The Western information system has evolved into an anti truth mechanism, a machine designed to compel the citizen to reject the evidence of their eyes and ears, the “final, most essential command” of the Party.
Bryan Anthony Reo

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” George Orwell, 1984
Modern Western outright state media and nominally private corporate (actually de facto state) media often implicitly demand that the subjects in their respective technocratic sham democracies believe demonstrable falsehoods and profess their shared collective belief in these demonstrable falsehoods. It doesn’t make a difference whether it is NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, or whatever it is, on certain matters they clearly read from the same script and promote the same talking points, sometimes word for word, all brought to you by Pfizer.
I proclaim, “Russia was allied with the Entente from 1914 to 1917 and the Soviet Union was allied with the Western Allies from 1941 to 1945.”
Western media replies, “It never happened; Russians have always been enemies of the Western world.”
I retort, “I know it happened, I know it.”
Western media replies, “No, you don’t know it, you can’t know it, it didn’t happen. History is what we say it was. Russia is our enemy; Russia has always been our enemy.”
I proclaim, “Russia was one of the first nations to give significant assistance to the United States and their leaders engaged in correspondence with Thomas Jefferson and praised his ideas.”
The American media replies, “No, that wasn’t so; you’re wrong.”
I retort, “I have seen the letters exchanged between Jefferson and Tsar Alexander I.”
American media replies, “No, you haven’t, because we say they don’t exist, the correspondence never happened, there are no letters, there never were.”
I proclaim, “I have original British and American government documents from 1919 demonstrably proving that Western elites financially backed the Bolsheviks and the Western powers provided material assistance to the Bolsheviks as a way to weaken and harm Russia and fan the flames of civil war.”
Western elites reply, “No, you don’t; no such documents exist. No Western powers tried to deepen and prolong the civil war in Russia. Russia was in chaos because Russians are uncivilized barbarians.”
I proclaim, “There are only eight known copies of the original unabridged unedited Russia No. 1 (1919), A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia ‘Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty. April 1919,’ and it establishes Western-based international banker financial support for the Bolsheviks, and I have one of these original unabridged documents from 1919.”
Western elites reply, “No such document exists; there are no unabridged copies, none were released to the public, and you can’t have one. How do you even claim to have come into possession of that document, which can’t possibly exist?”
I reply, “A close personal friend, born in 1940, obtained it from a member of the House of Lords who was his close personal friend born in the 1890s, who got it from his father, who was a member of the House of Lords in 1919, and then it was given to me.”
Western elites reply, “That’s not plausible; there is no such document.”
I proclaim, “I have original documents demonstrating that Russia was rapidly industrializing under the Tsar and doing well but that this was disrupted by the First World War and that Russia was on track to possibly eclipse some major Western powers in economic industrial productivity.”
Western elites reply, “No, you don’t; you can’t possibly have such documents because such a thing is not possible. Leading historians agree Russia was a backward feudal autocracy and was not amounting to anything.”
Western media proclaims, “Russia is a revanchist imperialist power that wants to reform the Soviet Union.”
I retort, “I see no evidence of that. You have been saying that since 1991, there is no evidence of any of that.”
Western media, “The evidence is that they oppose the expansion of NATO. If Russia doesn’t want to become the Soviet Union, they should let us subjugate them.”
I retort, “That makes no sense. Any reasonable power would oppose the expansion of NATO to their doorsteps. Russia is not opposing NATO because of hostile intentions on the part of Russia but because of legitimate security interests.”
Western media proclaims, “Russia is an existential threat; we must go to war with them now before they destroy us! We must attack now, before they overrun all of Europe to the English Channel!”
I retort, “Why now? Why the urgency? Why must we go to war with them? A war would be unnecessary and brutal.”
Western media replies, “They are weak with a second-rate military; we will easily crush them. They are a cardboard castle inhabited by a paper tiger.”
I inquire, “How can they be an existential threat about to overrun Europe if they are weak with a second rate military and can be easily crushed? Which is it? Is Russia an existential threat or a weak paper tiger?”
Western media replies, “Both!”
Aristotle observed in the Nicomachean Ethics (Book I, Ch.1, 1098b10) that “when something is true, everything that pertains to it is consonant with it, but when something is false, the truth quickly shows itself dissonant with it.”
The narratives of not merely lies but anti-truth (hostility to truth on a metaphysical level) that exist within Western media, quickly fade and crumble when faced with the truth of the consequences of the implementation of the lies.
History has nothing to teach us
The modern West could be personified as a decrepit, drug-addled man in a bunker, hunched over a map sprawled across his desk, moving divisions that only exist on the map and in his mind, yelling at his subordinates when they bring inconvenient truths to his attention, truths such as “that plan won’t work because those forces don’t exist anymore.” He insists Steiner is about to launch an attack and turn the situation around. Woe to any who dare inform him of the truth and confront him with the reality of his plight.
Western corporate/state media exists to run cover for the benefit of Western Sham Democracies to keep the subjects/serfs/slaves content to be fleeced in an epic multi-generational fraud, used as cannon fodder, and slated for ultimate replacement
Western media, at the behest of the Party, orders the masses to ignore all lessons from history because history has nothing to teach us and any lessons can be summarized by the Party. Western media, at the best of the Party, orders the masses to ignore all those things that common-sense dictates, because if common sense were even truly a thing, the Party would tell us what we need to know of so-called common sense.
Western media, at the behest of the Party, will have their masses march willingly into an inferno of carnage and nuclear flames for the sake of getting ready the victims of a multi-generational Ponzi scheme involving old-age pensions that cannot be made good on due to imploding demographics, before the leaders of the Party admit to their collective role in this historically unprecedented fraud. The party running the Collective West is faced with several choices:
- Admit that the ruling parties of the Western Sham Democracies perpetrated fraudulent mismanagement of their respective nations from at least the 1970s forward, if not indeed from the post-war era forward. This would require admitting that the post-war neoliberal global order is a lie built on a foundation of lies.
- Kick the can down the road and let things collapse later for another generation when the perpetrators of this fraud are finally gone and won’t care.
- Annihilate their own populations and replace them with people who won’t string them up for what they did. This could be conveniently accomplished in a war with Russia, which would also afford the opportunity to damage or weaken Russia, a civilization enemy of the Modern Western Sham Democracies.
If every Western man were to gain a sudden mental awareness, a total clarity of perception, an epiphany, of what had been done to his society in the context of the degradation of the Modern Western Civilization, the result would be a thousand bastilles being stormed in one week, a hundred Ceaușescus being shoved up against the walls, dozens of Stasi headquarters being taken over and ransacked by outraged citizens in a fury of righteous indignation the like of which would have seldom ever been seen before. Western corporate/state media exists to run cover for the benefit of Western Sham Democracies to keep the subjects/serfs/slaves content to be fleeced in an epic multi-generational fraud, used as cannon fodder, and slated for ultimate replacement.
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” George Orwell, 1984
I watched them tear down statues, rename streets and parks, pull history books from libraries, and replace them with critical theory books. I have watched as they deny the truth of information contained in documents that I have originals of or outright deny the existence of the documents themselves, documents that I have original (often sealed/embossed) copies of.
In the West, we are now approaching Year Zero, where Brother Number One will seek to erase the truth of the past and cancel any of those alive who insist they have a living memory of a time before Brother Number One.
I recite, “In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth,” or “In the beginning was the Word.”
They insist in their retort, “In the beginning was the Party, and all truth came from the Party. The Party brought forth life itself.”
My eyes still perceive light as light and darkness as darkness, no matter what the Party demands of me. I am not a faithful, ideal citizen of Western Anti-Civilization.
Bryan Anthony Reo is a licensed attorney based in Ohio and an analyst of military history, geopolitics, and international relations
No comments:
Post a Comment