By criminalising UNRWA, Israel is delegitimising the United Nations

by Dr Ramzy Baroud

A view of destruction at UNRWA headquarters, which provides aid to millions of Palestinians and works under the United Nations, is targeted by Israel in Gaza City, Gaza on 11 February, 2024 [Karam Hassan – Anadolu Agency]

The Israeli Knesset passed a second reading of two bills on 28 October that effectively ban the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) from carrying out “any activity” in Israel and occupied Palestine. Simply put, the decision is catastrophic, because UNRWA is the main international body responsible for the welfare of millions of Palestinians throughout the occupied territories and neighbouring countries.

Israel followed its decision by attacking and damaging an UNRWA office in the Nur Shams refugee camp in the occupied West Bank. It was the Israeli government’s way of demonstrating its seriousness regarding the matter. UNRWA schools sheltering displaced Palestinians and other buildings have been bombed throughout Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

This is not the first time that Israel has pursued an anti-UNRWA agenda.

Moreover, contrary to claims by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israel officials, the decision is not linked to the current genocidal war on Gaza, or the unfounded claims that UNRWA supports “terrorism”. An independent review commissioned by the UN revealed that Israel “made public claims that a significant number of UNRWA employees are members of terrorist organisations,” but that it “has yet to provide supporting evidence of this.”

Israeli claims, however, did a great deal of damage to the agency, as 13 countries, including the United States, Canada, Australia, Britain, Germany and Italy, withheld badly needed funds which were helping Gaza stave off a horrific famine. Eventually, most of these countries reinstated their financial support, although they did so without apologising to the Palestinians who were impacted adversely by those countries’ initial, unfair decision.

Unrepentant, Israel continued to unleash its relentless war against the agency. “UNRWA workers involved in terrorist activities against Israel must be held accountable,” said Netanyahu on 28 October.

The anti-UNRWA rhetoric remains functional for Israel. Amplified by the ever-willing US mainstream media, Israel has managed to keep UNRWA’s name in the news, always associating it with “supporting terrorism”. So, when the Israeli Knesset (parliament) voted for the anti-UNRWA bills, mainstream media conveyed the news as if they were the only rational conclusion to an essentially fabricated story.

Israel’s problem with UNRWA has little to do with the organisation itself, but with its underlying political representation as a UN entity whose mission is predicated on providing “assistance and protection to Palestine refugees”.

Israel bans UNRWA’s operations – Cartoon [Sabaaneh/MiddleEastMonitor]

UNRWA was established in 1949 by the UN General Assembly Resolution 302 (IV). It began its operations on 1 May 1950. In time, it became central to the survival of a large number of Palestinian refugee communities in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan.

Many have rightly criticised the UN for failing to supplement UNRWA’s humanitarian mandate with a political equivalent that would ultimately help Palestinians achieve their Right of Return in accordance with UN Resolution 194. For Israel, however, UNRWA has always been problematic.

According to Tel Aviv’s thinking, UNRWA’s existence is a constant reminder that there is a distinct group of people called Palestinian refugees. And although UNRWA is not a political agency, the Palestinian refugee crisis and all related UN resolutions that emphasise the “inalienable” rights of these refugees are very political.

Taking advantage of the initial, albeit brief sympathy with Israel worldwide, and the massive campaign of misinformation emanating from Israel and its allies, Netanyahu used 7 October 2023 as an opportunity to further demonise UNRWA. However, his campaign had started much earlier.

A key player in the war against UNRWA was Jared Kushner, son-in-law of former US President Donald Trump. Kushner, who invested much time in helping Israel defeat the Palestinians once and for all, made UNRWA a key point in his plan. He vowed to carry out a “sincere effort to disrupt” the work of the agency, a leaked email revealed.

Due to international rejection and solidarity, Kushner ultimately failed.

Even the withholding of funds by the US administration did not force UNRWA to shut down, although it did have a negative impact on the lives of millions of Palestinians.

The ongoing war on Gaza and the push to annex large parts of the West Bank represented a golden opportunity for Netanyahu and his extremist government to increase the pressure on UNRWA. They have been enabled by unconditional US support, and the willingness of various western governments to act recklessly upon Israel’s false claims regarding the UN agency.

By allowing Israel to delegitimise the very organisation responsible for enforcing international law, the UN’s crisis becomes much deeper. The impassioned plea on 30 October by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese reflects the frustration felt by many UN-affiliated officials regarding the growing irrelevance of the organisation.

In her speech, Albanese pointed out that, if the UN’s failures continue, its impact will become even “more and more irrelevant to the rest of the world,” especially during these times of turmoil. This irrelevance is already being felt by millions of Palestinians, mainly in Gaza, but also in the West Bank. Although Palestinians continue to withstand, reject and resist Israeli aggression, they are fed up with an international system that seems to offer them only words, but little action.

Israel’s banning of UNRWA should represent an opportunity for those concerned about the standing of the United Nations to remind the occupation state that UN members who have no respect for international law deserve to be alienated. This time, however, words must be accompanied by action. Nothing else will suffice.