Thursday, June 23, 2016

UN genocide official warned not to be complicit in Israel’s crimes

Rania Khalek
UN Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide Adama Dieng has ignored Palestinian appeals not to be complicit in Israeli occupation and abuses.
Jean-Marc FerréUN Photo
Pressure has continued to mount on organizers of a major international conference on genocide to move the venue from Jerusalem.
On Wednesday, a South African organization announced it was pulling out of the conference, organized by the International Network of Genocide Scholars, because of concerns over Israeli abuses of Palestinian human rights.
But organizers and sponsors have ignored or rebuffed the appeals from hundreds of scholars, dozens of civil society groups and at least one former UN human rights official to move the conference.
A current UN official, the special advisor to the secretary general on genocide, is still scheduled to speak at the conference.
On 26 June, the International Network of Genocide Scholars (INoGS) is set to convene its 5th Global Conference on Genocide at Hebrew University’s Mount Scopus campus, some of which was constructed on land that Israel forcibly expropriated from Palestinians in East Jerusalem after it militarily occupied the West Bank in 1967.
Hebrew University directly participated in the ongoing removal of Palestinians in subsequent years, sending its own bulldozers to demolish their homes as recently as 2000 and threatening to displace even more families to expand dormitories in 2004.
Back in March, the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) urged scholars and UN officials to boycott the conference over its partnership with Israeli academic institutions that are deeply complicit in Israel’s human rights violations.
At least 270 academics from 19 different countries have heeded that call and signed their names to a letter calling on conference organizers “to act in a principled way” and relocate the event to another country.
By holding its conference in Jerusalem, INoGS “is lending its name and reputation to Israel’s occupation and ongoing colonization of Palestine,” the letter states. “The significance of all this cannot be lost on genocide scholars.”
The letter also urged “scholars and professionals to reflect upon the ethical and legal implications of participating in a conference, organized by complicit institutions and taking place in a colony on occupied land and to boycott this event, should it go ahead under these circumstances.”
“ ‘Never again’ means never again for everyone,” the letter concludes.
According to PACBI, the conference organizers have ignored all appeals to cancel the conference.
INoGS did not respond to repeated requests for comment from The Electronic Intifada.

“Genocide studies is now complicit”

John Dugard, a former UN special rapporteur for human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories and a signatory to the letter, expressed shock at the conference location.
“There are serious allegations that Israel committed crimes against humanity in its 2014 assault on Gaza,” PACBI quoted him as saying in a press release. “In these circumstances it is highly inappropriate to hold a conference on genocide in Israel.”
John Docker, a professor of genocide and massacre studies at the University of Sydney, added, “Genocide studies is now, it seems clear, actively seeking opportunities to be complicit in Israel’s flouting of international law, not least the Fourth Geneva Convention.”
Haidar Eid, an academic who lives in the besieged Gaza Strip, slammed INoGS for colluding with his oppressors.
“I have witnessed three massacres committed by Israel, I almost lost my own life and saw my comrades, colleagues, relatives and students perish in them,” Eid said. “I have read with agony the names of 44 of our students and colleagues who lost their lives and 66 families wiped out by Israeli weapons.”
“INoGS is lending its name to the perpetrators of these crimes in a move that is not unlike holding a conference on racism in apartheid South Africa,” Eid added.
Indeed, Israeli universities are enthusiastic participants in Israel’s war machine at every level, from the development of military policy to shouldering the costs of bombing campaigns.
Hebrew University, which will host the INoGS conference, was one many Israeli institutions to reward “warrior students” who took part in Israel’s 2014 military assault on Gaza which killed more than 2,200 Palestinians, including at least 550 children.

UN stamp of approval

One of the scheduled conference speakers is Adama Dieng, special adviser on the prevention of genocide to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.
Last month, more than two dozen civil society and human rights groups from around the world published a letter urging Dieng to withdraw from the conference.
“Both the location of the INoGS conference and its attendance are incompatible with your mandate, which strives to protect populations from the worst international crimes,” the letter states.
“Palestinian and international human rights organizations are currently in the process of presenting evidence of Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity to the International Criminal Court, including compelling evidence of international crimes with close associations to genocide, such as murder, forcible transfer and persecution,” it adds.
Participation in the conference “would represent tacit acceptance of Israeli-perpetrated grave breaches of international law,” the letter states, urging Dieng not to take part unless the conference is relocated.
Dieng’s participation is all the more remarkable at a time when is Israel is being led by the most openly racist government in its history.
Dieng did not respond to The Electronic Intifada’s requests for comment.

German complicity

One of the conference sponsors is the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, a left-wing German institution that checks its progressive politics at the door when it comes to Palestine.
The foundation calls itself “one of the largest political education institutions in Germany today and sees itself as part of the intellectual current of democratic socialism.”
The Palestinian Boycott Divestment and Sanctions National Committee, or BNC, wrote to the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation asking it to withdraw its funding for the conference so as “not to undermine Palestinian rights under international law.”
The BNC received a response from the foundation which it has not published.
Based on the BNC’s side of the correspondence seen by The Electronic Intifada, it would appear that the foundation justified its sponsorship by invoking German guilt for the Holocaust.
“[W]e are not convinced that German exceptionalism (“special history and responsibility”) exonerates Germany and German institutions of complicity in maintaining and covering up illegal acts,” the BNC wrote in response to the foundation’s refusal to budge.
Such “exceptionalism,” PACBI noted, “has translated in exceptional German treatment of Israel as if the latter were above international law.”
The conference is also co-sponsored by five other Israeli institutions that PACBI wrote “have been irrefutably and persistently implicated in Israel’s violations of international law.”
In a statement to The Electronic Intifada, PACBI highlighted the contradictions in proceeding with the conference as planned.
“The 2016 INoGS conference will theorize about genocide and histories of mass violence while willfully ignoring the very real role of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in forcefully displacing Palestinian families from their homes to make way for the campus where the conference is being held,” PACBI said.
The statement continued, “The decision of INoGS leadership to reject appeals from Palestinians and hundreds of academics for the conference to be moved on the basis of its complicity with Israel’s crimes strikes as deeply hypocritical and epitomizes all that is wrong with ivory tower academia.”

Update

On Wednesday, South Africa’s Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation announced its withdrawal from the INoGS conference.
BDS South Africa said the move came after it contacted the center urging them to pull out.
According to BDS South Africa, the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation wrote to conference organizers that it “had failed to carefully consider the ramifications of its participation when it initially registered for the conference.”
A staff member had been scheduled to give a presentation.
“While we saw the INoGS conference as an opportunity to share our work and learn from others, we cannot turn a blind eye to the nature of the location and the host institutions for the conference,” the South African center wrote. “Serious concerns about these issues have been raised by Palestinian human rights groups.”
PACBI welcomed the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation’s decision as a demonstration of “admirable consistency with its mission of social justice, sustainable peace and human rights,” and urged other participants to follow its lead.
Rania Khalek is an independent journalist reporting on the underclass and marginalized.

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

The ugly face of Islamophobia in Canada

Is Islamophobia on the rise in Canada as well in the wake of the racist Islamophobic rhetoric of Donald Trump south of the border? The June 20 assault by an ugly woman on a hijabi sister at a London, ON supermarket definitely gives cause for concern. The assailant has been charged but not with hate crime; only assault. From what has transpired, it definitely appears to be a hate crime.

Toronto,
Wednesday, June 22, 2016, 16:38 DST

Police in London, ON, have charged a suspect with assaulting a hijabi Muslim woman in a supermarket on Monday June 20. The38-year-old assailant spat on, punched several times, and had her hair and hijab pulled off of a Muslim woman who was at the store with her four-month old baby.

The ugly woman first started shouting obscenities at the Muslim woman for no apparent reason before assaulting her. The 38-year-old assailant’s photo has appeared in the media (see attached photo). After appealing to the public the woman was found and has now been charged although the police have not released her name.The Muslim sister was at the Superking Supermarket at 785 Wonderland Rd. S. at about 5 pm Monday when the ugly woman started yelling at her. The victim did not know the assailant.

Not content with verbal abuse, the ugly woman then spat at the Muslimah, punched her several times and pulled her hijab in full view of the public. The assailant then hurried left the store.

"We don't have a motive for the assault right now," London Police Service spokeswoman Sandasha Bough said. "We don't have any information that this is a hate motivated offence. In what you're seeing and what you're hearing and what was provided through social media Tuesday [June 21] it would lead people to believe that. But right now
we're looking at it as an assault."

It is strange that the police would not say it is a hate crime. What was the motive for the assault? Did the Muslim sister do anything wrong other than wearing a hijab that is her right under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Why would a total stranger attack her and pull her hijab?

And when does an assault become a hate crime? There is unfortunately a pattern to the police attitude across Canada not taking assaults on Muslim men and women seriously. Hate crime charges are far more serious.

At the Quds Day rally in July 2014, for instance, a Muslim woman and man that were left behind from the main rally were assaulted by Jewish Defence League (JDL) thugs. The man was seriously wounded after being punched and kicked. The assault was captured by another person on his cell phone camera and the police were able to identify the assailants. Again, they were only charged with assault, not hate crime!

In the case of the London, ON assault on the Muslim woman, the police said their department's street gang unit will review the investigation once it has been completed. It will determine if the assault has elements of hate or bias, which could be used during sentencing, if charges are laid and the matter ends up in court.

The police spokesperson, Ms Bough said: "We're asking anybody who saw or heard anything to let us know." She went on: "We're really, really hoping that the public can help. We've spoken to witnesses, but we're still looking for more."

The suspect was located after tips were called in to Crime Stoppers and London police headquarters.

While hate crimes are not as widespread in Canada as they are in the US, the trend is disturbing both because racists and bigots think they can act with impunity and the police’s reluctance to charge them with hate crimes.

It is absolutely certain that if a Jewish woman or man were assaulted, it would be immediately branded a hate crime. In the case of Muslim victims, a different standard seems to apply.

London, ON has witnessed a number of such incidents in recent years. There is a group of Islamophobes in th city including some Christian clergy that spout venom against Muslims. Further, Donald Trump’s racist rhetoric has also fuelled hate against Muslims in North America.

Canadian politicians cannot be absolved of responsibility either. The Harper regime that was soundly defeated at the polls last October did much to spread hatred against Muslims. He never missed an opportunity to denigrate Muslims. One of his ministers, Jason Kenney went a step further denouncing the Muslims’ “barbaric cultural practices”. Kenney who is from the province of Alberta, tried to capitalize on the inherent racism of some Canadians but mercifully, the majority rejected the Conservatives hate-filled rhetoric.

The recent attack in London, ON gives cause for concern. If the police do not treat it as a hate crime, it would mean they are indirectly complicit in such crimes. That would be a very troubling development.

IslamophobiaCanada

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Islamophobia Rises in Germany amid Immigrants Upsurge: Poll

Alwaght- Islamophobia has risen sharply in Germany after more than one million migrants, mostly Muslims, arrived last year, a new poll shows.

In a study published on Wednesday, Every second respondent in the study of 2,420 people said they sometimes felt like a foreigner in their own country due to the many Muslims here, up from 43 percent in 2014 and 30.2 percent in 2009.

The number of people who believe Muslims should be forbidden from coming to Germany has also risen, the study showed, and now stands at just above 40 percent, up from about a fifth in 2009.

The study was conducted by researchers at the University of Leipzig in co-operation with the Heinrich Boell Foundation, the Rosa-Luxemburg Foundation and the Otto-Brenner foundation.

The influx of migrants has fueled support for the anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany (AfD) party that wants to ban minarets and the burqa and has described Islam as incompatible with the German constitution. The number of attacks on refugee shelters has also risen.

The number of those surveyed that believed Sinti and Roma peoples tended towards criminality rose to nearly 60 percent, while slightly more than 80 percent of respondents wanted the state not to be too generous when examining asylum applications.

Almost 40 percent of those surveyed in east Germany agreed with the statement that foreigners only came to Germany to take advantage of its social welfare benefits, compared to about 30 percent of those in the west of the country.

Early April, German police recorded almost 300 attacks and other criminal offences on refugee shelters since the beginning of the year. 

Law enforcement agencies fear that the 2016 attacks against refugee shelters across Germany could exceed last year's level.

Germany has witnessed multiple similar attacks on residences for refugees as the country took in more than one million asylum seekers in 2015. LEGIDA which is an offshoot of the anti-Islam and anti-refugee group PEGIDA, protested against the government's refugee policy.

Europe is facing an unprecedented influx of refugees who are fleeing conflict-ridden zones in Africa and the Middle East, particularly Syria.

Major Western powers have been blamed for the unprecedented exodus due to their policies of militarily intervening in other countries, leading e led to a surge in terrorism and war in those regions, forcing more people to flee their homes.

Sunday, June 12, 2016

The Rising Threat Against Shia Muslims in Pakistan

The efforts of various governments to counter the growing influence of extremist forces have not been effective.

 People in Karachi protesting rising violence against Shia Muslims in January, 2013. Credit: Reuters

Karachi residents protesting the rising violence against Shia Muslims 

in January, 2013. Credit: Reuters

A few weeks ago a delegation of the Pakistan’s People Party led by Senator Sherry Rehman staged a protest at the National Press Club in Islamabad over the killing of social activist Khurram Zaki, who was well-known for his open criticism of extremist groups in Pakistan. However, the protest was against not just the murder of a social activist but also yet another Shia Muslim becoming the target of extremist forces in Pakistan in the name of sectarianism.

Admonishing the federal government for turning a blind eye to the plight of Pakistan’s Shia community, Rehman said, “The purpose of the National Action Plan was not to impart selective justice – the government cannot continue ignoring these killings.”

In Pakistan, the environment in which the minorities find themselves is characterised by hate speech, the invocation of blasphemy laws and a surge of vicious attacks on worshippers and sacred places. Pakistan is an Islamic country. However, Jinnah’s vision seems to have faded with the passage of time. Now, not only non-Muslims are being harmed but also sub-sects like the Sufis, Ahmadis and Shias.

The Shia Muslims of Pakistan

Shias account for 15-20% of the Muslim population in Pakistan. The country is home to the second largest Shia population after Iran. Shias in Pakistan are geographically spread across the country. The highest numbers are found in the Gilgit-Baltistan province in the northern region, where they form the majority. Cities in Pakistan like Lahore, Karachi, Rawalpindi and Multan are also home to large Shia communities. There are numerous Shia mosques and dargahs, or shrines, located across Pakistan.

The majority of Pakistan’s Shia community adheres to the Twelver school of thought; other sub-sects are the Ismailis, Khojas and Bohras. Most of these are not easily distinguishable by either name or identity. Among Twelver Shias, however, the most vulnerable is the Hazara community in Quetta region as they are easily recognisable due to their ethnicity and language. Quetta is home to nearly 6,00,000 Shi’ite Hazaras. According to estimates, for every 10 Shias killed in Pakistan, 5 of them are Hazaras.

Targets against Shias

Over the years, the Shias of Pakistan have been specifically targeted and killed by machine guns and suicide bombers. They have been killed inside mosques and shopping markets, while on pilgrimage to Iran and even at funerals. Hazaras have been the victims when extremists have gunned down buses packed with pilgrims heading to Iran via the Pakistan-Iran border at Baluchistan. In 2011, extremist organisations in Quetta sent an open letter to the Shia Hazara people stating: “All Shias are worthy of killing and the intention is to make Pakistan their graveyard.”

In January 2014, a suicide attack on a bus with Shia pilgrims left at least 22 dead. Reacting to the rising spate of selective violence against the Shia community, Fatima Bhutto, niece of late Benzazir Bhutto, wrote in the Hindu in 2015 that Shias had overtaken Hindus and Christians as the targets of sectarian killings and Pakistan had become “a country of ghosts”.

Attacks on Shias escalate during the month of Muharram, when Shias mourn the martyrdom of the grandson of the Prophet by taking out street processions in the thousands. During Muharram in 2012, 30 Shias were killed and more than 200 injured in attacks. In November 2013, on the 10th day of Muharram, a suicide bomber killed eight people and left 30 injured in a Shia procession in Rawalpindi.

Various reports on the death toll

A report by the Human Rights Watch states that more than 500 Shia Hazaras have been killed since 2008. According to another report, by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, around 600 Shias were killed between 1999 and 2003 as a result of extremist violence and approximately 500 Shia doctors fled the country as a result of the assassination of more than 50 of their colleagues in Karachi alone. In October 2015, UN General Secretary Ban Ki-moon urged the Pakistan government to protect its citizens, including Shia Muslims.

Below is a list by the South Asian Terrorism Portal (SATP) compiling data on incidents of targeted violence against Shia Muslims from 2003 to May 16, 2016.


YearIncidentsKilledInjured
200342417
20048129466+
20051086223
200696061
200728258+195+
200823150371+
200917183455
201034`245693
201124136199
2012115399439
201381504965
201445116116
201538251316
20166112+
Total4462558+4518+

(+approximate number)

Reasons for the violence

The first main reason behind the violence is religious – the great Shia-Sunni divide in Islam that dates back to the death of Prophet. The succession of the caliphate is a highly debated topic in Islam and will always be. Sunnis believe that Abu-Bakr was the right man to succeed the Prophet; Shia Muslims instead affirm that the Prophet had decided that his cousin and son-in-law Ali should succeed him. The two sects have clashed for centuries. In Pakistan, the extremist Sunnis, or the Wahabis, consider Shias to be apostates and believe that it is right and pious to kill Shias for being ‘non-believers’.

The second reason is political – specifically, Pakistan’s long-standing support of Saudi Arabia. As Shia-dominant Iran tries to export its Islamic revolution beyond the Middle-East and into countries with significant Shia populations, Wahabi-dominant Saudi Arabia views this as a threat. Saudi Arabia’s alleged financing of Sunni militant groups has been a sore point in Washington as well. In 2009, a cable released by Wikileaks made public the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s warning that “donors in Saudia Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide.”

In 2012, Iqbal Haider, the former law minister of Pakistan, told Deutsche Welle that most jihadist and terrorist organisations operating in Pakistan are Wahabi and funded by Saudi Arabia. Pakistani historian Mubarak Ali said that Wahabis are against any cultural plurality, so they attack shrines and other cultural centres that are, in their view, ‘un-Islamic’.

Prominent anti-Shia groups

Prominent anti-Shia groups banned by the Pakistan government are the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ), the Ahle-Sunnat Wal Jama’at, previously known as Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP), and the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A report published in 2013 by the Human Rights Watch Pakistan revealed that the LeJ reportedly has links with the Pakistani military and intelligence agencies.

LeJ believes it has a sacred calling – to safeguard the legacy of the Prophet and his companions – and it sees Shias as the main obstacle in this goal. One LeJ operative captured in 2012 by the Pakistan army told Reuters, “Get rid of Shias, that is our goal. May God help us.”

Over the years, various governments have taken the initiative to protect the Shia Muslims of Pakistan. But their efforts have not been effective in countering the growing influence of extremist forces. These forces have now started targeting notable Shia clerics, speakers, journalists and those with influential positions, in a bid to weaken the strength of the community. Andreas Rieck says, in The Shias of Pakistan: “Sunni extremists have increasingly targeted them [Shias] with hate propaganda and terrorism.” Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan and the most highly regarded individual within the country was himself a Shia Muslim; however, his vision for all communities to live in peace and safety is no longer even acknowledged.

Uzair Hasan Rizvi is an independent multimedia journalist.