TEHRAN PAPERS
TEHRAN - In a commentary, Hamshahri discussed the change of approach in the Iran-Israel conflict and wrote: Although about a week has passed since the implementation of the True Promise operation, the investigation of the various angles of this operation and the consequences and developments resulting from it are still at the top of the analyses of international think tanks.
It is an operation that observers consider to be a crossing of long-term patterns between Tehran and Tel Aviv. In the first encounter with the shock caused by Iran's drones and missiles attack on some military targets in the occupied territories, the decision-makers in Washington and Tel Aviv put the approach of "achievement-manufacturing" on the agenda and tried to make Tel Aviv look successful in "repelling Iran's attack" and show it as a victorious on the field but the point here is that the True Promise operation while stabilizing Iran's deterrence power showed Iran's strategic power in the region. According to Susan Maloney, Vice President of the Brookings Institution and Director of the Foreign Policy Program, the Middle East seems to have been freed from an important danger, and after Iran's drone-missile attack on Israel, Washington hopes that peace will be established in the conflict between Tehran and Tel Aviv.
Iran: Collapse of the fake hegemony
In an analysis, the Iran newspaper discussed the collapse of the fake regime's hegemony and said: The Zionist regime tried to respond to the True Promise operation which destroyed the fake hegemony of this regime by attacking one of Iran's military bases. But Amir Abdollahian described this attack as follows: "The flight of two or three quadcopters in Isfahan is like a toy that our children use in Iran." Despite the efforts of the Western media circles to exaggerate the Israeli attack in Isfahan, the timely interception of the Iranian military base's anti-aircraft defense has left nothing but silence and anger for the Israeli authorities. This means that Iran's upper hand in the "field" can make Tel Aviv the definite loser of any possible conflict. Therefore, when the American network ABC News quoted an American official and claimed that Israeli missiles had hit a center in Iran, no reliable media confirmed this news. Even Ben Gvir, the minister of internal security of the Zionist regime, simply preferred to react to the recent events by saying, "The Iranians are mocking us after this action".
Ham Mihan: The policies of Iran and Turkey should complement each other
Ham Mihan dedicated its headline to the policies of Tehran and Ankara regarding Palestine and wrote: Hadi Borhani, an analyst of Israeli issues, said in a conversation with this newspaper that Turkey's active support for the Palestinians is defined in the financial, political, and international fields. What Turkey does not want to interfere is military issues. Financial aid is also done as much as possible so that it does not harm Ankara's interactions and relations with other countries. If we look at the geopolitics of the region, we realize that Iran and Turkey are important countries in the Palestinian issue. However, the roles of Tehran and Ankara in this field are different. Iran is very active in the field of supporting Palestinian militant groups in the military dimension, and Turkey supports the Palestinians politically, internationally and to some extent financially. The role of these two countries can complement each other and if coordination between Tehran and Ankara happens, it will ultimately benefit the Palestinians. If the understanding spreads in the two countries that the two sides complement each other, something positive will happen in the Palestinian issue.
Etemad: Trying to change the phase from the field to diplomacy
In a conversation with Ali Bigdeli, an expert on international affairs, Etemad dealt with the entry of new actors, including Egypt and Jordan, into indirect negotiations between Iran and Israel. The paper said: The best way in any equation in the field of foreign policy is negotiation and dialogue. This path can reduce the anger between Iran and Israel and even America. Iranian Foreign Minister Amir Abdollahian's visit to New York and his unannounced meeting with Egypt's Foreign Minister indicate that Egypt is acting as a mediator in this crisis. Even some European officials secretly changed this situation with secret diplomacy so that Israel would not take unconventional action. The situation that was formed after Iran's attack on Israel is the result of the efforts made in the diplomatic channel. This is the right thing to do. It seems that part of our differences with Israel has ended for now. However, Israel's enmity will not end and may continue to hit Iran's regional arms. This is a separate discussion, but the differences and conflicts between Iran and Israel have been reduced to a great extent as a result of diplomacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment