Rights Group: UK Government’s Anti-Terror Plan ‘Illegal, Anti-Muslim’

LONDON (Dispatches) – A British rights group has expressed alarm over the UK’s controversial Prevent strategy, insisting that the purported anti-terror plan has led to unlawful collection of personal data and facilitated “widespread illegality.”
Describing the government policy as “confused, secretive, and illegal,” a report published this week by Rights and Security International (RSI) further emphasized, “Prevent, like other aspects of the government’s national security strategy, operates largely in secrecy. The handling of people’s personal data under Prevent is no exception.”
The report also pointed out that the holding of information in Prevent databases, which is accessed by the police, intelligence services and other public bodies, appeared to be in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
“We conclude that, despite an abundance of general government guidance about Prevent, little information exists about how the government believes agencies such as police, schools, hospitals and local authorities should treat people’s personal information under Prevent,” it added as cited in a report by the London-based Middle East Eye (MEE).
“To put it bluntly, the government has not established a sufficient evidence base to justify data gathering, storage and sharing under Prevent as effective in – let alone necessary to – stopping acts of terrorism,” the report noted.
Meanwhile, RSI’s Jacob Smith – who helped compile the alarming report – told MEE that “since Prevent’s introduction, the strategy has negatively affected Muslim and other minority communities, activists or individuals who hold different political or religious opinions.”
Smith further expressed concerns that the hoarding of Prevent data would disproportionately impact Britain’s Muslim community and lead them to be targeted by British police and other security agencies.
“Official government statistics indicate that Muslims are more likely to be referred to Prevent unnecessarily, yet the police and other public authorities still want to hoard this data – putting the person under constant suspicion and impacting their daily life,” Smith emphasized.
He then cited an example of a 2020 High Court case in which a mother filed a claim against the London Metropolitan Police, which insisted on retaining her 11-year-old son’s data for six years despite admitting that his referral was a mistake.
“While in theory this applies to all individuals referred to Prevent, the fact remains that more Islam-related referrals are classed as mistaken than any other category of extremism that the government identifies,” Smith reiterated.