The calm in southern Syria has broken, exposing a volatile front that none of the major players – Damascus, Tel Aviv, or Washington – seems prepared for what is to come.
The Cradle
Its mission was a raid-and-arrest operation. These intrusions have become near-routine in Syria's fragmented south. But this time, the Israeli incursion met an unexpected response.
‘House of Jinn’
After arresting three men alleged by Haaretz to belong to the Jamaa al-Islamiyya (Islamic Group), Israeli troops came under fire from Beit Jinn residents. A close-quarters firefight broke out, marking the first time in years that Tel Aviv's forces encountered direct armed resistance deep inside Syrian territory.
According to the occupation army’s spokesperson, six officers and soldiers sustained injuries ranging from serious to minor. However, Hebrew media outlets later reported that as many as 13 Israeli troops were wounded in the assault. It was, by any measure, a debacle.
On the Syrian side, 20 people were killed – among them women and children – and 25 more were injured. These casualties resulted from both the clash itself and the subsequent Israeli shelling using artillery and airstrikes, which also displaced many of the town’s residents.
Since the fall of the previous government last year, Israel has expanded its military footprint in Syria's south with impunity. The only comparable precedent came on 25 March this year, when residents of Koya in Deraa fired at Israeli soldiers. That attack caused no injuries, but six Syrians were killed in Israel's retaliatory bombing.
Beit Jinn, then, marks a first: a local resistance act that inflicted real damage on the occupation forces.
Narrative shifts and political blame games
Initially, Israeli sources blamed the attack on the Jamaa al-Islamiyya, a designation some interpreted as a reference to the Lebanese branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is closely aligned with Hamas. The group denied any involvement, insisting its operations are confined to Lebanon.
Later, Israel’s Public Broadcaster (KAN) cited unnamed sources claiming that some of the assailants were affiliated with Syrian General Intelligence. That allegation stunned Syrian observers, especially given the lack of a coherent state presence in the south.
The confusion did not end there. Syria’s Al-Thawra Newspaper briefly published a profile of one of the fallen, “Hassan Ahmad Abdul Razzaq al-Saadi,” describing him as “among the first to join the internal security forces after the fall of the former regime.” The article was swiftly scrubbed from all platforms.
Meanwhile, the Syrian Foreign Ministry issued a strong statement condemning what it called a “criminal assault” by Israeli forces. It credited local residents for repelling the incursion and forcing a withdrawal. The contradiction between Damascus’s official denial and the newspaper’s quiet admission hinted at deeper fractures.
Strategic implications and Israeli recalibration
Why the contradictory accounts from Tel Aviv? Syrian academic Dr Ahmad al-Kanani believes they reflect panic and have raised alarm in Tel Aviv over the possibility that Damascus may have “assets in the region,” particularly given the Sunni-majority demographic, which in Israeli calculations might seem more pliable.
Kanani told The Cradle that the preliminary investigation results seemed to serve as “messages” confirming Israel’s focus on Islamic groups – such as Jamaa al-Islamiyya and its ally Hamas – as the security justification for resuming wide incursions into the Mount Hermon area and southern Syria. Political analyst Mohammad al-Huwaidi shares the view that the incident was a surprise, noting that the resistance in Beit Jinn appeared to act independently of the Damascus government. He tells The Cradle that the self-appointed Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa (formerly known as Abu Muhammad al-Julani when he was an Al-Qaeda leader) has failed to defend southern Syria, giving Israel the space to entrench its presence. For Damascus, the Beit Jinn firefight came as a shock.
Huwaidi believes the official Syrian response reflects “confusion and detachment from the reality on the ground,” and describes the state’s handling of the south as “flailing.” He points to Turkiye’s interference as a major constraint on Sharaa, saying Ankara has effectively imposed a “veto” on any potential Syrian–Israeli security arrangements.
At the same time, Sharaa lacks the capacity to halt Israel’s ongoing incursions, leading to contradictory and incoherent statements from Damascus.
Huwaidi characterizes Sharaa’s stance on the south as weak and unclear: “He doesn’t seem to understand what Israel might do next.” According to him, none of the political or military factions aligned with the Syrian government have taken any concrete action – they have issued statements, and little more.
From raids to assassinations
Israel’s Channel 13 reported that the occupation army is now weighing a shift toward “airborne assassinations” to address what it labels as emerging security threats in Syria. The channel cited military sources as saying the Beit Jinn incident could prompt a shift in operational patterns, with fewer raids and greater reliance on airstrikes to reduce the risk to ground forces.
A full-scale operation may also be on the table if Syrian General Intelligence is proven to be involved.
Kanani believes Israel is now crafting a strategic response aimed at “restoring deterrence without ground deployments.” This likely means increased reliance on drones and airpower for special operations. But he cautions that this approach is militarily expensive and will likely limit future ground incursions, especially given the resource demands of sustained aerial operations.
He notes that since the collapse of former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad's government, Israel has carried out arbitrary arrests and raids across the south, and now holds 42 Syrian detainees without concrete evidence linking them to hostile activity. For Kanani, the Beit Jinn operation has “redrawn the map,” halting part of Tel Aviv’s ground campaign.
Huwaidi, for his part, argues the incident may prompt Tel Aviv to “recalculate” its approach, possibly even launching a large-scale military operation in the south. He says Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will exploit the event both domestically and internationally to bolster claims that Israel faces an armed threat on its northern frontier.
The missing envoy: Tom Barrack
Notably absent in this episode is the voice of Tom Barrack, the US envoy to Syria. Since the release of emails linking him to convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, Barrack has vanished from the public eye. Once a frequent commentator on Syrian affairs, his silence since 12 November – even as Israeli operations intensify – is striking.
Barrack had long played the role of US facilitator in Syria, shuttling between capitals and weighing in on minute policy details. Now, amid one of the most significant Israeli setbacks in years, he is nowhere to be found.
The Beit Jinn episode, with its complex military details, conflicting Israeli accounts, and divergent Syrian positions, reveals a new phase of turbulence in Syria’s south – one in which security, political, and regional dynamics are colliding like never before.
For Israel, the operation was unexpected. Despite surveillance, checkpoints, and sweeping arrests, it suffered its first real blow since these cross-border raids began.
The clash not only exposed the fragility of Israel's southern strategy but also revealed the vacuum left by Damascus, the opportunism of Tel Aviv, and the silence of Washington.
The south remains contested, volatile, and wide open to the next blow. Whether Beit Jinn marks a new chapter in the Syrian resistance or merely a spike in the chaos depends on what follows – but one thing is certain: the rules have changed.
No comments:
Post a Comment