Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Nuclear weapons have no place in Iran's defense doctrine

SNSC chief

Nuclear weapons have no place in Iran's defense doctrine

TEHRAN, (MNA) – Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Ali Akbar Ahmadian has said that Iran will not give up on its inalienable right to peaceful use of atomic energy, adding that nukes have no place in Iran's doctrine.

Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) Ali Akbar Ahmadian made the remarks in Brazil's Rio de Janeiro on Wednesday in the BRICS security officials meeting. 

"In the Palestinian issue, we are witnessing the reemergence of a dangerous discourse called 'peace through power' and 'coercive diplomacy,'" said Ahmadian at the start of his meeting.

"True peace has roots in justice and the recognition of legitimate rights," he added.

The SNSC chairman further said that "The threats made by some countries against BRICS and its members show their deep concern about the BRICS' enormous potential to create a powerful economic, political, and cultural bloc."

"Iran will not give up on its inalienable rights, including the right to peaceful use of atomic energy. Nuclear weapons have no place in Iran's defense doctrine, as evidenced by reports from international watchdogs," Ahmadian underscored.

"The Islamic Republic proposes to unveil a BRICS digital currency and a dedicated and secure banking messenger for intra-group trade and a symbol of economic independence," he elsewhere said.

"The Islamic Republic proposes to form a supply chain security committee with an emphasis on transportation insurance, the creation of an anti-sanctions corridor, and the launch of a support fund to counter foreign sanctions," the top Iranian security official said.

Ambassador announces Pakistan position on Pahalgam incident

Ambassador announces Pakistan position on Pahalgam incident

TEHRAN, (MNA) – Muhammad Mudassir Tipu, H.E. ambassador of Pakistan in Iran had a media interaction today to explain the position of Pakistan on Pahalgam incident on 30 April, 2025.

The following are the main points of his address to reporters on the Wednesday presser:  

  • Our region is facing a serious threat to its peace and stability owing to the politically motivated and highly provocative environment being created by India in the wake of the Pahalgam attack in IIOJK.
  • Pakistan condemns terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. Targeting of innocent civilians is deplorable and condemnable. We are concerned over the loss of lives during the Pahalgam attack.
  • We also extended our condolences. Being a victim of terrorism itself, no one can feel the pain of those impacted by this scourge like Pakistan.
  • As a member of the UN Security Council, Pakistan constructively engaged with other members on the press statement issued by the LINSC on the Pahalgam incident in the IIOJK. The UNSC statement contains condemnation in the strongest possible terms of the incident.
  • On the other hand, it is India that glorifies, and even celebrates its assassination campaign and sponsoring of terrorism in Pakistan.
  • Pakistan has been a victim of terrorism that is planned, orchestrated, and sponsored by India.
  • In this backdrop, it is preposterous to even suggest any kind of association of Pakistan with this incident.
  • The hype that is created on each and every incident in India seems to be deliberate and orchestrated.
  • It is unfortunate that India continues to weaponize unsubstantiated allegations as a part of its disinformation strategy for narrow political ends. This is not the first time that India has resorted to such tactics.
  • In fact, this has now become a very familiar pattern, aimed at diverting attention from India's inability to suppress the inalienable right of the Kashmiris to self-determination; its security failures in IIOJK; as well as its decades-long state terrorism, and oppression.
  • To distract the international community's attention from the horrors in IIOJK, India deliberately raises tensions with Pakistan. A durable solution for India lies in focusing on its internal problems instead of raising fingers at other countries.
  • India has a history of using the excuse of "terrorism" for introducing draconian laws to suppress the innocent Kashmiris in IIOJK, and to defy the UNSC resolutions, bilateral agreements and international law.
  • A case in point being India's illegal and unilateral actions of 5 August 2019 which remains a blatant violation of the relevant UNSC resolutions, and the 4th Geneva Convention as well as India's own commitments.
  • The root cause of instability and conflict in South Asia is the unresolved and long festering Jammu and Kashmir dispute.
  • We remain concerned at the vitriolic, highly inflammatory and Islamophobic narrative being directed against the Kashmiris and the Indian Muslims.
  • Indian media and political leaders are directing a similar discourse against Pakistan.
  • This highly irresponsible ploy for narrow political gains is dragging the entire region towards the precipice of instability.
  • India made allegations against Pakistan after the Pahalgam attack without an iota of evidence and with such dramatic speed.
  • India needs to explain why such 'incidents' usually coincide with high profile visits.
  • We demand an independent probe by neutral investigators because Pakistan has nothing to do with it. Pakistan has neither any connection to it, nor is the potential beneficiary.
  • At a time when Pakistan's economy is stabilizing, and we are making significant progress against terrorism, we need to question why this situation is being created by India all of a sudden and what is the motivation behind it.
  • The actions that India has announced after its Cabinet Committee on Security are illegal and highly irresponsible.
  • Holding in abeyance of IWT is unilateral and illegal. There are no such provisions in the treaty.
  • This action shows India's blatant disregard for the sanctity of international treaties. It sets a dangerous precedent.
  • It strikes at a fundamental pillar of the regional cooperation with profound implications for regional and global stability.
  • Pakistan is an agrarian economy. Millions of people are dependent on the waters being regulated by this Treaty.
  • The National Security Committee of Pakistan has made it clear that any attempt to stop or divert the flow of water belonging to Pakistan as per the IWT and the usurpation of the rights of the lower riparian will be considered as an Act of War.
  • It is equivalent to an attack on the people of Pakistan, and its economy.
  • Other diplomatic measures by India are indiscriminate, and unnecessary. For example, these restrictions are having a serious humanitarian impact on ordinary people.
  • Indian actions and rhetoric in the last few days are highly irresponsible.
  • Being a responsible member of the international community, Pakistan believes in restraint and remains committed to regional peace and stability.
  • However, in case of any act of aggression, Pakistan remains determined to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity in exercise of its inherent right to self-defence as enshrined in Article 51 of the UN Charter.
  • The following questions need to be considered by the international community: -
  • The international community needs to distinguish between its sympathy with victims of the incident and unwitting endorsement of Indian belligerence.
  • In the wake of Indian propaganda, the international community must not unknowingly support New Delhi in fabricating a casus-belli for an irresponsible military adventurism.
  • Indian disregard of international law will lead it to violating other international commitments and obligations as well. A regional order based on Indian whimsical approach will lead to permanent instability and unpredictability.
  • The Indian effort to build an environment of Islamophobia and hatred where people are being targeted on the basis of religion, needs to be condemned.
  • The dangerous Indian brinkmanship and efforts aimed at escalation can potentially lead to disastrous consequences in the nuclear environment of the region.
  • The international community needs to hold India accountable for its assassination campaign in USA, Canada and Pakistan.
  • Notwithstanding above, Pakistan is cognizant of the developing situation. We are alert and vigilant and will thwart any misadventure, responding in a befitting manner at the time and place of our choosing.

    Ambassador announces Pakistan position on Pahalgam incident

All evidence points to genocide being committed by Israel

Iran diplomat to ICJ

All evidence points to genocide being committed by Israel

TEHRAN, (MNA) – Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs, Kazem Gharibabadi delivered a speech to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) Wednesday, during which he said all evidence suggests genocide in Gaza.

Speaking in the Wednesday session of the ICJ, the Iranian diplomat said that the UNRWA and other aid agencies face systematic hindrances in delivering aid to Gazans.

"Israeli occupying regime systematically prevents and obstructs access to the civilian population in Gaza, Gharibabadi said. 

"Palestinians have been deprived of the basic necessities of life, including food, fuel, water," he added.

"Israeli occupying regime significantly undermines the Palestinian people's right to health and medical care," the deputy Iranian foreign minister highlighted.

The UN estimates show up to 1.9mn Palestinians in Gaza are categorized as internally displaced, he further underscored.

The ICJ began a hearing in The Hague on Israel’s humanitarian obligations in the Palestinian territory on Monday. The proceedings at the ICJ are scheduled to last for five days.

The hearings are being held at the request of the UN General Assembly, which voted in favour of asking the World Court to weigh in on Israel’s legal obligations last December. That resolution was put forward by Norway after Israel banned the UN agency for Palestinian refugees from operating in Israeli-controlled territory.

Russian Embassy congratulates Persian Gulf Day to Iran

Russian Embassy congratulates Persian Gulf Day to Iran

TEHRAN, (MNA) – The Russian Embassy in Tehran has congratulated the Iranians on the anniversary of the National Persian Gulf Day.

Iran is celebrating the Persian Gulf National Day, which marks the anniversary of the expulsion of colonial and foreign forces from the strategic gulf in 1622.

In different posts on different social media on Wednesday, Russian Embassy in Tehran felicitated all the Iranians on the anniversary of the National Persian Gulf Day. 

Russian Embassy congratulates Persian Gulf Day to Iran

Lebanese Druze leader warns against Israeli regime’s plots

Lebanese Druze leader warns against Israeli regime’s plots

TEHRAN, (MNA) – Reacting to the developments in the Damascus southern suburb, a leader of the Lebanese Druze community warned against escalating conflict as plotted by the Israeli regime in Syria and Lebanon.

Sheikh Sami Abu al-Mini, the leader of the Druze in Lebanon, said in response to the developments and clashes in the Damascus southern suburbs, saying that "What is happening in Syria is a sedition plot."

He further stressed that "Damascus must listen to the demands of all Syrian people."

He added that "We condemn the insult to the Prophet Muhammad and the sedition attempts. There are plots seeking to escalate the tensions. We want the situation to be brought under control. Seditionist plans are being implemented by Israel. We oppose separatist plans against Syria and the Arab and Islamic identity."

In the meantime, Walid Jumblatt, the head of the Progressive Socialist Party of Lebanon said with regard to the developments in Syria, that "We want peace and dialogue, and the Syrian authorities must conduct a transparent investigation into the events in Jaramana. We are ready to go to Syria and we oppose Israeli interference in this country. Israel seeks to abuse the Druze to create sedition in Syria."

Jumbalatt also said that "We want a united Syria," warning that "Israel seeks to displace the Druze and exploit them."

Exclusive | Iran-U.S. talks are a ‘litmus test’ for diplomacy, says IRNA’s CEO

Hossein Jaberi-Ansari said the Iran-U.S. negotiations are ‘difficult and complicated’ but are nevertheless a new test for diplomacy.

CEO of the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) Hossein Jaberi-Ansari
Tehran, IRNA – CEO of the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) Hossein Jaberi-Ansari says the ongoing negotiations between Iran and the United States, mediated by Oman, represent a “litmus test” for diplomacy and an opportunity for both sides to gauge each other’s positions beyond media narratives and rhetoric.

In an exclusive interview with IRNA, Jaberi-Ansari, who is a former spokesperson for the Foreign Ministry and a former chief negotiator in the Astana talks on Syria, said the negotiations with the U.S. were “difficult and complicated” given the long history of tensions and distrust between Tehran and Washington.

He said that there had been widespread speculation about the outcome of the talks before they had even begun, but added that if they have managed to create a slight opening for diplomacy, the process could be deemed a success.

Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and Steve Witkoff, the U.S. president’s special envoy to the Middle East, led two rounds of indirect negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program and the removal of U.S. sanctions. The meetings took place in Muscat, Oman, on April 12, and in Rome, Italy, on April 19. Both parties have expressed satisfaction with the progress achieved so far, with a third round of talks anticipated to convene in Oman on Wednesday, focusing on technical issues.

“What was done in Muscat and completed in Rome, the capital of Italy, with the mediation of the Kingdom of Oman, confirms that the negotiations have begun relatively successfully, meaning that the first doors have been opened for both sides to continue to work with each other,” Jaberi-Ansari said.

He cautioned, however, that negotiations tend to become increasingly complicated when the involved parties have vastly different political perspectives and conflicting interests.

Diplomatic efforts, he said, are aimed at bridging these gaps and reconciling divergent goals and interests. The current talks between Iran and the U.S. are a clear example of this challenge, he added.

The former diplomat said that if Washington is serious in the negotiations, the two sides can narrow their differences and reach an agreement on Iran’s nuclear program in “a realistic and reasonable timeline.”

Regarding potential reactions from regional countries, particularly the Persian Gulf Arab states, to the renewed negotiations, Jaberi-Ansari said the region appears more willing to “move forward” compared to 2015, when Iran and world powers, including the U.S., signed the landmark Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

In his first term, President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from that agreement and re-imposed tough economic sanctions as part of a “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran. Upon his return to the White House for a second term in January, Trump said he wanted negotiations with Iran to “make a new deal.” However, he also restored his “maximum pressure” policy, a move that has scuttled any possibility of direct engagement with Iran.

“It appears that in this round, Iran is engaging with its neighbors more seriously, communicating its policies, and clarifying realities,” Jaberi-Ansari said.

Foreign Minister Araqchi, his deputies, and Iranian ambassadors in the region are actively working to maintain close contact with Arab leaders and officials to prevent a “distorted image” regarding a potential deal between Iran and the U.S., he added.

He pointed out that the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, have learned that escalating tensions would harm the entire region. 

Iran seeks concrete guarantees in nuclear talks with US, not promises: Sr. Lawmaker

By Alireza Hashemi
Iran will only accept concrete guarantees in indirect nuclear talks with the US, as repeated American betrayals have shown that US signatures and promises hold no weight, says a senior Iranian lawmaker.

In an interview with the Press TV website, Abolfazl Zohrevand said the core objective of the Oman-mediated negotiations is to address concerns about Iran’s nuclear program, as well as military and economic threats posed by the US and its allies in a durable and decisive manner.

"The goal is for both sides to move away from hostility and resolve disputes through dialogue," said the member of the Iranian parliament’s national security and foreign policy commission.

He criticized the American side for perpetuating distrust through inconsistent positions. For instance, as he noted, lead US negotiator Steve Witkoff initially accepted uranium enrichment on Iranian soil but later demanded a complete halt to enrichment in Iran, which was also echoed by the hawkish US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

“These positions show that the American side is not trustworthy,” Zohrevand asserted. “Negotiating with someone who is not trustworthy is futile. If we ignore this, we risk a bigger failure than the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), losing our capabilities without gaining anything.”

The senior lawmaker and former ambassador emphasized that the Islamic Republic demands concrete guarantees to counter the risk of empty promises.

Unfulfilled commitments

Reflecting on the JCPOA, commonly known as the Iran nuclear deal, he noted that Iran complied by exporting enriched materials and stopping work at the Arak heavy-water reactor, yet these actions were met with unfulfilled US commitments.

“The signatures of American politicians are not binding for us; only concrete guarantees matter,” he stressed, citing Trump’s unilateral adjustment of tariffs on China as evidence of America’s capriciousness.

“We consider America an enemy and cannot expect it to honor its commitments. The JCPOA experience proved this, and neither Congress nor Trump can offer us concessions," he added, referring to the speculation that ratification of a new deal by the US Congress would serve as a guarantee for Iran.

Zohrevand also dismissed the notion of US investment in Iran as a guarantee for a new deal, questioning whether American investors would act on Iran’s terms.

Instead, he defined a concrete guarantee as something the US cannot easily retract, such as removing all sanctions and returning all frozen Iranian funds.

Transferring uranium out of Iran not on table

On speculation about transferring Iran’s highly enriched uranium to Russia under a new agreement, Zohrevand clarified that 60 percent uranium enrichment in Iran has not yet been addressed in the three rounds of talks, as the focus is on establishing a framework for a deal.

He suggested that Iran might consider storing 60% enriched uranium with a strategic partner as a guarantee, but this would depend on the benefits offered by the US.

“It depends on how much Iran gains to justify giving up such leverage,” he said, emphasizing that Iran will not sacrifice its capabilities without reciprocal benefits.

Netanyahu, Trump on same page

Touching on the Israeli regime's repeated threats against Iran during the indirect talks, Zohrevand said the US and Israel pursue a shared agenda to neutralize Iran’s deterrence capabilities.

He argued that there is no discord between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, describing their positions as a coordinated effort.

“The entire purpose of Trump’s negotiations is to ensure Israel faces no threat from Iran due to its crimes in the region,” he said, adding that Israel wants to maximize this course of threat removal.

US military threats largely a bluff

On Trump’s threats of military action against Iran, Zohrevand dismissed their credibility, arguing that the US knows it would suffer greater losses in the event of any confrontation.

“Iran can deliver a heavy blow to the US with its regional influence,” he said, referring to Iran’s vast ground forces and superior military capabilities in a prolonged war.

He said that Iran could close the Persian Gulf to American forces, destroy their military bases scattered across the region, and expel them.

Drawing a comparison, he noted that Yemen has disrupted US and British capabilities during its confrontation with their warships in the Red Sea.

Zohrevand also underscored Iran’s strong alliances with Russia and China, describing them as “decisive powers in the region” united by their shared confrontation with the US.

He added that China’s hostility toward the US further cements the geopolitical necessity for Iran, Russia, and China to stand together.

Iran UN envoy: France’s claim on nuclear program unfounded and irresponsible

Iran's permanent representative to the UN categorically rejected the French government’s accusation that the Islamic Republic is on the cusp of developing nuclear weapons.

New York, IRNA – Iran's Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the UN Amir Saeid Iravani rejected French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot’s accusation that the Islamic Republic is “on the cusp of developing nuclear weapons,” characterizing these allegations as unfounded and politically irresponsible.

Iravani’s full statement comes as follows:

“Upon instructions from my Government, I am writing to you regarding the statement delivered by H.E. Mr. Jean-Noel Barrot, Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs of France, at the Stakeout following the United Nations Security Council’s private meeting on 28 April 2025. During his remarks, the French Foreign Minister made unsubstantiated and politically motivated claims regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s peaceful nuclear program, including the baseless assertion that “Iran is on the cusp of developing nuclear weapons.” Such an allegation reflects either a fundamental misunderstanding or deliberate distortion of Iran’s legal rights under international law. It also demonstrates a selective reading of facts and exemplifies a persistent pattern of double standards by a State that bears particular responsibility as a permanent member of the Security Council. In this regard, I wish to bring the following points to your attention, and the attention of the Members of the Security Council:

Allegations that Iran is “on the cusp” of developing nuclear weapons are entirely unfounded and politically irresponsible. The Islamic Republic of Iran has never pursued nuclear weapons, and its defensive doctrine has not been changed. Iran unequivocally rejects all weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), including nuclear arms. As a founding member of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), Iran remains fully committed to its obligations under the treaty. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) continues to monitor and verify the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program. Its reports have consistently confirmed that there has been no diversion of nuclear material for non-peaceful purposes.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was a landmark multilateral achievement, unanimously endorsed by the Security Council through Resolution 2231 (2015). Its disruption was caused not by Iran but rather the consequence of the United States’ reckless and unlawful withdrawal, coupled with the E3’s failure to deliver the promised economic benefits. In response, Iran showed strategic patience for over a year before gradually reducing and stopping its commitments, strictly in accordance with Articles 26 and 36 of the JCPOA. These measures were transparent and fully proportionate.

The French Foreign Minister’s open threat to reimpose sanctions with “devastating effects” on Iran’s economy constitutes a blatant act of political and economic coercion. Resorting to threats and economic blackmail is entirely unacceptable and represents a clear breach of the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. Additionally, France’s threat to trigger the so-called snapback mechanism despite its own non-performance contradicts the fundamental principles of international law that preclude a party from claiming rights under an agreement while simultaneously failing to fulfil its obligations thereunder. Such an action is legally and procedurally flawed, inadmissible, and invalid, and would undermine the credibility of the Security Council.

While voicing concern over the risks of nuclear proliferation in relation to Iran's peaceful nuclear program, France’s credibility on non-proliferation is fundamentally undermined by its own record. It continues to modernize and expand its nuclear arsenal, refuses to extend unconditional negative security assurances to non-nuclear-weapon states, remains silent, and is complicit in the Israeli regime’s undeclared nuclear weapons program. France has also yet to fulfill its disarmament obligations under Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

The Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates its commitment to diplomacy and constructive engagement. However, genuine diplomacy cannot proceed under threats or pressure. If France and its partners are truly interested in a diplomatic resolution, they must abandon coercion and respect the sovereign rights of States under international law.”

A new dawn in the Sahel: President Traore and Burkina Faso’s anti-imperialist rebirth

By Maryam Qarehgozlou

Last week, Burkina Faso’s military announced that it had successfully dismantled a significant coup attempt in the West African nation engineered by France.

The Burkinabe Minister of Security, Mahamadou Sana, revealed that the leaders behind the coup attempt are based in Ivory Coast, whose government, led by President Alassane Ouattara, is known for aligning with France’s interests in the region.

Sana disclosed on state television last Monday that the objective of the coup attempt was to “sow total chaos and place the country under the supervision of an international organization.”

The plot was uncovered following the interception of messages exchanged between a Burkinabe military officer and leaders of terrorist groups. These communications discussed details about the positions of defense and security forces, as well as ongoing military operations.

According to the government, the information shared with these terrorist groups was intended to escalate attacks against security forces and civilians under the governance of President Ibrahim Traore, with the aim to “stir up a revolt against the authorities.”

This recent event underscores the challenges faced by President Traore, who has actively sought to distance the country from its former colonial power, France, since assuming office two and a half years ago.

At 37, Traore is the world’s second-youngest head of state, after Iceland’s Prime Minister Kristrun Frostadottir. He has made significant strides in reshaping Burkina Faso’s international relations and domestic policies despite the persistent threat of terrorism and neo-colonialism.

Traore has emerged as one of Africa’s most prominent advocates for a multipolar world and now serves as the face of the tripartite Alliance of Sahel States (AES), an anti-Western regional bloc formed with neighboring Mali and Niger last year.

The charismatic young African leader, a staunch proponent of anti-imperialism, has spearheaded the expulsion of French troops from Burkina Faso, catalyzing a ripple effect as other African nations consider similar actions.

By declining his presidential salary and retaining the modest military rank of captain, Traore has demonstrated a commitment to fostering economic self-sufficiency and eradicating corruption.

Rise to power

Traore – known as “IB” among locals – joined the Burkina Faso army in 2010 at the age of 22.

By 2020, he had been promoted to captain and played a pivotal role in numerous counter-terrorism operations in the African country.

However, around this time, Traore became disillusioned with his country’s leadership after witnessing the stark contrast between the under-equipped Burkinabe soldiers and the corrupt politicians who were distributing “suitcases of money” for bribes.

As Traore grew increasingly discontent with the status quo, he gradually emerged as a spokesperson for the frustrated soldiers stationed in the north of the country.

In January 2022, he played a part in the Burkina Faso coup d’état against President Roch Marc Kabore, which led to the rise of the Patriotic Movement for Safeguard and Restoration military junta.

However, dissatisfaction with the junta’s leader, Paul-Henri Sandaogo Damiba, escalated due to his inability to effectively tackle the terrorist threat.

The discontent among younger officers on the frontlines culminated in yet another coup on September 30 of the same year.

Following this coup, Traore, aged 34, was elected as the new leader of the Patriotic Movement for Safeguard and Restoration.

On October 6, 2022, he also assumed the position of Interim President, serving as both “Head of State” and “Supreme Head of the Armed Forces.”

Other coup attempts

The recent coup attempt to overthrow Traore was not the first since his ascension to power; in fact, his government has withstood numerous coup attempts over the past two and a half years.

Shortly after Traore took charge, military prosecutors disclosed in December 2022 that there had been an attempt to “destabilize state institutions” by civilians and a lieutenant-colonel named Emmanuel Zoungrana.

In late September 2023, Burkina Faso’s government reported that yet another “proven coup attempt” had been thwarted, nearly a year after Traore assumed power.

In January 2024, government spokesperson Rimtalba Jean Emmanuel Ouédraogo revealed that a coup attempt had been foiled, resulting in the arrest of coup plotters, which he described as an “umpteenth attempt at destabilizing” the Sahelian nation.

In September 2024, the government of Burkina Faso disclosed that it had foiled “several attempts at destabilization,” stating that former transitional president Damiba had spearheaded the “military segment of this plot” within Burkina Faso.

Security Minister Sana explained that opposition forces, backed by Western intelligence agencies and European mercenaries, had orchestrated a wide-ranging destabilization plot from various countries, including Ivory Coast, Ghana, and Nigeria.

Pragmatic foreign policy

Since assuming power, the young anti-imperialist African leader has striven to liberate Burkina Faso from neocolonialist forces, including the US and France, with the aim of securing the nation’s independence.

In a decisive move, Traore’s government expelled hundreds of French troops from Burkina Faso in February 2023, just one month after the Sahel nation demanded their withdrawal.

Traore subsequently expressed his desire to “look at other horizons, because we want win-win partnerships,” endorsing the diversification of Burkina Faso’s international alliances.

Echoing these sentiments, Prime Minister Apollinaire Kyelem de Tembela suggested in 2023 that Russia would be a “reasonable” ally in Burkina Faso’s fight against terrorism.

The country’s rejection of its colonial past has since sparked a wider trend across West and Central Africa, where nations are increasingly downgrading ties with France.

Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger’s military governments have collectively expelled approximately 4,300 French soldiers from their territories in recent years.

In January, France completed its troop withdrawal from Chad, while Ivory Coast had previously announced its intention to withdraw French forces.

Furthermore, France and Senegal are negotiating the terms for the withdrawal of all French troops stationed in Senegal by the end of this year.

These French military bases in Africa have served as logistical hubs facilitating French military interventions, often under the pretense of providing assistance in fighting terrorism.

Their closure would mark the end of France’s capacity to intervene across Africa, effectively diminishing its influence in the region.

In response to this trend, French President Emmanuel Macron commented in January that African leaders had “forgotten to say thank you” to France for its purported assistance in combating Sahel insurgencies.

Denouncing Macron’s remarks as “just a smokescreen for the people,” Traore retorted, “If anyone is ungrateful, it is him. France exists today thanks to our ancestors. They should pray for us.”

Alliance of Sahel states

On July 26, 2023, a coup d’état occurred in Niger, during which the country’s presidential guard removed and detained President Mohamed Bazoum.

In response, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) issued an ultimatum on July 30, demanding the reinstatement of Bazoum within a week, under the threat of international sanctions and the potential use of force.

On September 26, 2023, Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso formed the Alliance of Sahel States (AES), a mutual defense agreement established in response to the ECOWAS threat.

In July 2024, the AES evolved into a confederation led by the three post-coup administrations.

The confederation opposes neocolonialism, as demonstrated by the downgrading of the French language and the renaming of colonial-era street names. It also holds anti-French and anti-ECOWAS views, contesting many of their policies.

The AES aims to pool resources to develop energy and communications infrastructure, establish a common market, implement a monetary union with a proposed currency, enable the free movement of people, promote industrialization, and invest in the agriculture, mining, and energy sectors. The ultimate goal is to federalize into a single sovereign state.

The AES countries are resource-rich and are renegotiating relationships with Western companies to assert greater control over their resources and operations.

They have been actively diminishing the influence and control of their former colonial power, France, across resources, territory, diplomatic relations, and trade.

In pursuit of new partnerships to fill the vacuum left by France’s departure, AES nations are seeking to enhance economic and security cooperation with Russia, Turkey, China, Iran, and North Korea.

The economic outlook for AES countries appears promising, with Burkina Faso achieving 5.494%, Mali securing 3.751%, and Niger reaching 9.869% GDP growth in 2024.

Domestic policies

A 2023 Afrobarometer report revealed that nearly two-thirds of Burkinabes believe military intervention is warranted when leaders abuse power, while 66% support military rule, a stark contrast to the 24% recorded in 2012.

This survey, conducted during a period of military governance, seemingly reflects general approval of Traore’s administration.

Traore’s supporters highlight several achievements, including the doubling of military spending, the creation of a rapid support force to aid overstretched troops in the north, and increased use of drones and helicopters in government offensives.

Additionally, Traore’s reforms, such as rejecting a salary increase while maintaining his military captain earnings and nationalizing gold mines to promote domestic gold refining, resonate with many citizens.

His administration has also inaugurated the National Support Center for Artisanal Cotton Processing, constructed a new airport, and made significant investments in agriculture.

In an effort to assert financial independence, Traore has refused financial assistance from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, emphasizing the country’s potential for development without reliance on Western loans and conditionalities.

Burkina Faso’s untapped natural resources, including gold, zinc, copper, manganese, diamonds, and more, hold significant potential to transform the national economy.

Despite progress, including a GDP increase from US$3.2 billion in 1990 to US$18.3 billion in 2023 and a reduction in extreme poverty, challenges remain.

According to recent research by the African Futures and Innovation team at the Institute for Security Studies, Burkina Faso’s economy is projected to grow at an average rate of 8% from 2025 to 2043, with the potential to reduce income poverty to 2.6% and lift an additional 2.4 million Burkinabes out of poverty by 2043.

Nonetheless, prioritizing the urgent issue of terrorism is critical, as it has compromised the state’s authority and its capacity to provide public services in the 40% of territory lost to extremist groups. Thousands of schools and health facilities in these areas remain closed.

Experts suggest that with its strong, charismatic leadership, Burkina Faso has the potential to improve governance and achieve its developmental goals.

Persian Gulf, a sea intertwined with Iran’s identity

Persian Gulf, a sea intertwined with Iran’s identity

TEHRAN, (MNA) – The Persian Gulf is intrinsic to Iran's identity. It is a natural source full of benefits for the peoples living in its littoral regions.

Iran is celebrating the Persian Gulf National Day, which marks the anniversary of the expulsion of colonial and foreign forces from the strategic water body in 1622.

The 10th day of Ordibehesht – the second month on the Iranian calendar – has been designated as the Persian Gulf National Day to commemorate not only the historical victory of the Iranian forces against the trespassers in the southern waters but also to remind all that the true name of the Persian Gulf will remain so forever.

Throughout the history of the region, which has been full of ups and downs, the Persian Gulf, this civilization-making span of water, has constantly been named the Persian Gulf or called by its equivalents in all foreign languages.

From millennia B.C. up until now, the Persian Gulf has always been referred to with the same ancient name or the ‘Persian Sea’ in a variety of books, travelogues, documents, maps, historical research, and numerous international documents written in different languages. Historians and researchers have emphatically used the same name, particularly incredible Islamic and Arabic sources of reference.

While laying emphasis on the policy of neighborliness, the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran hopes that this body of water will be a sanctuary of regional security and stability as well as a symbol of peace, friendship and co-existence among regional nations and that others will respect the establishment of peace and security in the Persian Gulf by the littoral states.

The Iranian trio islands of Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb in the Persian Gulf are inseparable parts of the country’s territory and any comments made by third parties about them are fundamentally null and void.

The United Arab Emirates (UAE), as a newly established country, has been making baseless claims about the three Iranian islands of Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb in recent years. 

The UAE has issued political statements with other parties, but these claims have been invaild and will not change the identity and status of these islands, which belong to Iran, and the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran over these islands is unalterable.

In a recent joint statement of the final meeting of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council member states and the European Union, contrary to authentic official documents, Iran has been asked to put an end to what they claim to be the "occupation" of the three Iranian islands (Greater Tunb, Lesser Tunb, and Abu Musa). This statement takes a hostile stance against Tehran and ignores the documents of international law in this regard. It claims that Iran's ownership of the islands is a violation of the territorial integrity of the UAE and the principles of the UN Charter!

The sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran over the three islands has been proven and is completely valid and inviolable according to international law. Historical documents acknowledge this, and the newly established countries will not be able to distort it.

Undoubtedly, as Iranian officials have stated, the three islands are an integral part of the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Islamic Republic of Iran does not allow any foreign party to interfere in its internal affairs.

The Islamic Republic of Iran asserts its ownership of the three islands and closely monitors any activities that threaten its national and regional interests. Any aggression against the country's territory will be met with a necessary response.

Persian Gulf, a sea intertwined with Iran’s identity

The certainty of the islands belonging to the Islamic Republic of Iran remains unwavering despite unfounded meetings and baseless claims.

Iranian government congratulates all Iranians and those who have done their utmost to safeguard this soil and its waters on this great occasion, which is reminiscent of the expulsion of colonialists from the region, and pay tribute to the honorable martyrs of the Persian Gulf.

The Persian Gulf has always been a source of pride and honor for Iranians. For thousands of years, the people of Iran have lived alongside the Persian Gulf and have enjoyed its endless benefits.

In addition to having vast resources of energy and economic significance, the Persian Gulf has an ancient and unique history and culture that can be seen in the people who lived by it.

The rare cultural and artistic identity of the neighboring regions of the Persian Gulf is a category that entails a true strive to preserve and promote until it passes on this ancient culture to the next generations.

The southern Iranian gulf has been referred to by historians and ancient texts as "Persian" since the Achaemenid Empire was established (550 BC) in what is now modern-day Iran.

According to the book “Documents on the Persian Gulf's Name, the Eternal Heritage of Ancient Time,” the term the Persian Gulf and its equivalents have been used continuously since earlier than 400 BC in all languages, especially in the Arabic language.

On almost all maps printed before 1960, and in most modern international treaties, documents and maps, this body of water is known by the name "Persian Gulf."

Persia is the historic name for Iran.

However, since the mid-19th century, some Arab-speaking countries, along with their western allies, have been trying to change the historical name of the Persian Gulf in the mass media but Iran has attributed such efforts as politically motivated which will be of no avail.

In this regard, back in 2006, Iran designated the Tenth of Ordibehesht as the Persian Gulf National Day, to remind them all that the name of the water body will remain Persian forever.

The date designated as the national day coincides with the anniversary of Abbas I of Persia's successful military campaign when the Portuguese navy was driven out of the Strait of Hormuz in the Capture of Ormuz.

In the Persia–Portugal war in 1602, by the order of Abbas I, the Persian army under the command of Imam-Quli Khan, managed to expel the Portuguese from Bahrain. In 1612, the Portuguese Empire took the city of Gamrun and transliterated the name to Comorao. Almost two years later (in 1615), the city was taken by Abbas the Great after a naval battle with the Portuguese and renamed Bandar-e ‘Abbas, or "Port of ‘Abbas".

In 1622, Abbas completely retook Hormuz from the Portuguese in the Capture of Ormuz.

Geopolitics

The Persian Gulf has been in the spotlight for its geopolitical significance for a long time.

Spanning some 250,000 square kilometers, the Persian Gulf is bounded by the Arvand River in the north, which forms the frontier between Iran and Iraq, and the Strait of Hormuz in the south, which links the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and the Indian Ocean.

It shares boundaries with littoral states Iran (Persia), Oman, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. The Strait of Hormuz connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman.

Connecting the Middle East to Africa, India and China, the Persian Gulf is one of the most important waterways and strategic areas in the world.

The Middle East’s first discovery of oil in the Iranian city of Masjed Soleiman in the early 19th century increased the geopolitical weight of the Persian Gulf region, and consequently, the start of a wave of explorations, extractions and exploitations changed the region's – and the world's – history.

The Persian Gulf is now considered as the energy hub of the world. Close to 20 million barrels of crude and condensates are shipped from the Persian Gulf and through the strategic Strait of Hormuz per day. With the normal global oil consumption amounting to about 100 million bpd, that means almost a fifth of world demand passes through the strategic strait.

About 50,000 ships navigate through the waterway annually, of which 17,000 are oil tankers that head to Asian countries.

However, the variable geopolitical factors in the Persian Gulf are not merely limited to oil. In fact, different periods of history have laid different impacts on the strategic water body.

The Persian Gulf region has been the scene of severe tensions between the regional and non-regional powers in the past decades.

The several wars between the neighbors in the past decades and the heightened military activities by the regional and non-regional countries, such as the naval drills and the establishment of military bases in the Persian Gulf's Arab states, are among other proofs of the undeniable position of the strategic water body to all.

Experts believe that not maintaining security in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz will adversely affect economies throughout the world as a great deal of energy crosses that Gulf and the strategic waterway. 

Persian Gulf, a sea intertwined with Iran’s identity

MNA