqun, more invested in sectarian warfare than in resisting oppression or defending the Ummah.
The sectarians are now losing the battle of minds. For over forty years, they fed Muslims a steady diet of lies about the Shia, but those narratives are collapsing under the weight of reality.
The proof is in what people can now see with their own eyes. As events unfold, it has become clear who Iran is actually fighting, why it stands largely alone, and what it is willing to confront, and in that clarity, the old sectarian propaganda is being washed away.
What has also been exposed is far more damning: the role of so-called “Sunni states” as puppets and proxies of Israel and America. Open and covert ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia are no longer deniable; Jordan functions as a security subcontractor; Egypt enforces the siege; Turkey plays both sides; and the United Arab Emirates normalizes openly, while all remain aligned with United States.
Yet the sectarians never attack this reality. They reserve their fury not for these alliances with Israel, but for fellow Muslims, especially the Shia. And now, as confrontation intensifies, it is becoming evident that many of these states are prepared to line up on Israel’s side against Iran.
This moment has drawn a clear line. It has revealed who stands on Haq and who stands on Batil, not through slogans, but through actions.

No comments:
Post a Comment