Wednesday, November 06, 2024

Tactical differences between Trump and Harris By Hassan Beheshtipour

By Hassan Beheshtipour

International relations expert

Is the US presidential election important to the world? Yes, it is, because American policies have a significant impact on many parts of the globe. In fact, the president of the United States not only influences the 50 states but also could shape developments in numerous countries around the world through US foreign policy. The US has a military or intelligence and security presence in around 120 countries, plays a key role in global trade and its dollar is used in three out of every four international transactions. With a military budget of more than $700 billion, the US has the largest military budget in the world. Therefore, it is natural for such a country to have a profound impact on international developments.
Consequently, US policies have a significant bearing on the West Asia region, which is grappling with various long-standing crises. Even in the recent conflict involving Israel, the Gaza Strip and southern Lebanon, the US remains the main player behind the scenes. Israel’s attacks are integral to the US strategy for the region, aimed at imposing a new order by eliminating Islamic resistance groups. This strategy will persist regardless of whether Trump or Harris wins, though it may be executed with different tactics and approaches.
However, this should not be taken to mean that one should remain passive in the face of US policies. On the contrary, a shrewd observer or a savvy statesman should pay close attention to these tactical differences and details and try to find opportunities for their country or region within these differences. For instance, despite the US’ unwavering support for Israel, Democrats have been critical of Israel’s settlement policy and have backed a two-state solution (an independent Palestinian state and an independent Israeli state).

 However, during his previous term in office, Trump recognized Al-Quds (Jerusalem) as Israel’s capital, supported the settlement policy, and declared the Golan Heights – which are considered occupied territories under UN resolutions – as part of Israel.
Therefore, it is crucial for Iran or any other country in West Asia to be aware of the strategic nuances between Harris and Trump and take them into account. Based on this understanding and assessment of the differences between Republicans and Democrats, they should adopt corresponding policies and behaviors when dealing with the US government. Another point to note is that the impact of US policies should not be viewed as a one-way street, assuming that the US will always succeed in implementing its policies toward Iran or the region. There have been instances where the US has been forced to change its policies, so it is not always the case that the US will get its way.

No comments:

Post a Comment