TEHRAN PAPERS
TEHRAN - In an analysis, Kayhan dealt with the increase in people's participation in the run-off election of Iran and wrote: The run-off presidential election was held and the great nation of Iran once again took part in the election, forming long lines in front of polling stations.
In the system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the people's vote is decisive and determines the future of the country. One of the hopes of the defeated enemies of the Islamic Revolution is the non-participation of everyone in the elections. For this reason, they put the election boycott project on the agenda with rumors and political propaganda. But the aware people of Iran, with their decisive presence, dealt a fatal blow to all the enemies of Islamic Iran and defeated them once again. The opposition networks targeted participation in the elections on a large scale and tried to induce despair, but they were faced with the hopeful presence of the nation and once again defeated their vain enemies.
Iran: Barbarism against the republic
In a note, the Iran newspaper addressed the opposition's prevention of the participation of foreign Iranian citizens in the elections and wrote: A week after the first round of the 14th presidential term was held, the run-off elections were held on Friday. The people's participation in the run-off increased compared to the first one. Both inside the country and in the polling stations abroad, we saw the presence of more of our compatriots at the ballot boxes. But just like the first round of the elections, the rabble affiliated with the Iranian opposition in some countries tried to prevent Iranian citizens from participating in the elections by using obscenities and creating disturbances. In London, people affiliated with MKO and monarchists tried to prevent our compatriots from voting by harassing the citizens of our country. They were holding the flag of the hated Zionist regime. But they faced a decisive response from the voters and they failed again.
Siasat-e-Rooz: Iran's real democracy or the British royal system with the mask of democracy?
Siasat-e-Rooz devoted its editorial to the tarnishing of Iran's democratic elections by the anti-revolution media. It wrote: There are governments in the world that show sensitivity to the elections in Iran and focus on it, and even in their media they plan against the elections in Iran. These media have always focused their activities on reducing participation and have advertised that elections in Iran are not democratic and free. At the same time as the presidential election in Iran, the Labor Party won the British Parliament. The BBC Persian reporter described the parliamentary elections in this country as one of the most democratic elections in the world, while the political system of this country is royal and hereditary and the parliament is completely show and sham. However, this network and other similar networks did not consider the elections in Iran to be democratic and tried to insinuate that it was rigged. Iranian people always choose their presidents and representatives and democracy has been ruling in Iran. However, media such as the BBC, International, and other Persian and non-Persian language media consider Iran's elections undemocratic.
Javan: Taliban's tension with Iran
In a commentary, Javan discussed the third Doha meeting about the latest developments in Afghanistan. The paper said: The remarkable thing is that as a result of many diplomatic exchanges during the past months to satisfy the Taliban to participate in the Doha meeting, a superficial and false understanding has been given to the Taliban that the West is ready to open its arms to them. Under the influence of such a perception, we are witnessing an increase in tension and a change in the type of behavior and approach of the Taliban with Iran. It seems that the relations between the Taliban and Iran are undergoing some changes. It is quite obvious that the Taliban, in a change of tone and now participation in the Doha meeting, is seeking to change its approach and policy towards Western countries. The previous approach of the Taliban was close interaction and coordination with the neighbors and regional powers. If the Taliban loses the alignment and companionship of the three powers Iran, Russia, and China due to false signals from the West, it will definitely be alone in the field of foreign policy and diplomacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment