TEHRAN PAPERS
TEHRAN - The Iran newspaper presented its analysis regarding the relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia as follows: Despite the efforts made by the American-Israeli axis to influence the improving relationship between Iran and Saudi Arabia, the convergence process of these two countries in recent months and after the beginning of the Gaza war, Saudi Arabia has reached numerous proposals for economic cooperation with Iran.
From Saudi Arabia's point of view, maintaining and deepening the agreement that was signed months ago to reopen the relationship with Iran is possible through economic relations and that can extend to the political and security fields. Riyadh's approach shows that the Saudi leaders will not subject the situation to reduce tension, especially regarding their relations with Iran, to the belligerent goals of the Israeli authorities. Riyadh's refusal to participate in the coalition that the U.S. planned to create in the Red Sea after the start of the Gaza war showed that efforts to influence the de-escalation of tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia would be useless.
Hamshahri: The end of American monopoly in the arms market
In a conversation with Farshid Bagharian, an expert on strategic issues, Hamshahri discussed Iran's progress in the defense-military fields and said: These days, Iran's progress in the defense-military fields has been the focus of the media and Western officials because now more than ever, they see their arms monopoly globally in danger. Although the Western authorities and media have focused on these developments in recent months with special focus, but in the meantime, the increase in the quality of Iranian weapons and their low prices are points that cannot be ignored, and this has caused many governments to have a special desire to buy Iranian weapons in order to avoid wasting their capital and resources. It should be kept in mind that through the sale of defense-military equipment, it is possible to strengthen and develop strategic cooperation with buying countries, an approach that can play a strategic role in expanding the country's strategic links in the regional and international arenas.
Sobh-e-No: Iran does not seek to expand the conflict
Sobh-e-No wrote about the Munich Security Conference: The 60th Munich Security Conference ended its work while the opposition of the Islamic Republic of Iran was invited to it like last year. It once again showed the peak of the decline of the West's capacity to act against Iran. Isolating the Islamic Republic and severing economic and diplomatic relations with the Islamic Republic were among the issues raised in this conference. Although the Iranian opposition has been invited to the Munich meeting for several years, the international views in this meeting are different towards Iran. As far as Saudi Foreign Minister Bin Farhan admitted on the sidelines of the Munich security meeting: "I don't believe that Iran has a desire for a wider war, I don't feel that way. We are facing a humanitarian disaster in Gaza, with 17,000 orphans and 30,000 or more victims, and most importantly, we have difficult living conditions, lack of food and humanitarian needs there, in the meantime, due to the lack of access to sufficient aid for the people of Gaza, the disaster Humanity has doubled."
Javan: The policy of enemies in elections
Javan wrote about Iran's upcoming elections and the enemy's strategy: After his trip to America and after the joint news meeting with Biden, the German chancellor expressed his concern about the rise of Iran's power and said that good cooperation between Israel and the neighboring Arab countries is essential for the future of the region. It is important because our foundation is that Iran does not become the superior power and hegemon in the entire region. The repetition of this position in the statement of the foreign ministers of the Group of 7 in this meeting shows that the most important concern of the Western powers, even before the fate of the Zionist regime, is the increasing trend of the authority of the Islamic system and the spread of the Islamic revolution discourse in the world. Of course, expressing these positions on the eve of the elections can indicate their plans in this field. By boycotting the elections, the enemies have goals such as discouraging the people from participating in the elections, reviving the Western trend in Iran and trying to maintain their presence in power as the saviors of Iran, creating conflict and polarizing the people, and restraining Iran's authority.
No comments:
Post a Comment