Monday, September 30, 2024

National Conference of Elites slated for October

TEHRAN –The 14th National Conference of Elites is scheduled to be held from October 1 to 2 in Tehran.

The event will bring together 600 elites from all over the country, 200 of whom are women, IRNA reported.

The annual event provides an opportunity for elites, researchers, and scientific experts to get familiar with each other and share ideas on new scientific and research achievements in various fields.

On the first day of the conference, the participants are scheduled to meet President Masoud Pezeshkian and on the second day, they will meet Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei.

The conference focuses on different topics such as money and finance, governance and policy making, environment and natural resources, health system, food security, science, technology and knowledge-based economy, technologies, leading and strategic industries, new world order including issues such as regional developments and Iran's position, as well as soft technologies.

From the Iranian year 1395 (2016-2017) to 1400 (2021-2022), a total of  2,240 Iranian specialists and graduates returned to the country from the top 200 universities abroad, while in the next two years, 1,191 experts and elites got back to the country, Mehr news agency reported.

Some 170 elites who have returned to the country are recruited as faculty members in universities.

Also, around 250 projects were defined for cross-border cooperation with overseas elites instead of passing military service.   

Profile: How N-a-s-r-a-llah rose through ranks to become Axis of Resistance backbone

By Maryam Qarehgozlou

Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, the Secretary-General of the Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah, a visionary leader and a backbone of the Axis of Resistance, was assassinated in a massive Israeli attack in the southern suburbs of Beirut on Friday.

Israeli airstrikes on the Haret Hreik neighborhood, the main stronghold of Hezbollah in southern Beirut, leveled several residential buildings, with hundreds of civilians, including children, feared dead.

In a statement on Saturday, Hezbollah confirmed the martyrdom of Nasrallah, describing him as “an outstanding, courageous, wise, and insightful leader”, who joined his “great and immortal martyr comrades.”

“The leadership of Hezbollah vows to the highest, most sacred, and dearest martyr in our journey filled with sacrifices and martyrs to continue its struggle against the enemy, supporting Gaza and Palestine, and defending Lebanon and its steadfast, honorable people,” read the statement.

The Israeli regime has intensified its aggression against Lebanon since last week, which has led to the killing of more than 720 people, including dozens of women and children, since Monday.

The recent escalation came after nearly a year of Hezbollah operations in solidarity with the Palestinian nation and the Palestinian resistance as the death toll in Gaza has crossed the 41,500 mark.

Hezbollah has carried out near-daily operations in support of Palestinians in Gaza since October 8, 2023, only a day after Israel unleashed its genocidal war on the besieged Palestinian territory.

Nasrallah’s ironclad commitment to resistance against Israeli aggression and his unwavering support of the Palestinian cause made him a popular and loved figure in the Axis of Resistance.

A young man with big ambitions

Sayyad Hassan Nasrallah was born on August 31, 1960, in the eastern suburbs of Beirut, in the Matn district. He grew up in a poor Shia family and was displaced to southern Lebanon during his childhood.

Despite these challenges, Nasrallah was a motivated and devout student of Islam, and in 1975 he went to study theology at Ayatollah Mohammad Baqir al-Sadr’s Seminary in Najaf, Iraq, at the age of 16.

Al-Sadr, a prominent Islamic scholar, is said to have recognized Nasrallah’s qualities and is quoted as saying: “I feel in you the aroma of leadership; you are one of the Ansar [followers] of the Mahdi [Shia’s last of the Twelve Imams]....”

In 1979, the young Nasrallah joined the Amal Movement, a Lebanese Shia political group. However, owing to some differences, he left the group in 1982 to join the nascent Hezbollah movement.

Nasrallah quickly rose through the ranks of the popular resistance movement, becoming a key military commander during the Israeli occupation of Lebanon in the 1980s.

In 1985, Nasrallah took on the role of deputy head of the region within Hezbollah.

Later, he was promoted to the position of chief executive, which involved carrying out the decisions made by the organization’s Shura Council, the governing body responsible for making strategic decisions and formulating policies for the group.

As chief executive, he was responsible for ensuring that the group’s decisions were implemented effectively, and for managing the day-to-day operations of the movement.

He played a key role in the resistance against the Israeli occupation regime, and his strategic acumen earned him the respect and admiration of his fellow fighters and commanders.

Nasrallah’s steady rise to this position was a testament to his leadership skills and his commitment to the group’s goals and values.

He was seen as a trusted and capable leader who could navigate complex political and military situations.

His appointment as chief executive of Hezbollah was a significant milestone in his career and set the stage for his eventual rise to the position of Secretary-General.

Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (center) met Abbas Mousavi (right) during his stay in Najaf.

Successor to Abbas Musawi

In 1992, Abbas al-Musawi, the Lebanese Shia cleric and the co-founder of Hezbollah, who served as the group’s Secretary-General, was assassinated by the Israeli regime.

Nasrallah succeeded him as the leader of Hezbollah on February 16, 1992, a position he held until his martyrdom on Friday.

Under his inspiring and able leadership, Hezbollah grew into a powerful political and military force in the region, with a strong base of support among Lebanon’s Muslim and non-Muslim communities alike.

After he was appointed the Hezbollah leader, he immediately set about reshaping the organization’s strategy and tactics in response to changing political and military realities.

Under Nasrallah’s leadership, Hezbollah launched a series of highly effective operations against Israeli forces in southern Lebanon, which were designed to make the occupation of southern areas untenable for Israeli forces, and ultimately succeeded in achieving their goal.

In 2000, after nearly two decades of struggle, Israeli forces finally withdrew from southern Lebanon, marking a major victory for Hezbollah and the broader resistance movement in the region.

Nasrallah played a key role in this victory, both through his leadership of Hezbollah’s military operations and through his political skills in negotiating with the Lebanese government and other regional actors.

In 2004, Nasrallah played a pivotal role in negotiating a major prisoner exchange between the Israeli regime and Hezbollah, which resulted in the release of hundreds of Lebanese and Palestinian prisoners held illegally by Israel.

The 2004 prisoner exchange further cemented his reputation as a skilled diplomat.

The exchange was also significant for Nasrallah on a personal level, as it resulted in the return of the remains of his son, who had been killed by Israeli forces in 1997.

The return of his son’s remains was a powerful symbol of Nasrallah’s dedication to the cause of resistance, and his willingness to make personal sacrifices for the sake of his people.

Nasrallah’s leadership during the 33-day Lebanon War in 2006 further solidified his reputation as the “leader of the resistance” both within Lebanon and across the broader Arab and Islamic world.

Throughout the war, Hezbollah was able to hold the line against a massive Israeli military onslaught and emerged victorious with its reputation greatly enhanced.

The group’s ability to withstand Israeli air strikes and ground offensives, and to continue launching rockets and missiles into Israeli-occupied territories, demonstrated its tremendous military prowess and its commitment to the cause of resistance against the Zionist occupation.

An undated photo of Nasrallah meeting with Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, the Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran. (Photo by Khamenei.ir)

A man of strong alliances

Nasrallah was particularly instrumental in building alliances with other regional actors, including Iran and Syria, and in coordinating resistance efforts against the Tel Aviv regime.

Nasrallah was a vocal supporter of Syria, particularly the government of President Bashar al-Assad, during the country’s civil war which began in 2011, opposing West-backed attempts to undermine the Assad government through mercenaries and terrorists.

Hezbollah fighters have been actively involved in the Arab country, fighting alongside Syrian government forces against US-backed terrorist groups to prevent the spread of extremist groups in the region.

Nasrallah was also known for his eloquence and charisma as a public speaker.

His speeches have inspired millions of people across the region, and his message of resistance and self-determination has resonated with oppressed people around the world, including Palestinians.

Despite numerous attempts to assassinate him and undermine his leadership, Nasrallah remained steadfast in his commitment to the cause of justice and liberation.

His leadership has been critical in defending Lebanon’s sovereignty and dignity, and in inspiring a new generation of resistance fighters.

With the beginning of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza last year in October, he declared the opening of a “front in southern Lebanon to support Palestinian resistance.”

Unwaveringly committed to this cause, he vowed in numerous speeches that this front would tirelessly persevere until the devastating war on Gaza ended.

Nasrallah was a true hero of the Axis of Resistance, and his legacy will continue to inspire and guide future generations in their struggle for justice and liberation.

Hezbollah Stands Firm Despite Loss of Chief

Alwaght- After Hezbollah officially confirmed martyrdom of its Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah on Friday bombing of Israeli regime, the mind of those in a way or another obsessed with the Palestinian cause and Lebanon and Israel created a question: What would be the fate of the Israeli war with Lebanon and the Palestinian groups?

This question and its answer mainly matters to the leaders of the Israeli regime, Israeli citizens, the US as backer of Israel, many Western countries, many leaders of Arab countries, the Muslims of the world, the free people of the world, the resistance movements, and the government and people of Iran. 

A review of the thought and hostility of Zionism and its past and present leaders, as well as its historical behavior, indicates that, according to their belief, two goals should be kept in mind to deal with the enemy: To subjugate the enemy and neutralize it, otherwise, to eliminate it. 

Concerning the second choice, they face two factors: The body and the people and the leaders and heads. 

According to the Israelis, the elimination of people is time-consuming and costly and should be avoided if possible, but the removal of leaders is cheaper and more feasible, and therefore it is a priority, especially that this choice leads to subjugation and surrender of people. Sometimes, for some reasons, both choices are put on the agenda at the same time, like in Gaza and Lebanon wars. 

The historical and behavioral examination of the Israeli regime of past decades makes it crystal clear that the theoretical foundations and as a result the long-term performance of the Israelis has been totally miscalculated, and their movement in this path has not brought about to them gains they expect, and on the contrary, as the time goes by, the opposite side grows stronger. This gives rise to an important question: Despite the fact that this path is proven wrong and costly, why does Israel insist on it? 

There are two fundamental factors behind this blind and logical insistence. One, the unlimited US and Western support and arming, and the other the frustration with finding other choices. 

In other words, the cultural and religious foundations of Hezbollah and Palestinian groups and the popular support to these foundations creates a powerful factor called struggle and resistance against the occupation and tyranny and feeds uprisings to retake what was usurped from them. Another face of this precious, credible, and influential factor is the popular support to the military branch of the resistance camp, to an extent that we can roughly claim that Israel is fighting the people of Gaza and Lebanon not the resistance militant groups. So, it is not senseless to suggest that the damage the blood of toddlers, school children, and women inflicts on the Israeli regime is not less effective than the blows the armed resistance groups deal to the Israeli military. And perhaps the Israeli grudge against the pro-resistance popular stream is more than against the resistance forces fighting on the battleground since the fighters can only deal direct and visible blows and the effect of their struggle can be seen in the damage to the enemy, but the people mentioned are only exposed to death and devastating damages, and there is no possibility for them to fight, still, they stand and proudly support the resistance movement and become martyrs. 

When the criminal and child-killing Israeli regime faces such a unique and amazing phenomenon, it tests what it tested and failed out of the anger and frustration in a bid to gain a favorable result. But there are no signs of the smallest success. 

If Hamas’s Saleh al-Arouri and Ismail Haniyeh and Hezbollah's Fuad Shukr, Ibrahim Aqil, and Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, and others were assassinated and not killed by the Israeli regime in a technical sense, this means that the Axis of Resistance is moving in a right and advancing path and has forced the enemy to just hold in place without advances. In a point and technical view which the Israelis set hopes on and count on a lot, the assassinations ostensibly bring success, but in a linear view, these ostensible gains are transient and what stands firm and determines the battle result is the popular support and the organizational motivation and belief of the resistance groups that are always determining, and the current battle is no exception. In the eyes of the Lebanese and Palestinian people, who are supporting the resistance with all their heart, if Nasrallah, Haniyeh, and others are gone, Hezbollah and Palestinian groups still exist, and most important of all is the God's invioble promise which says God defends those who believe in him. This belief is the unending nightmare of the Israeli regime by which the Israelis will be crushed. 

So, given what was said, the answer to the question that came at the beginning is as follows: 

By carefully and intelligently using the precious experiences of the past and reorganizing its structure and re-reading the strategy designed by Nasrallah to confront the Israelis and adopting appropriate tactics compatible with the new situation and focusing on the management of the battleground and paying attention to the fact that the fate of this battle will be determined by the brave, intelligent fighters, Hezbollah should put military pressure on the sensitive sites in the occupied territories to exhaust the fragile Israeli power. This is not far from realization under Hezbollah's reconstructed power

H-e-z-b-*o-l-l-a-h-'s offensive capabilities remain intact

 By Wesam Bahrani

TEHRAN- Despite the martyrdom of Hezbollah Secretary-General Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah continues to wage operations against the Israeli regime.

Like before the assassination of its leader, Hezbollah is issuing statements in support of the people of Gaza and resistance against Israel for its massive air raids on Lebanese towns.
 
It doesn’t appear to be any changes to the military strikes on Israeli sites. 

This is while Israeli media has been reporting on the recruitment of asylum seekers to serve in the Israeli army. 

The Haaretz newspaper reported that the Israeli Ministry of Interior plans to recruit asylum seekers into the army in exchange for granting them permanent residency.

Hezbollah continues to fire rockets at Israel despite the martyrdom of its secretary-general and senior commanders. It reported that estimates indicate that the Israeli army suffers from a shortage of about 10,000 soldiers while facing a multi-front war and exhaustion among the soldiers.


In a series of statements on Sunday, Hezbollah announced: 

“In support of our steadfast Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip and in backing their brave and honorable resistance, as well as in defense of Lebanon and its people, and in response to the barbaric Israeli assault on towns, villages, and civilians, the Islamic Resistance fighters hit the Sa'ar settlement with a rocket salvo, struck the movements of enemy soldiers in the Menara settlement with rocket weaponry and bombed the Ofak camp with a salvo of Fadi 1 rockets.”

A Hezbollah missile struck a settlement in the vicinity of occupied al-Quds (Jerusalem), resulting in a large blast and causing a blackout in several settlements.

A barrage of rockets was launched towards the Lower Galilee and the Western Galilee.

Throughout the day on Sunday, the “Israeli Home” Front Command warned of sirens sounding in regions such as the Lower Galilee.

Israeli media reported that five rockets fired from Lebanon landed in areas near Lake Tabarayya and that large explosions were heard. 

In the 24 hours prior to Hezbollah’s statements on Sunday, the resistance movement published more than a dozen statements using the same terminology in announcing its operations against different Israeli military sites and settlements. 

The Israeli aim of returning Israelis to the north does not look like it is anywhere close to being accomplished despite Hezbollah announcing the martyrdom of more senior commanders. 

In contrast, the Lebanese resistance appears to have maintained its military structure and chain of command. 

Experts say this is due to detailed planning by Hezbollah in the event its senior commanders are assassinated by Israel in an all-out war. The movement had already made plans on who to take control of its sophisticated military apparatus.  

Israeli Calculations behind Hezbollah’s Nasrallah Assassination?

Alwaght- After the terrorist detonation of the pagers and assassination of the resistance commanders in Lebanon over the past two weeks, the Israeli military on Friday carried out a deadly attack on southern Lebanon's suburbs, claiming to have targeted the central command of Hezbollah.

The Israeli sources said that Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah was the target. Hezbollah on Saturday afternoon in a statement announced martyrdom of its leader.

The Israeli media said that in this attack, 2,000-pound bunker buster bombs were used and several buildings were destroyed. These sources also say that F-35 fighters dropped the bombs. It is said that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered this attack from his hotel in New York. According to Israeli security officials, this was a difficult decision that was approved at the recent meeting of the political and security council of this regime.

An Israeli source told Axios news that when Israel attacked Hezbollah's command center, the party's top officials were present in the place. 

With this crime, Netanyahu's cabinet tried to assassinate the top leaders of Hezbollah and improve its precarious position inside the occupied territories. Here a question presents itself: Can Netanyahu achieve his declared aims with this adventure or will the consequences of this escalation go beyond the expectations of the Israelis?

To get a clear picture of this crime, we must first analyze the expectations of Netanyahu's hardline government and then evaluate the reaction of Hezbollah and the Axis of Resistance, and finally see what Tel Aviv has gained in this crime and what it has lost. 

Tel Aviv expectations of attack on Hezbollah command center 

The Israeli leaders always think that the resistance groups in the region are heavily dependent on their leaders, and if they target the heads of these groups, they can weaken them and guarantee the security of the Israeli settlers. Therefore, Netanyahu's government designed the attack on the suburbs of Beirut with the thought to weaken Hezbollah by assassinating Nasrallah so that it might get rid of the self-inflicted crisis and restore security to northern borders of Israel. 

At present, over 70,000 Israeli settlers are displaced from their homes on the border with Lebanon due to Hezbollah's attacks in solidarity with Gaza. Therefore, one of Netanyahu's goals was to restore the security of the settlers by launching attacks on Hezbollah and assassinating its commanders, as continued displaced of Israelis imposed a heavy burden on the government.

In the past ten days, the Israeli army has carried out attacks on the southern parts of Lebanon and claimed to have destroyed half of Hezbollah's arsenal, but the rocket operation using Hezbollah's new weapons against the occupied territories, including Tel Aviv and Haifa, showed that the arsenal of this movement is still firm and the claim of the leaders of Tel Aviv does not match the reality. With the new round of Hezbollah rocket operations, which has reached a depth of 60 kilometers, more settlers are in the fire range of resistance missiles, and according to estimates, 2 million Israelis pass most of their hours in the shelters. 

On the other side, Netanyahu, who has suffered major defeats in Gaza and is under the criticism of the opposition parties, intended to promote the attack and assassination of resistance commanders as a great achievement in a hope to free himself of criticism. 

The other issue about Israel's adventure is that by assassinating the commanders and weakening Hezbollah, it would lead this movement into a tunnel of internal crisis. From the point of view of the leaders of Tel Aviv, in the absence of Nasrallah and other senior leaders of Hezbollah, the remaining resistance forces will lose the initiative on the battleground and will not be able to reorganize themselves and manage the military formations, and therefore the operations against the occupied territories will scale down. 

Hezbollah has a powerful arsenal of long-range and pinpoint missiles that can target all the occupied territories if necessary, and Tel Aviv hardliners think that in the absence of Nasrallah, the resistance fighters, who are less experienced than their leaders, will not be able to use this huge arsenal. The leaders of Israel even think that by using the detailed intelligence Tel Aviv has from the hideout of Hezbollah leaders, with the assassination of Nasrallah and other commanders, the future leaders of this movement will grow conservative for fear of assassination, and the scales of power will be tipped in favor of Israel and the occupied territories will remembrance calm.

Israeli crimes deliver the reverse 

Though airstrikes on Lebanon have caused losses and damages to Hezbollah, the consequences of this warmongering outnumber the achievements of the occupying enemy. It is a misconception that with the assassination of the resistance commanders, these groups will be weakened and the Israelis will be relieved of the threats against the occupied territories. The experience of the past two decades has shown that every assassinated commander or leader is replaced by another one firmly pressing ahead with struggle against the occupation.

When the Israelis assassinated Seyed Abbas al-Mousawi, the former Secretary General of Hezbollah in 1992, they thought that this movement reached its end, but in the past thirty years, Hezbollah, under the leadership of Nasrallah, transformed from a guerilla group to a well-equipped and powerful army. The Israelis themselves have admitted that if they knew that Hezbollah would become so powerful with the assassination of al-Mousawi, they would not have committed such an act. Under Nasrallah's leadership, Hezbollah expelled the occupation army from southern Lebanon and in the 33-day war in 2006, inflicted fatal blows on this regime, and these great victories will be repeated under the future leaders of this movement. 

This is true of other regional resistance groups. The US and Israel thought that with assassination of Iran's Quds Force Commander General Qassam Soleimani and Iraq's Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis they can undermine Iran and the Iraq's Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) and guarantee Israeli security, but these crimes backfired and now Iraqis strike all the American bases in Iraq and Syria and the occupied territories. 

About Yemen's Ansarullah, though a number of its leaders and commanders were assassinated by the US and its allies, these cowardly actions not only have not weakened this movement, but also it has now developed capabilities to build hypersonic missiles and unmanned submarines that target Israel unchecked. 

So, now that Nasrallah is confirmed martyred, Hezbollah has no concerns since the movement has commanders in several security and leadership layers that can act to turn the tide in favor of Hezbollah. 

Hezbollah has a modern organization and has trained many commanders in the past two decades to solidify its political and security body, and Israel's crimes cannot weaken this movement. The fact that Hezbollah relies on local capabilities to produce precision missiles shows that the two decades of Israeli push against this movement have gone nowhere. 

The destruction of Hezbollah's missile launchers and arsenal is nothing but an allegation, and the leaders of Tel Aviv through this psychological warfare are trying to force Hezbollah to de-escalate and to convince the settlers of the army power to defend their security. However, expanding the scope of Hezbollah's operations deeper into the occupied territories invalidated Israeli claims and sent a clear message that Hezbollah is at peak and the desperate attacks by the Israelis cannot disrupt its military power. 

Hezbollah will maintain its military power and political structures even without Nasrallah, and under its new leader, it even can make huge gains and make the enemy regret its crimes. After all, resistance groups are not individual-reliant and after assassination of their leaders, they will impose high costs on the Israeli occupation. 

Escalation does not serve Israeli interests 

All the analysts and political officials across the world admit that new Israeli actions in Lebanon are pushing the region to a major war.By assassinating Hezbollah commanders, Netanyahu's government has crossed the red lines of the Axis of Resistance and these actions will certainly escalate the tensions. Although the leaders of Tel Aviv threaten Iran and the resistance groups every day that the attack on the occupied territories has a heavy price, this regime is now caught in a vortex of internal crises that make it far from capable of fighting in multiple fronts. This is what Israeli officials admit. 

The resistance groups in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen have warned that in the event of Israeli warmongering, they will give a painful response to Tel Aviv, and with the coordination of the joint operation room of Resistance camp, the occupied territories will grow more insecure. 

Now, the occupation army is exhausted due to the conflict in Gaza and Lebanon, and resorting to airstrikes, which is the only tool of Tel Aviv's power, shows that this regime does not have the ability to directly confront Hezbollah. Otherwise, it would have started the ground invasion by now. 

As a conclusion, it can be said that in case of war prolongation, the Axis of Resistance can step up its missile and drone attacks to put psychological and military pressure on Israelis and make huge gains in the occupied territories. Israel has proven that it only knows the language of force and tolerance of this rogue regime only makes it daring to continue their crimes. So, the Resistance camp in the coming days will take hard decisions against the Israeli massacre machine that can change the fate and future of the region. Additionally, experience of the past year has shown that in case of destabilization of the occupied territories, the Israelis will have no choice but to flee, and the reverse migration is the biggest nightmare of Tel Aviv leaders that can deal an unrepairable blow to this regime amid the security crises that are rattling Tel Aviv. 

Unyielding as Rock

Why Israel's strategy against Hezbollah is doomed to fail again
By Shahrokh Saei

TEHRAN- Israel and its Western allies, in particular the United States, have been living in cloud-cuckoo-land since the Tel Aviv regime assassinated Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah in the Lebanese capital.

The Hezbollah chief was killed in Israeli brutal airstrikes on residential areas of the Dahiyeh suburb of Beirut late on Friday.

The popular head of the Lebanese resistance movement was targeted after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

Banned bombs 

The Israeli army used dozens of American-made bunker-busting bombs during its strikes on Dahiyeh. 

The Geneva Convention has banned the use of such bombs in densely populated areas due to the potential for significant civilian casualties.

Israeli F-15I fighter jets that dropped the bombs were equipped with at least 15 2,000-pound munitions with an American-made precision guidance system that attaches to bombs, according to an analyst cited by the New York

Times. 
Netanyahu’s office circulated a photograph of the prime minister in New York using a landline telephone to approve the strikes, according to US media.  

Horrible crime  

On Saturday, the Israeli premier said he ordered the Hezbollah chief’s assassination, which has been described by many officials as well as religious figures as a horrible crime. 

Israel killed Imad Mughniyeh, Hezbollah’s military chief, in 2008; but the resistance movement gathered strength in the years that followed.“Eliminating Nasrallah was an essential condition for achieving the aims that we have set out — returning the residents of the north safely to their homes and changing the balance of power in the region for years,” Netanyahu, known as Bibi, said. 

Tens of thousands of people have become displaced in northern Israel and southern Lebanon amid the exchanges of fire between Israel and Hezbollah since October 8. That is a day after Israel launched war on Gaza which has so far killed more than 41,500 Palestinians. 

Netanyahu said earlier this month that returning evacuated people to northern Israel is an official war goal.

The Lebanese resistance movement had said it would halt the attacks if there was a ceasefire in Gaza. But Netanyahu not only derailed talks aimed at ending the Gaza war but also ordered a massive bombing campaign in Lebanon that began a week ago.  Hundreds of people in Lebanon have lost their lives in the Israeli strikes so far. 
Criminal collusion

Unsurprisingly, the United States has neither condemned Israel for killing hundreds of people in Lebanon nor assassinating Nasrallah whose party has been one of the leading political factions in the country’s parliament. 

President Joe Biden, whose country’s army has killed a large number of civilians in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, has called Nasrallah’s assassination “a measure of justice for his many victims, including thousands of Americans, Israelis,

and Lebanese civilians.”
Biden has also doubled down on support for Israel. 

Al-Aqsa Storm Operation demonstrated that the Israeli assassination of Hamas founder Sheik Ahmad Yassin in 2004 backfired. The US has rejected any involvement in the assassination. But it seems implausible to think that Tel Aviv could have executed the Friday strikes on Beirut without the coordination of Washington.

The United States, along with several Western and regional allies, is opposed to Hezbollah and has devised strategies to oust the group from Lebanon's political sphere and dismantle its influence. However, these efforts have proven ineffective because Hezbollah continues to win more popular support stemming from its opposition to Israeli occupation and aggression.

Hezbollah establishment 

Israel invaded Lebanon in June 1982, ostensibly in response to attacks launched on it by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) from southern Lebanon. 

Israel occupied the south and went as far as West Beirut, where the PLO was based, which it put under siege. Several Lebanese groups, including Hezbollah, were formed to repel the invasion.

Ultimately, Hezbollah drove the Israeli army out in 2000, ending the regime’s occupation after nearly 20 years. 

Nasrallah legacy 

Nasrallah is regarded as one of the most influential figures in the region who played a key role in transforming Hezbollah into a major military and political force.

The charismatic leader, who was 64 years old when he was assassinated, had led Hezbollah since the assassination of his predecessor Sayyed Abbas Al-Mousawi in 1992.

Al-Mousawi was killed by a missile strike from Israeli helicopters while driving with his wife and 6-year-old son on a road in the Bekaa region of eastern Lebanon on February 16, 1992. He became the Hezbollah resistance movement's secretary general in April 1991.

Israeli illusions 

Israel is under the illusion that the assassination of Nasrallah will lead to the elimination of Hezbollah. 

Israel assassinated Al-Mousawi with a similar misconception. But Nasrallah turned the movement into a more powerful political and military force. 

Hezbollah currently has 100,000 fighters. It has also increased its stockpile of missiles from 14,000 in 2006 to about 150,000 and has developed precision-guided missiles and its drone programs. 

Israel waged war on Lebanon in 2006 but Hezbollah forced the regime’s army to retreat after 34 days. 

In 2008, Israel also assassinated Hezbollah’s military leader, Imad Mughniyeh, in Syria. But the movement gathered strength in the years that followed.

Israel has also assassinated other regional resistance leaders and commanders in an attempt to cripple their movements. 
Nonetheless, this policy has backfired. 

Israel assassinated Sheik Ahmad Yassin who founded Hamas in late 1987 after the outbreak of the first Palestinian Intifada (uprising) in the same year. 

The Hamas spiritual leader was killed on March 22, 2004, along with nine other people in Gaza. 

Hezbollah became Israel’s recurrent nightmare after the regime assassinated its then leader Sayyed Abbas Al-Mousawi in 1992.He strongly defended the Palestinian people’s right to resist the Israeli occupation and often criticized the Palestinian Authority for discounting the armed resistance option in its dealings with the occupation regime. 

Yasin had been confined to a wheelchair following an injury he sustained at the age of 12.

Israel believed that the assassination would result in the eradication of Hamas. However, the Al-Aqsa Storm, the surprise military attack carried out by Hamas on October 7 in southern Israel, demonstrated that such actions only serve to empower Palestinians, motivating them to put up resistance against the Israeli occupation.

For now, Nasrallah’s killing will have far-reaching consequences for Israel. 

Israel should know from its experiences that Hezbollah will grow in strength and strike a crushing blow to the regime. This blow could potentially reach a magnitude that threatens the very existence of the Zionist entity.


China opposes infringement on Lebanon’s sovereignty

China has expressed opposition to any violation of Lebanon’s sovereignty following Israel’s airstrikes which killed Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, China’s Foreign Ministry said.

“China opposes the infringement on Lebanon’s sovereignty and security, opposes and condemns any action against innocent civilians, and opposes any move that fuels antagonism and escalates regional tensions,” the ministry said.

“The tension between Lebanon and Israel is a spillover of the Gaza conflict. The pressing priority is to implement relevant UN Security Council resolutions, end the fighting in Gaza as soon as possible, and earnestly safeguard peace and stability in the Middle East,” it added.

Martyrdom of Seyyed Hassan Nasrullah and the Line of The Imam

Crescent International

Seyyed Hassan Hasrallah has met his Creator while struggling for justice for the oppressed, but many more will follow in his footsteps. The struggle goes on...
The hired pens are out again spewing their poision.

This is neither the first time nor will it be the last.

There has been another martyr on the way to the liberation of Al-Quds and there will be many more before final victory against the forces of darkness and oppression is achieved.

For some, Seyyed Hassan Nasrullah (shaheed) has become a pragmatist, a national hero, a Shi’i cult figure while the Munafiqeen say good riddance.

This is no surprise.

In his early years, the Arabian press, led by Yahudi-controlled Saudi Arabia, repeatedly tried to undermine Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hizbullah, who was the most popular leader of the Muslim world.

They fabricated reports about opposition to him within Hizbullah, and even that he had been overthrown from his position in the organization.

Seyyed Hasan Nasrullah was not a media sensation; his charisma emerged from a principled struggle against zionist colonization on the battlefields of south Lebanon.

In order to properly understand the achievement of the late Shaheed Seyyed, one needs to understand the line of Al-Imam Khomeini (r.a.) and the Islamic Revolution in Iran.

The line of the Imam was simultaneously located within four concentric circles: the oppressed people, the Islamic people, the Shi’i people, and the Iranian people.

Imam Khomeini provided the defining and guiding leadership of the Revolution and the centrality and importance of the oppressed and Islamic elements of these concentric spheres were clear for all to see.

The Shi’i and Iranian elements, on the other hand, integral and inseparable as they were, were never emphasized or even overtly displayed in any public or official sense.

One of the first messages to have been proclaimed by the Islamic Revolution and the line of the Imam was that the Islamic Revolution in Iran is neither east nor west.

There has never been any cessation of hostilities between the followers of the line of Imam Khomeini (ra), who refuse to compromise when it came to the independence and sovereignty of the Islamic state, and the numerous other interests wanting to shape the state on their terms.

Seyyed Hassan Nasrullah shaheed represented that trans-national, trans-sectarian foreign policy of the Islamic Republic.

Dr ‘Ali Shari‘ati pointed to “Black Shi‘ism”, the traditional and emotion-consuming practice of later “Shi‘i” generations, and “Red Shi‘ism”, the revolutionary and justice-centered Shi‘ism of early generations.

“Black Shi‘ism” is alive and kicking with the help and support of imperialism and Zionism.

The results are catastrophic for all the Muslims, especially, ironically, those of Islamic Iran.

Red Shi‘ism in Lebanon, breathes and demonstrates the principles of justice, liberation and revolution.

In Iran, meanwhile, we have elements of both: those who continue to follow the revolutionary line of Imam Khomeini, and those who effectively undermine the Islamic Revolution by harking back to Shi‘i traditionalism.

We never heard Sayyid Hasan Nasrallah or Imam Khamane'i bad-mouthing the sahabah or the wives of the Prophet, peace be upon him (pbuh).

All of these, and other Hujjatiyah mission-creep, have taken their toll on the original character and the initial thrust of the Islamic Revolution in Iran.

The only redeeming rectitude of this Islamic Revolution is its leader Imam Khamanei and Hizbullah, and all the remaining institutions that solidify this line of the Imam.

The continuing occupation of the Holy Land, are strong arguments for a new direction.

The nationalist “Islamic” types, like king Mu’awiyah, are waiting for popular opinion to turn against “the line of the Imam” so that they can make their move, ride the wave of popular discontent, and eventually “rescue” their people from their transnational, transcultural, Ummah-encompassing identity.

This must not be allowed to happen.

Seyyed Hasan Nasrullah was a muttaqi leader who expressed his mind and ideas without reading a paper, never had dual citizenship, and was steadfast in his principled struggle against zionism, and zionism’s proxy rulers across the region who never say anything and those who do need a script to utter the instructions of their Zionist and imperialist masters, who are dual if not multiple nationality holders, and who capitulate when their personal assets are at risk.

Seyyed Hasan Nasrullah is a hero who survived Israel’s attempts to outflank him through proxies in the region many of whom will go down in history as being the Ibn Salluls, Yazids, and Sadats.

For these sectarian and nationalist types, there was a time when Hizbullah became a danger that superseded Israel.

What made some of their hired pens label Hizbullah as Hizb al-Shaytan and to call Seyyed Hasan Nasrallah, Hasan Nasrallat (al-Lat, one of the jahili gods)?

For Seyyed Hasan Nasrallah, the Palestinian issue was a red line and resistance against zionism and Israeli colonialism was an article of faith.

Under the leadership of Seyyed Hasan Nasrallah, Hizbullah, driven by the Islamic priority of liberating Palestine, stood its ground against the Israeli genocidal forces.

For the third time, we feel, once again, the actual possibility of routing zionist Israel out of existence.

The first time was in the spring of 2000 when Hizbullah kicked out of Lebanon an 18-year zionist occupation and the second was during the 33-day war in Lebanon.

The spirit of the Islamic Revolution lives on in the valiant warriors and fearless fighters of Hizbullah and the Islamic resistance.

The brutal zionist colonizers are worried as they remember Seyyed Hasan Nasrullah saying, “the Golan shall become another confrontational front against them.”

Hizbullah worked out a plan that drew the genocidal Israeli military into this bleeding confrontation to take off the current relentless genocidal pressure from Palestine.

Thanks to the Hizbullahi legacy of shahadah, the genocidal Israeli military is once again mired in bewilderment as to how, when, and where the response of Hizbullah will be?!

The followers of the line of the Imam who are not tainted by their nationality or their sect are to be found in Lebanon.

When we listened to the words of Seyyed Hasan Nasrullah, we detected the voice of Imam Khomeini.

His speeches penetrated the hearts of Arabs and non-Arabs, of Muslims and non-Muslims, of the developed world and the developing world.

And today, his blood flows in their veins.

Hizbullah has honored and heartened the Muslims and other oppressed peoples of the world by its jihad.

Israel's very survival is now unlikely, thanks to Hizbullah's sacrifices and steadfastness.

And the leadership of Seyyed Nasrallah through his life and martyrdom has brought the beating hearts of all Muslims (healthy Sunnis and healthy Shi‘is alike) together.

In the martyrdom of Seyyed Hasan Nasrallah we saw how a non-Sunni Nasrallah supported a non-Shi’i Hamas.

It will be a loss of tragic proportions if the voices of Imam Khamane’i and Imam Naeem Qasim are drowned out by the combination of voices representing “Black Shi‘ism”, Persian nationalism, sectarianism, zionism and imperialism who may want to abandon both the ideals of the Islamic Revolution and the rest of the Islamic movement, instead of intensifying the struggle against the zionists, imperialists and their regional puppets.

وما محمد إلا رسول قد خلت من قبله الرسل أفائن ماتَ أو قتل انقلبتم على أعقابكم

But Muhammad is only a messenger who was preceded by [other] messengers [who also passed away]; so, if he dies or is killed will you retreat and fall back? (The Ascendant Qur’anSurat Aal Imran, verse 144)

So, now we come to those who were in the footsteps of the final Prophet (pbuh), and ask their followers:

وما روح الله إلا مجتهد قد خلت من قبله المجتهدون أفائن ماتَ أو قتل انقلبتم على أعقابكم

And, Imam Khomeini was only a Mujtahid who was preceded by [other] Mujtahids [who also passed away]; since he has passed on, have you retreated and fallen back?

وما حسن نصر الله إلا مجاهد قد خلت من قبله المجاهدون أفائن ماتَ أو قتل انقلبتم على أعقابكم

And, Seyyed Al-Shaheed Hassan Nasrullah is only a Mujahid who was preceded by [other] Mujahids [who also passed away]; so, now that he has been martyred will you retreat and fall back?

Seyyed Hassan NasrallahHizbullahLebanonZionist crimesImam KhomeiniIslamic Iran