Tuesday, October 31, 2023

The Israeli Victim Narrative About October 7 Is Based On Western Double-Standards

Source: Al Mayadeen English

For all those condemning the Gazans for rising up, they first must look at themselves in the mirror and ask what they did when the people were being forced into using violence as the obvious last option available to them.

The Israeli regime was not the victim on October 7. The Hamas offensive bears no resemblance to the September 11 attacks of 2001 and the Palestinian resistance has nothing in common with Daesh or other takfiri terrorists. The only thing that was out of the ordinary for the conflict in Palestine on October 7, was that for once the fight was taken to the Israelis and instead of it being dead Palestinians, it was dead Israeli soldiers and settlers.

In Western media, the Hamas offensive of October 7 is being depicted as the single worst event in the history of the Palestine-Zionist conflict, an attack comparable to the 9/11 bombings and hence a justification for the complete annihilation of the Palestinian people as a result. This is because they have been fed the narrative that Hamas fighters, belonging to the movement's armed wing, the Qassam Brigades, stormed over a “border fence” and launched a devastating attack on Israeli unarmed civilians. 

According to Western media, the Hamas attack is where the war started, the attack on Israelis was unique and therefore it justifies a racist annihilation of the indigenous population of Palestine. Israel, with the full backing of Western media and politicians, have managed to concoct a narrative that mimics the post 9/11 narrative, one that depicts Palestinians are barbaric Muslim extremists that rape white women and behead babies. But, unfortunately for them, despite this working on older portions of the population, the younger generations are not falling for it, because they can see through the double-standards and racist rhetoric that their parents fell for in the lead up to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Attack Was Only Unique In One Way

Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, as declared by al-Qassam Brigades’ Commander Mohammed Deif, was a retaliatory offensive that Hamas and the some dozen Palestinian political factions had warned was coming if the Zionist regime continued its attacks on worshippers at the Aqsa Mosque. In 2021, Hamas also launched an offensive, named the Sword of Jerusalem, in response to similar Israeli attacks against Palestinian worshippers during the Holy month of Ramadan. The 11-day war in May of 2021 resulted in the murder of at least 285 Palestinians, while 13 Israelis were also killed. Since then, "Israel" continued, in 2022 and this year, to violently assault worshippers at al-Aqsa Mosque, with extremists inside the Zionist Knesset also discussing proposals to change the status quo at the third holiest site in the Islamic faith.

In August of 2022, “Israel” launched an unprovoked attack on the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement inside the Gaza Strip, killing 50 Palestinians - most of whom were civilians - while no Israelis were killed. Then in May of this year, "Israel" launched another unprovoked attack that targeted PIJ, along with civilians, which resulted in around 35 Palestinians being murdered. In the West Bank, Israeli forces have been invading refugee camps and cities non-stop since the beginning of the year, murdering hundreds of Palestinians. In early July the Israeli military invaded the Jenin refugee camp, targeting medical workers, and journalists and destroying the civilian infrastructure there while killing at least 18 Palestinians, before they ran away out of fear after suffering soldier casualties.

To go through the record of massacres committed against the Palestinian people would require a whole book to be written, however, for the sake of time, consider the following examples: In 2008/9 the Israeli attack on Gaza massacred around 1,417 Palestinians, during the 2014 war there were over 2,300 Palestinians murdered by "Israel’s" offensive, then, to throw in one of many historical massacres, when "Israel" invaded Lebanon and later occupied the south of it in 1982, the Zionist military’s offensive resulted in roughly 20,000 dead Palestinians and Lebanese. All of these examples noted are worse, statistically, than the offensive of Hamas on October 7, 2023. As for such death in a short period of time, this isn’t even comparable, take the opening strikes launched on Gaza in 2008, which targeted a police ceremony, killing over 251 non-combatants within seconds. 

In 2018, beginning on March 30, the Palestinian people in Gaza launched one of the largest non-violent protest movements in history along the Gaza separation fence, calling for the lifting of the blockade. Israel responded by killing 300 Palestinians over the course of the demonstrations that lasted over a year, targeting men, women, children, the elderly, journalists, medical workers, and people with disabilities. What was the international response to this? To condemn Hamas and claim that “Israel has the right to defend itself”. All of what is being mentioned only scratches the surface of the horror inflicted upon the Palestinian people, not even touching on the ethnic cleansing of 1947-9 and the countless wars of aggression, coupled with the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands since.

To suggest that what happened on October 7, is somehow a “unique evil” is to either say that you value Western/Jewish lives more than Arab lives, or it comes from a place of pure ignorance.

An Attack On “Israel”

Often we hear of “Israel’s right to defend itself” and that “Israel’s border was breached”, on October 7. To begin with, under international law, the Zionist regime is an occupying power in the Eastern part of Al-Quds, the Gaza Strip, and the West Bank, meaning that they have an obligation to provide the means for civilians' human rights to be protected; they have never lived up to the international standards. "Israel", being an occupying power, also means that under the Fourth Geneva Convention, the people under its occupation have the right to use violence in order to free themselves from the rule of that occupying power. As the occupier, dubbed an Apartheid regime by the world's top human rights organizations, the Israelis have no right to defend the continuation of their military occupation, none.

Also, there is no border between “Israel” and Gaza, and there are armistice lines where there is a militarized separation barrier, but there is no border, this is an outright lie. Gaza is not a separate country. This territory has been labeled by UN experts as unlivable since 2020 when 97% of the water was already undrinkable for years prior to the beginning of the war when the Zionist entity cut off the water. 

Another thing we have to look at critically here is the true nature of the Hamas-led offensive against the Israeli military and settlements surrounding Gaza. Yes, the offensive initially targeted military sites and resulted in the killing of at least 300+ Israeli soldiers, in addition to other kinds of armed Israeli combatants, so when you see the Israeli death toll, this must also be kept in mind. The second issue with the narrative in Western media about the death toll is the immediate assumption of guilt when allegations are made towards the Palestinian armed groups; specifically the Qassam brigades of Hamas. 

Often, Western media will cite the need for investigations into allegations of war crimes committed in Gaza, but then it will instantly assume war crimes were committed against unarmed Israelis. There must be one rule for all, if we can’t decide what is going on in Gaza, then we certainly can’t make a judgment on what happened on October 7 to the Israelis, especially since the information from the Israeli side is heavily restricted. There is no consideration to the fact that there were armed clashes between Israeli forces and the Palestinian armed groups inside the settlements, which we have video evidence documenting. These clashes, which we have film showing unarmed Israelis in the middle of, could well have meant that Israeli armed gunmen accidentally shot their own citizens, we also have testimonies of Israelis who were held hostage and testified to having witnessed Israeli forces killing unarmed hostages. 

Until there are human rights reports and independent inquiries, we simply cannot know exactly what happened on the Israeli side, especially considering all of the unsubstantiated reports spread about rape and beheaded babies. On top of this, it wasn’t just Hamas fighters that crossed the separation fence, fighters from various smaller armed groups engaged in the fighting, while even Palestinians who were from no group at all crossed over. So telling who shot who and what unarmed civilians were killed, and under which circumstances, is going to require further investigation, in the cases where we do not have any video evidence. What happened to the Israelis on that day, is a more complex picture than when the Zionists fire missiles into civilian neighborhoods.

None of the above is written to justify any killing of unarmed people, but it works to put what happened into perspective. They live in settlements, on top of the villages that Zionist militias ethnically cleansed, the descendants of those who were expelled by force are now making up the majority of those Palestinian fighters from Gaza. Gaza’s armed groups are a refugee resistance, many of whom joined the resistance forces following the murder of family members at the hands of the Israeli military. They lost their lands, their family members, their friends, their homes, their livelihoods and there was not a single hope for anyone to help them, so they decided to take matters into their own hands, to free their people, to create a new life for the following generations. Hamas is a product of Israeli occupation, violence and Apartheid. They are a national liberation movement, they do not seek to kill disbelievers in their brand of religious dogma in order to force the world to fall under their rule like Daesh terrorists do, they simply want to reclaim their lands. This does not mean you have to agree with their ideology or their violent tactics, but to ignore why they exist, why they have support throughout the Arab and Muslim World, and why they launched this attack, is simply choosing to remain ignorant. The same was the case for the ANC in its fight against Apartheid in South Africa, which most of the world now understands today.

The Palestinian people were led by secular-nationalist armed movements, along with secular-Marxist movements, for the majority of the history of the struggle against the Zionist entity. There is no equivalence to be made between what was essentially a modern-day slave revolt, from Gaza, and a senseless terrorist attack. In all successful revolts against colonial rule, European invaders, settler-colonialism, and slave masters, there have been unarmed people killed as a result of these uprisings, this is what happens when you murder, dispossess, and humiliate an entire people just because of their ethnicity/race. Eventually, the people who are persecuted by violent racist oppressors, will rise up and attempt to break their chains. For all those condemning the Gazans for rising up, they first must look at themselves in the mirror and ask what they did when the people were being forced into using violence as the obvious last option available to them. The Israeli regime itself is not the victim, it is the cause of the violence, while unarmed civilians are simply those who are caught in between.

Palestinian Islamic Jihad: 'Al-Aqsa Flood was a preemptive strike against the enemy'

Ali Bou Jbara - The Cradle 

In an exclusive interview, a top PIJ official revealed that the 7 October Al-Aqsa Flood operation was a preemptive strike against a US-Israeli plan to destroy the Palestinian resistance. Now, he says, we will not stop until we 'break the American-Zionist project in this region.'

In an exclusive interview with The Cradle, Ihsan Ataya, member of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad's (PIJ) political bureau, head of the PIJ's Department of Arab and International Relations, and its envoy in Lebanon, explains what Operation Al-Aqsa Flood has achieved so far, the role played by the region's Axis of Resistance, and what new realities the Gaza battle will impose on the Israeli occupation. 

One of Ataya's most stunning revelations is that the "Al-Aqsa Flood" operation carried out by the Palestinian resistance on 7 October was a "preemptive strike." The Israeli occupation army, he discloses, was preparing to strike a “preemptive blow” to the resistance in Gaza - as part of the US-led normalization plan with Arab states.

Arab states, after all, cannot comfortably collude with Israel as long as the resistance continues to exist, keeping the Palestinian issue alive and embarrassing Arab regimes at every turn. 

This interview with Ihsan Ataya was conducted on Saturday, 28 October:

The Cradle: What were the main objectives of the battle for the “Al-Aqsa Flood?” What were your expectations, and to what extent have the resistance factions succeeded in achieving them?

Ataya: The goal of the "Al-Aqsa Flood" operation has been declared from the beginning, which is to prevent the targeting of Al-Aqsa Mosque (in Jerusalem), disparaging or insulting of Muslim religious rites, assault of our women, efforts to Judaize Al-Aqsa Mosque and normalize Israeli occupation of it, or divide it temporally and spatially. 

This is what the enemy was working to do continuously, which is why the operation was named “Al-Aqsa Flood.” 

The operation's second goal is to free thousands of Palestinian prisoners from the occupation jails, after the enemy's continuous refusal to exchange Palestinians who have been in its prisons for years in exchange for prisoners held by the resistance in Gaza - which forced the resistance factions to capture more Zionist soldiers.

Moreover, one of the most prominent objectives of the operation was to carry out a pre-emptive operation because the enemy was preparing for a surprise strike on the resistance.

Of course, the operation has achieved important successes from the very beginning, showing the weakness and fragility of the occupation entity, the possibility of defeating it, and liberating all of Palestine. A large number of Zionist soldiers and settlers have fallen into the hands of the Palestinian resistance; they will play an important role in the process of negotiations for the exchange of Palestinian prisoners.

Operation "Al-Aqsa Flood" also cut off the recent normalization initiative with Saudi Arabia, which the United States was striving hard to achieve, and thus the operation, at the very least, hindered the initiative. 

The Cradle: Israel is betting on crippling the environment that incubates the resistance through the unprecedented massacres being committed today in Gaza. Does it intend to achieve this by punishing all Palestinians?

Ataya: The Palestinian people in Gaza are not an "incubator" they are an integral part of the resistance. They are the ones who lead the scene of confronting the enemy, with their steadfastness and defiance of it, despite all these unprecedented massacres and the war of extermination led by the US administration by Zionist hands to re-displace the Palestinian people, intimidate them, and break the will of resistance. Until now, they have failed, and the enemy couldn't achieve its declared goal - alongside the Americans - which is the displacement of the Palestinian people from Gaza and from the West Bank. 

The Cradle: There are Israeli attempts to separate the resistance parties from each other, and to frame what is happening today in Gaza as an effort to target Hamas only. What is the PIJ's position on this issue?

Ataya: Targeting Hamas is targeting all the Palestinian resistance, and it is targeting the spearhead of the resistance in this axis. It is why the occupation tried to market the idea that "Hamas is ISIS" and manipulate international public opinion against the Palestinian resistance with these lies. But certainly, any targeting of Hamas is targeting all Palestinian resistance movements, because breaking the resistance in Gaza is breaking the resistance in the whole region. 

Therefore, we believe that the enemy's attempts have failed, and even social media trolls that tried to create a division between Palestinians, their resistance, and the region's resistance have all failed, because all the resistance proved that it is present in the battlefield. As the leadership of the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon, Hezbollah, announced, specifically, from the first day, the resistance “is not neutral,” in addition to the military messages that were sent From Iraq, Yemen, and Syria.

The northern front (Lebanon) with occupied Palestine, this front is "boiling" and not hot. But now we can say that the Iraqi, Syrian, Yemeni, and Iranian fronts are, of course, hot fronts, but in Lebanon, it is a boiling front. Hezbollah has offered a large number of martyrs so far, this is evidence to refute all these suspicions and these attempts to deceive public opinion - in addition to the meeting that brought together Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah with the Secretary-General of the Islamic Jihad movement Ziad al-Nakhaleh and the Hamas Politburo's Deputy Head Saleh al-Arouri.

All resistance factions are strongly present at the table, managing battle from a joint operations room at various levels, following what is happening carefully - moment by moment - evaluating the situation, making recommendations, and deciding what is appropriate for the interest of Gaza and the interest of the resistance to break the Zionist-American project in the region.

The Cradle: What are the "red lines" followed by these resistance parties to expand their reach?

Ataya: In my opinion, the enemy has crossed all red lines. The expansion of the battle is linked to the course of events in Gaza: if the resistance in Gaza can break the Zionist-American project and defeat this enemy alone in the field, why open all the fronts and turn it into a regional battle? 

Perhaps it is in the interest of the Palestinian resistance to break the enemy and inflict a second defeat on it in less than a month - after its inability to protect its soldiers and settlers at the start of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood. The second defeat will be if it initiates a ground battle and invades Gaza. Therefore, this depends on the course of the battle, the ability of the resistance to withstand the assault, and its ability to possess powerful cards in Gaza, with which it confronts this enemy. 

Despite the ugliness of the massacres and the large scale of killing against the Palestinian people, we are convinced that victories are never without prices and without sacrifices. Algeria gave millions of martyrs to be liberated from French colonialism, and the Palestinian people have, and still are, providing martyrs for their cause.

The Cradle: We talked about integration and coordination around the "Al-Aqsa Flood" operation. Who chose the timing?

Ataya: Al-Qassam Brigades and the Hamas leadership announced, from the beginning, that they were the ones who chose the timing, and planned this operation. But after the start of the operation, the other Palestinian resistance factions in Gaza were informed - within the joint operations team - to join this battle, because they also felt that this battle would be large and wide, and not just limited to destroying a military site, capturing enemy soldiers and bringing them back to Gaza. We infiltrated the settlements, widened the area of our incursions, and the battle expanded in the "Al-Aqsa Flood" operation.

The Cradle: The PIJ's Al-Quds Brigades launched an important military operation from southern Lebanon. What does this indicate? Will these operations continue?

Ataya: The military operation was able to deal a blow to the enemy: it was able to prove the unity of the Palestinian confrontation arenas, that the Palestinians are an indivisible unit, people, and resistance, and that what is happening anywhere against the Palestinians concerns us all, wherever they are.

That a group of Al-Quds Brigades fighters can storm the occupied Palestinian territory, penetrate a fair distance into it, and ambush Zionist soldiers - this is also a security blow to all Zionist monitoring and intelligence agencies, a moral blow. It is exhausting the enemy in northern Palestine, which led to the neutralization of part of the forces it wants to mobilize against Gaza, and distracts it from being able to focus on a single front on the ground. 

This was a very important message to the Palestinian refugees in their camps inside Lebanon - to remind them to aim their weapons at the enemy and not at each other - and also a positive aspect for Lebanon, because the country is under great foreign pressure to naturalize its Palestinian refugees. So this operation came to tell everyone that we don't want this, that the Palestinian people want to liberate their land and return to it.

This is an important path that we will continue. The enemy's attempts to pressure Lebanon to prevent operations against it in northern Palestine are due to it. But it is not a justification for the enemy to target Lebanese sites, because these are Palestinian groups carrying out operations inside occupied Palestine.

The battle is wide open and will continue. Even in the West Bank, there are constant confrontations in which we strike wherever possible, and in recent days, the Palestinian street in the West Bank has flared up, as the people went out to demonstrate against this Zionist barbarism, this heavy bombardment of Gaza, and the cutting of its electricity and internet networks on Friday.

The Cradle: Has the ground invasion begun?

Ataya: In my opinion, so far, we have seen an attempt to test the ability of the resistance to confront, and the occupation has not yet committed itself to starting the ground invasion, so as not to be disappointed and be unable to progress. So he went on to say that he wants to expand the operation against Gaza, in an attempt to pressure the resistance to negotiate over the civilian prisoners.

The Cradle: Where are the negotiations today?

Ataya: The negotiations have clearly stalled because the enemy does not want to abide by a condition that will establish a 5-day ceasefire. It wants a ceasefire for only one day, but the resistance knows that a single day is not enough - neither to unload aid trucks nor to distribute them to the Palestinian people.

The Cradle: Several scenarios have been suggested on how to end the war, such as a proposal reported in the Saudi newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat that recommends handing over Hamas Leader Yahya Sinwar to the occupation and ending all this. Or a proposal to deploy Arab or international forces in Gaza.  What do the Palestinian resistance factions see happening today?

Ataya: First, the enemy's attempt to change the facts on the ground and redraw the map of the region from Gaza will fail. Just as the attempt to draw a map of a "new Middle East" failed in 2006, just as these attempts failed in the war against Yemen, as they failed in the global war against Syria, and as they failed in the stifling economic war directed at all these countries in the region, this project too will undoubtedly fail.

There is some similarity in some aspects between what happened in Lebanon in 2006 and what is currently happening in Gaza. Then, the Lebanese resistance was accused of having ventured into war in an ill-considered way. The enemy launched large campaigns against it, and directed a great amount of pressure on it, demanding that Hezbollah hand over the two captured Israeli soldiers, while launching a huge aggression under the pretext of recovering them. 

What the resistance in Gaza wants today is to stop the war of extermination against the Palestinian people, acknowledge the defeat of the enemy, and go to a negotiator for the mutual exchange of prisoners. 

Now America is trying to save this entity, because “Israel” is considered its basis for colonizing the whole region. America's "big stick" was broken in the operation “Al-Aqsa Flood,” so it came to reverse this defeat for this army that attacked this whole region, it came for its advanced base in this region. 

As long as the resistance in Gaza is steadfast, as long as it does not exhaust its capabilities in confrontation, and as long as the Palestinian people endure this enormous pressure, it will certainly break this project.

After all these sacrifices, none of the resistance leaders will be satisfied without the release of all Palestinian prisoners in exchange for the Zionist soldiers who are now considered a treasure in the hands of the resistance.

The Cradle: How much do you count on the Arab world?

Ataya: On the popular side, we count on all Arab populations to exert great pressure, including in those countries that have normalized relations and followed the American project. This pressure from the Arab street will affect the decision-making in Washington - if America feels that heads will fall, that regimes will fall, they will remedy the matter so as not to lose their tools in the region.

As for the Axis of Resistance countries, they are ready and present for field participation as well. For example, Iraqis today are amassing on the Jordanian-Iraqi border, Yemen is ready to reach Palestine and fight alongside us if the borders are opened, and Syria as well. Iran, from the first moment, its foreign minister has not stopped moving, contacting, and visiting countries and leaders, in order to pressure and change their convictions about what is happening - to stop the enemy's war of annihilation.

The resistance also won in Lebanon in 2006. The resistance in Gaza will win in 2023; it will win a divine victory, we are sure of this, this war must have repercussions that will bring down thrones or regimes in this world.

The Cradle: What do you think Al-Aqsa Flood established in your conflict with the Israeli enemy?

Ataya: The operation was established to change the face of the region and the face of the world, in the interest of the resistance, in the interest of the liberation of Palestine, and the interest of breaking the American-Zionist project in this region.

Gaza War Takes Its Toll on Erdogan


Alwaght- With the start of the new round of conflict between the Israeli regime and the Palestinian resistance groups, the geopolitical game in West Asia once again emerged with surprise changes that put some actors in unpredictable and challenging positions. Meanwhile, Turkey is one of the regional actors that is extremely concerned about the situation and the way it should craft the best strategy to counter the situation at a low cost. 

With the continuation of the Israeli bombardment of Gaza that entered its fourth week, a fundamental change has occurred to Turkey’s approach to the Palestinian cause, ultimately triggering stronger-toned stance, though with limited practical steps. 

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who in the past two decades has created a launching pad from the Palestinian conflict to improve his position among regional countries, this time is trying to draw attention to himself by surfing the waves caused by war. 

In this connection, in his Saturday remarks in a pro-Palestinian rally attended by hundreds of thousands of Turks in Istanbul, Erdogan strongly attacked the Israeli regime and described the attacks on Gaza as “barbaric.” He also declared his country’s intention to announce the Israeli regime as a war criminal on the world stage, adding: “We knew that Israel would be upset if we said that Hamas was not a terrorist organization, but we made our position clear.”

“We will announce to the whole world that Israel is committing war crimes and we will work hard to make it clear. What is happening in Gaza is not self-defense, but an open and scandalous massacre. They seek to collectively destroy the population of Gaza through hunger, thirst and destruction of infrastructure,” the Turkish leader added. 

He also said that the Israeli regime does not care the least about the life of people as it openly talks about its art of killing. 

“But it will pay a heavy price for its actions,” he warned. 

The Israeli reaction to Erdogan did not come long later, and Israeli foreign Minister Eli Cohen in an X post said that he recalled the Israeli diplomats from Turkey for a revision of relations with Ankara. Turkish media, however, said that Israeli diplomats had left Turkey earlier. 

Erdogan’s remarks and departure of the Israeli diplomats showed that the normalization between Ankara and Tel Aviv has returned to before 2022, triggering a growing tension. 

Record of diplomatic crisis 

This is not the first time that Ankara and Tel Aviv have been in tensions with each other over the Palestinian conflict. At the Davos Economic Summit in 2009, in response to the killing of the people of Gaza in the 22-day war, Erdogan severely criticized Shimon Peres, then Israeli president, and left the press conference in defense of the Palestinian people. In 2010, Turkey expelled Tel Aviv’s ambassador after Israeli commandos attacked a Turkish aid flotilla to Gaza led by Marmara ship, killing 10 Turkish citizens and leading to diplomatic hiatus between the two sides for several years. 

Their diplomatic relations continued at a low level for six years, and criminal cases against Israeli officials were filed in Turkish courts. Eventually, with the American mediation, Tel Aviv apologized for the incident and agreed to pay compensation to the families of the victims and the injured. The two sides resumed diplomatic relations in 2016, but in 2018, Turkey expelled Israel’s ambassador and recalled its ambassador from Tel Aviv when Israeli forces killed a number of Palestinians participating in protests in Gaza Strip. 

Again and as Erdogan embarked on a policy of de-escalation with the regional actors in 2022, Ankara and Tel Aviv normalized their relations and announced their readiness for improvement of ties at all levels. Before the current Gaza war, Turkey was to host the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to shore up bilateral ties. 

Erdogan’s contradictory stances 

In general, repairing ties with the Israeli regime has made Erdogan act more conservatively than before. After all, he who won the presidential elections this year with shaky foundation due to various economic challenges does not want the support for the Palestinians negatively impact Turkish economic ties with Israel. 

In the first days of the Gaza war, Turkey tried to take a cautious stance towards the tensions between Hamas and the Israeli regime, and even criticized Hamas operation inside Israeli settlements on October 7 and Erdogan in a phone conversation with the Israeli President Isaac Herzog expressed condolences for the death of Israeli civilians. 

Actually, in parallel with the Arab governments’ soft positions regarding the Israeli massacring of the people of Gaza, Erdogan tried to remain neutral in this conflict to some extent and, contrary to his fiery positions in the past, he tried to play the role of a mediator similar to the one he had played in Ukraine war. 

However, with the intensification of the Israeli crimes in Gaza that drew waves of global condemnation, Ankara stepped up its support to Palestine and blasted Israeli slaughtering of civilians. It also affirmatively voted to the United Nations General Assembly resolution against the Israeli occupation and even severely censured the Western supportive stances to Israeli crimes in Gaza. 

Erdogan also defended the rights of the Palestinian nation and said that permanent peace in the region will not be established unless an independent Palestinian state whose legitimacy is based on UN resolutions and geographically integrated is established. 

But even with these positions, it is clear that Erdogan’s policy towards Palestine has changed, as in the past conflicts and tensions, it was Turkey that took punitive measures against Israel in support of the Palestinians and expelled the Israeli diplomats, but now Erdogan’s government does not seek to downgrade diplomatic relations with Tel Aviv and has not taken such steps yet. 

Many consider economy to be a determining factor in this approach. Erdogan, who needs economic relations with other actors in the region to improve Turkey’s embattled economy, is worried about the impact of the Palestinian conflict on the domestic economic conditions. According to Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed report, after Erdogan’s anti-Israeli position, Istanbul Stock Exchange dropped 7 percent, leading to closure of the index for the second time in recent weeks. With the Turkish national currency lira losing its value, investor fears are on the rise. 

Despite the political differences between Turkey and the Israeli regime over the Palestinian cause, these differences have not had a serious impact on other areas. According to Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed, despite the political differences, the economic relations between Turkey and Israel have made significant progress in the last 20 years, and the volume of trade, which was about $1.41 billion before Justice and Development Party came to power in 2002, has increased to $8.91 billion in 2022. 

This trade volume shows that even in the past decade that the Turkish-Israeli relations were frayed, their economic ties experienced a growth regardless of their political tensions, and Erdogan seems to intend to improve these ties even further. 

Official statistics show that the differences between the two sides have not affected mutual trade relations, and the economic crisis that Turkey is grappling with has increased the necessity for cooperation with Israel in many fields, including energy. 

There is no doubt that Turkey has interests in relations with the Israeli regime, the most important of which is the transfer of Eastern Mediterranean gas, which Tel Aviv plans to transfer to Europe with the help of Egypt and Turkey, and this issue is also important for Turkey as it can earn from its transit role. 

Indeed, Erdogan’s past support for the Palestinian cause and his criticism of the regime’s treatment of the Palestinians had won him support among some Muslims in the region, but now Erdogan is on the edge since the public opinion compare his policy to the infamous policy of Arab states who sell the Palestinian cause for profits. 

Palestine’s place in Erdogan’s new foreign policy

Dreaming of reviving the Ottoman Empire in Turkey, Erdogan during his two-decade rule of Turkey has tried to bring regional countries that once were part of the Ottoman Empire to Ankara’s side to complete his project. Palestine is part of this project and Erdogan’s support to the Palestinians falls under a policy pursuing this project. 

According to Al-Mayadeen news network, Erdogan government’s policies regarding Palestine are more or less still being pursued within the framework of the same general doctrine. Accordingly, a strategic diplomacy is being pursued by the Turkish officials in support of the Palestinians, which includes initiatives to increase the number of countries that recognize Palestine as an independent state and East Al-Quds (Jerusalem) as its capital.

Also, protecting the status of the holy Al-Aqsa Mosque and strengthening the economy of the Palestinians with the help of financial funds, especially the Islamic Development Bank, are other measures that Ankara’s officials are trying to implement. Even in his election campaign in the past period, Erdogan called the support of Palestine an important part of his foreign policy. He knew that the Islamic layer of the Turkish society supports the Palestinian nation and it played an important role in his victory in the elections. 

At present, although Erdogan is seeking to secure political and economic interests in his stances concerning the Palestinian conflict, the current situation in the occupied territories and the wide-ranging conflict between the Israeli regime and Hamas have put Turkey at a difficult dilemma between the two. Turkey is well aware of the fact that if it wants to have Israel by its side, it must give up its former support to Hamas, just as in the process of normalization with Tel Aviv it had to close Hamas office in Istanbul and expel the officials of this resistance movement from Turkey. But now the situation is different and the Israeli hardliners will not accept anything other than labeling Hamas a terrorist group, and this is what Erdogan must decide on. 

One of the factors that accelerated the process of Israeli-Turkish normalization was the supportive positions of the Israelis for Azerbaijan in the Karabakh war, which changed Erdogan’s negative opinion towards the Israelis, and in order to justify his Karabakh policy to the Turkish public, he relied on Tel Aviv’s support for Baku and on the nationalist policies to bring the society’s nationalists on his side in this case. But now that Karabakh crisis is resolved and the Palestinian conflict has intensified, using the nationalism tactic to gain public opinion support is of no avail, especially when many Turkish people want the government to cut off ties with Tel Aviv. 

Also Erdogan’s political opponents in recent days have taken a strong stance against him for his silence to the Israeli crimes in Gaza and called for Ankara’s serious reaction. The opposition have criticized Erdogan’s stance on Israel’s atrocities in Gaza and accused him of neglecting his religious and humanitarian duty towards the Palestinians. Former Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu used the Gaza card in his recent remarks against Erdogan, saying that he misses Erdogan of Davos, referring to president’s clash with Israeli president in the middle of a press meeting in Davos Economic Forum in 2009. 

So, to mitigate the opposition pressures, Erdogan has to highlight his pro-Palestinian policy, and this automatically leads to escalated tensions with the Israelis. Since the wave of global opposition to the Israeli crimes in Gaza is expanding and Tel Aviv is isolated on the international stage, Ankara will continue to provide political support to Palestine as long as its positions do not harm the economic relations with Tel Aviv. 

Prospects of relations 

The chart of the Turkish-Israeli relations has seen many highs and downs in recent years, but the two have saved their economic cooperation. Gaza war has only laid bare once again the political gap between the two and that there is a long way to them to completely bridge their gaps. Odds are that with rise of tensions between the two sides as a result of the Israeli ground offensive, the gap will grow as wide as before. 

Since the Israelis deem enemy any country supporting Hamas, the tough stances of the Turkish officials against the Israeli war on Gaza can once again harm the diplomatic relations, and according to some experts, this issue will impact economic relations, especially Turkish tourism and investment sectors. 

Some analysts suggest that given the Turkish public solidarity with Gaza, Erdogan intends to satisfy his people by voicing support to Gaza while at the same time saving relations with Tel Aviv. But this exploitative approach to the Palestinian cause no longer wins popularity for Erdogan at home and abroad. 

From another aspect, Erdogan has lost the initiative of the Palestinian case and even fell out of favor with Hamas, and now others like Qatar and Egypt have become important actors in the Palestinian case. The mediation of the Qataris for release of Israeli prisoners in recent days showed that Turkey is no party to the process and Hamas even rejected Ankara’s mediation offer. 

Iran’s FM meets with Hamas leader Haniyeh in Qatar’s Doha to discuss Gaza war

This undated photo shows Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian (L) meeting with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Doha, Qatar.
Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian has met with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in second such encounter since a conflict erupted between the Palestinian resistance group and the Israeli regime on October 7.

Amir-Abdollahian and Haniyeh met on Tuesday in the Qatari capital of Doha where the top Iranian diplomat was briefed about the latest situation of people in Gaza amid ongoing Israel aggression on the small blockaded territory.

“The region is at a critical juncture and the resistance groups in the region make decisions independently and they do not necessarily wait for political decisions,” Amir-Abdollahian said.  

“Therefore, if the war crimes of the Zionist regime continue and the scope of conflict and war widens, no party will remain unaffected by the consequences and repercussions,” he added.

For his part, Haniyeh said the Palestinian resistance is at the peak of its strength and capabilities.

Therefore, instead of engaging with the resistance forces, the occupying regime continues to target Palestinian civilians, he said.

He added that the amount of explosives used against the residents and residential areas of Gaza exceeds the volume of the atomic bomb dropped by the United States on Hiroshima, expressing regret that the Israeli attacks are carried out with full support from the United States and some European countries.

Haniyeh serves as head of the political bureau of Hamas, the top office in the resistance group which is based in Doha and deals with various issues, including attracting foreign support for Gaza’s fight against Israel and its decades-long occupation of Palestine.

Amir-Abdollahian and Haniyeh had met in Doha on October 14, a week after Hamas launched a successful military operation against Israeli settlers and military forces in the occupied territories near Gaza.

The operation, dubbed Al-Aqsa Storm, led to some 1,400 deaths on the Israeli side and was described as the worst defeat suffered by the regime in 75 years since its creation.

Israel has used the operation to justify a brutal military campaign against Gaza, which has left more than 8,500 Gazans dead, including over 3,500 children.

 Amir-Abdollahian arrived in Qatar earlier on Tuesday to coordinate and discuss efforts needed for an immediate stop in the fighting in Gaza.

Tehran has announced it is ready to use its relations with Hamas to work out a ceasefire deal between the group and the Israelis, although Iran does not have any relations with the regime.

The Iranian foreign minister held meetings with senior Qatari officials on Tuesday before departing for Turkey to continue his diplomatic efforts to help find a solution to the crisis in Palestine.

Gaza: The Siege… and the Battle for Humanity

  • Nora Hoppe

Source: Al Mayadeen English

The battle being fought by Palestine, particularly in Gaza, is a civilisational battle… a battle for all humanity.

Note: I am neither a journalist nor a historian. In this essay I am incorporating some historical data, which will probably already be known to most readers… but in some cases this well-known data cannot be repeated enough – especially for the young… and in certain contexts it is necessary for the sake of illuminating the point of this essay.

*   *   *

Why do some people resist and fight on despite being encircled, outnumbered and outweighed by weapons… despite facing intolerable circumstances? What is life worth living for? What is it that some people are willing to die for? And what is it that some people consider “sacred”?

How is it that some people can smile and find any hope at all in a devastated home? How is it that some people can celebrate a child’s birthday – amidst a sea of ruins?

How is it that some people can persevere with their resistance, even when their own children have been murdered and torn asunder before their eyes?

In the Western world, where rapacious capitalism, neoliberalism and materialism have taken over and determine the belief system, the value system, the culture, and the daily routines of most people there, there are no answers to such questions, and thus this struggle cannot be understood by the Western silent majority.

The particular heinous and savage circumstances that have affected the Palestinians over decades – the constant subjugation, persecution and ethnic cleansing – have made these people keenly aware of what the true priorities are in life and what meaning can be found in a collective united struggle… things that cannot be understood by a people engrossed in their individual selves, in their consumerism and in their constant demand for more of everything.

Younes Arar, a human rights activist involved in the founding and activities of the “Dismantle the Ghetto, Take Settlers Out of Hebron” campaign, and the Director of Al-Khalil (Hebron) section of the Colonization and Wall Resistance Committee of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, tried to describe the spirit of his people: “We are very much like our olive trees – while their branches reach out to the sky, storms may bend them but will not uproot them, because their roots are firmly established in the depths of our land, which we love and which we belong to…”

*   *   *

As many already know, the Zionist entity, known as the "State of Israel", was created as an immensely opportune Western "outpost" for the British Empire whose power was beginning to wane in the early 20th century, as the "Arab World" (stretching across the Maghreb to the Levant) was not only unified by a common language and shared several cultural aspects, but also incorporated key strategic nodes: the Persian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz, the Gulf of Aden, the Red Sea, the Suez Canal, the Eastern Mediterranean – the British saw it as a looming threat to its Empire. Moreover, they had their eye on the vast and rich resources in this region. 

The colonial powers came up with an idea: the implantation of a "foreign entity" in a geographic space that would separate the Arab Maghreb from the Arab Levant, a "foreign entity" that would be loyal to the British imperialist powers and the West, a "foreign entity" that would, through its presence, permanently guarantee an imbalance in the region and that would continually sow disorder with the aim of creating perpetual instability to prevent the rise of any "pan-Arab" power.

Theodor Herzl's Zionist project for "a Jewish state" (which had already considered Argentina, Cyprus, Mesopotamia, Mozambique, and the Sinai Peninsula as potential Jewish homelands) presented itself as a "godsend" and fit the bill perfectly, and the Balfour Declaration of 1917 sealed the deal. (The two bonusses in the package were that the West would have easier access to the coveted resources in the region while reducing their own Jewish populations, of which they were not particularly fond.) Joining Britain in this grand design were also France and the United States… who clearly saw their own colonialist advantages.

Biden has inadvertently exposed this colonialist "agenda" numerous times when he famously said back in 1986: “Were there not an Israel, the United States of America would have to invent an Israel.”… And on 28 October 2022: “If there were not an Israel, we’d have to invent one.”… and again on July 18, 2023,  and again on 19 October 2023: "I have long said: If Israel didn’t exist, we would have to invent it."

The West has always justified its support for "Israel" by bringing up the Holocaust. And it often justifies its discriminatory views toward Palestine by bringing up the controversial "infamous" Grand Mufti in Jerusalem Amin al-Husseini whose antizionist fervour led him to seek some form of alliance with Hitler [despite the fact that Hitler spoke of the Arabs as "lacquered half-apes" in a speech in 1939]. Many believed that the Nazis even inspired and financed the Arab Revolt… but according to Philip Mattar, there exists no reliable evidence to support such a claim. Indeed, despite their hostilities toward Great Britain, Hitler's Englandpolitik precluded any genuine support for Arab leaders; English colonial initiatives (such as the promotion of Zionist immigration), shared common ground with Nazi ambitions to drive Jews out of Europe.

Thus, frankly, if there was any question of justice for the West, if the West ever had any sincere feelings for the sufferings of the Jewish people during and following WWII, they would have provided for Jewish homelands in Germany and fascist regions of other European countries that had conspired with the Nazis… in the very countries where so many Jews had lived for centuries!

And – as foreseen – along came the Nakba in 1948, during which 78% of Mandatory Palestine was declared as "Israel" and involved: the expulsion and plight of 700,000 Palestinians; the depopulation and destruction of over 500 Palestinian villages by "Israeli" armed forces; terrorist attacks executed by members of paramilitary terrorist organisations – e.g. HaganahIrgun, Lehi (an organisation that initially sought an alliance with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany) with their various brigades and elite fighting forces (such as Palmach) – against the civilian population and subsequent geographical erasure; the denial of the Palestinian right of return; the creation of permanent Palestinian refugees; and the "shattering of Palestinian society"… Ethnic cleaning on a grand scale, a practice that continues to this day.

The creation of "Israel" by Western powers can be seen as the planting of a metastasising tumour in – ultimately – the non-Western world as a whole – for all the pernicious global instabilities it has given rise to and the destruction it has wrought.

Some people might connect such a remark with Hitler's description of Jews as "a dangerous bacillus" in Mein Kampf… But we are not speaking here about "Jews" or any other human beings but about a racist colonialist ideology called Zionism.

The term "anti-semitic" is used as a bludgeon to condemn and prevent any criticism of the Israeli entity. It is, in fact, a ridiculous misnomer created intentionally to obfuscate the differences between the terms "Judaism", "Zionism", "Israel" - so that one can be denounced as being a "Nazi" for simply raising one's voice against the Zionist imperialist expansion. In fact… the creation of the "State of Israel" is itself against all people who qualify as "Semites": various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including the Arabs, Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, and Hebrews.

Truth be told, that very "state" has ultimately become a curse for Jewish people all over the world… as people of the Jewish faith are often automatically associated with the Zionist nightmare. Another fateful gift from the British Empire…

*   *   *

For 75 years, the Palestinians have had to endure extermination, barbaric ethnic cleansing, relentless apartheid, displacement, humiliation, torture, killings, the repeated use of white phosphorus… and now massive carpet bombing strikes, compounded by the total cut-off of supplies of water, food, medicine, electricity, gas, oil and...

The Siege of Gaza turned the "Gaza Strip" – measuring 8 x 40 km, populated by over 2.3 million people – into the world's largest open-air concentration camp in history.

Russian President Vladimir Putin denounced "Israel’s" siege of the Gaza Strip as “unacceptable,” comparing it to the Nazi blockade of Leningrad during World War II. The chief difference between the two being the duration: the Blockade of Leningrad lasted almost two and a half years; the Siege of Gaza has been going on, so far, for almost 57 years (when in 1967 it came under "Israeli" rule during the Six-Day War).

And, now, for well over two weeks, Gaza has been suffering one massacre of its inhabitants after another through the relentless massive carpet bombings by the Zionist terror regime, which has culminated – so far – in the Bloodbath at the al-Ahli Arab Baptist Hospital. The US-funded fanatic Zionist entity is obviously seeking to implement its own "Endlösung" for the Palestinian population.

And yet, in spite of – or rather precisely because of – all the barbaric massacres, the intifada only grows.

The Palestinians of Gaza ("gaza" means “fierce", "strong” in Semitic languages – which is not only includes "Hebrew" but also Arabic, Amharic and numerous other ancient and modern languages), remain steadfast in their struggle and will pursue their resistance for as long as it takes.

For as long as it takes. No matter what.

An extraordinary, staggering steadfastness – similar to that of the Leningraders during their agonising Blockade (which I wrote about here) – a steadfastness which allowed them to survive against all odds… similar to that of the of the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong who succeeded in defeating "the world's best equipped army" and driving out the USA. And like the Leningraders on January 27, 1944, and like the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong on April 30, 1975, the Palestinians will also triumph in the end, because they possess a force that imperialists will never fathom.

On the other end of the spectrum: As the West looks on in silence and indifference – with Western governments facilitating massacres, ethnic cleansing and genocide in various parts of the world it – together with its cherished Frankenstein creation and protectorate: the Zionist entity – is immersed in rot and sinking spinelessly ever deeper into an abyss. On their way down, war and destruction are the sole means by which the now desperate Western powers believe they can secure their domination of the world.

To put it bluntly: When it comes down to it all, the Zionist entity – alongside of its own rapacious plans to snatch all the remaining territory of Palestine and much more beyond – is dutifully carrying out this dirty war for the Western powers – as was the plan all along.

As Pepe Escobar recently and so aptly put it here: "The war against Russia in Ukraine and the Israeli 'war on terror' in Gaza are just parallel fronts of a single, horrifyingly evolving, global war."

This global war is a battle against Humanity as a whole.

At the core and the forefront of this battle stands Gaza – the world's most concentrated aggregate of courageous resistance against the forces of oppression, colonialism, racism, fascism, Zionism, Nazism, whose objectives, in these days, appear to be reaching their pinnacle.

In the meantime, the peoples of the "Global Majority" seem to have finally had enough of hegemony, of unipolarity, of western supremacy, of imperialism. They are slowly waking up from a long and stony sleep.

However, this auspicious awakening is late and not enough. Most still remain groggy and bleary. Where is the sense of conscience and responsibility for those who are already fighting their fight? The peoples of the "Global Majority" (as well as a small minority of the West) are taking to the streets to demonstrate against the heinous crimes they are witnessing directly each and every day in Gaza… But where is the outrage and outcry from their governments?? Stuck in their "formalities" and their "diplomacy", they arrange grand meetings, board their planes and sit in air-conditioned, catered conferences to discuss these matters on the side-lines.

Only a few statesmen besides President Putin have spoken out in no uncertain terms about these crimes. Colombia's president, Gustavo Petro, denounced the genocide committed by Israeli occupation forces against the people of Gaza, called for a United Nations special session, and ordered the Israeli ambassador to leave the country. Former Bolivian President Evo Morales called for "Israel" to be declared a terrorist state and that diplomatic relations with it be severed due to its acts of genocide against civilians. He also called Western countries supporting the Zionist State accomplices of genocide. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa termed "Israel's" ground invasion in North Gaza as genocide and described the occupying entity as "oppressive and apartheid'. Ione Belarra, Spain's Social Rights Minister and leader of Podemos, has also asked the government to suspend diplomatic ties with "Israel" due to its "planned genocide."

But for what concerns the UN Security Council, one could almost assume that it has legitimated the ongoing war crimes and genocide carried out against Gaza – as it has refused to condemn the occupation and aggression. (The entire UN is a mockery of justice and should be dismantled immediately.)

We can rejoice in the fact that the governments representing the "Global Majority" no longer want to be dictated to by the Hegemony: they want to bypass the dollar, they plan to build New Silk Roads, they are forging new mutually beneficial partnerships with others for trade and collaborative projects regarding technological innovations, energy and logistics. These steps and the new geopolitical alliances are all promising developments for a fairer, more balanced multipolar world. But changes in economic, banking and technological spheres are not enough. There is little examination of the global current state of Humanity as a whole. We cannot really change things in our world without getting to the root of oppression, racism, colonialism, and hegemony. Where are the international conferences on history, education, on culture, on ethics?

This is a global Civilisational War that could easily lead to our end. It is time for a new consciousness to emerge. It is time to face decisions regarding our collective survival with a collective human conscience.

The ULTIMATUM has already arrived.

Gaza is the burning light of Humanity in the darkness of inaction and indifference, from which the "Global Majority" is only slowly rousing itself. Gaza is the naked consciousness of the current global state of our humanity. Gaza embodies the profound belief in something greater than anything material or mortal: empathy toward one's fellow man and a resolute collective struggle against injustice that transcends one's own death.

Gaza is the Paradigm.


Suggested reading list:

Not to Begin at the End (2001) – Mahmoud Darwish, translation of the full text, broadcast on the 53rd of the creation of the State of Israel, and the beginning of the Palestinian Nakba: https://web.archive.org/web/20011202055655/http://www.ahram.org.eg/weekly/2001/533/op1.htm

Palestine: A Four Thousand Year History (2018) – Nur Masalha

https://www.are.na/block/3389959 

The Invention of Ancient Israel: The Silencing of Palestinian History (1996) – Keith Whitelam

Deconstructing the Walls of Jericho (1999) – Zeev Herzog (Professor of Archaeology at Tel Aviv University and director of its Institute of Archaeology), an article in the weekly magazine "Haaretz" (no longer accessible on the "Haaretz" site, the text can be read here:

http://websites.umich.edu/~proflame/neh/arch.htm)

The Invention of the Jewish People (2008) – Shlomo Sand

The Holocaust Industry (2000) – Norman Finkelstein… and his other books

In the Shadow of Zion: Promised Lands Before Israel (2014) – Adam Rovner

The Mufti of Jerusalem: Al-Hajj Amin Al-Husayni and the Palestinian National Movement (1988) – Philip Mattar