The 58th specialized meeting of Empathetic Ummah was held
The 58th specialized meeting of "Empathetic Ummah" was held with a focus on examining the "objectives, achievements, and consequences of the third imposed war," attended by professors and experts in political issues and West Asia.
According to the Taghrib News Agency, the 58th session of the specialized meetings series " Empathetic Ummah" was held on the topic of "Objectives, Achievements, and Consequences of the Third Imposed War." The main focus of this meeting was stated to be examining the impact and necessity of Muslim unity in confronting the Zionist regime and the system of domination.
At the beginning of the meeting, Dr. Mohammad Shahidi, secretary of the meeting and senior expert on political issues, referring to the passage of about 80 days since the start of the war, stated: "The people of Iran, contrary to the usual practice in many countries during war, did not empty the streets and squares and, despite the bombings and difficult conditions, remained on the scene" – an issue that, according to him, amazed the world.
Stating that the third imposed war began in the midst of negotiations and the diplomatic process, he said: "The US and the Zionist regime showed that they are not committed to the principles of diplomacy, and the attack in the heat of negotiations was an open betrayal of the structure of global diplomacy."
Shahidi, referring to the martyrdom of a number of commanders and also the incident at the Minab school and the martyrdom of dozens of students, stated: "In this war, three fronts were simultaneously active: the military front, the diplomatic front, and the media front."
According to him, the US, NATO, and the Zionist regime entered the field using the most advanced military equipment, but also tried to advance their goals in the media and diplomatic arena, which ultimately, according to him, they did not achieve their intended goals.
He added: "They sought to impose a forced agreement, change Iran's political system, and cause collapse, but these goals were not achieved, and even the issue of the Strait of Hormuz became one of the main challenges for the US and its allies."
Continuing the meeting, Dr. Salman Rizvi, an expert on West Asian affairs, elaborated on the "principles of Israel's warfare" and said: "The Zionist regime follows several fixed principles in its wars, including maximum military destruction, inflicting the highest human casualties, targeting scientific and military elites, destroying social infrastructure and scientific centers, causing widespread displacement, and relying on full US support."
Referring to the attacks on Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran, he stated: "Targeting schools, universities, and scientific centers is part of Israel's constant strategy in wars."
Regarding the goals of the war against Iran, Rizvi stated: "One of the most important goals was to weaken Iran's missile and nuclear capabilities, because the Zionist regime has always identified Iran's missile capability, nuclear capability, and regional influence as three main components of the Islamic Republic's power."
He added: "Israel also sought the collapse of the resistance front, and after the events of October 7, it tried to target this axis from Gaza to Lebanon, Syria, and ultimately Iran."
Stating that the Zionist regime seeks to eliminate or weaken any opposing Islamic country, this West Asia expert noted: "Israel's policy is to create continuous crisis and conflict in the Islamic world so that the countries of the region are always engaged in internal and regional disputes."
Rizvi also, referring to the internal political developments of the Zionist regime, said: "Extremist currents now dominate the political structure of Israel, and their ultimate goal is the complete swallowing of Palestine, both in Gaza and the West Bank."
He further identified the change of political system in Iran and the disintegration of regional countries as other goals of the US and the Zionist regime, and added: "Some Israeli theorists have for years emphasized the disintegration of countries such as Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey so that the Zionist regime can become the dominant power in the region."
In another part of the meeting, Dr. Hossein Rouyvaran, university professor and expert on Middle Eastern affairs, referring to the Islamic Republic of Iran's readiness for such a war, stated: "The creation of missile cities and the development of missile capability show that Iran had prepared itself for such conditions years ago."
He considered the most important achievement of the war to be the failure of the enemy's goals and said: "The enemy sought the overthrow of the system, destruction of missile and nuclear capability, incitement of the people, and even causing insecurity through counter-revolutionary groups, but none of these goals were achieved."
Rouyvaran, referring to the people's presence in support of the system and the armed forces, stated: "Even some people who had previously participated in anti-system protests sided with the system during the war, and this issue shows the depth of national unity in the face of foreign aggression."
He also, referring to the economic situation of the country during the war, said: "Despite the pressures, no serious shortage occurred in the country, and this showed that the policy of relying on domestic capability and meeting needs inside the country has been successful."
This regional expert, citing some US intelligence reports, stated: "According to some assessments, Iran has the ability to maintain resilience in war for months and has also retained most of its missile capability."
Rouyvaran also emphasized: "The structure of the Islamic Republic is not individual-oriented, and even the martyrdom of senior commanders or the highest officials did not stop the system's functioning" – an issue that, according to him, is the result of institution-building after the Islamic Revolution.
Continuing the meeting, Dr. Hossein Kan'ani Moghadam, university professor and expert on international affairs, referring to America's goals for entering the war, said: "Maintaining the security of the Zionist regime, paving the way for Greater Israel, changing Iran's political system, disintegrating the country, controlling energy and the Strait of Hormuz, economic war, and destroying the resistance front were among America's main goals, none of which, according to him, were achieved."
He added: "The result of this war was not weakening, but rather strengthening Iran's internal cohesion, and the people showed their support for the system by being present on the scene."
Kan'ani Moghadam, referring to Iran's attacks on US bases in the region, stated: "Many US centers and bases in the region were targeted, and part of the US monitoring and control capability was disrupted."
Referring to the defense strategies of the Islamic Republic, he stated: "Iran has prepared itself over the years for direct confrontation with the US and the Zionist regime, and has achieved significant capability in the field of missiles and drones."
This international affairs expert also said about the Strait of Hormuz issue: "The Islamic Republic now has dominance over one of the most important energy chokepoints in the world, and recent developments have shown how dependent the global economy is on this region."
Referring to the economic consequences of the war for the US and the West, he added: "Increased war costs, economic pressure, inflation, and the energy crisis have caused serious problems for the US and its allies."
Kan'ani Moghadam also, referring to the concept of "war economy," stated: "In modern warfare, economic capability and logistical support are of fundamental importance, and the US has faced serious challenges in this area."
In conclusion, he emphasized: "The recent war showed that the Islamic Republic of Iran has high military, economic, and social capability, and the resistance front remains present as a deterrent and influential factor in the region."
No comments:
Post a Comment