By proposing an astonishing anti-Iranian resolution at a recent meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's Governing Council, Europe has shown that it is weaker and more passive than the US unilateralist approach and, contrary to irresponsible slogans, is ready to serve Trump's ambitious goals.
NORNEWS - Political group: US comprehensive efforts to circumvent Security Council Resolution 2231 and continue Iran's arms embargo are completely illegal, unlawful, and a new step in the path of discrediting international institutions and the logic of dialogue.
The White House has made every effort to achieve achievable results in the 2020 elections by persistently following this path and putting pressure on Europe, China and Russia.
By proposing an astonishing anti-Iranian resolution at a recent meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's Governing Council, Europe has shown that it is weaker and more passive than the US unilateralist approach and, contrary to irresponsible slogans, is ready to serve Trump's ambitious goals.
Resolution 2231 of the Security Council, as a legal, international and binding document supporting Barjam, fully defines the task of how and when to lift Iran's arms embargo, according to which these sanctions must be lifted on October 18, 2009.
News reports from some media sources suggest that Europe, under pressure from Trump, is seeking to repeat the pattern set by the IAEA Board of Governors, and under the pretext of preventing larger destructive actions by Trump, plans to limit purchases. And offer the sale of weapons by Iran.
Europe's non-compliance with Resolution 2231 under any pretext and with any justification is practically considered to be in line with the United States on the path to the complete destruction of the UN Security Council.
October 18, 1999, is more than a day of significance for Iran, it is a historic day for countries claiming influence and position in the international arena, and they must choose between a model of multilateralism and a unilateral unipolar system.
The implementation of Resolution 2231 is also crucial for the BRICS, including China and Russia.
The United States, in line with its National Security Strategic Document, has focused its interests in the Middle East on competition with Russia and China.
Controlling Iran as a country that is conducting political and security maneuvers against the United States with these two countries has been extended.
to describe precisely; The combined war against Iran, aimed at curbing the Islamic Republic's power and influence at various levels of the international system that has challenged US regional and global interests, is seen as part of the US global policy of confronting China and Russia in West and Southwest Asia.
In recent years, Russia has vetoed Security Council resolutions against Syria 13 times and China eight times. Accordingly, as much as Moscow and Beijing need to cooperate with Iran in order to gain more influence in the region, the United States is trying to prevent Iran from strengthening its global rivals in the Middle East by putting pressure on Iran.
However; The United States' unilateral actions in the Security Council over the past few years have shown that these actions have not been particularly successful, especially during the tenure of Trump's ambassador to the United Nations, Nicki Haley.
On the other hand; Given Iran's presence and influence in the region, the United States, along with its European allies and regional allies, is seeking to erode the Islamic Republic of Iran so that it seeks solutions to obstacles and maintain the status quo instead of better planning and action.
In other words; In general, US policy is to avoid military confrontation with strategic patience, plus more sanctions, and to try to impose the costs of a war of attrition on the Islamic Republic without firing a shot.
Following in the footsteps of the United States, the Europeans have entered a serious phase of confrontation with Iran, while the US strategy during this period is to separate Europe, Russia and China from Iran with levers such as the FATF, the International Atomic Energy Agency and "Continuation of Iran's arms embargo" so that the achievements of the "active resistance" strategy for Iran remain unaffected.
In fact, because Iran has created the necessary capacity in various political, economic, and military sectors and enhanced its deterrent power, the United States and its allies are trying to take advantage of Iran's legal and diplomatic capabilities by politicizing interim cases. Reduce Twitter diplomacy.
Knowing that the United States is not able to confront Iran legally and, of course, militarily, it has tried to advance its goals against Iran by adopting a combination of strategies and politicizing its actions. What is clear is that the United States will continue to confront Iran. In the IAEA and the UN Security Council, it is possible to turn a debate from an Iranian-American dispute into an international one, leading to a consensus against Iran.
In this context, although Europe has not left the UN Security Council, it has at least accepted the US position and taken an effective step towards achieving US goals against Iran by drafting an anti-Iranian resolution in the IAEA Board of Governors and accompanying the drafting of new resolutions in the Security Council.
Europe's move in this direction actually means that all four Western signatories to the UN Security Council, three of which are permanent members of the Security Council, have withdrawn from the Security Council, and there will no longer be a document called the Security Council.
No comments:
Post a Comment