Wednesday, November 06, 2024

West Asian leaders react to Trump victory in US elections

Israel said the election result was a ‘great victory,’ while Iran said its ‘policy does not change’ based on individuals  

News Desk - The Cradle

Regional and world leaders reacted on 6 November to Donald Trump’s victory in being elected as the 47th president of the US, which marked the controversial businessman’s second time in office. 

“I congratulate my friend Donald Trump, who won the presidential election in the US after a great struggle and was re-elected as the President,” said Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan via X on 6 November. 

“In this new period that will begin with the elections of the American people, I hope that Turkiye-US relations will strengthen, that regional and global crises and wars, especially the Palestinian issue and the Russia-Ukraine war, will come to an end; I believe that more efforts will be made for a more just world,” Erdogan added. 

He expressed hope that “the elections will be beneficial for our friendly and allied people in the US and for all of humanity.” 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and others in his government have shown joy over Trump’s re-election. 

"Dear Donald and Melania Trump, Congratulations on history’s greatest comeback! Your historic return to the White House offers a new beginning for America and a powerful recommitment to the great alliance between Israel and America. This is a huge victory!” Netanyahu said on X. 

“Yesssss,” wrote Netanyahu’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. 

Senior Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri said “We urge Trump to learn from [US President Joe] Biden’s mistakes,” adding that the new president will be “tested” on his statements about being able to end the war on Gaza “within hours” and calling for the end of Washington’s “blind support” for Israel. 

Moscow has reacted cautiously to the election. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said it was important that Trump “started talking about how America is sick and that the problems of American society need to be addressed" during his victory speech. 

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said "Let us not forget that we are talking about an unfriendly country, which is both directly and indirectly involved in a war against our state [in Ukraine]."

"We have repeatedly said that the US is able to contribute to the end of this conflict. This cannot be done overnight, but ... the US is capable of changing the trajectory of its foreign policy. Will this happen, and if so, how ... we will see after (the US president's inauguration in) January," he added, referring to Trump’s statements that he is capable of swiftly ending the war in Ukraine. 

An Iranian government spokesperson, Fatemeh Mohajerani, said “US elections are not really our business. Our policies are steady and don't change based on individuals. We made the necessary predictions before, and there will not be a change in people's livelihoods," referring to US sanctions on Iran.

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Deputy Commander in Chief Ali Fadavi did not comment specifically on Trump’s re-election but vowed on Wednesday that Tehran is ready for a confrontation with Israel, and does not rule out US–Israeli pre-emptive attacks to try to prevent Iran’s promised retaliation to the Israeli attack on its soil last month.

The late commander of the IRGC Quds Force, Qassem Soleimani, was assassinated by a US airstrike under Trump’s administration in 2020.

In 2019, the US under Trump recognized Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, which was illegally occupied by Israel in 1967. One year earlier, Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran and reimposed harsh sanctions against Tehran in a move highly satisfactory to Israel. In 2017, he recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moved the US embassy to the occupied city. 

Trump has been described as among the most staunchly pro-Israel presidents in US history. Despite this, he recently criticized Netanyahu for Operation Al-Aqsa Flood happening “on his watch.”

Hebrew newspaper Haaretz reported in June that Trump received a pledge from the widow of late US businessman Sheldon Adelson to support his presidential campaign with millions of dollars.

The report adds that Miriam Adelson seeks, in exchange, US support for Israeli annexation of the West Bank and recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the occupied territory.

Trump wins the White House

 Donald Trump was elected the 47th president of the United States on Wednesday, an extraordinary comeback for a former president who refused to accept defeat four years ago, sparked a violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, was convicted of felony charges and survived two assassination attempts.

With a win in Wisconsin, Trump cleared the 270 electoral votes needed to clinch the presidency, AP reported.

The victory validates his bare-knuckle approach to politics. He attacked his Democratic rival, Kamala Harris, in deeply personal – often misogynistic and racist – terms as he pushed an apocalyptic picture of a country overrun by violent migrants. The coarse rhetoric, paired with an image of hypermasculinity, resonated with angry voters – particularly men – in a deeply polarized nation.

“I want to thank the American people for the extraordinary honor of being elected your 47th president and your 45th president,” Trump told throngs of cheering supporters in Florida even before his victory was confirmed.

In state after state, Trump outperformed what he did in the 2020 election while Harris failed to do as well as Joe Biden did in winning the presidency four years ago. Upon taking office again, Trump also will work with a Senate that will now be in Republican hands, while control of the House hadn’t been determined.

“We’ve been through so much together, and today you showed up in record numbers to deliver a victory,” Trump said. “This was something special and we’re going to pay you back,” he said.

In his second term, Trump has vowed to pursue an agenda centered on dramatically reshaping the federal government and pursuing retribution against his perceived enemies.

Trump will inherit a range of challenges when he assumes office on Jan. 20, including heightened political polarization and global crises that are testing America’s influence abroad.

His win against Harris, the first woman of color to lead a major party ticket, marks the second time he has defeated a female rival in a general election. Harris, the current vice president, rose to the top of the ticket after Biden exited the race amid alarm about his advanced age. Despite an initial surge of energy around her campaign, she struggled during a compressed timeline to convince disillusioned voters that she represented a break from an unpopular administration.

The vice president has not publicly spoken since the race was called. Her campaign co-chair, Cedric Richmond, said she would speak Wednesday: “She will be back here tomorrow.”

Trump is the first former president to return to power since Grover Cleveland regained the White House in the 1892 election. He is the first person convicted of a felony to be elected president and, at 78, is the oldest person elected to the office. His vice president, 40-year-old Ohio Sen. JD Vance, will become the highest-ranking member of the millennial generation in the U.S. government.

BRICS post-Kazan: A laboratory of the future

The much-awaited BRICS heads of state meeting in Russia's Kazan did not disappoint. The multilateral institution has finally brought bite and substance to many of the global financial and political conundrums that have long-challenged a genuine reshaping of the global order

The Russian presidency of BRICS 2024 could not have chosen a more multicultural and multi-nodal site to host a summit laden with enormous expectations by the Global Majority. The southwestern Russian city of Kazan, on the banks of the Volga and Kazanka rivers, is the capital of the semi-autonomous Republic of Tatarstan, renowned for its vibrant mix of Tatar and Russian cultures.

Even though the BRICS summit took place in the Kazan Expo – a sort of multi-level station connected to the airport and the aero-express link to the city – it was the Kazan Kremlin, a centuries-old fortified citadel and World Heritage Site, that imposed itself as the global image of BRICS 2024.

That spelled out, graphically, a continuity from the 10th century onwards through Bulgar culture, the Golden Horde, and the 15th–16th-century Khanate all the way to modern Tatarstan.

The Kazan Kremlin is the last Tatar fortress in Russia with remnants of its original town planning. The global Muslim Ummah did not fail to observe that this is the northwestern limit of the spread of Islam in Russia. The minarets of the Kul Sharif mosque in the Kremlin, in fact, acquired an iconic dimension – symbolizing a collective, trans-cultural, civilization-state effort to build a more equitable and just world.

It has been an extraordinary experience to follow throughout the year how Russian diplomacy managed to successfully bring together delegations from 36 nations – 22 of them represented by heads of state – plus six international organizations, including the United Nations, for the summit in Kazan.

These delegations came from nations representing nearly half of the global GDP. The implication is that a tsunami of thousands of sanctions imposed since 2022, plus relentless yelling about Russia’s “isolation,” simply disappeared in the vortex of irrelevance. That contributed to the immense irritation displayed by the collective west over this remarkable gathering. Key subtext: there was not a single official presence of the Five Eyes set-up in Kazan.

The various devils, of course, remain in the various details: how BRICS – and the BRICS Outreach mechanism, housing 13 new partners – will move from the extremely polite and quite detailed Kazan Declaration – with more than 130 operational paragraphs – and several other white papers to implement a Global Majority-oriented platform ranging from collective security to widespread connectivity, non-weaponized trade settlements, and geopolitical primacy. It will be a long, winding, and thorny road.

Onward drive, from Asia to the Muslim world

The BRICS Outreach session was one of the astonishing highlights of Kazan: a big round table re-enacting the post-colonial Bandung 1955 landmark on steroids, with Russian President Vladimir Putin opening the proceedings and then handing the floor to representatives of the other 35 nations, Palestine included.

The first round of BRICS expansion last year focused heavily on West Asia and Northeast Africa (Iran, UAE, Egypt, and Ethiopia, with Saudi Arabia still deciding its final status). Now, the new “partner” category – 13 members – includes, among others, four Southeast Asian powerhouses, including Malaysia and Indonesia, the top two powers in the Heartland, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, and NATO member Turkiye.

Muslim-majority nations are all over the place as part of the BRICS drive; in parallel, Asia as a whole is fast becoming prime BRICS territory.

In-depth debate on how to develop a new global financial and payment system practically from scratch – a key plank of de-westernization – has been relentless across the BRICS matrix since February. By early October, the Russian Finance Ministry announced the launch of BRICS Bridge – inspired by Project mBridge: a digital payment platform for cross-border trade in national currencies.

Western hegemons are already scared. The Swiss-based Bank of International Settlements (BIS) is now mulling to shut down mBridge – backed, among others, by commercial banks from BRICS members China and UAE, BRICS partner Thailand, quasi-BRICS member Saudi Arabia, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.

The excuse is “geopolitical risks” – a euphemism for mBridge making it harder to enforce unilateral, illegal US and EU sanctions. That ties up, for instance, with global banking giant HSBC officially joining China’s interbank cross-border payment system (CHIPS), which is similar to the Russian SPFS. From CHIPS/SPFS to BRICS Bridge is just a short step.

The key issue – a serious worry for the Global Majority – is how to settle trade surpluses and deficits. When it comes to initiatives such as BRICS Bridge and BRICS Pay – the test run of the BRICS Pay card took place a week before Kazan – that’s not a technical issue.

What matters is not so much how to send a currency but what to do with that currency at the other end. It’s an eminently political affair, but there are ways around it, as the predominant, western-controlled SWIFT system is very primitive.

The BRICS working groups also paid close attention to facilitating investment; these are open systems, good for BRICS members and partners. Once companies from whatever latitude start joining, critical mass for growth/investment will be just a shot away.

All of the above embodies the spirit of BRICS starting to function in 2024 – driven by the Russian presidency – as a global laboratory, testing every possible model, old and new, to be applied in a multi-nodal way. Diplomatically, the Kazan Declaration stated that new approaches should be presented to the UN and the G20; yet, realistically, there’s no evidence the collective western bloc will receive them with open arms.

The de-dollarization nitty-gritty

Apart from establishing the 13 new partners – constituting a large, transcontinental, de facto BRICS zone – Kazan advanced two key platforms: BRICS Clear and the BRICS (Re)Insurance Company.

BRICS Clear is a multilateral settlement/clearing system for both BRICS trade and trade between BRICS and their partners (as it stands, applying to 22 nations). The key aim, once again, is to bypass SWIFT.

BRICS Clear will use national currencies for international trade. Everything will be transacted via a stablecoin – a unit of account – managed by the NDB, the Shanghai-based BRICS bank.

As top French economist Jacques Sapir has pointed out, “trade requires insurance services (for both the contract itself and transportation); these insurance services involve reinsurance activities. With the BRICS (Re)Insurance Company, BRICS is building its independence from western insurance companies.”

BRICS Clear and BRICS (Re)Insurance, in the short to middle term, will have enormous consequences for global trade and the use of US dollars and euros. Trade flows, intra-BRICS and between BRICS partners – already at least 40 percent of the global total – may rise exponentially. In parallel, western-controlled insurance and reinsurance companies will lose business.

That’s de-dollarization in practice – arguably the BRICS Holy Grail. Of course, India and Brazil never refer to de-dollarization in the manner of Russia, China, and Iran, but they do support BRICS Clear.

Sapir predicts that up to 2030, the BRICS Clear effect may result in the dollar share in Central Bank’s reserves falling “from 58 percent to around 35-40 percent.” Significantly, that would imply “massive sales of Treasury bonds, causing a collapse of the public bond market and significant difficulties for the US Treasury in refinancing United States debt.” The Hegemon will not take that lightly, to say the least.

Lab experiments counter-acting arrogance

These BRICS geoeconomic breakthroughs – call it lab experiments – mirror diplomatic coups such as India and China, mediated by Russia, announcing on the eve of Kazan their drive to settle bilateral troubles in the Himalayas to advance the unifying, pan-cooperation BRICS agenda.

Solving geopolitical issues among member-nations is a key BRICS priority. The China–India example should translate to Iran–Saudi Arabia when it comes to their involvement in Yemen and Egypt–Ethiopia when it comes to the controversial building of a major dam in the Nile. BRICS sherpas openly admit that BRICS needs an internal institutional mechanism to solve serious problems among member-states – and, eventually, partners.

And that brings us to the ultimate incandescent tragedy: Israel’s military offensives in Gaza, Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, and Iran.

BRICS sherpas revealed that two scenarios were being actively discussed in the closed sessions, as well as the bilateral meetings. The first foresees an Iran–Israel Hot War, with Lebanon turned into a major battleground, leading to a “chain reaction” involving several Arab actors.

The second scenario foresees a pan-West Asia crisis, involving not only neighboring nations but what would coalesce into coalitions – one pro-Arab, the other pro-Israeli. One wonders where dodgy actors such as Egypt and Jordan would fit in. It’s unclear how BRICS, as a multilateral organization, would react to both scenarios.

Dreadful realpolitik did not stop in its tracks to watch the BRICS high-speed train leave the Kazan station. Israel staged its puny strike on Iran immediately afterward, and the collective west pronounced the elections in Georgia null and void because they did not like the result – even though the OSCE issued a rational report about it.

The collective west’s incomprehension of what transpired in three historic days in Kazan only highlighted their astonishing arrogance, stupidity, and brutality. That’s precisely the reason why the BRICS matrix is working so hard to come up with the lineaments of a new, fair international order, and despite an array of challenges, will continue to flourish.

Ongoing genocide and United Nations’ standing


For me and many graduates of law and international relations, whose understanding of global developments is rooted in concepts such as the principles and goals outlined in the United Nations Charter, the norms and rules of international law, the principle of non-use of force or threat of force, and the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of countries, these days have been marked by ambiguity and contradiction—if I may say, exceedingly disheartening days. Indeed, all the most valuable moments we’ve spent learning throughout our lives have been tested over the past year.

By Esmaeil Baghaei
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman

As we commemorate the one-year anniversary of the renewed genocide in occupied Palestine, which coincides with the UN’s founding anniversary, it presents a timely opportunity for a genuine reflection on the organization’s operations and the norms and institutions that have arisen from it.
Who would have thought that in the 21st century, 79 years after the UN’s establishment, an entity that is ironically one of the organization’s first products - albeit a woeful and ill-fated one - would so brazenly defy all its principles and objectives, tear up its founding document, label its secretary-general persona non grata, and insult him, while killing 230 of its staff members over the past year and using its General Assembly as a platform for saber-rattling, intimidation, and bullying?
Who would have imagined that, more than two decades after the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC)—a court intended to prevent the commission of international crimes—and in a context where everyone had pinned their hopes on the existence of the court and the criminalization of four heinous international crimes as a guarantee against their recurrence in the 21st century, the most horrific crime, namely genocide, would become a commonplace occurrence before our astonished eyes and, regrettably, continue to this day?
The explosion of pagers in Lebanon has left everyone aghast at the boundless cruelty and inhumanity of which humans are capable. The transformation of a technology meant to connect humans into a tool for killing is not only a nefarious, unethical, and indefensible conspiracy but also a perilous innovation in the lexicon of war and enmity.

Unbridled brutality of past year

Over the past year, we have realized that cruelty, when combined with narcissistic racism and ideological superiority, creates an insatiable thirst for killing, burning, and destruction, and generates a strange talent for justifying brutality.
The extent and continuity of aggression, the level of brutality and killing, and the immense scale of destruction that has occurred over the past year in Gaza and now in Lebanon have not only expanded the boundaries of human savagery to an unprecedented level in the history of human cruelty, showcasing new manifestations of human creativity and innovation in killing one’s kind, but have also simultaneously caused a semantic transformation, creating a new and stark form for the discursive concept that has so far been imposed on the minds and thoughts of the nations of the world as human civilization (or, better put, Western civilization) through a distortion of reality. This civilization has proven itself to be, more than ever, a ruthless, profit-driven, and self-serving entity, tainted by racism and a sense of superiority, justifying oppression, shying away from fairness and justice, and submissive to power and harsh against the oppressed.
Over the past year, the credibility of human rights advocates in North America and Western Europe has been called into question more than ever before, and the instrumentalization of human rights by these advocates has been laid bare. The statement by Jürgen Habermas, the renowned German philosopher long regarded as a champion of ethics, peace, and tolerance, in explicit support of Israel’s genocide, left no doubt about this. Although Habermas’s statement was unexpected for many, it served as a stark reminder of the philosophical and political unity of the West in its view of the “non-Western” human being and the racist and nationalist underpinnings of Western philosophy and politics. In other words, Habermas’s statement, while reflecting the moral decline of the West, is entirely aligned with and justifies the policies of the German government in supporting Israel and its practical (military, financial, and political) involvement in the massacre of Palestinians. Over the past year, “the world has awoken from its slumber, realizing the true nature of European nationalist philosophy. Today, we owe this awakening to the suffering of the people of Palestine, who, through their heroism and sacrifices, have laid bare the barbarity at the heart of Western civilization”. But what has the ongoing genocide in Gaza and the aggression against Lebanon and other countries in the region done to the United Nations, its goals and aspirations, and the institutions that have emerged from it?

Erosion of UN credibility

Over the past year, the credibility of the United Nations system, its structure, and institutions, as well as the rules and norms that underpin it, have been called into question in an unprecedented manner. The functioning and position of the United Nations as an organization based on a set of principles and lofty goals for the revival of lost civilization, resulting from two world wars that originated solely in the West, as well as the international legal system born out of the UN Charter, have suffered an unprecedented erosion. This has posed a fundamental challenge to the integrity and functioning of the post-war global order and the institutions spawned by it. In this past year, the principles and objectives of the UN Charter, the principle of non-use of force or threat of force, the principle of promoting human rights, and all the norms and tenets derived from these principles and objectives have been ridiculed by a UN member state, while influential players have merely played the role of bystanders or even condoned such actions. The prime minister of the Zionist regime brazenly announced his decision to use force, commit genocide against Palestinians, and invade Lebanon in the UN General Assembly, threatened regional governments with force, and issued orders for attack and terror from the UN headquarters. The regime’s ambassador insulted the UN secretary-general and tore up the UN Charter in a show of contempt for the organization, while the regime’s foreign minister labeled the secretary-general persona non grata, and its military has carried out its mission to humiliate and undermine the UN, killing over 230 UN staff members in the past year. The latest move in the regime’s chain of actions to erase Palestinians from their ancestral land was the Israeli Knesset’s resolution to completely ban the activities of the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in occupied Palestine, effectively denying the Palestinian people access to the only available means of enjoying their most basic human rights.

Once, the realization of the principles enshrined in the UN Charter was a lofty aspiration. Now, after a year of blatant and persistent violations of these principles, with no consequences for the occupying regime, they appear to be nothing more than an unattainable ideal.

Blow to international humanitarian law

The international humanitarian law system and human rights were the first casualties of the genocide and brutality that unfolded over the past year. In this past year, the systematic slaughter of children and women in Gaza, the widespread killing of journalists, the deliberate attacks on hospitals and aid centers, the destruction of mosques and churches, and the annihilation of historical sites and civilian infrastructure - all of which are protected under international law - dealt a mortal blow to the international humanitarian law regime, leaving it reeling. With each child killed in Gaza, the pillars of the laws governing conduct in armed conflict were shaken, and with each missile and bomb that struck a hospital or aid center, a chunk of the humanitarian law ceiling crumbled.
The genocide in Gaza is the most egregious embodiment of the systematic and flagrant violation of human rights. The right to life, the most fundamental human right, was rendered meaningless, and the Palestinian people were subjected to the most heinous forms of slaughter and genocide. Gaza has been the scene of the most horrific and systematic violations of all human rights and humanitarian norms simultaneously. Those who managed to survive the bombardments and gunfire were left to face the even more dire consequences of the total blockade of food, medicine, and healthcare. The large number of children, women, and men who have lost their lives due to starvation, disease, and the lack of basic medicine is a stark testament to this bleak reality. Ironically, over the past 13 months, the [UN] Human Rights Council has failed to hold a single special session to discuss the human rights situation in Gaza, due to the inaction or obstructionism of Western governments that claim to champion human rights.
The genocide in Gaza has also had serious implications for the credibility and standing of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the judicial organ of the United Nations. The Israeli regime has brazenly disregarded six provisional orders issued by the ICJ to prevent genocide and ensure humanitarian access to Gaza, emboldened by its confidence in US support. Meanwhile, a pressing and disturbing question remains: how could the ICJ, despite overwhelming evidence of genocide in Gaza, fail to issue a ruling to halt the military operations of the Israeli regime, instead merely issuing a mild statement calling on Israeli forces not to commit genocide?!

Unrelenting crimes against humanity  

Over the past year, alongside the egregious and unprecedented violations of humanitarian law that constitute war crimes, numerous instances of crimes against humanity and genocide have occurred in a continuous and persistent manner. All three categories of these crimes, in addition to the crime of “aggression”, are criminalized under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and despite the Israeli regime’s non-membership in the court, the necessary mechanisms, including referral by the Security Council or the intervention of the court’s prosecutor, are in place to pursue and prosecute the regime’s leaders. Furthermore, the Palestinian Authority, since January 2015, has accepted the court’s jurisdiction over crimes committed in the occupied Palestinian territories by filing a declaration under Article 12(3) of the statute.
While the court’s prosecutor in May 2024 took the step of requesting an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and Gantz for crimes against humanity, no concrete progress has been made in holding them accountable, and instead, the prosecutor and judges of the court have been brazenly threatened and intimidated by Israel and the United States. US President Biden personally launched a scathing attack on the ICC prosecutor’s actions, and the prosecutor himself has been subjected to Israeli harassment and Mossad’s fabrications against him and his family. In the latest development, Karim Khan has been accused of sexual misconduct against a female employee, with reports suggesting that this is a dirty plot by Mossad to pressure Karim Khan and the ICC. At the same time, Julia Motoc, the Romanian president of the ICC’s pre-trial chamber responsible for examining the indictment against Netanyahu and Gantz, has resigned from her post.
As a result, doubts have intensified about the ability or willingness of the ICC and its members to resist the illegitimate pressures from Israel and its Western allies and to take concrete and expected steps towards upholding the integrity and respect for international law and prosecuting the Israeli regime’s leaders.

ICRC’s inaction on Palestine

Over the past year, the unique position and humanitarian mandate of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) have been compromised, with its invocation of the principle of ‘neutrality’ being perceived by many as a form of ‘indifference’ that is unjustifiable in the face of the blatant genocide of Palestinians. Furthermore, the ICRC has been found wanting in its response to repeated Palestinian requests for assistance, having fallen short in its duty to act.
A striking difference in the stances, including the use of expressions and terms that raise suspicions of the committee’s bias towards Israel, has raised serious concerns about the possibility of the organization being influenced by the political and philosophical views of Western states on the issue of Palestine. Pro-Palestinian advocacy groups argue that the ICRC has been guilty of “taking sides” or, at the very least, showing “uneven sympathy” towards Israel from the get-go. For instance, ICRC statements have repeatedly condemned Hamas’s attacks on Israel and explicitly called on the group to release “hostages,” while studiously avoiding direct references to Israel and instead using passive voice to describe its actions and crimes. Meanwhile, the ICRC has opted to use the term “detainees” to describe the thousands of Palestinians who are often arrested and held in harsh conditions without charge or trial, with the aim of extracting concessions from their families.
ICRC statements also frequently call on “all parties” to end hostilities or respect international humanitarian law. However, there is no equivalence between the nature and capacity of the Zionist regime’s aggression as the occupying power on one hand, and the nature and capacity of the Palestinian resistance as the occupied nation on the other, or even Hamas, which uses the most basic means to defend itself. In this situation, “equating” or implying the equality of the two sides provides a legal cover to justify the severe crimes committed by the Zionist regime and its Western supporters, which in a way complements the media propaganda against the Palestinian people and resistance groups.

UN agencies under fire

It is necessary to shed light on the inadequate response of two other international bodies that were expected to play a pivotal role in halting the genocide: the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The WHO’s response, as the global custodian of health and healthcare, to Israel’s repeated and ongoing attacks on hospitals, medical centers, and medical staff, as well as the ruthless slaughter of patients and wounded individuals within hospitals, has been negligible and ineffective. A case in point is the WHO’s response to the destruction of Al-Shifa Hospital on October 17, 2023, which left over 500 patients and medical staff dead; the organization merely condemned the attack without mentioning the perpetrator, Israel, or calling for an end to its assaults. The UNHCR has also been guilty of a similar dereliction of duty. While Israel is actively pursuing a policy of forced displacement of the Gaza population, the UNHCR has condemned Hamas and criticized the international community for its silence in the face of Israeli displacement.
The upshot is that the repetition and perpetuation of atrocities in occupied Palestine and Lebanon have numbed many people to the point of apathy. The human conscience, which is the most significant barrier to the spread of evil and malice, has been influenced by the “justifying” rhetoric of Israel’s Western supporters, leading to self-deception and denial of the severity of the crimes. The danger of trivializing evil and normalizing atrocities has never been more pressing. Edward Herman’s concept of “the banality of evil” refers to “making the unthinkable seem normal” and “doing horrific things” in a regular and organized manner based on normalization. This is a trend where heinous, degrading, and inhumane acts become routine and are accepted as normal and factual.

So, what is to be done?

If we accept that only hegemonic, bullying, and aggressive countries with a history of colonialism and interventionism benefit from lawlessness and chaos at the global level, we must uphold the existence of the United Nations and its principles and objectives, and strive to protect them. As one of the 51 founding members of the United Nations, Iran has always believed in and adhered to the UN’s principles and objectives. Despite the injustices and affronts, we have suffered at the hands of this organization, which has been influenced by the abuse of power by its powerful members, we have never turned against the United Nations. We have not torn up the UN Charter, killed peacekeepers, disparaged the UN secretary-general, or disrespected the specialized agencies and organizations of the UN, even when we were under the harshest sanctions imposed by the Security Council. This is not surprising, given the Iranian people’s reputation for being civilized, enlightened, noble, forward-thinking, responsible, and patient.
Call to action against Israeli atrocities

The world is in dire need of a coalition to put an end to Israel’s brutality, lawlessness, and slaughter. In the current state of affairs, everyone must uphold the principles and objectives of the United Nations and be wary of their violation. The heinous crimes committed by Israel must not lead to the “banality of evil” and the “normalization of atrocities”, casting doubt on humanitarian and moral principles. It is essential to meticulously identify and expose the breaches of the UN Charter and international law to the global community, and to condemn the Zionist regime’s actions and those of its apologists. We must not allow crime and evil to become the norm, nor should we tolerate the erosion of the principles of the UN Charter, human rights, and humanitarian law. We must safeguard the achievements of human civilization in the realm of international law and humanitarian principles. Governments and other stakeholders who believe in international law and institutions must launch a joint campaign within the United Nations and other international and regional organizations to enforce the ICJ’s provisional measures and put an end to the genocide of Palestinians. They must also support the ICC’s decision to prosecute Israeli leaders for crimes under its jurisdiction. Simultaneously, we must hold international organizations such as the ICRC, the WHO, the UNHCR, UNESCO, and others accountable and push them to break their silence and inaction in the face of Israeli atrocities. We must make it clear to them that remaining silent in the face of the Gaza genocide, under the guise of neutrality, is morally reprehensible. In a situation where evil is spreading rapidly, neutrality and inaction are tantamount to complicity.
In short, every individual has a responsibility to confront the trend that is targeting humanity and human dignity.

Hamedan festival honors foreign participants for their contributions to children’s theater

 By Samaneh Aboutalebi

HAMEDAN- A ceremony to honor international groups participating at the 29th edition of Iran’s International Theater Festival for Children and Young Adults was held in Hamedan on Tuesday.

Six international groups from Uzbekistan, Armenia, Iraq, Brazil, Turkey, and Russia as well as special guests from Morocco were honored during the event, attended by high-ranking provincial officials, judicial panel and artists.

Speaking at the ceremony the Director General of the Dramatic Arts Center of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance Hamid Nili thanked all those involved in organizing the festival, stating that this year’s festival symbolizes security, friendship, and love, and wishing that the guests might serve as good ambassadors for the land.
Nili expressed his appreciation to the Iraqi guests who brought the sacred banner of the holy shrine of Imam Hossein (AS) as a gift, emphasizing the symbolism of Imam Hossein (AS) for the community.
For his part, the Secretary of the festival Amir Mashhadi Abbas commented on the challenges of organizing such events, asserting that the joy of the city’s children outweighs any difficulties faced by the festival team.
He also thanked the foreign groups whose performances contributed positively despite some venue-related issues.
The secretary of the festival expressed hope that collaborative efforts would lead to an even more distinguished festival next year.
Hamedan province's Governor-General Hamid Molanouri, expressed his gratitude to the artists and cultural figures present, acknowledging their role in spreading joy and enthusiasm throughout the country and in Hamedan. He noted that various agencies had worked diligently to ensure the festival’s success and extended his thanks to the artistic groups, which are the core of the festival, as well as to the judges who enriched the event.
“The people of Hamedan are proud, hospitable, and art-loving,” Molanouri stated, emphasizing that hosting this festival is a source of pride for the community. He added that residents and authorities have developed a strong bond with the festival over the years and expressed hope that the event remains in Hamedan indefinitely.
Molanouri further emphasized the significant impact of the festival on the city, stating that the presence of artists has enhanced the knowledge of artists and contributed to social vitality. He lamented the failure to adequately provide Iranian youth with access to their history and culture, asserting that the arts serve as a crucial bridge for a community eager to engage with its true essence.
Masoud Hosseini, the Mayor of Hamedan, also remarked on the festival's positive influence on boosting the tourism potential of Hamedan, expressing joy at nearing the festival's conclusion and noting the many positive developments witnessed in children and adolescent theater.
Reflecting on the joy and excitement of children during the festival’s opening ceremony, he noted that the enthusiasm of families confirmed the success of the event through the smiles it brought to young attendees.
He also highlighted that, for many children in Gaza, Lebanon, and other nations suffering under oppression, such joyful experiences may seem like unattainable dreams, wishing for peace and justice to prevail across the globe.
The 29th Iran’s International Theater Festival for Children and Young Adults is organized by the Dramatic Arts Center of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, supported by Hamedan Municipality and in partnership with the Hamedan province's Cultural and Islamic Guidance Office, as well as the Iranian Dramatic Arts Association.
The event aims at enhancing unity and companionship, growth, awareness, and the confidence of Iranian children through the medium of theatre as well as achieving social participation of children and adolescents, promoting public culture, strengthening the foundations of family and intergenerational communication, and educating citizens and increasing responsibility through the active participation of Iranian children and adolescents in the production of theatrical works.
With the motto “Theater: Dialogue Without Borders”, the 29th edition of Iran’s International Theater Festival for Children and Young Adults will come to an end on Thursday.

ICC chief defends arrest warrant against Netanyahu for Gaza war crimes

ICC's Khan criticizes Berlin’s pro-Israel stance

The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has defended his pursuit of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and others, emphasizing the need for timely action in investigating war crimes in Gaza.

“Should I wait until everybody’s dead?” Karim Khan said in an interview with German weekly Der Spiegel, dismissing claims of hasty decision-making regarding arrest warrants for Israeli politicians and three Hamas leaders.

“If your father, your mother, your grandfather was a hostage, would you really want me to wait? If this was your child or your sister blown to bits, would you want me to wait?” he said, stressing the importance of immediate legal intervention in ongoing conflicts.

“We shouldn’t indulge ourselves into thinking that the suffering of people is something to comment on in the future. The law must be felt in real time. If you are a firefighter, you don’t wait until the house is burned down and the neighborhood is in flames,” he said.

The ICC, established in 2002, investigates and prosecutes individuals for international crimes such as genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.

In May, Khan issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu, war minister Yoav Gallant and three Hamas leaders - Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammad Deif - following a months-long investigation into war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict.

Haniyeh and Sinwar are confirmed dead, while Hamas has yet to publicly confirm Deif's demise.

The process faced delays due to reported Israeli espionage operations targeting the ICC and diplomatic pressure from Israel's allies.

Asked about Germany's argument that the ICC should only intervene when a state is unwilling or unable to investigate potential crimes, Khan criticized Berlin’s pro-Israel stance, and underlined that political considerations should not undermine justice.

“Israel has very capable lawyers and judges. The question is: Is the law being applied in the occupied territories?" he said, referring to the illegal policies and practices in the occupied Palestinian territories.

it's simply that there should be no justice because a country is an ally?" the ICJ chief stressed.

“If you read what experts are writing and look at what’s happening on the ground, we don’t see investigations. We don’t see accountability. Again: What is the complaint? Is it simply that there should be no justice because a country is an ally?" he stressed.

In response to accusations of antisemitism following the issuance of arrest warrants against Israeli leaders, Khan dismissed such claims, citing his long-standing respect for Jewish faith and culture.

“There is a lot of abuse and threats and games going on between political leaders, intelligence agencies and interest groups. But I know who I am,” he said.

“The Jewish religion is the great teaching of the Prophet Moses, and I have a lot of respect for the Jewish people and the Jewish faith,” he added.

Khan underlined the importance of applying the law equally worldwide, and said all people deserve equal protection before the law irrespective of their ethnicity, religion or origin.

“Every victim is equal. I have as much regard, attention and love for a Jewish child as for a Palestinian child, or any other person anywhere in the world,” Khan said.

“It’s about equality before the law. I have the responsibility to investigate as effectively as I can,” he added.